Islam IS Political Correctness

Islam is a perfect fit with modern liberalism: ISLAM IS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

What sane people call “the slippery slope,” liberals call “progress!”

Political correctness (slanderous victim-blaming factual incorrectness) is both fraud (crime) and extortion – pretending that, either you lie along with the majority, or you’ll be replaced with a better liar by that same majority; group might makes right! Exact same as communazism.

Political correctness = factual incorrectness.

Anything that qualifies, modifies or otherwise dilutes “Correctness” is, by definition, less than Correct: it’s Incorrect; a lie and a FRAUD. “Political” Correctness is a lie backed up with the threat of might-made “right.”

[Similarly, "Multi-Culturalism" is nothing but "PC," too - extortion and slander - it implies that all "cultures" (cultural indoctrinations) must now be INCORRECTLY tolerated as "equal" because in the past they were "unfairly," "intolerably" discriminated against as "unequal" by "hatefully prejudiced bigoted racists." ONLY White, Western cultures are forced to be "Multi-Cultural." The intolerant Saudis aren't derided for banning all non-muslims from Mecca or for carving up women. Nobody forces the "racist," isolationist Japanese to open their borders to "poor" muslim immigrants or ebola-stricken Africans].

PC is also a clear case of ends-justify-means,* might-makes-right. Political correctness is only advocating for others to masochistically Submit to extortion – to “Go Along” (with criminal lies) “To Get Along” (with lying criminals).

It is a pretended and idolatrous philosophy of perpetual and habitual self-sacrifice, (whether or not the given situational circumstances require it) which agrees with the militarist’s extortion creed slanderously asserted by all ‘Authorities” everywhere, that we never have a right to self-defense.

And enforced self-sacrifice isn’t self-sacrifice at all!

But PC is worse than that – it’s an extortion attempt at mind/thought control, it embodies an implicit threat asserting that one WILL be attacked, if and when one even dares to THINK about defending one’s self, or even about preparing to do so!

It reverses cause and effect, inflicting fear to effectively neuter our ability to be rational.

It embodies the criminal’s assertion that only they have rights, while we only have responsibilities. It advises and commands us all to embrace their slavery – or else!

“Militarists and Pacifists both agree that there should be no resistance to the use of force!”

PC pretends – as all nannystate kindergarten teachers always insist – that all “attacks” (even counter-attacks, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others) are equally BAD things; PC is a LIE defined by immoral relativism.

And lying is the most basic form of theft – it’s the at-least-attempted theft of the Truth. Since all crimes are forms of theft, lying (“fraud”) is a crime. And lying backed up with the implicit threat of force, is the crime of extortion.

PC is an empty, fake pseudo-philosophy of submission to despair, to “inevitable” pain and failure, EXACTLY like islam – which is probably WHY islam is being deliberately embraced and forced on us all by our would-be corporazi globalist bankster oil-masters.

Extortion = give up, Submit, or DIE. StopIslam ………………… Let’s examine the most basic psychological assumptions present in both Judeo-Christianity and islam. Christianity encourages hope; while islam enforces despair:

Genesis claims we ARE able to distinguish evil (attacking innocents first) from good (self-restraint) and Isaiah says God only wants us to Reason with Him, while muslims claim he is both unknown and unknowable, and liberals like to pretend life is too complex for any of us to ever really understand cause and effect, so there’s no such thing as free will, choice, self-reliant responsibility, or even evil crimes nor evil criminals, because we’re all really only helpless before random predetermined, predestined forces outside our control, so we’re really all only victims of society, products of our environments, and slaves of allah.

Since their god never gave us free will, it also never separated itself from its creation, so they (both muslims and liberals) are really only atheists – when one’s version of a god is generally only “Everything!*” it’s also specifically only “Nothing!” (Existentialism IS Nihilism)!

“Islam” literally means “pacification” (violently forced compliance) not peace (which is “salaam”). Islam is coercion, (aka intimidation, bullying, duress, harrassment, activist agitation, extortion, and of course, “terrorism”) – it’s not voluntary.

While at “worst,” all real religions only say:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

ONLY islam says:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

And a forced “Faith!” ISN’T a “Faith!” at all – it’s only extortion, which is always a crime (unless done in defense of one’s self &/or innocent others, which islam is most specifically NOT doing).

At “best,” islam is designed to protect muslims FROM allah, BY sacrificing  all the non-muslims in the world to him!

Islam is the religion of murder. And Satan was a murderer from the beginning.

Leftists admire the “noble savage’s” murderous “freedom” from self-restraint.

Islam is all about FORCE and group (family, clan, tribe, ‘religion’)-might-made “rights” ABSOLUTELY trumping all individual ones:

In islam, abortions aren’t limited by age – parents and grandparents can kill their children and grand-children at ANY age, with no legal penalties for these allah-sanctioned murders!

