… they’re maybe islam-ist, or islam-ish, but defintitely NOT islam or muslims!

Not IslamSqueamish enemedia inaction … these stockholm syndrome drones capitulate daily, willfully blinding them selves and attempting to cover for, and so enable, the ongoing atrocities of the global crime gang called “islam!”

Posted in America, Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, Treason, War | Leave a comment


When the news first broke, most if not all Americans were sympathetic to “reporter” James Foley, and gave him the doubt benefit:




But it turns out that recently-beheaded “reporter” James Foley was a typical MSM liberal cowardly masochist and delusive criminally negligent muslim-loving racist who hated the West after all:


We have to remember: ALL the MSM presstitutes ARE our enemies. The friend of my enemy is my enemy; when they choose to ignore and cover up the islamic crime-gang, they are criminally negligent traitors, whose lies (fraud is a crime) deliberately endanger us all for their own gain.




Presstitutes have no souls. Because today’s “journalists” are all corporate drones, who get given their stories by their editors and publishers, on a day-by-day basis; there is no individual initiative room for any of them to follow up on any stories!

They are all empty vessels, nothing more than actors given their lines by their owners.

They have no opportunity nor desire to learn any basic principles beyond keeping their jobs and padding their pensions, no loyalty to the country or citizens at all!

The MSM are all traitorous self-serving cowards. The reason they used to shoot cowards in wartime (unlike today, where they promote them) was because, being masochists, most cowards are also traitors. Masochists cause their own imagined worst-case scenarios all the time, in order to maintain an illusion of “control” over them.

So, while a very FEW sites, like this one, PersonalLiberty, WND, ConservativeBytes, and a FEW others, do somehow manage to exist on the Internet, ALL the “official” ones, including Fox (which has major Saudi stockholders) which have global television presences, are traitors.

Idolatrous Americans were aghast at his (presumably coerced) pre-execution, openly anti-Western denunciations, but, as it turns out, even if he hadn’t been kidnapped and threatened, he’d probably have made those exact same, anti-American and Western-civilization-hating comments of his own free will anyway.

Many people still support these liars, these presstitutes, who try to sell our children their lies, their false “narratives” that “islam is a Great Religion Of Peace!” all the time, while excusing, covering up and ignoring all the muslim’s many rape murder arson kidnapping ransoming slavery crimes!

They even made up excuses for Foley’s “homegrown” murderer.

“But he enjoyed the full range of “Western” (rap) “culture!” He ate fish and chips, and went to soccer games!


Foley killed by a “moderate” British muslim rapper:


There are no moderate muslims, simply because there is no moderate islam. There is only one Qur’an, one islam.

The only way anyone having the misfortune to be born into the crime-cult has, to be seen in a positive light, is to risk being murdered by the others (as the others are commanded to do to them, in Sura 4:89) and LEAVE ISLAM. Period.

After all, without “nazis,” there would have been no ‘national socialism,’ and without “muslims,” there will be no ‘islam!’

One cannot be against completely criminal islam, and still pretend to like individual “muslims,” any more than one could be against national socialism, and still pretend to have “good nazi” friends!


James Foley wasn’t innocently mistaken – he was a prejudiced racist bigot who got his just deserts!

Posted in America, Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, progressive, progressives, propaganda, religion, Treason, Uncategorized, United States, USA, War | 2 Comments

DIVERSE AND CONQUER! Leftardation Explained!


Liberals love to pretend that life is just too “complex” for any of us fallible, helpless and so potentially dangerous victims to ever be able to understand cause and effect, so to them cause and effect don’t really exist, because, when all facts can be spun as opinions, it gives them the false relativistic right to pretend their entirely fact-free, subjective opinions are the “diversely opposite equals” to conservatives’ objective facts; it gives them the false ‘right’ to remain irresponsibly wrong.

In fact, lefties always sound retarded (hence, the accuracy of such terms as “leftardation,” “libtarded,” etc.) BECAUSE all they’re ever really doing is trying to think up alibi-EXCUSES FOR THEFT, so of course their language has to employ all the critical thinking logical fallacy evasions, distractions, deflections, euphemisms, and metaphors (i.e: lies) in order to sell it to sane people, (and all crimes are forms of theft); i.e: “Wealth Redistribution” and that of course requires lies, like I just said, most often in the form of evasive metaphors and euphemisms (like for the best instance example, the term “Wealth Redistribution” itself)!

Libs aren’t stupid, they’re evil slanderous victim-blaming masochists, always trying to cause their own imagined worst-case scenarios before anyone else can, so they can pretend to have “control” over them!

