Dracula Untold Irks Turks

I saw the movie, and it was awesome, because it asserts self-defense is allowed vs. islam (!)

(I know, I know – totally out of character for racist masochistic liberal Hollywood, right?)!

Anyway, I wasn’t going to review it, or reply to the slanderous lies presented by the Turks about it, [in the New Statesman (and reprinted in the New Republic), where Turkish writer Elest Ali asks the burning cinematic question, “Is Dracula Untold an Islamophobic movie?”] until others decided to take her down first, (here).

“Let’ em continue to stew in their own prideful holier-than-thou lies and ignorant slander,” I said to my self: that alone is all the punishment they need.

Why educate the enemy?

But since then, others (and my own damned ego LOL!) have prompted me to revise that initial stance, so here goes after all:

The Turk’s review of the recently-released “Dracula Untold” movie is (of course) …

Nothing but pathetic lies.

The Turkish “reviewer” made so many historical errors it’s hard to know where to start.

She says Dracula was of the line of the “Draculesti,” whatever that is. WRONG.

Dracula’s surname was BASARAB. The family ruled nearby Bessarabia, and the progenitor was Voda Negru (the Black Prince) aka Basarab the Old. Their symbol was BAAL ( the pagan’s horned moon-bull god) but NOT ALLAH! ‘Basara’ is an ancient Arabic word which means “stern-faced biter” (how prophetic LOL)! Chances are, they were originally ARABS; hardly “racists” when it comes to islam (although they may have been righteously indignant about Arabia being violently conquered and enslaved by the bandit-king Muhammad and his goons)!

His own middle name was Dragulya, which means “beloved one” and his nickname (which he gleefully adopted and even used in signing offical correspondence,) was of course Dracula. His father (whom he despised) had been given the honorific “Dracul” when inducted into the Ordo Draconis when Vlad was born in 1431.

Anyway, let’s start off with noting how the Turkish movie critic completely avoids the main motivating issue of contention in the movie: the “Devshirme” culling (kidnapping) of indigenous children to satisfy the Sultan’s perverse desires, and to be brainwashed and used later as janissary shock troops against their own brethren.

Dracula strenuously objected to the practice, which was first introduced around the time of his birth (the Turks had first invaded Wallachia only ten years before that)!

That’s the main plotline for the movie, and yet she’s avoided it completely, probably because, as a “TRUE STORY,” it makes her own Turkish people look like the evil ISIS-like swine they’ve always been, and, it increasingly seems, still are!

And the rest of the review is nothing but fact-free, speculative opinion presented as fact – in other words, pathetic lies to deflect from Turkish guilt; i.e:


“Vlad Dracul II of the house of Draculesti sought support from the Ottoman Sultan in his claim to the Wallachian throne. To put him on it, the Ottomans waged war with Dracul’s enemies. In return, Dracul willingly offered them not one, but two of his sons: Vlad Tepes Dracula and Radu cel Frumos – aka Radu the handsome. While Vlad Tepes went on to become the progenitor of the vampire myth, his brother would remain loyal to the Sultan, and his childhood friend, Mehmet II.”


Vlad Dracul didn’t “seek support” from the muslims, he was already on the Wallachian throne, and was supported by the Austro-Hungarian Emperor Sigismund, and by the king of Hungary, Matthew Corvinus!

In fact, the situation was the exact opposite: he was extorted into giving up his sons as hostages to the Turks BECAUSE they suspected he would attack them in a Crusade if they didn’t force him to do so!

Besides, Vlad wasn’t known as “Vlad Tepes” until AFTER he’d learned impaling – FROM THE TURKS!

In addition, Radu wasn’t Mehmet II’s “childhood friend” because the sultan was a grown man when the Basarab child-hostages were rendered unto him – in stead, Radu was only an innocent 8-year-old child when Mehmet first RAPED him, and gave him syphilis (which they both eventually later died from)!!!!

The Turkish muslim author of this insipid article then states:

“The film’s generous use of the word “Turk” was interesting. To call an Ottoman a Turk is like calling a Roman an Italian. True, the Ottoman sultans were of Turkic origin. But the empire was much too big, much too ethnically diverse to be called Turkish.”

LIAR!!!! Just look at a map!

Apart from the fact that “Turks had a Turkic origin” OUTSIDE of what was then, as now, known as “Turkey,” the nomadic barbarian tribes of same had all violently invaded Greek THRACE and Tarsus and ANATOLIA before the conqerors re-named it to “Turkey!”

Turkey ITSELF abuts Romania at Bulgaria, and Turkish ships can easily get straight to Romania directly from TURKEY itself, not from some varied and diverse part of the allegedly multi-ethnic-and-cultural empire!

And of course all empires can claim to be multi-ethnic, but MOST if not all of them cannot validly claim to have expanded to have become so through means of “peaceful tolerance!”

In fact, even the multi-ethnic and multi-religious Roman empire consisted of multiple countries which had all been first violently invaded and enslaved by Rome’s own pagan emperors.

And it’s only an historical aside that all of later Christendom itself was peacefully converted when all the provincial Roman heads of state decided to go along with emperor Constantine’s own conversion, in order to continue to curry favor with his regime!

However, contrast pagan Rome’s tolerance of other religions with islam’s intolerance.

And Judeo-Christian tenets have no world-conquest mandate, unlike islam’s official one.

Anyway, I saw the film a few weeks ago, here in Ottawa.

