…and here’s how and why:

Montesquieu was wrong.

There is no system of checks & balances, division of powers etc – as even Aristotle noted long ago, the legislative branch only looks to the future, the forensic judiciary only looks to the past, while only the executive is free to rampage at will in the present; none of them pays even the slightest attention to any of the others!

And, as for government being the people’s servant, that will always backfire, too, when the people themselves become tyrants, through the democractic process:

“A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy…”

Alexander Fraser Tytler, Scottish lawyer and writer, 1770


H.L. Mencken (1880 – 1956) was a journalist, satirist, critic, and Democrat. He wrote this editorial while working for the Baltimore Evening Sun, which appeared in the July 26, 1920 edition.

“As democracy is perfected, the office of the President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last and the White House will be occupied by a downright fool and complete narcissistic moron.”

- H.L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920

So, while the Second Amendment exist to defend citizens from tyrannical governments, when government tyranny is what people eventually vote for in a democracy, they (a majority of tyrannical self-entitled leftist citizens) are the government, so they will assiduously work hard at disarming themselves.


PHILOSOPHICALLY, it’s the difference between the real, objective Golden Rule of Law (what Mark Levin calls “negative rights”) most simply defined as Do Not Attack First, and as was first phrased by Confucius in the negative as “Do NOT Do Unto Others, That Which You Would NOT Have Them Do Unto You,” where one can do nothing either TO nor FOR others, without getting their express permission first – and the false, “positivist” one, (aka “Do Unto Others”) and which I have termed the Brazen Rule of criminal Chaos, which gives criminals the subjectivist “out” for instance, all criminal masochists could claim “I love punching my self in the head, so, since you have also agreed to the positivist golden rule, you won’t mind me exercising my ‘freedom’ to punch YOU in the head, too! Whee!” i.e: They can do whatever they want TO you, as long as they also claim to be doing it FOR you (for your own good)!

Similarly, criminals (like, say, Muhammad) can assert:

“I’d LOVE to be ruled with an iron fist by ME, even if I wasn’t ME! Whee!”



George Washington was completely against political parties.

It’s the idolatrous political “party” system itself which permits our otherwise public SERVANTS to indulge them selves in interest-conflicted divided loyalties, and so to metaphorically slip from the tethers of oversite we should be keeping them on.

Unless we eliminate political parties, the salesmen in government will destroy the country.

Politicians don’t represent the people – they only represent their parties. And their parties only represent those who pay them – who happen to be the exact same people for each party.

So ALL politicians are only treasonous sales-puppets, foisted on us by their corporazi sales-masters. Their real job is to sell us all out by selling off our country to the highest bidders – usually by buying our enemies’ money to fund their own pet projects. The faster the turnover (more sales per minute) the more quick profits, even at low-low fire-sales prices. It’s a race to the bottom.

So, let’s just FIX DEMOCRACY! And here’s how: If we just hold 2 quick, back-to-back elections each time (the first, as usual, to hire the worker’s pool of our Public SERVANTS from our districts, and the second where WE ALL appoint them DIRECTLY to their cabinet portfolio positions) then we eliminate their self-interested conflicts of loyalty-dividing political “parties,” (which always only “party” at our direct expense, anyway,) forever!


These days, most if not ALL elected politicians are statists who always want to grow government to reward followers, who are more concerned with the ‘rights’ of their own groups (parties) than with any of their constituents, because if the other members of their party cause it to fall, they fall too.

Similarly, they will therefore also protect their own political CLASS – members of BOTH parties – lest they all fall as one, too.

The reason corporazi globalist traitors can puppetize the politicians is because the divisive interest-conflicted political party gangs exist at all. If there were NO funds allowed, no campaigning, but only platforms posted on free websites, and where the people could DIRECTLY appoint the elected politicians to their cabinet positions, the power of corporate money to influence elections would be reduced to near-zero.

Each politician would then be beholden ONLY to the people who elected them, not to group-rights loyalty conflicts.

And, what sane people call “The Slippery Slope,” liberals (criminals) call “Progress!”

Bad (“positivist,” “defensively pre-emptive”) laws are crimes because they attack first, by slandering individual citizens as criminals, and so also insisting that they have no inherent right to self-defense.

Unfortunately, there’s only so many symptoms of The Golden Rule of Law (which simply defines all situational morality as “Do Not Attack First!”) one can address with lesser, circumstantial “laws” of morality, only so many right answers, before one must veer off into exploiting the almost infinite number of sorta almost right,(but really wrong) answers, in order to keep up the pretense that the legislators are actually doing something responsible to earn their pay and to continue to enjoy the right to govern others – a point which, after whence reached, societies decline into criminality and empires fall into ruin.