OBJECTIVITY means all individual humans (and citizens of any groups thereof) should be treated EQUALLY, with the exact same rights and responsibilities.

SUBJECTIVITY means special-interest double-standards, where certain groups claim: “Only we have rights (to attack you first) while you only have responsibilities (like, to not defend yourselves from our attacks)!”

So: Objectivity = universal equality (law);

Subjectivity = CRIMINAL double standards: the unsolicited, forced transfer of rights and responsibilities (crime), because it’s proponents insist that NOT everyone should have equal rights, and thus also insists some should be denied rights, in advance (and not because they have lost their rights BY trying to take others’ rights away).

Obviously, islam falls into the latter category, where us-vs-them might makes right.

Bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying definition of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of criminal laws.

Bad (“positivist,” “defensively pre-emptive”) laws are crimes because they attack first, by slandering citizens as criminals, and so also insisting that they have no inherent right to self-defense.

The Bibles posit God gave us free will BY separating us from Him (the tree, the expulsion).

So we’re left to discover basic cause-and-effect (‘scientific’) principles without having it forced on us.

We get to Reason things out, all on our own. And, according to Isaiah, that’s what God most WANTS us to do!

This means that we’re not pre-perfected robots, like the angels allegedly are.

The ability to learn from self-inflicted mistakes, to solve problems, also leaves us able to (choose to) NOT learn from those same mistakes, and to refuse to solve problems (both of which choices define “Sin.”)

And “Sin” is a synonym for Crime, and “sinner” = criminal.


CRIMINALS (1. muslims; 2. liberals) hold that there is no Golden Rule of Law and morality social contract between people (i.e; simply: “Do Not Attack First,”) because 1. allah (unlike our self-detatched God) always attacks first, and 2. life is too complex for anyone to ever really understand cause and effect.

In Judeo-Christianity, the notion of original sin posited that we can and do understand morality, and are therefore granted the free will to choose our own fates.

Both islam and liberalism deny free-will human conscience and responsibility; to them, we are all still really only dumb animals, at the mercy of our base instincts (like Muhammad demonstrated he was) and so there are no real evil crimes nor criminals, because we’re all only helpless victims: of society, products of our environments, and slaves of allah.

To both kinds of criminal, “God” didn’t give us free will, and didn’t stand back apart from his creation, separate (and distinct) from it. *

That “allah” is NOT in any way separate from his creation, is the MAIN point of islamic ‘theology.’

So their “god” is random, predetermined, predestined, unstoppable violent force (what the Qur’an describes as “in the way of allah”) – so “we can either Submit to this ‘fact,’ and thereby join it, or try to pointlessly resist it and so be destroyed by it.” Might Makes Right!

Both liberals and muslims pretend to be proud of their practicality in submitting to the extortionist’s creed that “We Have To Go Along” (with criminal lies) “To Get Along” (with lying criminals)! To liberals, this is called “Political Correctness,” and to muslims, it’s known as Submissive lying (“to Keep The Peace!”)

Liberals also call this cowardly instinctive Submission to despair: “shrewdness,” “realism,” & “realpolitik.”

Both liberals and muslims are group-might-makes-right criminal extortionist gangsters.

Both liberals and muslims believe in the supremacy of group identities over individual choices.

Both liberals and muslims believe in forcing outcomes which are against individual free-will choice.

Both use fatalistic predeterminism excuses: muslims: “the will of allah;” libs: “historical determinism.”

Both believe minority groups are helpless victims, slaves to destiny, and so should all be treated as such.

Both feel the right to be noblesse oblige elitist masters and so also to “protect” their submissive victim slaves, in stead of enabling them to defend them selves.

And, of course (being criminals) both reserve the right to always attack innocent others first. At most, they pretend to use “group rights” to “justify” this criminal position:

By endorsing group rights, any criminal has an automatic alibi for their crimes, if they can pre-posterously claim “retaliation” for something that once happened anywhere to anyone even only vaguely or remotely “like them.”

Then they can always claim “acting under mental duress of institutional oppression” excuses.

Which is basically just another variant on the institutional systematic procedural favorite:

“I didn’t do it – ONLY The GROUP did it! Whee!” always endorsed by corporate government types!

The group rights stance is always idolatry and slanderous, prejudicial fraud and extortion; it’s crime.

I notice the leftists Postmedia rags (Ottawa Citizen, etc) are still “trying to understand” the “tragedy” of the 2 jihadis who killed those two Canadian soldiers.

They insist one was only a typical Canadian drug addict; no islam here, folks!

