Islam is a perfect fit with modern liberalism: ISLAM IS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.
What sane people call “the slippery slope,” liberals call “progress!”
Political correctness (slanderous victim-blaming factual incorrectness) is both fraud (crime) and extortion – pretending that, either you lie along with the majority, or you’ll be replaced with a better liar by that same majority; group might makes right! Exact same as communazism.
Political correctness = factual incorrectness.
Anything that qualifies, modifies or otherwise dilutes “Correctness” is, by definition, less than Correct: it’s Incorrect; a lie and a FRAUD. “Political” Correctness is a lie backed up with the threat of might-made “right.”
[Similarly, "Multi-Culturalism" is nothing but "PC," too - extortion and slander - it implies that all "cultures" (cultural indoctrinations) must now be INCORRECTLY tolerated as "equal" because in the past they were "unfairly," "intolerably" discriminated against as "unequal" by "hatefully prejudiced bigoted racists." ONLY White, Western cultures are forced to be "Multi-Cultural." The intolerant Saudis aren't derided for banning all non-muslims from Mecca or for carving up women. Nobody forces the "racist," isolationist Japanese to open their borders to "poor" muslim immigrants or ebola-stricken Africans].
PC is also a clear case of ends-justify-means,* might-makes-right. Political correctness is only advocating for others to masochistically Submit to extortion – to “Go Along” (with criminal lies) “To Get Along” (with lying criminals).
It is a pretended and idolatrous philosophy of perpetual and habitual self-sacrifice, (whether or not the given situational circumstances require it) which agrees with the militarist’s extortion creed slanderously asserted by all ‘Authorities” everywhere, that we never have a right to self-defense.
And enforced self-sacrifice isn’t self-sacrifice at all!
But PC is worse than that – it’s an extortion attempt at mind/thought control, it embodies an implicit threat asserting that one WILL be attacked, if and when one even dares to THINK about defending one’s self, or even about preparing to do so!
It reverses cause and effect, inflicting fear to effectively neuter our ability to be rational.
It embodies the criminal’s assertion that only they have rights, while we only have responsibilities. It advises and commands us all to embrace their slavery – or else!
“Militarists and Pacifists both agree that there should be no resistance to the use of force!”
PC pretends – as all nannystate kindergarten teachers always insist – that all “attacks” (even counter-attacks, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others) are equally BAD things; PC is a LIE defined by immoral relativism.
And lying is the most basic form of theft – it’s the at-least-attempted theft of the Truth. Since all crimes are forms of theft, lying (“fraud”) is a crime. And lying backed up with the implicit threat of force, is the crime of extortion.
PC is an empty, fake pseudo-philosophy of submission to despair, to “inevitable” pain and failure, EXACTLY like islam – which is probably WHY islam is being deliberately embraced and forced on us all by our would-be corporazi globalist bankster oil-masters.
Extortion = give up, Submit, or DIE. ………………… Let’s examine the most basic psychological assumptions present in both Judeo-Christianity and islam. Christianity encourages hope; while islam enforces despair:
Genesis claims we ARE able to distinguish evil (attacking innocents first) from good (self-restraint) and Isaiah says God only wants us to Reason with Him, while muslims claim he is both unknown and unknowable, and liberals like to pretend life is too complex for any of us to ever really understand cause and effect, so there’s no such thing as free will, choice, self-reliant responsibility, or even evil crimes nor evil criminals, because we’re all really only helpless before random predetermined, predestined forces outside our control, so we’re really all only victims of society, products of our environments, and slaves of allah.
Since their god never gave us free will, it also never separated itself from its creation, so they (both muslims and liberals) are really only atheists – when one’s version of a god is generally only “Everything!*” it’s also specifically only “Nothing!” (Existentialism IS Nihilism)!
“Islam” literally means “pacification” (violently forced compliance) not peace (which is “salaam”). Islam is coercion, (aka intimidation, bullying, duress, harrassment, activist agitation, extortion, and of course, “terrorism”) – it’s not voluntary.
While at “worst,” all real religions only say:
“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”
ONLY islam says:
“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”
And a forced “Faith!” ISN’T a “Faith!” at all – it’s only extortion, which is always a crime (unless done in defense of one’s self &/or innocent others, which islam is most specifically NOT doing).
At “best,” islam is designed to protect muslims FROM allah, BY sacrificing all the non-muslims in the world to him!
Islam is the religion of murder. And Satan was a murderer from the beginning.
Leftists admire the “noble savage’s” murderous “freedom” from self-restraint.
Islam is all about FORCE and group (family, clan, tribe, ‘religion’)-might-made “rights” ABSOLUTELY trumping all individual ones:
In islam, abortions aren’t limited by age – parents and grandparents can kill their children and grand-children at ANY age, with no legal penalties for these allah-sanctioned murders!
OBJECTIVITY means all individual humans (and citizens of any groups thereof) should be treated EQUALLY, with the exact same rights and responsibilities.
SUBJECTIVITY means special-interest double-standards, where certain groups claim: “Only we have rights (to attack you first) while you only have responsibilities (like, to not defend yourselves from our attacks)!”
So: Objectivity = universal equality (law);
Subjectivity = CRIMINAL double standards: the unsolicited, forced transfer of rights and responsibilities (crime), because it’s proponents insist that NOT everyone should have equal rights, and thus also insists some should be denied rights, in advance (and not because they have lost their rights BY trying to take others’ rights away).
Obviously, islam falls into the latter category, where us-vs-them might makes right.
Bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying definition of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of criminal laws.
Bad (“positivist,” “defensively pre-emptive”) laws are crimes because they attack first, by slandering citizens as criminals, and so also insisting that they have no inherent right to self-defense.
The Bibles posit God gave us free will BY separating us from Him (the tree, the expulsion).