Here’s a few examples to illustrate this point:

If a Republican doesn’t like guns, he doesn’t buy one.

If a Democrat doesn’t like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a Republican is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat meat.

If a Democrat is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a Republican is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.

A Democrat wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a Republican doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels..

Democrats demand that those they don’t like be shut down.

If a Republican is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church.

A Democrat non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.

If a Republican decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job ..that provides it.

A Democrat demands that the rest of us pay for his.

That’s how you create a Republican: Give him a job.

And here’s how you create a Democrat: by giving him welfare.

Here’s another obvious difference between the left and right: remember the old adage about “Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day, but teach him how to fish, and you’ve fed him for a lifetime!”?

Rightists are all for individual self-reliant responsibility, and so want to teach people how to fish (fend) for them selves, while leftists want their victims to become dependent on them, as slaves are to a master; i.e:

“Vote for us again, or you won’t get tomorrow’s fish – CAPISCE!?”

‘Liberalism’ is extortion, bribery, and blackmail all in one! Whee!



Posted in America, Education, Legal, Policy, politics, progressive, propaganda, Regulation, Treason, Uncategorized, United States, USA | Leave a comment


From the Ottawa Citizen, p.#A10, Friday 25 July 2014, and here:

Canada Revenue Agency over-writes Oxfam’s purpose

Tax agency says ‘preventing poverty’ not allowed as goal for charity

Oxfam Canada’ executive director  Robert Fox, right, said despite the new “purpose” statement, the group’s programs and activities have not changed.

Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS file photo

Oxfam Canada’ executive director Robert Fox, right, said despite the new “purpose” statement, the group’s programs and activities have not changed.

OTTAWA—The Canada Revenue Agency has told a well-known charity that it can no longer try to prevent poverty around the world, it can only alleviate poverty — because preventing poverty might benefit people who are not already poor.


The bizarre bureaucratic brawl over a mission statement is yet more evidence of deteriorating relations between the Harper government and some parts of Canada’s charitable sector.

The lexical scuffle (war of words) began when Oxfam Canada filed papers with Industry Canada to renew its non-profit status, as required by Oct. 17 this year under a law passed in 2011.

Ottawa-based Oxfam initially submitted wording that its purpose as a charity is “to prevent and relieve poverty, vulnerability and suffering by improving the conditions of individuals whose lives, livelihood, security or well-being are at risk.”

The international development group, founded in 1963, spends about $32 million each year on humanitarian relief and aid in Africa, Asia, and Central and South America, with a special emphasis on women’s rights.

But the submission to Industry Canada also needed the approval of the charities directorate of the Canada Revenue Agency, and that’s where the trouble began.

Agency officials informed Oxfam that “preventing poverty” was not an acceptable goal.

“Relieving poverty is charitable, but preventing it is not,” the group was warned. “Preventing poverty could mean providing for a class of beneficiaries that are not poor.”

The Canada Revenue Agency prevailed, and the official declaration to Industry Canada about the purposes of the non-profit corporation dropped any reference to preventing poverty.


Oxfam Canada’s executive director called the exchange an “absurd conversation.”

“Their interpretation was that preventing poverty may or may not involve poor people,” Robert Fox said in an interview with The Canadian Press.

“A group of millionaires could get together to prevent their poverty, and that would not be deemed a charitable purpose.”



“Our mission statement still indicates we’re committed to ending poverty, but our charitable (purposes) do not use the word ‘end’ or ‘prevent’ — they use the word ‘alleviate.’ ”

Philippe Brideau, spokesman for the Canada Revenue Agency, declined to provide information on the disagreement with Oxfam, saying “we do not comment on specific cases.”

However, he said legal precedents mean charities cannot help people not already impoverished from falling into poverty.

“Purposes that relieve poverty are charitable because they provide relief only to eligible beneficiaries, those in need,” Brideau said in an email.

“However, the courts have not found the risk of poverty as being equivalent to actually being in need. Therefore, as the courts have indicated, an organization cannot be registered with the explicit purpose of preventing poverty.”

He added that charities are still allowed to teach money management, budgeting and other life skills, which could lead to the prevention of poverty.

Oxfam Canada was singled out for criticism earlier this year by Employment Minister Jason Kenney over the group’s opposition to Israeli settlements in the West Bank.