Well it’s a simple thing to “understand,” really:

Whenever a Judeo-Christian feels depressed (probably because of liberal propaganda in society) and contemplates suicide, he knows he’s been told he’ll go to HELL for it.

In islam, on the other hand, muslims know that, if and when they feel depressed and suicidal, all they have to do is attack some unsuspecting, RANDOM “infidels,” and their sick version of a god will automatically welcome them into it’s highest HEAVEN, with special added bonuses for their family members, too!

After all, the human sacrifice of others is the main tenet of the koranimals’ forced “faith!”

Muslims are told to sacrifice “infidels” to protect them selves from their “god’s” wrath!


*The only time the ends justify the means is in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others. One has no right to defend or cover up one’s crimes. Islam embraces the worst notion in the Old Testament, that of sacrificing OTHERS (although even Judaism only sacrificed animals as tasty ghost-meals to appease the offended spirit/s) to atone for one’s crimes, a role only God Himself can honesty fulfill, even by the muslims’ own rules, since even according to them, only He is truly responsible for, and so, “Guilty” of, everything.

In Christianity, Jesus is supposed to have been that final human sacrifice, “The Lamb:” saving us from the alleged need to be sacrificed in proportional response for our crimes.

By His own self-sacrifice, Jesus not only confirmed the Old Testament notion that God had deliberately separated Himself from his creation (including us), but also that He had done it FOR us, and still didn’t hold us accountable for His gift to us: of our ability to learn by making mistakes and inadvertently causing problems for our selves and others.

True “sin” only comes about if and when we pridefully assert “Screw you! I meant to do that!” and thus append our own lying slanderously masochistic criminal intent to gloss over our mistakes, in stead of owning up to, and so only then being able to correct them!

Muslims are in a perpetual state of eternal sin because they falsely claim that, since God is perfect, and He created them, then they are perfect, too, and so also posit that everything that ever goes wrong cannot be their fault, so there’s not only no need to try to correct mistakes and fix or solve problems here, but also that it would be an insult to “allah” to even try to do so! At most, they are to eliminate the mistaken people who cause problems!

Bottom line: Judeo-Christians see this world as an opportunity, as a learning experience. Muslims see it as a painful curse or test to be feared and opposed – or at most, endured.

Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, Education, Europe, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, United Nations, United States, USA, War | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 20 Comments

Dracula Untold Irks Turks

I saw the movie, and it was awesome, because it asserts self-defense is allowed vs. islam (!)

(I know, I know – totally out of character for racist masochistic liberal Hollywood, right?)!

Anyway, I wasn’t going to review it, or reply to the slanderous lies presented by the Turks about it, [in the New Statesman (and reprinted in the New Republic), where Turkish writer Elest Ali asks the burning cinematic question, “Is Dracula Untold an Islamophobic movie?”] until others decided to take her down first, (here).

“Let’ em continue to stew in their own prideful holier-than-thou lies and ignorant slander,” I said to my self: that alone is all the punishment they need.

Why educate the enemy?

But since then, others (and my own damned ego LOL!) have prompted me to revise that initial stance, so here goes after all:

The Turk’s review of the recently-released “Dracula Untold” movie is (of course) …

Nothing but pathetic lies.

The Turkish “reviewer” made so many historical errors it’s hard to know where to start.

She says Dracula was of the line of the “Draculesti,” whatever that is. WRONG.

Dracula’s surname was BASARAB. The family ruled nearby Bessarabia, and the progenitor was Voda Negru (the Black Prince) aka Basarab the Old. Their symbol was BAAL ( the pagan’s horned moon-bull god) but NOT ALLAH! ‘Basara’ is an ancient Arabic word which means “stern-faced biter” (how prophetic LOL)! Chances are, they were originally ARABS; hardly “racists” when it comes to islam (although they may have been righteously indignant about Arabia being violently conquered and enslaved by the bandit-king Muhammad and his goons)!

His own middle name was Dragulya, which means “beloved one” and his nickname (which he gleefully adopted and even used in signing offical correspondence,) was of course Dracula. His father (whom he despised) had been given the honorific “Dracul” when inducted into the Ordo Draconis when Vlad was born in 1431.

Anyway, let’s start off with noting how the Turkish movie critic completely avoids the main motivating issue of contention in the movie: the “Devshirme” culling (kidnapping) of indigenous children to satisfy the Sultan’s perverse desires, and to be brainwashed and used later as janissary shock troops against their own brethren.

Dracula strenuously objected to the practice, which was first introduced around the time of his birth (the Turks had first invaded Wallachia only ten years before that)!

That’s the main plotline for the movie, and yet she’s avoided it completely, probably because, as a “TRUE STORY,” it makes her own Turkish people look like the evil ISIS-like swine they’ve always been, and, it increasingly seems, still are!