If they were just plain stupid, they’d have to get some things right every now and then, just by random chance – but they don’t, because they have to know what’s right, in order to so perfectly oppose it all the time!

Since evil leftist masochists are always hell-bent on becoming victims of worst-case scenarios, they “project” onto and slander-blame their victims, because their first emotion is fear of getting caught for their crimes.

So subjective double-standards are what they’re all about! Deliberately! For them, No objective Truth allowed!

Most of their sub-sequent forced predeterminism and group-rights idolatry is also only an excuse to “defensively” either do nothing, or to enjoy a perpetual excuse attack others first, even if only by having the false right to delinquently force their own self-reliant responsibilities onto groups of “privileged/guilty” (innocent) others.

And of course they’ll always try to co-opt the largest gang, the government, into helping them with their wealth dedistribution theft schemes.

As Thomas Jefferson noted:

“It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself. Subject opinion to coercion: whom will you make your inquisitors?”

And yet deliberate “error” (i.e: wilfully intended, criminal negligence) isn’t really ‘error’ at all, is it?

The motto of leftists everywhere must be: “There’s No Money In Solutions!”
(So: Please Give Generously – AGAIN!)

They will always refuse to solve temporary problems with easy, simple and permanent solutions, in favor of not-solving them, spinning and pretending they are “eternal crises” with only temorary, band-aid “management therapies” available, in order to exploit the almost infinite number of symptoms unsolved problems generate.

Leftist idolaters love giving their imaginative alibi-excuses to criminals, don’t they? There’s never any personal responsibility: it’s always the case to them that criminals are really just victims, too, of some idealized, cause-and-effect-free predetermined force: they are victims of society, products of their environments, and slaves of allah!

Diluting self-reliant responsibility into group-might-made rights extortion works best for them, not only defensively, i.e:

“I didn’t do it! ONLY The GROUP did it!”


(Substitute the words “SYSTEM,” or “PROCEDURES” for “group”)!

But also offensively: Group rights (for them, but only group responsibilities for their opponents) give them the false right to attack someone who slightly resembles others who may have oppressed people sort of like them, at some other time and place – because if you look like the people who may have oppressed people who look like them, YOU OWE THEM!

To others, such generalized slanders would be called “stereotyping,” but to them it’s “reverse discrimination!” Their motto is “Diverse and Conquer!”

Liberal ‘psychology’ is very simple: commit any and all crimes, because the ends (enriching them selves) justify the means (screwing over others first, before and “because” those others will inevitably try to screw them over too, anyway)!

Like all criminals, they want to have false rights (like, to our stuff) without any responsibilities (like, for having to earn or otherwise pay for it)!

Because you bothered to earn stuff they didn’t, they feel perfectly entitled to extort you by asserting you OWE them!

It actually starts with masochism – they feel compelled to inflict the worst-case scenario them selves, because then they can pretend to themselves that they had control over it. Criminals turn mere negligence (accidents, mistakes) into criminal negligence all the time, by adding their own backwards false pride confession of intent to it: “Screw you, I MEANT to do that!”

That’s what “progressives” always do – they rush in first before some other fools can beat them to it!

There is no crime or perversion a liberal won’t instantly Submit to or immediately compromise with, all the while claiming they are doing so by just being “practical” about it. They call it ‘Realpolitik.’

And cowardice loves company, too… which is why their band-aid therapeutic “solution” to every “eternal crisis” is always to form a bigger gang! It explains “Globalism,” too.

To them, if something CAN go wrong, then so it WILL go wrong, SO they must make sure to cause it so they can control the amount of resulting wrongness, since preventing it completely is “impossible.” This immorality of despair is what they call ‘ethics.’

ALL libertine “liberals” are CRIMINALS too. After all, their entire pre-emptively defensive idolatrous alibi-excuse creed pretends there are no evil crimes nor evil criminals, because we’re all just helpless victims of predetermined force (products of our environments, victims of society, slaves of allah)! Whee! The Devil’s greatest trick is to pretend he doesn’t exist – after all, he’s really only ever a helpless victim, too!

Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Europe, Globalization, gun control, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, Uncategorized, United Nations, United States, USA, War | Leave a comment


So, what are all those Wascally Wetards in the American congress up to now?

The federal government has hatched a plan to take over the Internet! 

Using the broad powers of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC),Washington is planning to put unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats in control of the Internet–which will mean higher prices, less competition, and increased government regulations. 

To help me stop them from achieving their goal:

Please sign American Commitment’s new petition to the FCC right away, to make sure they stop this unprecedented takeover of the Internet – before it destroys online free enterprise for good.

Plus, if you sign today, we’ll also send duplicate copies to your U.S. Representative and your Senators – just so they know that their constituents are listening, and ready to fight for Internet freedom.