And in July last year, Oxfam Canada signed a joint letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, taking issue with reports that government officials had been asked to compile “friend and enemy stakeholder” lists to brief new ministers after the summer cabinet shuffle.

Fox said despite the new “purpose” statement, the group’s programs and activities have not changed.

The contretemps is yet more evidence of frosty relations between the Harper government and some charities, several dozen of which have been targeted since 2012 for audits of their “political activities.”

The Canada Revenue Agency, armed with $13 million in special funding, is auditing some 52 groups, many of which have criticized the Harper government’s programs and policies, especially on the environment.

The list includes Amnesty International Canada, the David Suzuki Foundation, Canada Without Poverty, and the United Church of Canada’s Kairos charity.

Pen Canada, a Toronto charity that advocates for freedom of speech, joined the ranks of the audited just this week. The group has raised alarms about the government’s muzzling of scientists on the public payroll.

Charities have said the CRA campaign is draining them of cash and resources, creating a so-called “advocacy chill” as they self-censor to avoid aggravating auditors or attracting fresh audits. Auditors have the power to strip a charity of its registration, and therefore its ability to issue income-tax receipts, potentially drying up donations.

Oxfam Canada is not undergoing a political-activities audit, said Fox.

Chantal Havard, spokeswoman for the Canadian Council for International Co-operation, a coalition of international-aid charities that includes Oxfam, said she was not aware of any other members in mission-statement disputes with the CRA.


Also, there’s more on this from here, and from here:


Posted in Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, human rights, Legal, media, Policy, politics, progressive, propaganda, Regulation, Treason, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“When things get ugly, I’ll stand with the muslims (i.e: Against the Americans!)”

How many people ignored this published warning of his written public confession?

“When things get ugly, I’ll stand with the muslims

(i.e: Against the Americans!)”



Posted in America, Corruption, Crime, Globalization, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, progressive, propaganda, Regulation, Treason, Uncategorized, United States, USA, War | Tagged | Leave a comment

Atheislam is nothing more than a giant Argumentum Tu Quoque theodicy crime-excuse!

“Allah’s” officially stated cause is to make Islam superior over all other religions:

9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).

Islam is not even a “religion,” (at all, much less one “of peace,”) much less a “superior” one.

Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

“I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”


Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

Islam itself is only a gigantic, convoluted, victim-blaming slanderous example of an Argumentum Tu Quoque theodicy!

“Muhammad isn’t an evil criminal because we all (i.e: you, ALLAH) do it, too! Whee!”

Just look up all the “In the Way of Allah” references: what do they have in common? As also described explicitly in the Qur’ime manual, “allah” is both unknown, and unknowable – he’s just evil random violence and sudden death! Chaos!

The whole chapter / sura about Moses, shows how “allah” kills off innocent people who “would have” otherwise become “evil,” and replaces them with “better” people. And the whole “moral” of the story is: YOU do not know; only “allah” knows, and he only tells Gebril to tell Muhammad to tell you about any of it!

Sura 4:77: Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected:
“War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

Allah’s supposed “oneness” with his creation is thus crucial to Muhammad’s eternal theodicy alibi-excuse for his many crimes, and it’s also blatantly, inherently ANTI-God, because when one’s “God” is generally ‘EVERYTHING!’ then it’s also implicitly, specifically ‘NOTHING!’ Existentialism IS Nihilism!

Islam IS Atheism!

The ‘theological’ notion of Allah’s “oneness” is CRUCIAL to their main criminal, might-makes-right alibi, that “we aren’t responsible, and no one is ever really a criminal anyway, because we’re really all only victims:

“The Allah Made Me Do It!”
“In fact, I didn’t do it at all – only the allah did it! Whee!”

[8.17] So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote, and that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is All-Hearing, Knowing.

“Fight them; Allah will punish them by your hands and will disgrace them and give you victory over them” – 9:14-15

And, more,

Islam has sentenced all the world’s non-muslims to “Death By Muslim” for our crime of not being muslims.*

Obviously, the muslims have no “faith” in even their god’s own power nor desire to enforce even it’s own basic us-versus-them and might-makes-right principles, because while, at worst, all real religions only say:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

ONLY islam says:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

Obviously, a forced “Faith!” isn’t any kind of a “Faith!” whatsoever – islam isn’t a religion at all, it’s only extortion!

And extortion is ALWAYS a CRIME!