And the rest of the review is nothing but fact-free, speculative opinion presented as fact – in other words, pathetic lies to deflect from Turkish guilt; i.e:


“Vlad Dracul II of the house of Draculesti sought support from the Ottoman Sultan in his claim to the Wallachian throne. To put him on it, the Ottomans waged war with Dracul’s enemies. In return, Dracul willingly offered them not one, but two of his sons: Vlad Tepes Dracula and Radu cel Frumos – aka Radu the handsome. While Vlad Tepes went on to become the progenitor of the vampire myth, his brother would remain loyal to the Sultan, and his childhood friend, Mehmet II.”


Vlad Dracul didn’t “seek support” from the muslims, he was already on the Wallachian throne, and was supported by the Austro-Hungarian Emperor Sigismund, and by the king of Hungary, Matthew Corvinus!

In fact, the situation was the exact opposite: he was extorted into giving up his sons as hostages to the Turks BECAUSE they suspected he would attack them in a Crusade if they didn’t force him to do so!

Besides, Vlad wasn’t known as “Vlad Tepes” until AFTER he’d learned impaling – FROM THE TURKS!

In addition, Radu wasn’t Mehmet II’s “childhood friend” because the sultan was a grown man when the Basarab child-hostages were rendered unto him – in stead, Radu was only an innocent 8-year-old child when Mehmet first RAPED him, and gave him syphilis (which they both eventually later died from)!!!!

The Turkish muslim author of this insipid article then states:

“The film’s generous use of the word “Turk” was interesting. To call an Ottoman a Turk is like calling a Roman an Italian. True, the Ottoman sultans were of Turkic origin. But the empire was much too big, much too ethnically diverse to be called Turkish.”

LIAR!!!! Just look at a map!

Apart from the fact that “Turks had a Turkic origin” OUTSIDE of what was then, as now, known as “Turkey,” the nomadic barbarian tribes of same had all violently invaded Greek THRACE and Tarsus and ANATOLIA before the conqerors re-named it to “Turkey!”

Turkey ITSELF abuts Romania at Bulgaria, and Turkish ships can easily get straight to Romania directly from TURKEY itself, not from some varied and diverse part of the allegedly multi-ethnic-and-cultural empire!

And of course all empires can claim to be multi-ethnic, but MOST if not all of them cannot validly claim to have expanded to have become so through means of “peaceful tolerance!”

In fact, even the multi-ethnic and multi-religious Roman empire consisted of multiple countries which had all been first violently invaded and enslaved by Rome’s own pagan emperors.

And it’s only an historical aside that all of later Christendom itself was peacefully converted when all the provincial Roman heads of state decided to go along with emperor Constantine’s own conversion, in order to continue to curry favor with his regime!

However, contrast pagan Rome’s tolerance of other religions with islam’s intolerance.

And Judeo-Christian tenets have no world-conquest mandate, unlike islam’s official one.

Anyway, I saw the film a few weeks ago, here in Ottawa.

The Turks were clearly depicted AS muslims, displaying their crescent-moon banners.

And it was awesome: the theatre was packed, and everyone was cheering loudly for Vlad and hating the Turks (muslims) and there was not a muslim to be seen in the audience!!!

And, (apart from the vampire stuff,) the only obvious historical inaccuracies were:

a) that Dracula had no army when the Turks came calling, and
b) that the Turks shot holes in Dracula’s castle with cannons.

In reality, it was Dracula who first brought Chinese gunpowder, rifles and cannons to Europe, to blow the shit out of the (very surprised) backwards barbarian Turks LOL!

Another historical inaccuracy in the movie was where Dracula slew Mehmed II; in reality, he ran away from his ignoble defeats in Transilvania and Wallachia, to have better luck elsewhere – an inaccuracy I’d be surprised the Turkish reviewer missed, has she not also demonstrated such complete bias and total ignorance of history in the rest of her article!

It was Vlad’s successful defense of his native lands which caused the eventual conquest of unfortunate Contstantinople, because once the Sultan had been evicted from Wallachia and Transilvania, his own men had demanded a victory – ANY victory! – from him, or else he would be EATEN by them. So, in suicidally reckless despair, he had then decided to kill himself in a “glorious” attempt to do the impossible: to take the impregnable holy city.

His unexpected audacity caught the Greek defenders there completely off guard (for who but a suicidally desperate madman would ever have even dreamed of trying such a thing?!) and so almost by accident, he succeeded. Then, however, Wallachia and Transilvania only remained muslim-free for another few years, until the almost-inevitable masochistic liberal treason of the sell-out boyars (the corrupt, upper-class of liberals of their day) enabled its downfall; but the rest of Eastern Europe wasn’t so fortunate in their leadership.