The Turks were clearly depicted AS muslims, displaying their crescent-moon banners.

And it was awesome: the theatre was packed, and everyone was cheering loudly for Vlad and hating the Turks (muslims) and there was not a muslim to be seen in the audience!!!

And, (apart from the vampire stuff,) the only obvious historical inaccuracies were:

a) that Dracula had no army when the Turks came calling, and
b) that the Turks shot holes in Dracula’s castle with cannons.

In reality, it was Dracula who first brought Chinese gunpowder, rifles and cannons to Europe, to blow the shit out of the (very surprised) backwards barbarian Turks LOL!

Another historical inaccuracy in the movie was where Dracula slew Mehmed II; in reality, he ran away from his ignoble defeats in Transilvania and Wallachia, to have better luck elsewhere – an inaccuracy I’d be surprised the Turkish reviewer missed, has she not also demonstrated such complete bias and total ignorance of history in the rest of her article!

It was Vlad’s successful defense of his native lands which caused the eventual conquest of unfortunate Contstantinople, because once the Sultan had been evicted from Wallachia and Transilvania, his own men had demanded a victory – ANY victory! – from him, or else he would be EATEN by them. So, in suicidally reckless despair, he had then decided to kill himself in a “glorious” attempt to do the impossible: to take the impregnable holy city.

His unexpected audacity caught the Greek defenders there completely off guard (for who but a suicidally desperate madman would ever have even dreamed of trying such a thing?!) and so almost by accident, he succeeded. Then, however, Wallachia and Transilvania only remained muslim-free for another few years, until the almost-inevitable masochistic liberal treason of the sell-out boyars (the corrupt, upper-class of liberals of their day) enabled its downfall; but the rest of Eastern Europe wasn’t so fortunate in their leadership.

Dracula alone had stemmed the tide of the Ottoman advance at the time; without him, it’s probable that North America would never have been discovered, as Christopher Columbus would have been left to his own devices, speaking Arabic in remote “Andalusian” mosques!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

So: What, Exactly, IS Islam’s “Message!”?

So, What exactly is the message of Islam?

13QuranicDoctrinesUnlucky ForInfidels The “message” of islam (extortion) is nonsensical: “peace” by Submitting to violence.

Islam’s main trope, that it can create “Peace” (even if only by killing off all its enemies) is entirely false, because it is only idolatry, deferring everyone’s self-reliant free-will responsibility onto it’s main idol, “allah!” Islam does not in any way teach people self-restraint, but only offers up endless alibi-excuses for irresponsibility and criminal desires.

Besides that, how successful at creating “peace” can any creed be, which advises the best way to achieve peace is by violent attack?!


Other than that, it’s “god,” allah, is described as both unknown and unknowable (basically, capriciously random painful violence; Satan).

The main thrust of the Qur’an is a lie: that all those ghost-towns all over Arabia (as described in the opening lines of most Suras or chapters) were caused directly by this “allah,” because the people who used to live there disobeyed his previous prophets. Obviously, the Arabian ghost-towns were abandoned due to natural disasters (Arabia is like Mordor or Hell, prone to volcanic eruptions and earthquakes) or changed economic circumstances, so Moe’s main assertion is a lie.

Secondly, to avoid that sort of thing happening locally, the Qur’an advises everyone to “Fear the Allah!” and “Obey the Muhammad!”

Only by obeying the Muhammad can the dreaded Allah be appeased.

And how does the Moe say the Allah can be best appeased? Why, only by attacking the “infidels” which the Allah has created to annoy itself.

So islam is really only a “Take THEM, Lord – Not ME!” sort of cowardly treason to rationality and civilization.

But even so, the Qur’an warns, since the Allah can and will do anything it wants, even obeying the Muhammad isn’t a sure-fire way to avoid it’s sadistic wrath; after all, it CAUSES the “infidels” one is ordered to attack, too, so anyone can be forced by the Allah to become an infidel at any time, without knowing it.

And so, (according to the ahadiths) when Moe was asked, as he lay dying, what his reward would be, and whether he would go to Paradise, or Hell, he responded with:

“I have absolutely no idea.”

… SO:

Dear Muslims:

Allah isn’t God – allah is NOTHING.

“Allah” doesn’t exist, even by you moslems’ own, most official doctrines!

While we in the West believe in live and let live, you moslems obviously DON’T! And so islam isn’t a religion at all (much less one “of peace”)! You have no real “faith” because your description of your allah is that he/it is unknown and unknowable (so why listen to Big Moe?) and since allah has been generalized as the indivisible EVERYTHING, it is therefore also specifically NOTHING! It isn’t Ha-Shem, only Shiite-Happens! Existentialism IS nihilism!

Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

“I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

- Muhammad -

Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

Muhammad’s islam pretends that objective, right-and-wrong morality are all false concepts which don’t really exist – because, as moslems, only the big bad scary capricious unknown and unknowable idol of allah is responsible for everything, including both “good” and “bad,” as your main #1 excuse for your crimes!

Moe said allah is unknowable to us; he cannot make himself understood to us! Which leaves only Moe’s words in the Qur’an as a substitute for god! And the Qur’an says only those who kill others and die for Moe, will go to heaven, while those who do not kill and die for Moe, implicitly deny his version of a god, and so will go to hell! And this is also why islam doesn’t separate the religious and secular realms: because Moe’s word concerning “allah” is absolute extortion, and it’s not open to individual interpetation. It’s: Submit, or die!