*Of course, for all you selfish subjectively-oriented libertine “liberals” out there, this sad fate can be easily avoided by mumbling some magic words called “the shahada” in Arabic, and by adopting proper attire, but there’s still an unfortunate degree of risk involved, in that you will then also have thereby personally become part of that “death by muslim” function yourself, as they fit you out for your very own shiny new suicide vest with its integral explosive belt. Be proud of your new fashion-statement accessory; you’ve
certainly earned it.


Christianity, on the other hand, represents free-will conscience and so potential guilt for not doing one’s best; so since liberals, being criminals, hate all notions of personal, self-reliant responsibility, and in stead choose to favor pre-deterministic alibi excuses to pretend they had no choice but to commit their crimes, must hate Christianity and its symbols, whether or not it’s true. Same for muslims, who are also morally delinquent atheists, because their idolatrous version of a god doesn’t give them free-will
responsibility, but only enslaves them and forces them to do both good and bad things! Idolatry is immorality because it’s only an alibi-excuse for one to avoid all self-reliant responsibility.

Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Europe, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, Uncategorized, United Nations, United States, USA, War | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment


Here’s ISLAM IN A NUTS’ HELL (Cowardice Loves Company!):

SUBMIT! (To “predetermined, enforced and inevitable” Inferiority!) SUBMIT – to FAILURE! SUBMIT – to “allah!”

OK – DEFINE ‘ALLAH:’ “Allah is unknown and unknowable; allah is generally “everything!” and so “allah” is specifically NOTHING!

Since one is commanded to only fear and obey, not admire and love, “allah,” it’s clear that islam only focuses on (“worships”) one’s own fear – of Pain.

Allah is ONLY Pain: “La ilaha il Muhammad; ALLAM RASUL MUHAMMAD!”

The Message of the Qur’an is an empty one: “You must fear and obey your Pain!” How pathetic! Allah is Pain, and islam is Submission to one’s own fears.

When people (especially liberals, in the West) are willing to give up everyone’s individual liberty for tribal gangster security, they forfeit the former AND the latter, by Submitting like muslims to the Stockholm-syndrome-like extortion creed of how “We Have To Go Along (with criminal lies) To Get Along (with lying criminals)! Whee!”

And, in their self-righteous, holier-than-thou fear, they are quite willing to sacrifice the individual rights and liberties of everyone else to their own cowardly selfish extortion creed, too, musing that:

“It would, after all, be negligent to not submit to my fears, so any and all such ‘criminal’ “infidels” will deserve whatever they’ve got coming to them, too! In fact, it’s our logical duty to force them to Submit to our own fears of allah, lest allah obviously rightfully get us for not making them Submit to the fear of him!”

So: SUBMIT to the fears of the fearsomely fearful, OR ELSE they will “need” to become fearsomely afraid of you, too!



Posted in Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, progressive, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, Uncategorized, War | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

How and Why Liberals ARE Muslims

The 5 Pillars of Liberalislam

The 5 Pillars of Liberalislam

Here’s how liberals have always viewed islam and sharia:

Initially, liberals must assume that, “Since God is unknowable &/or religion is only some silly opinions anyway, it doesn’t really matter what anyone describes their god as! (even if, as “allah,” he’s portrayed as a violent sadistic slaver.)

To which they *might* add the “unless they believe in it and abuse their kids with it and want to impose it on everyone else against their will, of course!” bits left only implied, but which they’re too polite and “culturally sensitive” (i.e: racist) to ever actually articulate; so that, as selfish cowards, they can safely ignore all the muslims’ crimes by pretending to not pre-judge them, and so leave the crimes and criminals in a perpetually contextually-abstracted, idolatrous state: as eternally innocent until (never even bothering to try to find them to ever be) proven guilty!

To aid them in this delusive deception, they also claim the false, allegedly Christian Commandment, of “Judge Not – EVER!” Whee.


Liberals defend muslims crimes

Further, whenever they describe muslim crime as “islam-IST,” Extrem-IST, Radical-IST, Militant-IST, etc., they’re really only sublimating the suffix “-ISH;” as in islam-ish, muslim-ish (but not *really* fully islam-IC)!


At first, they’ll want to assert that “Islam is a great religion of peace,” and “an Abrahamic monotheism,” neither of which are true:

The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims.

So, if and when liberals consider islam to be a religion, they must also implicitly agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

As soon as you pretend this divine extortion fantasy excuse is even a remotely possible scenraio, you’ve also instantly Submitted to the alibi of becoming a criminal “muslim” yourself!