Right now, the federal government has launched a campaign to turn the Internet into a “public utility” just like the local water and power companies you use today. 

“Public Utility” means no competition. There are no other companies to turn to. They are in charge and if you don’t pay, be prepared to sit alone, thirsty in the dark. 

Just imagine what this would mean to your Internet service. 

Government bureaucrats could tie the Internet up in red tape, censor content, decide who can use the Internet, how to use it and when and more. If they succeed, it will:

  • End competition between Internet companies to win customers and set pricing.
  • Destroy the engine of innovation that has made the Internet what it is today.
  • Drive out the very risk-taking entrepreneurs that have invested billions to get us this far. And,
  • Erase your Internet freedoms, upend your right to privacy, censor the content you view on Internet, seize control of e-commerce, keep records of the sites you visit and when, track what you read and for how long and so much more!

Say no to Internet control - sign our petition
That’s not all. 

If the FCC forces your Internet provider to transform itself into a “public utility” get ready for these additional nightmares.

  • Public sector unions going on strike for higher wages, fat benefit packages, platinum health care plans and “Golden Parachute” retirement packages – all at your expense.
  • “Public Interest Regulation” forcing your favorite websites to give “equal time” to liberal views you find offensive. And;
  • “Nickel and Dime” charges that all monopolies use including fees for service repair, “cost recovery,” pay-by-phone penalties and more.

If you think these kinds of costs and abuses are unlikely, please take a good look at your latest phone bill. (Or think back to your phone bill in the bad old monopoly days.) 

Did you read the “Terms and Conditions” on your bill? What about your phone company’s “Privacy Policy”? 

And what about all those confusing taxes, fees and other charges that you must pay each month – fees and taxes you don’t understand but better payto keep your phone connected? 

Now imagine these terms, privacy policies, fees and taxes on your Internet bill – taxes the government will force you to pay once they are running the show. 

All this is coming and more if we fail to cut the legs out from under the government’s seemingly harmless plan to “reclassify” the Internet as a “Public Utility.” 

This is why I urge in the strongest terms to sign American Commitment’s petition to the FCC today. This is the only way to STOP this unbelievable FCC power grab to gain dictatorial control of the Internet.

With your signature, you will be joining American Commitment’s pro-freedom army of liberty activists to shed light on this un-American scheme and stop the government’s effort to take over the Internet dead in its tracks.

Our battle cry in this struggle – our motto – is to “Stop Internet Regulation.”And I need you on our team, if we’re going to keep the Internet free. 

Thank you for signing our American Commitment petition to the FCCimmediately after you finish reading this message because we cannot win this historic battle against our government any other way. 

United in Freedom, 

Phil Kerpen, President
American Commitment 

Say no to Internet control - sign our petition

American Commitment
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW #190-406 | Washington, D.C. 20004
Office: (202) 656-2193
Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Europe, Globalization, human rights, Legal, media, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Technology, Treason, United Nations, United States, USA, War | Leave a comment


…and here’s how and why:

Montesquieu was wrong.

There is no system of checks & balances, division of powers etc – as even Aristotle noted long ago, the legislative branch only looks to the future, the forensic judiciary only looks to the past, while only the executive is free to rampage at will in the present; none of them pays even the slightest attention to any of the others!

And, as for government being the people’s servant, that will always backfire, too, when the people themselves become tyrants, through the democractic process:

“A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy…”

Alexander Fraser Tytler, Scottish lawyer and writer, 1770


H.L. Mencken (1880 – 1956) was a journalist, satirist, critic, and Democrat. He wrote this editorial while working for the Baltimore Evening Sun, which appeared in the July 26, 1920 edition.

“As democracy is perfected, the office of the President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last and the White House will be occupied by a downright fool and complete narcissistic moron.”

- H.L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920

So, while the Second Amendment exist to defend citizens from tyrannical governments, when government tyranny is what people eventually vote for in a democracy, they (a majority of tyrannical self-entitled leftist citizens) are the government, so they will assiduously work hard at disarming themselves.


PHILOSOPHICALLY, it’s the difference between the real, objective Golden Rule of Law (what Mark Levin calls “negative rights”) most simply defined as Do Not Attack First, and as was first phrased by Confucius in the negative as “Do NOT Do Unto Others, That Which You Would NOT Have Them Do Unto You,” where one can do nothing either TO nor FOR others, without getting their express permission first – and the false, “positivist” one, (aka “Do Unto Others”) and which I have termed the Brazen Rule of criminal Chaos, which gives criminals the subjectivist “out” for instance, all criminal masochists could claim “I love punching my self in the head, so, since you have also agreed to the positivist golden rule, you won’t mind me exercising my ‘freedom’ to punch YOU in the head, too! Whee!” i.e: They can do whatever they want TO you, as long as they also claim to be doing it FOR you (for your own good)!