Dracula alone had stemmed the tide of the Ottoman advance at the time; without him, it’s probable that North America would never have been discovered, as Christopher Columbus would have been left to his own devices, speaking Arabic in remote “Andalusian” mosques!

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

So: What, Exactly, IS Islam’s “Message!”?

So, What exactly is the message of Islam?

13QuranicDoctrinesUnlucky ForInfidels The “message” of islam (extortion) is nonsensical: “peace” by Submitting to violence.

Islam’s main trope, that it can create “Peace” (even if only by killing off all its enemies) is entirely false, because it is only idolatry, deferring everyone’s self-reliant free-will responsibility onto it’s main idol, “allah!” Islam does not in any way teach people self-restraint, but only offers up endless alibi-excuses for irresponsibility and criminal desires.

Besides that, how successful at creating “peace” can any creed be, which advises the best way to achieve peace is by violent attack?!


Other than that, it’s “god,” allah, is described as both unknown and unknowable (basically, capriciously random painful violence; Satan).

The main thrust of the Qur’an is a lie: that all those ghost-towns all over Arabia (as described in the opening lines of most Suras or chapters) were caused directly by this “allah,” because the people who used to live there disobeyed his previous prophets. Obviously, the Arabian ghost-towns were abandoned due to natural disasters (Arabia is like Mordor or Hell, prone to volcanic eruptions and earthquakes) or changed economic circumstances, so Moe’s main assertion is a lie.

Secondly, to avoid that sort of thing happening locally, the Qur’an advises everyone to “Fear the Allah!” and “Obey the Muhammad!”

Only by obeying the Muhammad can the dreaded Allah be appeased.

And how does the Moe say the Allah can be best appeased? Why, only by attacking the “infidels” which the Allah has created to annoy itself.

So islam is really only a “Take THEM, Lord – Not ME!” sort of cowardly treason to rationality and civilization.

But even so, the Qur’an warns, since the Allah can and will do anything it wants, even obeying the Muhammad isn’t a sure-fire way to avoid it’s sadistic wrath; after all, it CAUSES the “infidels” one is ordered to attack, too, so anyone can be forced by the Allah to become an infidel at any time, without knowing it.

And so, (according to the ahadiths) when Moe was asked, as he lay dying, what his reward would be, and whether he would go to Paradise, or Hell, he responded with:

“I have absolutely no idea.”

… SO:

Dear Muslims:

Allah isn’t God – allah is NOTHING.

“Allah” doesn’t exist, even by you moslems’ own, most official doctrines!

While we in the West believe in live and let live, you moslems obviously DON’T! And so islam isn’t a religion at all (much less one “of peace”)! You have no real “faith” because your description of your allah is that he/it is unknown and unknowable (so why listen to Big Moe?) and since allah has been generalized as the indivisible EVERYTHING, it is therefore also specifically NOTHING! It isn’t Ha-Shem, only Shiite-Happens! Existentialism IS nihilism!

Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

“I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

- Muhammad -

Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

Muhammad’s islam pretends that objective, right-and-wrong morality are all false concepts which don’t really exist – because, as moslems, only the big bad scary capricious unknown and unknowable idol of allah is responsible for everything, including both “good” and “bad,” as your main #1 excuse for your crimes!

Moe said allah is unknowable to us; he cannot make himself understood to us! Which leaves only Moe’s words in the Qur’an as a substitute for god! And the Qur’an says only those who kill others and die for Moe, will go to heaven, while those who do not kill and die for Moe, implicitly deny his version of a god, and so will go to hell! And this is also why islam doesn’t separate the religious and secular realms: because Moe’s word concerning “allah” is absolute extortion, and it’s not open to individual interpetation. It’s: Submit, or die!

And how else does Muhammad describe his “unknown and unknowable” allah?! As a terrorist!

Qur’an Sura 3:151 – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers!” etc.

Q: 4:77: “Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected: “War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

Muhammad himself: “I have been made victorious through terror” (Bukhari 4.52.220).

Islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)! it’s ONLY an extortion CRIME-syndicate. The only “religious” part is:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”


And while, at WORST, all real religions only say:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

…ONLY islam says:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

So you moslems are atheists because you have NO faith in your god’s abilities or desires to pay any attention to you or to anyone alse ever anyway, not even a desire nor ability to enforce even it’s own us-versus-them, might-makes-right creed.

Allah is described in your Qur’an as a big, bad, remote, scary thing, so the group called “islam” and it’s rule-book, the Qur’an, are the only gods you can worship and obey.

So, static islam itself is the false idol you continue to worship – and it’s about as responsive to human needs as the rocks your Arabs used to worship!

You moslems only Submit – to Pain as your “god!” You Submit to Failure, to inferiority, to victimology, and pretend that Giving Up is a ‘holy virtue, inshallah akhbar!’