After this, their initial reaction will predictably be: “You can’t claim islam is against us, as in it’s an us-vs-them creed! (because they’re more violent than we are, so it isn’t safe to do so!”) coached in terms of immoral might-makes-right relativism:

“Islam isn’t evil because we (i.e: you) all do it, too!”

Or, in the slightly more intelligent attempt:

“But non-muslims commit crimes, too, so islam isn’t responsible for (any) crimes!”

Well, obviously islam isn’t the *only* cause of crime, (although, in this world and at this time, it has long maintained the position of being the main cause of most crimes globally) but it is definitely a crime-causing venture: if one were to consciously take all the rationalizations and reasons for any humans committing any crimes, and bundle them all into one book, appended with the exhortations that “God” wanted people to commit crimes for these reasons, and which further, were NOT really crimes, BECAUSE said God endorsed them – then you would have created exactly what we are all faced with here and now: the Qur’an, islam, and it’s muslim mobsters.

Islam is a threat to everyone because IT says it is.

Holy mobster Moslems only hate infidels because the Qur’an says “god” orders them to – Period.

ALL moslems are criminals because, by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an.

And the Qur’an tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-moslem humans, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-moslems in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being moslems.

“Slay the idolators wherever you find them…” Chapter 9, verse 5

“When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them….” Ch. 47:4

So the Qur’an is a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat.

But then, both liberals and muslims pretend to be proud of their practicality in submitting to the extortionist’s creed that one must “Go Along” (with the criminal’s lies) “To Get Along” (with the lying criminals)!

To liberals, this is called “Political Correctness” and to muslims, it’s known as Submissive lying (“to Keep The Peace!”)

Liberals also call this cowardly instinctive Submission to despair: “shrewdness,” “realism,” & “realpolitik.”

Both liberals and muslims are group-might-makes-right criminal extortionist gangsters.
Both liberals and muslims believe in the supremacy of group identities over individual choices.

Both liberals and muslims believe in forcing outcomes which are against individual free-will choice.

Both use fatalistic predeterminism excuses: muslims: “the will of allah;” libs: “historical determinism.”

Both believe minority groups are helpless victims, slaves to destiny, and so should all be treated as such.

Both feel the right to be noblesse oblige elitists to “protect” submissive victims, in stead of enabling them to defend them selves.

Most Liberals believe that we’re all really only random mistakes, and, as such, also potentially dangerous victims of predetermined force – victims of society, products of our environments, and slaves of allah – so their great “solution” is always the same: to dilute our potentially dangerous individual propensity to make mistakes by forming into pre-emptively defensive groups (of potentially dangerous  mistakes LOL) and all for our own good and “protection,” of course!

Pretending a group of individuals is entitled to have more rights than the sum of those individuals, is idolatry (image over reality, form over substance, lies over truth). When groups have idolatrous rights, then all individuals who are not members of those groups have less rights. And all group-might-makes-rights amounts to anyway is the crime of extortion. Either all humans have the exact same rights, or none have any real rights.

All humans have a right to defend themselves, and part of that defense involves being able to be free to speak to accuse those who seek to attack them first.

Fred Bastiat said something like: “We all have the natural right to self defense; bad laws are those which try to deprive us of that right.”

Criminals attack first by fraudulently lying to slander and blame their own victims in an attempt to remove their victims’ rights to self-defensive free-speech, by asserting that they themselves are the victims and their victims are the criminals who therefore have no right to slander them.

To achieve this irrationality, they must often pretend there is no discernable cause and effect, that all is relative, expecially when it applies to them, because their group is in a minority.

When groups have rights, individuals don’t – simply because such a stance creates an injustice system, where some people (these days, in the West, who are part of some subjectively determined “identifiable protected minority groups,” including “women’s rights”) have more rights than others, which means those others have LESS rights than the protected group, and so are to be officially pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent in comparison.

By endorsing group rights, any criminal has an automatic alibi for their crimes, if they can pre-posterously claim “retaliation” for something that once happened anywhere else to anyone else who was even only vaguely or remotely “like them.”

Pre-judice is slander, and vice-versa. Group rights is pre-judicial, obviously false idolatry, slander, and fraud – it’s a crime.

Reversing the onus of proof to guilty until never proven innocent is fradulent prejudicial slander and might-makes-right extortion (crime)!

It’s attacking first!

Any so-called Judges or politicians who supported and enabled these crimes are guilty of same.

They are also guilty of criminal harrassment and extortion (conformity, like all communazis want for everyone, is extortion; aka terrorism).