Similarly, criminals (like, say, Muhammad) can assert:

“I’d LOVE to be ruled with an iron fist by ME, even if I wasn’t ME! Whee!”



George Washington was completely against political parties.

It’s the idolatrous political “party” system itself which permits our otherwise public SERVANTS to indulge them selves in interest-conflicted divided loyalties, and so to metaphorically slip from the tethers of oversite we should be keeping them on.

Unless we eliminate political parties, the salesmen in government will destroy the country.

Politicians don’t represent the people – they only represent their parties. And their parties only represent those who pay them – who happen to be the exact same people for each party.

So ALL politicians are only treasonous sales-puppets, foisted on us by their corporazi sales-masters. Their real job is to sell us all out by selling off our country to the highest bidders – usually by buying our enemies’ money to fund their own pet projects. The faster the turnover (more sales per minute) the more quick profits, even at low-low fire-sales prices. It’s a race to the bottom.

So, let’s just FIX DEMOCRACY! And here’s how: If we just hold 2 quick, back-to-back elections each time (the first, as usual, to hire the worker’s pool of our Public SERVANTS from our districts, and the second where WE ALL appoint them DIRECTLY to their cabinet portfolio positions) then we eliminate their self-interested conflicts of loyalty-dividing political “parties,” (which always only “party” at our direct expense, anyway,) forever!


These days, most if not ALL elected politicians are statists who always want to grow government to reward followers, who are more concerned with the ‘rights’ of their own groups (parties) than with any of their constituents, because if the other members of their party cause it to fall, they fall too.

Similarly, they will therefore also protect their own political CLASS – members of BOTH parties – lest they all fall as one, too.

The reason corporazi globalist traitors can puppetize the politicians is because the divisive interest-conflicted political party gangs exist at all. If there were NO funds allowed, no campaigning, but only platforms posted on free websites, and where the people could DIRECTLY appoint the elected politicians to their cabinet positions, the power of corporate money to influence elections would be reduced to near-zero.

Each politician would then be beholden ONLY to the people who elected them, not to group-rights loyalty conflicts.

And, what sane people call “The Slippery Slope,” liberals (criminals) call “Progress!”

Bad (“positivist,” “defensively pre-emptive”) laws are crimes because they attack first, by slandering individual citizens as criminals, and so also insisting that they have no inherent right to self-defense.

Unfortunately, there’s only so many symptoms of The Golden Rule of Law (which simply defines all situational morality as “Do Not Attack First!”) one can address with lesser, circumstantial “laws” of morality, only so many right answers, before one must veer off into exploiting the almost infinite number of sorta almost right,(but really wrong) answers, in order to keep up the pretense that the legislators are actually doing something responsible to earn their pay and to continue to enjoy the right to govern others – a point which, after whence reached, societies decline into criminality and empires fall into ruin.


Here’s a few examples to illustrate this point:

If a Republican doesn’t like guns, he doesn’t buy one.

If a Democrat doesn’t like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a Republican is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat meat.

If a Democrat is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a Republican is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.

A Democrat wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a Republican doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels..

Democrats demand that those they don’t like be shut down.

If a Republican is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church.

A Democrat non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.

If a Republican decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job ..that provides it.

A Democrat demands that the rest of us pay for his.

That’s how you create a Republican: Give him a job.

And here’s how you create a Democrat: by giving him welfare.

Here’s another obvious difference between the left and right: remember the old adage about “Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day, but teach him how to fish, and you’ve fed him for a lifetime!”?

Rightists are all for individual self-reliant responsibility, and so want to teach people how to fish (fend) for them selves, while leftists want their victims to become dependent on them, as slaves are to a master; i.e:

“Vote for us again, or you won’t get tomorrow’s fish – CAPISCE!?”

‘Liberalism’ is extortion, bribery, and blackmail all in one! Whee!



Posted in America, Education, Legal, Policy, politics, progressive, propaganda, Regulation, Treason, Uncategorized, United States, USA | Leave a comment


From the Ottawa Citizen, p.#A10, Friday 25 July 2014, and here:

Canada Revenue Agency over-writes Oxfam’s purpose

Tax agency says ‘preventing poverty’ not allowed as goal for charity

Oxfam Canada’ executive director  Robert Fox, right, said despite the new “purpose” statement, the group’s programs and activities have not changed.

Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS file photo

Oxfam Canada’ executive director Robert Fox, right, said despite the new “purpose” statement, the group’s programs and activities have not changed.