And how else does Muhammad describe his “unknown and unknowable” allah?! As a terrorist!

Qur’an Sura 3:151 – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers!” etc.

Q: 4:77: “Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected: “War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

Muhammad himself: “I have been made victorious through terror” (Bukhari 4.52.220).

Islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)! it’s ONLY an extortion CRIME-syndicate. The only “religious” part is:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”


And while, at WORST, all real religions only say:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

…ONLY islam says:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

So you moslems are atheists because you have NO faith in your god’s abilities or desires to pay any attention to you or to anyone alse ever anyway, not even a desire nor ability to enforce even it’s own us-versus-them, might-makes-right creed.

Allah is described in your Qur’an as a big, bad, remote, scary thing, so the group called “islam” and it’s rule-book, the Qur’an, are the only gods you can worship and obey.

So, static islam itself is the false idol you continue to worship – and it’s about as responsive to human needs as the rocks your Arabs used to worship!

You moslems only Submit – to Pain as your “god!” You Submit to Failure, to inferiority, to victimology, and pretend that Giving Up is a ‘holy virtue, inshallah akhbar!’

“La ilaha is ALLAM; ALLAM rasul Muhammad!”


Contrast that with Christianity, which posits that, just because God might be too complex for us to understand Him, doesn’t mean that God can’t understand us, nor that He can’t make Himself understood to us on our own terms, through His incarnation as Jesus. And Jesus, the Jew, said we weren’t to kill each other, but to learn to progress through trust and cooperation.

Since “allah” doesn’t exist, just hating islam but giving you moslems a pass, simply because you were born into families of holy mobsters and your ancestors were Muhammad’s first victims, doesn’t work any better than saying:

“I hate national Socialism, but individual nazis are A-OK with me! Whee!”


Your “Allah” was only Muhammad’s made-up excuse for his own crimes!



See also:

www.askdrbrown.org  (Apologist)  http://quran.com/  to verify (also see above index on Terror)

www.politicalislam.com  (Dr. Bill Warner) A 2hour Koran for non-Muslims – read on site.  History of wars, death tolls, source of Quran stories

www.answering-islam.org (Comprehensive Encyclopedia on Islam) abrogation – which texts take precedence Median vs Meccan

www.jihadwatch.com (Robert Spencer) Everything you should know about ‘jihad’ historically, currently   over 25 books

www.markdurie.com  (blog) source of ISIL and current analysis. Book – Third Choice

www.pointdebasculecanada.ca  (Tipping Point  – Marc Lebuis) Terrorism in Canada – researcher – French and English

www.actforcanada.ca  archives and articles on all aspects of Islam, terror organizations, sponsoring Islamic Countries etc.

www.thereligionofpeace.com  registry of over 21,000 terror attacks since 9-11 – location, event, organization or individuals


Posted in Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, human rights, islam, Legal, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, War | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Muslims: “Martyrs” – or MASOCHISTS?

When trying to define the root causes of “Terrorism” (or when trying to make up predeterministic force excuses for it, like the currently favored but laughably hypothetical “radicalization” meme) some have recently asserted, in a tautological, circular fashion:

“I’d say there are terrorists and there are non-terrorists. The terrorists may live in mountains, in houses or tents; the terrorists may have a faith or no faith; the terrorists may belong to one faith or no faith. The common attribute of a terrorist is that the terrorists resort to acts of terror.”

Which could be summed up as:

“There are criminals, and there are non-criminals, of all stripes and beliefs.”

Except that criminals don’t have any real faith or beliefs in trusting others AT ALL.

In stead of being brave, life-affirming martyrs, who die trying to help others, it’s clear that muslims are in stead cowardly victim-blaming criminal masochists, Submitting to their own fears, despair, and failure.

They are only motivated, not by “faith” or trust in others, but by their own cowardly treasonous criminal masochism, where they always try to “control” their fears BY causing the pains they fear!

Criminals like muslims believe in “everything goes” fatalism; i.e: “Since every given crime’s going to happen anyway, we can’t deny it, so the best we can do, since have to allow it, is to accept, Submit to it, compromise with it and accommodate it! Whee!

That’s why there’s no crime or perversion they won’t immediately try to compromise with or Submit to: because, as idolaters, anything they can imagine as “possible” becomes immediately “probable” and then “inevitable” as their perpetual focus on, and so also worship of, their own fear of Pain itself takes them over!

It’s also why sharia crime (“law”) is based on the wholly non-principled Brazen Rule of criminal Chaos, where “All is allowed except that which is very specifically disallowed and only by might-makes-right Authority!” in stead of on the mutually-agreed-upon consensual moral contract called the Golden Rule of law (where everyone agrees to not attack first: do nothing either TO, nor FOR, anyone else unless & until specifically agreed to)!

Criminal terrorism is OFFICIALLY an intrinsic component (and the “most pious sacrament”) of islam itself.

“Submission, the Religion of Peace” (Pacification) is really only “Extortion, the Religion of Thieves!”

The REAL difference between “one man’s freedom-fighter and another man’s terrorist” is both the reason they attack, and WHO they attack: If one attacks one’s oppressors directly (the occupying foreign army which is oppressing your people, but which isn’t there in defending others in response to your criminal attacks) then one is a “freedom fighter.” But if one has decided to attack innocent others first, one’s own choice has defined one’s actions as being predatory criminal aggressions, and one has thus decided to become a “terrorist.” Ditto with then attacking the police force which has occupied one’s space IN RESPONSE to one’s previous attacks on innocents.