Any “legal” system which endorses group rights – even “minority” ones – is NOT a legal system at all: It’s only an extortion-promoting CRIME system!

And like all gangsters’ extortion rackets, it’s really only formed because each individual criminal (libertine liberal) really only wants rights without responsibilities for them SELF – to dilute their own responsibility in a group (because delinquent cowardice loves company) in order to be able to say:

“I didn’t do it! ONLY The GROUP did it!” and “In fact, NONE OF US in The Group did it, either – ONLY The GROUP did it! Whee!”

These infantile delinquent criminal negligent cowardly traitors in fact always want the false right to remain irresponsibly wrong.

Why do they crave government dictators and slavery? “Because with no power comes no responsibility!”

There’s no perverse crime a lefty won’t compromise with or Submit to!

Liberals racists can invariably be relied on to ignore even the worst depredations of muslims, under the blanket alibi/excuse of:

“Who Are We To Say Our Culture Is Better Than Theirs?”

- And yet they feel perfectly free to say our culture is WORSE than theirs (everyone else’s) – the guaranteed liberal response to the threat of the muslim conquest of the West is always:

“So what?! We’re worse than them so we deserve it!”

They feel perfectly safe and so free to challenge and attack the West, knowing full-well that our history of collaborative discussion and “Thou Shalt Not Kill” and “sticks and Stones” proportional-response cultural indoctrination will save them from any violent retaliation for their incessantly slanderous harrassments.

This is why these self-described champions of diversity and “minority victim’s rights equality” will never be found advocating for the oppressed and victimized minorities in muslim countries: Christians, Jews, or Women!

Here in the West, it’s far easier to be the vicious little guy attacking bemused, innocent goliaths, making names for themselves by complaining, rather than by self-improvement, than it would ever be anywhere else in the world!

And their cries of relativist “multi-culturalism” really only ever amount to racism, because,  in denying the obviously inferior cultural indoctrination nurture of islam, leaves the liberals with only nature to explain the total failure of the muslim nations!

They insist we mustn’t belittle the inferior races’ attempts, and so must in stead defend their failures in stead of granting them the equal regard necessary to solve their problems by explaining them to them!

Liberals believe muslims, being inferior animals at the mercy of their instincts, cannot learn from mistakes, so it’s mean of the rest of us to try educating them away from their crime-creed!

In rabidly and vociferously denying the role “nurture” or education (cultural indoctrination) has on any given people’s development, liberals reveal their true prejudicial stance: that “nature” (or ‘race’) is at the bottom of it all anyway!

FINALLY, I wouldn’t hold out too much hope that this recent anti-Boko-Haram trend is any kind of a true wake-up call for liberals.

Just as they’ve prefered to pretend they were always against “Al Quaeda” and “The Taliban” and radical-IST extreme-IST militant-IST islam-ISTS (“IST” = “ISH,” as in: “They’re islam-ISH and muslim-ISH, but “not really” islamic muslims!”) but never against the ancient ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndiate of islam itself, nor against any of its holy-mobster muslims.

Criminals (such as liberals and muslims) like “allah,” because allah is predetermined force (the perfect excuse for their own crimes: “The allah made me do it!”) while the Judeo-Christian God allegedly gave us all free-will choice and so both the self-reliant rights to, AND responsibilities for, our own actions – which is why all the criminals hate Him!

They choose Lucifer (allah) because then they get to pretend it’s all someone else’s fault, so they won’t have to face the painful truth that rights only come with responsibilities.

If with great power comes great responsibility, then leftists want to enjoy the right of any slave to remain irresponsibly wrong – because with no power comes no responsibility.

It’s divide and conquer to them, where they pretend to imagine they can have pleasure without pain, hope without fear, and pleasant rights without painful responsibilities. They love the idea of forced predeterminism, so they can always pretend to be the victims, helpless infantile delinquent criminal negligents that they are.

And Cowardice loves company, too!

People who want rights without responsibility always intrinsically, inherently slander their victims by downloading those responsibilities onto them; being an infantile delinquent is really just another form of negligent criminal extortion.


People who are truly cooperative, collaborating to reach a truly objective universal truth, realize that all individuals are equal. But contentious adversarial subjectivists must inplicitly and intrinsically oppose everyone else’s basic human rights to self defense, and so must be seen to at least seem to champion group might made rights extortion, while pretending they are really only “defending groups of victims” by slandering everyone else first.

i.e: If you’re a selfish liberal, you must oppose any and all objective standards of the equality of universal individual human rights, while idolatrously pretending to champion GROUPS (of “poor oppressed minorities”) as a cover for your false ‘right’ to do so!