OTTAWA—The Canada Revenue Agency has told a well-known charity that it can no longer try to prevent poverty around the world, it can only alleviate poverty — because preventing poverty might benefit people who are not already poor.


The bizarre bureaucratic brawl over a mission statement is yet more evidence of deteriorating relations between the Harper government and some parts of Canada’s charitable sector.

The lexical scuffle (war of words) began when Oxfam Canada filed papers with Industry Canada to renew its non-profit status, as required by Oct. 17 this year under a law passed in 2011.

Ottawa-based Oxfam initially submitted wording that its purpose as a charity is “to prevent and relieve poverty, vulnerability and suffering by improving the conditions of individuals whose lives, livelihood, security or well-being are at risk.”

The international development group, founded in 1963, spends about $32 million each year on humanitarian relief and aid in Africa, Asia, and Central and South America, with a special emphasis on women’s rights.

But the submission to Industry Canada also needed the approval of the charities directorate of the Canada Revenue Agency, and that’s where the trouble began.

Agency officials informed Oxfam that “preventing poverty” was not an acceptable goal.

“Relieving poverty is charitable, but preventing it is not,” the group was warned. “Preventing poverty could mean providing for a class of beneficiaries that are not poor.”

The Canada Revenue Agency prevailed, and the official declaration to Industry Canada about the purposes of the non-profit corporation dropped any reference to preventing poverty.


Oxfam Canada’s executive director called the exchange an “absurd conversation.”

“Their interpretation was that preventing poverty may or may not involve poor people,” Robert Fox said in an interview with The Canadian Press.

“A group of millionaires could get together to prevent their poverty, and that would not be deemed a charitable purpose.”



“Our mission statement still indicates we’re committed to ending poverty, but our charitable (purposes) do not use the word ‘end’ or ‘prevent’ — they use the word ‘alleviate.’ ”

Philippe Brideau, spokesman for the Canada Revenue Agency, declined to provide information on the disagreement with Oxfam, saying “we do not comment on specific cases.”

However, he said legal precedents mean charities cannot help people not already impoverished from falling into poverty.

“Purposes that relieve poverty are charitable because they provide relief only to eligible beneficiaries, those in need,” Brideau said in an email.

“However, the courts have not found the risk of poverty as being equivalent to actually being in need. Therefore, as the courts have indicated, an organization cannot be registered with the explicit purpose of preventing poverty.”

He added that charities are still allowed to teach money management, budgeting and other life skills, which could lead to the prevention of poverty.

Oxfam Canada was singled out for criticism earlier this year by Employment Minister Jason Kenney over the group’s opposition to Israeli settlements in the West Bank.


And in July last year, Oxfam Canada signed a joint letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, taking issue with reports that government officials had been asked to compile “friend and enemy stakeholder” lists to brief new ministers after the summer cabinet shuffle.

Fox said despite the new “purpose” statement, the group’s programs and activities have not changed.

The contretemps is yet more evidence of frosty relations between the Harper government and some charities, several dozen of which have been targeted since 2012 for audits of their “political activities.”

The Canada Revenue Agency, armed with $13 million in special funding, is auditing some 52 groups, many of which have criticized the Harper government’s programs and policies, especially on the environment.

The list includes Amnesty International Canada, the David Suzuki Foundation, Canada Without Poverty, and the United Church of Canada’s Kairos charity.

Pen Canada, a Toronto charity that advocates for freedom of speech, joined the ranks of the audited just this week. The group has raised alarms about the government’s muzzling of scientists on the public payroll.

Charities have said the CRA campaign is draining them of cash and resources, creating a so-called “advocacy chill” as they self-censor to avoid aggravating auditors or attracting fresh audits. Auditors have the power to strip a charity of its registration, and therefore its ability to issue income-tax receipts, potentially drying up donations.

Oxfam Canada is not undergoing a political-activities audit, said Fox.

Chantal Havard, spokeswoman for the Canadian Council for International Co-operation, a coalition of international-aid charities that includes Oxfam, said she was not aware of any other members in mission-statement disputes with the CRA.


Also, there’s more on this from here, and from here:






Posted in Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, human rights, Legal, media, Policy, politics, progressive, propaganda, Regulation, Treason, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“When things get ugly, I’ll stand with the muslims (i.e: Against the Americans!)”

How many people ignored this published warning of his written public confession?

“When things get ugly, I’ll stand with the muslims

(i.e: Against the Americans!)”



Posted in America, Corruption, Crime, Globalization, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, progressive, propaganda, Regulation, Treason, Uncategorized, United States, USA, War | Tagged | Leave a comment