So we’re left to discover basic cause-and-effect (‘scientific’) principles without having it forced on us.
We get to Reason things out, all on our own. And, according to Isaiah, that’s what God most WANTS us to do!
This means that we’re not pre-perfected robots, like the angels allegedly are.
The ability to learn from self-inflicted mistakes, to solve problems, also leaves us able to (choose to) NOT learn from those same mistakes, and to refuse to solve problems (both of which choices define “Sin.”)
And “Sin” is a synonym for Crime, and “sinner” = criminal.
CRIMINALS (1. muslims; 2. liberals) hold that there is no Golden Rule of Law and morality social contract between people (i.e; simply: “Do Not Attack First,”) because 1. allah (unlike our self-detatched God) always attacks first, and 2. life is too complex for anyone to ever really understand cause and effect.
In Judeo-Christianity, the notion of original sin posited that we can and do understand morality, and are therefore granted the free will to choose our own fates.
Both islam and liberalism deny free-will human conscience and responsibility; to them, we are all still really only dumb animals, at the mercy of our base instincts (like Muhammad demonstrated he was) and so there are no real evil crimes nor criminals, because we’re all only helpless victims: of society, products of our environments, and slaves of allah.
To both kinds of criminal, “God” didn’t give us free will, and didn’t stand back apart from his creation, separate (and distinct) from it. *
That “allah” is NOT in any way separate from his creation, is the MAIN point of islamic ‘theology.’
So their “god” is random, predetermined, predestined, unstoppable violent force (what the Qur’an describes as “in the way of allah”) – so “we can either Submit to this ‘fact,’ and thereby join it, or try to pointlessly resist it and so be destroyed by it.” Might Makes Right!
Both liberals and muslims pretend to be proud of their practicality in submitting to the extortionist’s creed that “We Have To Go Along” (with criminal lies) “To Get Along” (with lying criminals)! To liberals, this is called “Political Correctness,” and to muslims, it’s known as Submissive lying (“to Keep The Peace!”)
Liberals also call this cowardly instinctive Submission to despair: “shrewdness,” “realism,” & “realpolitik.”
Both liberals and muslims are group-might-makes-right criminal extortionist gangsters.
Both liberals and muslims believe in the supremacy of group identities over individual choices.
Both liberals and muslims believe in forcing outcomes which are against individual free-will choice.
Both use fatalistic predeterminism excuses: muslims: “the will of allah;” libs: “historical determinism.”
Both believe minority groups are helpless victims, slaves to destiny, and so should all be treated as such.
Both feel the right to be noblesse oblige elitist masters and so also to “protect” their submissive victim slaves, in stead of enabling them to defend them selves.
And, of course (being criminals) both reserve the right to always attack innocent others first. At most, they pretend to use “group rights” to “justify” this criminal position:
By endorsing group rights, any criminal has an automatic alibi for their crimes, if they can pre-posterously claim “retaliation” for something that once happened anywhere to anyone even only vaguely or remotely “like them.”
Then they can always claim “acting under mental duress of institutional oppression” excuses.
Which is basically just another variant on the institutional systematic procedural favorite:
“I didn’t do it – ONLY The GROUP did it! Whee!” always endorsed by corporate government types!
The group rights stance is always idolatry and slanderous, prejudicial fraud and extortion; it’s crime.
I notice the leftists Postmedia rags (Ottawa Citizen, etc) are still “trying to understand” the “tragedy” of the 2 jihadis who killed those two Canadian soldiers.
They insist one was only a typical Canadian drug addict; no islam here, folks!
Well it’s a simple thing to “understand,” really:
Whenever a Judeo-Christian feels depressed (probably because of liberal propaganda in society) and contemplates suicide, he knows he’s been told he’ll go to HELL for it.
In islam, on the other hand, muslims know that, if and when they feel depressed and suicidal, all they have to do is attack some unsuspecting, RANDOM “infidels,” and their sick version of a god will automatically welcome them into it’s highest HEAVEN, with special added bonuses for their family members, too!
After all, the human sacrifice of others is the main tenet of the koranimals’ forced “faith!”
Muslims are told to sacrifice “infidels” to protect them selves from their “god’s” wrath!
*The only time the ends justify the means is in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others. One has no right to defend or cover up one’s crimes. Islam embraces the worst notion in the Old Testament, that of sacrificing OTHERS (although even Judaism only sacrificed animals as tasty ghost-meals to appease the offended spirit/s) to atone for one’s crimes, a role only God Himself can honesty fulfill, even by the muslims’ own rules, since even according to them, only He is truly responsible for, and so, “Guilty” of, everything.
In Christianity, Jesus is supposed to have been that final human sacrifice, “The Lamb:” saving us from the alleged need to be sacrificed in proportional response for our crimes.
By His own self-sacrifice, Jesus not only confirmed the Old Testament notion that God had deliberately separated Himself from his creation (including us), but also that He had done it FOR us, and still didn’t hold us accountable for His gift to us: of our ability to learn by making mistakes and inadvertently causing problems for our selves and others.
True “sin” only comes about if and when we pridefully assert “Screw you! I meant to do that!” and thus append our own lying slanderously masochistic criminal intent to gloss over our mistakes, in stead of owning up to, and so only then being able to correct them!
Muslims are in a perpetual state of eternal sin because they falsely claim that, since God is perfect, and He created them, then they are perfect, too, and so also posit that everything that ever goes wrong cannot be their fault, so there’s not only no need to try to correct mistakes and fix or solve problems here, but also that it would be an insult to “allah” to even try to do so! At most, they are to eliminate the mistaken people who cause problems!
Bottom line: Judeo-Christians see this world as an opportunity, as a learning experience. Muslims see it as a painful curse or test to be feared and opposed – or at most, endured.