These adversarial (satanic) lefties (left-hand-path followers) really always oppose EVERYONE and everything else, including, of course, the All (God).

Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, Education, Europe, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, proglodyte, progressive, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, Uncategorized, United Nations, United States, USA, War | Tagged , | Leave a comment

False East/West Paradigm Hides The Rise Of Global Currency

May 6, 2014 by

False East/West Paradigm Hides The Rise Of Global Currency


Despite popular belief, very few things in our world are exactly what they seem. That which is painted as righteous is often evil. That which is painted as kind is often malicious. That which is painted as simple is often complex. That which is painted as complex often ends up being disturbingly two dimensional. Regardless, if a person is willing to look only at the immediate surface of a thing, he will never understand the content of the thing.

This fact is nowhere more evident than in the growing “tensions” between the elites of the West and the elites of the East over the crisis in Ukraine.

I am continually astonished at the refusal of many otherwise intelligent people to consider the evidence or even the possibility that there is, in reality, no fundamental political or philosophical conflict between the power brokers of the East and the West. As I outlined in great detail in Russia Is Dominated By Global Banks, Too, the truth is they are both working toward the same goal; and both ultimately benefit from an engineered and theatrical display of international brinksmanship.

Russia, like the United States, is utterly beholden to globalist financiers through organizations like the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements. Russia’s global economic adviser in matters ranging from investment image to privatization is none other than Goldman Sachs.

Goldman Sachs has also worked closely with the Ukrainian government since 2011, and it started its advisory work with Ukraine for free. (Whenever Goldman Sachs does something for free, one should take special note.)

Russia has continued to borrow billions of dollars from Western banks, including Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse, year after year.

Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with Mr. New-World-Order himself, Henry Kissinger, on a regular basis; and according to Putin’s press secretary, they are “old friends.” Putin’s meetings with Kissinger began almost immediately after he first took power in 2000.

Putin’s relationship with Kissinger has been so pronounced that the Russian Foreign Ministry gave Kissinger an honorary doctorate in diplomacy, and Putin placed Kissinger at the head of a bilateral “working group” — along with former KGB head and multilateralist (globalist) Gen. Yevgeny Primakov — dealing with foreign policy.

In more recent news, I would also remind pro-Putin cheerleaders that Putin and the Kremlin first pushed for the IMF to take control of the Ukrainian economy, and the IMF is now demanding that Ukraine fight Russia in exchange for financial support. This might seem like irony to more foolhardy observers; but to those who are aware of the false East/West paradigm, it is all the part of a greater plan for consolidation of power.

Clearly, Putin and Russia are just two more puppet pieces on the globalist chessboard, pitted against other puppets in the West in a grand theater designed to distract and divide the masses through chaos. As Kissinger points out, in crisis there is opportunity.

What is the goal? They’ve already told us, openly, on numerous occasions.

The first great prizes of the New World Order are a global currency and centralized economic control. Heads of state from around the world, including Putin, as well as international bankers and IMF representatives have all publicly called for the IMF to take charge of the global economic system through its Special Drawing Rights currency program.

However, for the SDR to become a dominant currency, several issues must be resolved. Here’s a short list.

The U.S. Dollar Must Fall

The dollar must lose its world reserve status, and most likely collapse in relative value, before the SDR can be elevated. This is where mainstream pundits lose track of the facts. For them, the dollar is an invincible monetary element, a currency product as infinite as time. Their normalcy bias prevents them from ever acknowledging the many weaknesses of the Federal Reserve note, including our country’s inability to ever service its more than $200 trillion debt. Others believe the dollar is the NWO currency, and that the globalists are somehow U.S.-centric. The evidence posted above suggests otherwise. Globalists have no loyalty to any nation or culture. Their only loyalty is to the progression of their own power. If sacrificing the dollar or the U.S. as a whole furthers that power, then they will have no problem cutting us loose like a rotting appendage.

A Liquidity Replacement Must Be Introduced

As my regular readers know, I have been covering China’s progression toward a decoupling from the U.S. economy for years. China, in my view, has always been the key to the elitist shift into a truly global currency mechanism. The primary argument in the mainstream against the idea of a dollar collapse is that there is no other currency with ample liquidity to take the dollar’s place. Well, in the past couple of years, this has changed.