“La ilaha is ALLAM; ALLAM rasul Muhammad!”


Contrast that with Christianity, which posits that, just because God might be too complex for us to understand Him, doesn’t mean that God can’t understand us, nor that He can’t make Himself understood to us on our own terms, through His incarnation as Jesus. And Jesus, the Jew, said we weren’t to kill each other, but to learn to progress through trust and cooperation.

Since “allah” doesn’t exist, just hating islam but giving you moslems a pass, simply because you were born into families of holy mobsters and your ancestors were Muhammad’s first victims, doesn’t work any better than saying:

“I hate national Socialism, but individual nazis are A-OK with me! Whee!”


Your “Allah” was only Muhammad’s made-up excuse for his own crimes!



See also:  (Apologist)  to verify (also see above index on Terror)  (Dr. Bill Warner) A 2hour Koran for non-Muslims – read on site.  History of wars, death tolls, source of Quran stories (Comprehensive Encyclopedia on Islam) abrogation – which texts take precedence Median vs Meccan (Robert Spencer) Everything you should know about ‘jihad’ historically, currently   over 25 books  (blog) source of ISIL and current analysis. Book – Third Choice  (Tipping Point  – Marc Lebuis) Terrorism in Canada – researcher – French and English  archives and articles on all aspects of Islam, terror organizations, sponsoring Islamic Countries etc.  registry of over 21,000 terror attacks since 9-11 – location, event, organization or individuals


Posted in Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, human rights, islam, Legal, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, War | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Muslims: “Martyrs” – or MASOCHISTS?

When trying to define the root causes of “Terrorism” (or when trying to make up predeterministic force excuses for it, like the currently favored but laughably hypothetical “radicalization” meme) some have recently asserted, in a tautological, circular fashion:

“I’d say there are terrorists and there are non-terrorists. The terrorists may live in mountains, in houses or tents; the terrorists may have a faith or no faith; the terrorists may belong to one faith or no faith. The common attribute of a terrorist is that the terrorists resort to acts of terror.”

Which could be summed up as:

“There are criminals, and there are non-criminals, of all stripes and beliefs.”

Except that criminals don’t have any real faith or beliefs in trusting others AT ALL.

In stead of being brave, life-affirming martyrs, who die trying to help others, it’s clear that muslims are in stead cowardly victim-blaming criminal masochists, Submitting to their own fears, despair, and failure.

They are only motivated, not by “faith” or trust in others, but by their own cowardly treasonous criminal masochism, where they always try to “control” their fears BY causing the pains they fear!

Criminals like muslims believe in “everything goes” fatalism; i.e: “Since every given crime’s going to happen anyway, we can’t deny it, so the best we can do, since have to allow it, is to accept, Submit to it, compromise with it and accommodate it! Whee!

That’s why there’s no crime or perversion they won’t immediately try to compromise with or Submit to: because, as idolaters, anything they can imagine as “possible” becomes immediately “probable” and then “inevitable” as their perpetual focus on, and so also worship of, their own fear of Pain itself takes them over!

It’s also why sharia crime (“law”) is based on the wholly non-principled Brazen Rule of criminal Chaos, where “All is allowed except that which is very specifically disallowed and only by might-makes-right Authority!” in stead of on the mutually-agreed-upon consensual moral contract called the Golden Rule of law (where everyone agrees to not attack first: do nothing either TO, nor FOR, anyone else unless & until specifically agreed to)!

Criminal terrorism is OFFICIALLY an intrinsic component (and the “most pious sacrament”) of islam itself.

“Submission, the Religion of Peace” (Pacification) is really only “Extortion, the Religion of Thieves!”

The REAL difference between “one man’s freedom-fighter and another man’s terrorist” is both the reason they attack, and WHO they attack: If one attacks one’s oppressors directly (the occupying foreign army which is oppressing your people, but which isn’t there in defending others in response to your criminal attacks) then one is a “freedom fighter.” But if one has decided to attack innocent others first, one’s own choice has defined one’s actions as being predatory criminal aggressions, and one has thus decided to become a “terrorist.” Ditto with then attacking the police force which has occupied one’s space IN RESPONSE to one’s previous attacks on innocents.

Finally, muslim terrorists actually have no faith in their god’s power nor desires to enforce even it’s own most basic us-versus-them and might-makes-right tenets; they are effectively selfish atheists, even though (or because) they have been told their hateful god has made this world an unbearable test for them to escape from by taking innocent others with them. Islam is really Submission to their own fears, despair, and failure. It’s easy, and that’s why it’s “effective” in terrorizing sane civilized people, who are always on the defensive, always trying to understand such a base and ultimately masochistic mentality, perpetually trapped trying to determine which specific offense of theirs has triggered the muslims’ eternal grievances. Little do they know that islam isn’t grievance-driven at all: it’s entirely doctrine-driven! Muslims are commanded to hate infidels simply BECAUSE they are infidels, not for any specific acts or ommissions said infidels may be guilty of committing beyond their inherent “infidelity!”