Finally, muslim terrorists actually have no faith in their god’s power nor desires to enforce even it’s own most basic us-versus-them and might-makes-right tenets; they are effectively selfish atheists, even though (or because) they have been told their hateful god has made this world an unbearable test for them to escape from by taking innocent others with them. Islam is really Submission to their own fears, despair, and failure. It’s easy, and that’s why it’s “effective” in terrorizing sane civilized people, who are always on the defensive, always trying to understand such a base and ultimately masochistic mentality, perpetually trapped trying to determine which specific offense of theirs has triggered the muslims’ eternal grievances. Little do they know that islam isn’t grievance-driven at all: it’s entirely doctrine-driven! Muslims are commanded to hate infidels simply BECAUSE they are infidels, not for any specific acts or ommissions said infidels may be guilty of committing beyond their inherent “infidelity!”

Unlike “real” religions, which, at WORST, only assert this ridiculous threat, that one must:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

…ONLY islam asserts this wholly believable terroristic threat: that everyone else must:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

Let’s not forget that ALL the so-called “islamic” countries in the Middle East (and world itself,) were all originally Greek, Christian ones – like Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Turkey, Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia (not to mention India and Iran) which were ALL violently invaded, conquered, raped and enslaved by the racist imperialist colonialist and genocidal creed of islam and it’s holy -mobster “muslim” mind-slaves.*

And NONE of the Arabs’ invasions were in any way “defensive” ones, simply because Arabia (which is much like Mordor, or Hell – a lifeless, desert land full of active volcanoes) has never been invaded by anyone!

(And I’m pretty sure that even the globe-conquering Greek warlord Alexander the Great gave Arabia a pass)!


*Quite unlike the peaceful process where those countries had all become Christian countries in the first place, which of course was simply to curry favor with their previously pagan masters in Rome, upon the conversion of the Emperor Constantine.

Posted in Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, War | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

What The Hell Is This “RADICALIZATION” Anyway?!


Re: the “Radical” vs. “Moderate” islam pretense:


While not all Germans were Nazis, and

not all Italians are Mafiosis,

not all white guys are Hell’s Angels, and

not all Arabs are muslims, still:



ALL Hell’s Angels ARE HELL’S ANGELS, and


The pretense is, that they’re NOT!

People try to conflate the two categories used above: nationality/ethnicity/”RACE,” with CRIME-CREED MEMBERSHIP.

And as long as “our Leaders” insist on maintaining this cowardly pretense – that islam ISN’T really islam, and that not all muslims ARE really muslims, we have already lost to the criminals’ savage barbarian indoctrinating culture, BY Submitting to its main extortive lie and alibi-excuse: That islam is a religion, and thus also that

“God” told them to commit their ‘holy’ crimes against us!

Isn’t it strange how “extremist,” “fundamentalist,” and “radical” are all oxymorons? If one is extremely fundamental to the core message of the source texts, then how can one also be “radical” (divergent to it)?!

Here’s the only real “difference” between “radical” and “moderate” muslims:

“Radical” muslims want to murder us (for not being muslims).
“Moderate” muslims want “radical” muslims to murder us (ditto).


Get it, yet?!

And why is this? Simple!

In Judeo-Christian lore, if one commits suicide, (much less by, or when, also trying to murder others,) one learns that one is destined for Hell.

But the criminal Qur’an tells it’s Submissive “muslim” dupes that, if and when they’re feeling down, they can instantly get to Heaven itself BY randomly murdering others!

So it’s obviously islam itself which causes any and all “radicalization!”

The only pretended “mystery” is why more rank-and-file muslims aren’t already “radicalized:” it’s simply because they’re still somewhat ignorant of what’s written in the Qur’an concerning

Allah’s ultimate expectations of them.


Here’s how and why any and all “Radicalism” and “radicalization” occurs in islam:


(Official ‘Abrogation’ of all the semi-peaceful verses in the Qur’an)!

In handy web-based .PDF format!

Bottom line: there are no “moderate” muslims, simply because there is no “moderate” islam!

So, why are “our leaders” and their pet enemedia lying to us all the time about this?!

Here’s what’s really going on:

While it’s still true that not all Germans were Nazis, not all Italians are Mafiosis, not all whites are Hell’s Angels, and not all Arabs are muslims – but it IS still also nevertheless true that all Nazis WERE nazis, all Mafiosis ARE Mafiosis, all Hell’s Angels ARE Hell’s Angels, and


the politically correct pretence du jour, is to pretend that:


And each of our so-called leaders wants to maintain this false right to remain irresponsibly wrong, to metaphorically kick this can down the road, to serve only their own selfish careers at our direct expense!!!!

They so-desperately want to lie to themselves and to us, hoping (while expressing this falsely hopeful opinion as fact, which is to lie) that “Most muslims are peaceful and so can and will contribute economically to our tax-base” – just as their lowest-common-wage demanding corporate sales-master owners have promised them.

But it’s not true!

In all the studies done in all the European countries, muslims self-segregate and economically contribute absolutely nothing to their host societies, while simultaneously draining the tax-base by welfare jihad, demanding and getting their allah-mandated jizya tribute from us!

So in reality, every sales-puppet politician’s future careers – and LIVES! – are in stead directly threatened/ endangered just like the rest of us, and damaged by the muslims’ inherently seditious presence in our society.

And, like it or not, so are the short-sighted corporate globalist oil-bankster’s own ultimate bottom lines!