China and the banks it controls have issued approximately $25 trillion in debt instruments and monetization. This is often referred to as a “debt bubble” created through panic and a weakness in China’s economy and a response to quantitative easing in the United States. I would take a slightly different position. I would say that China’s monetization has been carefully and deliberately engineered in order to lay the foundation for a massive liquidity spike in the Yuan. The argument that China’s incredible debt generation is a sign of impending collapse may be misguided. U.S. debt, including unfunded liabilities, absolutely dwarfs China’s $25 trillion. If any economy is on the verge of implosion, it is that of the United States, not of China.

The Chinese need exponential Yuan circulation. They do not want it to replace the dollar; they are preparing it for induction into the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights basket.

When might this occur?

The IMF holds an international conference and policy meeting on the SDR every five years. During these meetings, the IMF decides if it will absorb a new currency into the basket and if it will expand the creation or circulation of SDRs around the world. Interestingly, the next IMF conference on the SDR just happens to be scheduled for the end of 2014 to the beginning of 2015.

Another strange coincidence: The U.S. Congress was supposed to vote on legislation for further capital allocations to the IMF by April. The vote never came. The new allocations were to fund an expansion of IMF programs and help with the greater inclusion of BRIC nations in governing decisions. If the U.S. government does not pass this legislation, Russia and other nations have demanded that the IMF move forward without the United States on reforms. At the very least, the U.S. would lose its veto power over IMF decisions. I believe that the timing of this is deliberate, that the U.S. is meant to lose its veto power and that the simultaneous SDR conference will announce the inclusion of the Chinese Yuan, setting the stage for the replacement of the dollar as world reserve.

The SDR will not immediately be issued as a commonly traded currency itself. Rather, the IMF will take over management of included currencies and denominate those currencies using SDR valuations. For example, $1 U.S. is worth only .64 SDR today. In the near future, I expect that the dollar will plummet in relation to the SDR’s value. We will still have our greenbacks when the IMF begins administrating our currency system, but the international and domestic worth of those greenbacks will fall to pennies. In turn, other currencies with stronger economic positions will rise in worth relative to the SDR.

I believe one of the primary determinations in a currency’s value compared to the SDR will be a country’s stockpile of gold. This is why Russia and China in particular have been purchasing precious metals at an unheard-of rate (and why U.S. gold reserves have never been audited). The IMF itself is one of the world’s largest holders of physical gold, with nearly 3,000 metric tons (officially). With the crash of the dollar system and investors clamoring for a reliable hedge to protect whatever savings they have left, gold could conceivably skyrocket into the $5,000 to $10,000 per-ounce range. Governments holding the metal will be favorably placed during an implementation of the SDR as the new reserve standard.

A Cover Event Must Be Created

The centralization of power is best achieved during moments of bewildering calamity. The conjuring of crises is one of the oldest methods of elitist dominance. Not only can they confuse and frighten the masses into malleability, but they can also ride to the public’s rescue as heroes and saviors later on. The Hegelian dialectic is the mainstay of tyrants.

The destruction of the dollar and the institution of a global economic bureaucracy are not actions that can be executed openly by international financiers. These events will coincide with extreme catastrophe, likely worse than the Great Depression era, with millions upon millions of people losing the ability to financially support themselves and their families. Crime, death and public discontent will surely follow. People will be looking for someone to blame. This is where the false East/West paradigm comes in.

I have warned for quite some time that the development of East/West tensions would be used as a cover for a collapse of the dollar system. I have warned that among the American media this collapse would be blamed on an Eastern dump of foreign exchange reserves and treasuries, resulting in a global domino-effect ending U.S. world reserve status. In turn, the international community would be conditioned to see this as the mere bumbling of a spoiled America gone power-mad, rather than the result of a covert program of economic destabilization. This might lead to all-out war or a fiscal firestorm that leaves much of the world crippled and desperate for aid.

In either case, the elitist plan is to use scapegoats and false enemies to draw our attention away from the real culprits: the international banks themselves. Make no mistake: This fight is not about President Barack Obama, it is not about Putin and it is not even about the Federal Reserve. These men are tools, errand boys, public mascots. Do not be fooled by the global stage play being perpetrated. Whatever happens in Ukraine and whatever happens between Russia, China and the West, there are only two real sides to this battle: the elitist establishment and those who are smart enough to recognize their poison.

–Brandon Smith

Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Europe, Globalization, human rights, Legal, media, Policy, politics, Regulation, Treason, Uncategorized, United Nations, United States, USA, War | Tagged , , | 1 Comment