Unlike “real” religions, which, at WORST, only assert this ridiculous threat, that one must:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

…ONLY islam asserts this wholly believable terroristic threat: that everyone else must:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

Let’s not forget that ALL the so-called “islamic” countries in the Middle East (and world itself,) were all originally Greek, Christian ones – like Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Turkey, Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia (not to mention India and Iran) which were ALL violently invaded, conquered, raped and enslaved by the racist imperialist colonialist and genocidal creed of islam and it’s holy -mobster “muslim” mind-slaves.*

And NONE of the Arabs’ invasions were in any way “defensive” ones, simply because Arabia (which is much like Mordor, or Hell – a lifeless, desert land full of active volcanoes) has never been invaded by anyone!

(And I’m pretty sure that even the globe-conquering Greek warlord Alexander the Great gave Arabia a pass)!


*Quite unlike the peaceful process where those countries had all become Christian countries in the first place, which of course was simply to curry favor with their previously pagan masters in Rome, upon the conversion of the Emperor Constantine.

Posted in Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, War | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

What The Hell Is This “RADICALIZATION” Anyway?!


Re: the “Radical” vs. “Moderate” islam pretense:


While not all Germans were Nazis, and

not all Italians are Mafiosis,

not all white guys are Hell’s Angels, and

not all Arabs are muslims, still:



ALL Hell’s Angels ARE HELL’S ANGELS, and


The pretense is, that they’re NOT!

People try to conflate the two categories used above: nationality/ethnicity/”RACE,” with CRIME-CREED MEMBERSHIP.

And as long as “our Leaders” insist on maintaining this cowardly pretense – that islam ISN’T really islam, and that not all muslims ARE really muslims, we have already lost to the criminals’ savage barbarian indoctrinating culture, BY Submitting to its main extortive lie and alibi-excuse: That islam is a religion, and thus also that

“God” told them to commit their ‘holy’ crimes against us!

Isn’t it strange how “extremist,” “fundamentalist,” and “radical” are all oxymorons? If one is extremely fundamental to the core message of the source texts, then how can one also be “radical” (divergent to it)?!

Here’s the only real “difference” between “radical” and “moderate” muslims:

“Radical” muslims want to murder us (for not being muslims).
“Moderate” muslims want “radical” muslims to murder us (ditto).


Get it, yet?!

And why is this? Simple!

In Judeo-Christian lore, if one commits suicide, (much less by, or when, also trying to murder others,) one learns that one is destined for Hell.

But the criminal Qur’an tells it’s Submissive “muslim” dupes that, if and when they’re feeling down, they can instantly get to Heaven itself BY randomly murdering others!

So it’s obviously islam itself which causes any and all “radicalization!”

The only pretended “mystery” is why more rank-and-file muslims aren’t already “radicalized:” it’s simply because they’re still somewhat ignorant of what’s written in the Qur’an concerning

Allah’s ultimate expectations of them.


Here’s how and why any and all “Radicalism” and “radicalization” occurs in islam:

(Official ‘Abrogation’ of all the semi-peaceful verses in the Qur’an)!

In handy web-based .PDF format!

Bottom line: there are no “moderate” muslims, simply because there is no “moderate” islam!

So, why are “our leaders” and their pet enemedia lying to us all the time about this?!

Here’s what’s really going on:

While it’s still true that not all Germans were Nazis, not all Italians are Mafiosis, not all whites are Hell’s Angels, and not all Arabs are muslims – but it IS still also nevertheless true that all Nazis WERE nazis, all Mafiosis ARE Mafiosis, all Hell’s Angels ARE Hell’s Angels, and


the politically correct pretence du jour, is to pretend that:


And each of our so-called leaders wants to maintain this false right to remain irresponsibly wrong, to metaphorically kick this can down the road, to serve only their own selfish careers at our direct expense!!!!

They so-desperately want to lie to themselves and to us, hoping (while expressing this falsely hopeful opinion as fact, which is to lie) that “Most muslims are peaceful and so can and will contribute economically to our tax-base” – just as their lowest-common-wage demanding corporate sales-master owners have promised them.

But it’s not true!

In all the studies done in all the European countries, muslims self-segregate and economically contribute absolutely nothing to their host societies, while simultaneously draining the tax-base by welfare jihad, demanding and getting their allah-mandated jizya tribute from us!

So in reality, every sales-puppet politician’s future careers – and LIVES! – are in stead directly threatened/ endangered just like the rest of us, and damaged by the muslims’ inherently seditious presence in our society.