Originally posted on Uncle Vladdi's Blog:

View original

Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Europe, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, United States, USA, War | Tagged , , , | 11 Comments

What The Hell Is This “RADICALIZATION” Anyway?!

What The Hell Is This “RADICALIZATION” Anyway?!.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Muslims shoot up Canadian Parliament, RCMP only fears possible “backlash” against perps!

Details at Pamela Geller:

VIDEO of GUN BATTLE WITH ATTACKERS: Military bases shut down across Canada in wake of attack on Parliament

LIVE UPDATES War in Canada: Multiple Attacks, Multiple Gunmen in Islamic State Garb

(Almost) needless to say, the scum pretending to be “in charge” of us are busy in lockdown denial mode, pandering to muslims and slandering those who of us who would warn the innocent about them!

I live in Ottawa. You guys have of idea of the lengths these cowardly masochistic “officials” here will go to to appease and pander to Islam, while slandering civilians.

When I tried to warn my local MPP’s office that this sort of thing was on its way, and get some basic legal protection for myself to be able to warn others, the Liberal government in Ontario’s Ministry of the Attorney General stooges referred me to the Chief of the Ottawa Police Intelligence Division, a useless chucklehead himself, who chortled at me about “Islam?! Muslims?! What’s that – never heard of them! That’s for the ‘Terrorism Boys!’ – not ME!”

I pointed out that, nevertheless, “terrorism” is really only the crime of “extortion!”

Then he said I “might be a hatefully racist bigot” for simply attempting to inform him about a dangerous international crime-gang, and refused to consider my request.

So he had first more or less admitted that he knew that “islam/muslim” = “terrorist,” but then implicitly abdicated his office, abandoned his duty to protect and defend civilians from criminals, and went instantly into full dereliction of duty mode, while acting like a criminally negligent infantile delinquent. Oh, and he put me on speakerphone while making “he’s crazy!” gestures to other officers who were listening in., according to his own notes (which I later obtained on Appeal). What a clown.

I admitted that, Yes, I DID indeed hate crime and the criminals who commit them, and wondered why he – a Police chief – DIDN’T.

That made him uncomfortable, but not uncomfortable enough to do anything.

Neither did my quoting the facts and statistics proving islam had murdered more innocent people since its creation, than ALL other human creeds (both secular AND religious) in the entire world!

Meanwhile, as it rturned out, the MAG had decided to pre-emptively sacrifice the safety of my self, family, and neighbours, merely in order to preserve their own pensions and reputations from any potential cries of “racism!” by slandering me.

And all of these facts were proven when I managed to obtain their own notes on the case from a FOI request and subsequent appeal through the Ontario Privacy Commissioner’s Office.

In short, the Liberal stooges appointed to run both the MAG and Ottawa Police are an utter disgrace when it comes to fulfilling their oaths to protect the public from these threats. When – not if – the next attack comes, they’ll still be busy slandering & pandering!

More updates, from here:

Backlash, Dhimmitude & Useful Idiots in Ottawa

Posted: 22 Oct 2014 03:29 PM PDT

In wake of Ottawa shootings, Police Chiefs send letters to Muslim leaders inviting Muslims to contact them if they fear “backlash” ISIS Media account posts this picture claiming to be Michael…
Muslims are the real victims and we must be careful not to point the finger at mosques…

Posted: 22 Oct 2014 02:26 PM PDT

Canada: Muslims feel stigmatized by reports on radicalized youthBlazing Cat Fur Surete du Quebec police investigators go over the scene of a police shooting in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu near Montreal…
Algerian Muslim Michael Zehaf-Bibeau behind Ottawa attack

Posted: 22 Oct 2014 02:01 PM PDT

From the Muslim Issue: Michael Zehaf-Bibeau has been identified as the suspect in the shooting at Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Canada on Wednesday. Michael Zehaf-Bibeau is a Candian born in 1982,…

Canada: if it walks like a duck….

Posted: 22 Oct 2014 01:22 PM PDT

So lets take at look at the mosque where this convert worshipped: After convert’s killing, Quebec mosque eager to ‘live and let live’ (BCF) Mr. Bekkari said his mosque, housed in an aging strip mall,…

Canadian Muslims Fear ‘Backlash’ Over Attacks On Soldiers…

Posted: 22 Oct 2014 08:07 AM PDT

Breaking: One shooter shot dead inside parliament building! Said to be a “male with a long rifle”… Shots fired at Canada war memorial, soldier seen falling More Terror Attacks In…
Posted in Canada, Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, War | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Rabbi Shalom Lewis misses the point in “Ehr Kumt” and “Ehr Daw”

Recently, and not-so-recently, in Frontpage Magazine online, Rabbi Shalom Lewis tried to warn us of the global dangers posed by “radical islam,” as detailed here.

But in doing so, the Rabbi commited the exact same cognitive errors he accuses others of: calling the enemy of mankind “radical islam.”

Terorrism is “FUNDAMENTAL” to islam, so by definition it’s not “RADICAL!”

There are no “moderate” muslims simply because there is no “moderate” islam.

Here’s the only real “difference” between “radical” and “moderate” muslims:

“Radical” muslims want to murder us.
“Moderate” muslims want “radical” muslims to murder us.