And, like it or not, so are the short-sighted corporate globalist oil-bankster’s own ultimate bottom lines!


Originally posted on Uncle Vladdi's Blog:

View original

Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Europe, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, United States, USA, War | Tagged , , , | 22 Comments

What The Hell Is This “RADICALIZATION” Anyway?!

What The Hell Is This “RADICALIZATION” Anyway?!.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Muslims shoot up Canadian Parliament, RCMP only fears possible “backlash” against perps!

Details at Pamela Geller:

VIDEO of GUN BATTLE WITH ATTACKERS: Military bases shut down across Canada in wake of attack on Parliament

LIVE UPDATES War in Canada: Multiple Attacks, Multiple Gunmen in Islamic State Garb

(Almost) needless to say, the scum pretending to be “in charge” of us are busy in lockdown denial mode, pandering to muslims and slandering those who of us who would warn the innocent about them!

I live in Ottawa. You guys have of idea of the lengths these cowardly masochistic “officials” here will go to to appease and pander to Islam, while slandering civilians.

When I tried to warn my local MPP’s office that this sort of thing was on its way, and get some basic legal protection for myself to be able to warn others, the Liberal government in Ontario’s Ministry of the Attorney General stooges referred me to the Chief of the Ottawa Police Intelligence Division, a useless chucklehead himself, who chortled at me about “Islam?! Muslims?! What’s that – never heard of them! That’s for the ‘Terrorism Boys!’ – not ME!”

I pointed out that, nevertheless, “terrorism” is really only the crime of “extortion!”

Then he said I “might be a hatefully racist bigot” for simply attempting to inform him about a dangerous international crime-gang, and refused to consider my request.

So he had first more or less admitted that he knew that “islam/muslim” = “terrorist,” but then implicitly abdicated his office, abandoned his duty to protect and defend civilians from criminals, and went instantly into full dereliction of duty mode, while acting like a criminally negligent infantile delinquent. Oh, and he put me on speakerphone while making “he’s crazy!” gestures to other officers who were listening in., according to his own notes (which I later obtained on Appeal). What a clown.

I admitted that, Yes, I DID indeed hate crime and the criminals who commit them, and wondered why he – a Police chief – DIDN’T.

That made him uncomfortable, but not uncomfortable enough to do anything.

Neither did my quoting the facts and statistics proving islam had murdered more innocent people since its creation, than ALL other human creeds (both secular AND religious) in the entire world!

Meanwhile, as it rturned out, the MAG had decided to pre-emptively sacrifice the safety of my self, family, and neighbours, merely in order to preserve their own pensions and reputations from any potential cries of “racism!” by slandering me.

And all of these facts were proven when I managed to obtain their own notes on the case from a FOI request and subsequent appeal through the Ontario Privacy Commissioner’s Office.

In short, the Liberal stooges appointed to run both the MAG and Ottawa Police are an utter disgrace when it comes to fulfilling their oaths to protect the public from these threats. When – not if – the next attack comes, they’ll still be busy slandering & pandering!

More updates, from here:

Backlash, Dhimmitude & Useful Idiots in Ottawa

Posted: 22 Oct 2014 03:29 PM PDT

In wake of Ottawa shootings, Police Chiefs send letters to Muslim leaders inviting Muslims to contact them if they fear “backlash” ISIS Media account posts this picture claiming to be Michael…
Muslims are the real victims and we must be careful not to point the finger at mosques…

Posted: 22 Oct 2014 02:26 PM PDT

Canada: Muslims feel stigmatized by reports on radicalized youthBlazing Cat Fur Surete du Quebec police investigators go over the scene of a police shooting in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu near Montreal…
Algerian Muslim Michael Zehaf-Bibeau behind Ottawa attack

Posted: 22 Oct 2014 02:01 PM PDT

From the Muslim Issue: Michael Zehaf-Bibeau has been identified as the suspect in the shooting at Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Canada on Wednesday. Michael Zehaf-Bibeau is a Candian born in 1982,…

Canada: if it walks like a duck….

Posted: 22 Oct 2014 01:22 PM PDT

So lets take at look at the mosque where this convert worshipped: After convert’s killing, Quebec mosque eager to ‘live and let live’ (BCF) Mr. Bekkari said his mosque, housed in an aging strip mall,…

Canadian Muslims Fear ‘Backlash’ Over Attacks On Soldiers…

Posted: 22 Oct 2014 08:07 AM PDT

Breaking: One shooter shot dead inside parliament building! Said to be a “male with a long rifle”… Shots fired at Canada war memorial, soldier seen falling More Terror Attacks In…
Posted in Canada, Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, War | Tagged , | 1 Comment