First, the Rabbi said (correctly, concerning the German race’s involvement with the nazi crime-creed:)

“Not all Germans were Nazis – most were decent, most were revolted by the Third Reich, most were good citizens hoisting a beer, earning a living and tucking in their children at night. But, too many looked away, too many cried out in lame defense – “I didn’t know.” Too many were silent. Guilt absolutely falls upon those who committed the atrocities, but responsibility and guilt falls upon those who did nothing as well. Fault was not just with the goose steppers but with those who pulled the curtains shut, said and did nothing.”

But then he made a BIG mistake, conflating crime-creed (islam) with race (mostly Arab):

“Let me state that the overwhelming number of Muslims are good Muslims, fine human beings who want nothing more than a Jeep Cherokee in their driveway, a flat screen TV on their wall and a good education for their children, but these good Muslims have an obligation to destiny, to decency that thus far for the most part they have avoided. The Kulturkampf is not only external but internal as well. The good Muslims must sponsor rallies in Times Square, in Trafalgar Square, in the UN Plaza, on the Champs Elysee, in Mecca condemning terrorism, denouncing unequivocally the slaughter of the innocent. Thus far, they have not. The good Muslims must place ads in the NY Times. They must buy time on network TV, on cable stations, in the Jerusalem Post, in Le Monde, in Al Watan, on Al Jazeera condemning terrorism, denouncing unequivocally the slaughter of the innocent – thus far, they have not. Their silence allows the vicious to tarnish Islam and define it.”

In other words, while he’s correctly saying, “Not all Germans were Nazis,” he IS also, quite erroneously saying, “Not all muslims are muslims!”

Were his eyes open, he’d have correctly said:

“Not all Germans were Nazis, and not all Arabs are muslims.”
But Rabbi, I must add:



On the positive side, I did especially appreciate his “We must wake up and smell the hookah” quip LOL!

(My usual favorite, similar one has always been: “Wake up and smell the fatwah”)!


Unfortunately, he falls into the trap he describes for others:

“We cannot be lulled into inaction for fear of offending the offenders. Radical Islam is the scourge and this must be cried out from every mountain top.”

HE is afraid of offending the offenders by calling this evil what it is: normative, not “radical,” ISLAM.

Further, he errs when he asks, rhetorically (but mixed in with other, wrong category examples:) “Should a church be built in the Syrian town of Ma’arra where Crusaders slaughtered over 100,000 Muslims? “

IN that case: YES! Because those muslims were invaders who knew their “holy hijra” emigration was conquest.

He continues in his error:

“Despite all the rhetoric, the essence of the matter can be distilled quite easily. The Muslim community has the absolute, constitutional right to build their building wherever they wish. I don’t buy the argument – “When we can build a church or a synagogue in Mecca they can build a mosque here.” America is greater than Saudi Arabia. And New York is greater than Mecca. Democracy and freedom must prevail.”

Most Emphatically: NO! There is no comparison at all, no “moral high ground” to be gained by allowing the holy mobsters to build their triumphalist crime-dens amongst our children, while denying us the chance to educate.

Further, re: “Can they build? Certainly. May they build? Certainly. But should they build at that site? No — but that decision must come from them, not from us. Sensitivity, compassion cannot be measured in feet or yards or in blocks. One either feels the pain of others and cares, or does not.”

That’s the EXACT same as asserting that “They can and may commit their crimes against us, but their decision to stop committing them must come from them, un-influenced by us. A criminal should be allowed to continue his crime rampage until he decides to stop, and so we have no moral right or obligation to protect the innocent!”

Then he brags about being a member of the ACLU, cementing his libtarded, self-hating masochist credentials.

It’s obvious that he hasn’t bothered to read the Qur’an’s 500 pages, and so still presumes islam a religion.

So of course he quickly veers off-topic into the false “nationalism” is the cause of the conflict trope:

“In the Six Day War, Israel was the proxy of Western values and strategy while the Arab alliance was the proxy of Eastern, Soviet values and strategy.”

Well, again, NO, actually! When Israel was first bought freed in the past Century, the Soviets supported her, long before American Jews got on board.

He continues: “As Israel, imperfect as she is, resists the onslaught, many in the Western World have lost their way displaying not admiration, not sympathy, not understanding, for Israel’s galling plight, but downright hostility and contempt. Without moral clarity, we are doomed because Israel’s galling plight ultimately will be ours. Hanna Arendt in her classic Origins of Totalitarianism accurately portrays the first target of tyranny as the Jew. We are the trial balloon. The canary in the coal mine. If the Jew/Israel is permitted to bleed with nary a protest from the “good guys” then tyranny snickers and pushes forward with its agenda.”

Sorry, but again, NO. Truly, Jews are the first among infidels in the Qur’an, but bemoaning habitual Jewish victimology won’t cut it as far as “moral clarity” goes, when one ignores the real enemy: ISLAM itself, not “islamist fundamentalist radicalist extremist militantists” which only implies “islam-ish, (but not really!)”

The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims.

So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

Bottom line: If you decide to believe in “allah,” you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of “faith” in your crime-god will help us to do so.

It’s depressing and amazing how much he continues to miss the point, while almost getting it:

“How do we convince the world and many of our own, that this is not just anti-Semitism, that this is not just anti-Zionism but a full throttled attack by unholy, radical Islamists on everything that is morally precious to us? How do we convince the world and many of our own that conciliation is not an option, that compromise is not a choice? Everything we are. Everything we believe. Everything we treasure, is at risk. The threat is so unbelievably clear and the enemy so unbelievably ruthless how anyone in their right mind doesn’t get it is baffling. “


As a further sad example of his own blindness, he blithely continues with adding the following proud fallacy:

“I was no great fan of George Bush – didn’t vote for him. (By the way, I’m still a registered Democrat.) I disagreed with many of his policies but one thing he had right. His moral clarity was flawless when it came to the War on Terror, the War on Radical Islamist Terror.”

I think that, if he is able to think this through at all, he’ll find he is afraid of pitting his Rabbi status endorsing and selling Judaism against “another great world religion” because then people could claim it was a mere “conflict of superstitious religious opinions” open to subjective relativistic interpretations, and thus cancelling out any moral authority he might initially have had by seeming to be denigrating another “religion.”

But we cannot, as he noted, worry about offending the offenders’ sensibilities, and this is a false meme:

Criminal muslims are full of victim-blaming fallacies; like all criminals, slander is their weapon of choice.

We cannot EVER dissuade them from using such fraudulent lies, no matter how we try to Reason with them.

One, they pretend WE are slandering islam/muslims, “because” of our Judeo-Christian faith!

But the facts are, that the Christian faith demands slander of nobody!

Since Christianity came long before islam, there is nothing specifically anti-islamic in the Bibles.

There is only one line in the Christian bible about how Jesus saw the proto-islamic ‘faith’ of the Syro-Phoneocian Woman, in Mark 7:24-30 / Matthew 15:21-28: He called it “dogfood.”

To me, islam is dogSHIT, but there’s nothing in the Bible that forces me to say that out of “faith” except maybe the part of Isaiah  that says God only wants us to Reason with Him, to use our own reasoning, and NOT to have any false “faith” LOL!

Finally, islam isn’t a religion (at all, much less one “of peace!”) so to notice that the Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims, has NOTHING to do with any pre-conceived/pre-judicial “religious” viewpoint, it’s just FUCKING OBVIOUS.

And yet this poor benighted Rabbi continues giving credence to the enemy’s main trope:

“Our parents and grandparents saw the swastika and recoiled, understood the threat and destroyed the Nazis. We see the banner of Radical Islam and can do no less.”

Oy, Vey!


Subconsciously, I think he knows the reality, because his final, rhetorical question did not refer to “imams:”

“During WWII and the Holocaust was it business as usual for priests, ministers, rabbis? Did they deliver benign homilies and lovely sermons as Europe fell, as the Pacific fell, as North Africa fell, as the Mideast and South America tottered, as England bled? Did they ignore the demonic juggernaut and the foul breath of evil? They did not. There was clarity, courage, vision, determination, sacrifice, and we were victorious. “

Perhaps he remembered that the Arab and Turkish muslims were on the side of the Nazis?

“Today it must be our finest hour as well. We dare not retreat into the banality of our routines, glance at headlines and presume that the good guys will prevail.”

Nevertheless, he seems to be a “religions salesmen,” defending all similar-seeming creeds and thus ensuring and safeguarding his authority and pension, in stead of being a truly religious person, one prone to telling the hard truths even if it meant self-sacrifice.

Judeo-Christianity does not motivate people to proactively defensive acts, only to reactively irresponsibly palliative ones. People drag their butts into the churches and synagogues once a week, enduring the drone of the sermons, in penance for their subconscious guilt and to deflect their own moral responsibilities onto the preacher. They drop a few dollars into the collection plates, and thus ritually assuage their consciences, much in the same way as they defer their responsibility to think and act for them selves onto those they elect and pay to do their thinking for them. In a way, defering to any and all forms of moral authority is really criminal negligence.

But in reality, and in general, no force or police or laws or idolatrous authorities are necessary among free citizens who can and will govern themselves, while the opposite is: no amount of force or police or laws or idolatrous authorities are enough for a people who CANNOT – or will not – govern themselves.



Interestingly, the next, sister-article starts off right where the first left off:

“I remembered Joseph Conrad’s sadly, cynical observation – – “The belief in a supernatural source of evil is not necessary.  Men alone are quite capable of every wickedness,” and sadly it felt right.”


“But what disturbs me is where are the other 950 million Muslims who are not terrorists?  Who are not bomb blasting, acid throwing, zealots?  Where are the other 950 million Muslims who tuck their children in at night with a lullaby, who are okay with Christians and Jews, crave a peaceful world and wish nothing more than a tasty bowl of hummus and a friendly game of Shesh Besh with a neighbor?

I want to believe they are out there for their sake and for ours.  I want to believe they weep in pain over the desecration of their faith.  I want to believe that we have partners who dream the dreams we do and wish upon the same star.

I want to believe – – but where are they?

A silent partnership is no partnership.  Sin is not just in the act of commission – it is also in the act of omission.

Most Germans were not Nazis – but it did not matter.
Most Russians were not Stalinists – but it did not matter.
Most Muslims are not terrorists – but it does not matter.”





Edmund Burke’s powerful warning, that “All that is necessary for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing,” won’t amount to anything when the OFFICIAL QUR’ANIC DEFINITION OF GOOD AND EVIL is reversed from what we have been fallaciously led to believe holds universally true for all creeds and breeds of humans!

Islam is NOT about universally objective standards of good and evil; in stead, it’s ALL about subjective double-standards of pre-posterous, victim-blaming slander, where all the non-muslims in the world must be extorted, enslaved, and murdered simply for their “crime” of not being muslims – even though they also insist that their “allah” has most deliberately caused their (our) infidelity!

Even that word, ‘infidel,’ is backwards slander, for Muhammad’s creed came AFTER our Judeo-Christian one; so how can we have always been “unfaithful” to something which is relatively new?! Backwards muslims pretend their islam is the world’s original religion, and ours is the corrupted degraded and ultimately false form of it.

SO we have all been pre-emptively objectified as “the worst of creatures, as apes and swine, as lower than braying donkeys, lower even than demons who have converted to islam,” OFFICIALLY right in their “holy” Qur’ans!!!

So, according to their book, prophet, archangel and deity, we must convert or be murdered by them.

Islam OFFICIALLY sentences all the world’s non-muslims to “Death by Muslim!” for our “crime” of not being them! Sure, until their global conquest is achieved, there’s a grace period where we get to buy our way out of the last bit, by self-enslaving our selves to them, paying a 50% tax to fund their world conquest war effort, but that temprary escape clause, too, will expire immediately upon the instant of their final victory!


When “our leaders” blather on about how “islam is a great world religion of peace!” they hope to pretend that their wilfully self-blinded ignorance is a virtuous example of allowing islam to remain innocent until proven guilty, but their having failed to read the mere 500 pages of the Qur’an is evidence of criminal negligence, abdication of their oaths of office to protect their citizens, and dereliction of duty. They are traitors.

The Rabbi, then blithely continues with his falsehoods, concerning the fate of Europe:

“The continent that gave birth to Western civilization, the continent that defined high culture is crumbling before our very eyes.  Because of well-intentioned tolerance and an undisciplined pluralism, Europe is returning to the dark ages.  By most estimates, Europe will be unrecognizable by the middle of this century – crushed by a demographic tsunami.  The birthrate of the Brits, the French, the Dutch and the rest of the EU is well below ZPG.  The Muslim community’s birthrate is prolific.  The danger, however, is that Europe has not been a melting pot, assimilating new Muslims.  And these new Muslims, for the most part, are not interested in respecting the great democracies of Europe.  They want Sharia law and Islamic culture to be ascendant and with their birthrate, the ballot box and their disdain for the West, in time, they will get it.

The element that is surging and redefining Europe are not the democracy respecting Muslims” …


“… but those who are rampaging in nearly every capital.  They are preaching hate for Jews, for Christians, for Israel, for America, for the entire Western world.  It is not our grandfather’s Europe and it will not be a Europe our grandchildren will recognize.

For the record, Europe is being flooded not by freedom loving, tolerant, assimilating Muslims who wish to share in Western freedom, in Western tolerance, in Western culture but rather by violent Islamists, extremists who reject every value we treasure.”


Islam is inherently a form of SEDITION – because it never agreed with the Christian notion of separating secular (road-paving, taxation) and religious realms (render unto Caesar) and went with “Render The World Unto Muhammad!”

So it doesn’t believe in national sovereignty, preferring global theocracy (‘ummah’) ruled by the Caliphate government!

Islam is ONLY a crime syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it’s where they say: “God told us to commit these crimes!

Muslims are never national citizens; they regard all national sovereignties as temporary, man-made false idols which must all be eventually destroyed and replaced with the one-world global muslim Ummah, to be ruled by their theocratic caliphate, and their duty is to wage offensive war to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims. Terrorism is an inherent, not an incidental, nor in any way a “radical,” component of islam.


No self-determined muslim believes in any sovereign national governments nor countries at all, ever!

Sharia is allegedly the perfect law of allah, based directly on the Qur’an!

So it always applies to all humans everywhere!


Recall the Ayatollah Khomeini’s words during his 1980 speech in Qom, the Shi’ite spiritual hub:

“We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land burn. I say let this land [Iran] go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.”

So, since islam is a subversive anti-national and anti-legal entity, why on earth are any of its “muslim” members ever afforded any legal standing to promote their criminal treasonous sedition, before any of our courts of law?!

Allowing foreign (sharia “law”) courts to exist in your country is to enable those foreign governments to govern in your country; it’s obviously TREASON.

The Rabbi CONTINUES TO PRETEND “Not all muslims (nazis) are muslims (nazis!):”

“I say it again loudly, slowly and clearly – we are at war, here in America as well, with radical Islamists.

We have been attacked repeatedly and yet we continue to turn away.  We euphemize the enemy.  Disguising his identity and his intent.”

Speak for your self, pal!


It’s sadly laughable how he twists the facts and reverses the truth:

“we dare not make the mistake that all is well and that Islamic terrorists are simply violent criminals.”

NO! All is well enough, at the moment, that if we were to finally announce that islamic terrorists ARE indeed really ALL only violent criminal extortionists, blaming a sick version of a “god” for their criminal desires, the global threat of islam would be over within a year, at most!

He continues:

“For us, WWII lasted 4 years.  It has been 13 years since 9/11.  35 years since the invasion of our Iranian embassy and like it or not, we are still at war with radical Islam.  Declaring we are not at war with radical Islam does not make it so.”

Actually, IT IS SO!


I simply think it’s obvious that this Rabbi hasn’t bothered to read the Qur’an, yet – it’s the ony way I can see for him to have correctly observed all the resulting symptoms of islam (intolerant, offensive and violent jihads everywhere) and yet still be able to pretend to suppose to himself in public that islam itself must’ve somehow been “hijacked” or “misunderstood” by evil people.

But in fact, the Qur’an itself officially commands the muslims’ violent behaviour:






Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Europe, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, United Nations, United States, USA, War | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment