Rabbi Shalom Lewis misses the point in “Ehr Kumt” and “Ehr Daw”

Recently, and not-so-recently, in Frontpage Magazine online, Rabbi Shalom Lewis tried to warn us of the global dangers posed by “radical islam,” as detailed here.

But in doing so, the Rabbi commited the exact same cognitive errors he accuses others of: calling the enemy of mankind “radical islam.”

Terorrism is “FUNDAMENTAL” to islam, so by definition it’s not “RADICAL!”

There are no “moderate” muslims simply because there is no “moderate” islam.

Here’s the only real “difference” between “radical” and “moderate” muslims:

“Radical” muslims want to murder us.
“Moderate” muslims want “radical” muslims to murder us.



First, the Rabbi said (correctly, concerning the German race’s involvement with the nazi crime-creed:)

“Not all Germans were Nazis – most were decent, most were revolted by the Third Reich, most were good citizens hoisting a beer, earning a living and tucking in their children at night. But, too many looked away, too many cried out in lame defense – “I didn’t know.” Too many were silent. Guilt absolutely falls upon those who committed the atrocities, but responsibility and guilt falls upon those who did nothing as well. Fault was not just with the goose steppers but with those who pulled the curtains shut, said and did nothing.”

But then he made a BIG mistake, conflating crime-creed (islam) with race (mostly Arab):

“Let me state that the overwhelming number of Muslims are good Muslims, fine human beings who want nothing more than a Jeep Cherokee in their driveway, a flat screen TV on their wall and a good education for their children, but these good Muslims have an obligation to destiny, to decency that thus far for the most part they have avoided. The Kulturkampf is not only external but internal as well. The good Muslims must sponsor rallies in Times Square, in Trafalgar Square, in the UN Plaza, on the Champs Elysee, in Mecca condemning terrorism, denouncing unequivocally the slaughter of the innocent. Thus far, they have not. The good Muslims must place ads in the NY Times. They must buy time on network TV, on cable stations, in the Jerusalem Post, in Le Monde, in Al Watan, on Al Jazeera condemning terrorism, denouncing unequivocally the slaughter of the innocent – thus far, they have not. Their silence allows the vicious to tarnish Islam and define it.”

In other words, while he’s correctly saying, “Not all Germans were Nazis,” he IS also, quite erroneously saying, “Not all muslims are muslims!”

Were his eyes open, he’d have correctly said:

“Not all Germans were Nazis, and not all Arabs are muslims.”
But Rabbi, I must add:



On the positive side, I did especially appreciate his “We must wake up and smell the hookah” quip LOL!

(My usual favorite, similar one has always been: “Wake up and smell the fatwah”)!


Unfortunately, he falls into the trap he describes for others:

“We cannot be lulled into inaction for fear of offending the offenders. Radical Islam is the scourge and this must be cried out from every mountain top.”

HE is afraid of offending the offenders by calling this evil what it is: normative, not “radical,” ISLAM.

Further, he errs when he asks, rhetorically (but mixed in with other, wrong category examples:) “Should a church be built in the Syrian town of Ma’arra where Crusaders slaughtered over 100,000 Muslims? “

IN that case: YES! Because those muslims were invaders who knew their “holy hijra” emigration was conquest.

He continues in his error:

“Despite all the rhetoric, the essence of the matter can be distilled quite easily. The Muslim community has the absolute, constitutional right to build their building wherever they wish. I don’t buy the argument – “When we can build a church or a synagogue in Mecca they can build a mosque here.” America is greater than Saudi Arabia. And New York is greater than Mecca. Democracy and freedom must prevail.”

Most Emphatically: NO! There is no comparison at all, no “moral high ground” to be gained by allowing the holy mobsters to build their triumphalist crime-dens amongst our children, while denying us the chance to educate.

Further, re: “Can they build? Certainly. May they build? Certainly. But should they build at that site? No — but that decision must come from them, not from us. Sensitivity, compassion cannot be measured in feet or yards or in blocks. One either feels the pain of others and cares, or does not.”

That’s the EXACT same as asserting that “They can and may commit their crimes against us, but their decision to stop committing them must come from them, un-influenced by us. A criminal should be allowed to continue his crime rampage until he decides to stop, and so we have no moral right or obligation to protect the innocent!”

Then he brags about being a member of the ACLU, cementing his libtarded, self-hating masochist credentials.

It’s obvious that he hasn’t bothered to read the Qur’an’s 500 pages, and so still presumes islam a religion.

So of course he quickly veers off-topic into the false “nationalism” is the cause of the conflict trope:

“In the Six Day War, Israel was the proxy of Western values and strategy while the Arab alliance was the proxy of Eastern, Soviet values and strategy.”

Well, again, NO, actually! When Israel was first bought freed in the past Century, the Soviets supported her, long before American Jews got on board.

He continues: “As Israel, imperfect as she is, resists the onslaught, many in the Western World have lost their way displaying not admiration, not sympathy, not understanding, for Israel’s galling plight, but downright hostility and contempt. Without moral clarity, we are doomed because Israel’s galling plight ultimately will be ours. Hanna Arendt in her classic Origins of Totalitarianism accurately portrays the first target of tyranny as the Jew. We are the trial balloon. The canary in the coal mine. If the Jew/Israel is permitted to bleed with nary a protest from the “good guys” then tyranny snickers and pushes forward with its agenda.”

Sorry, but again, NO. Truly, Jews are the first among infidels in the Qur’an, but bemoaning habitual Jewish victimology won’t cut it as far as “moral clarity” goes, when one ignores the real enemy: ISLAM itself, not “islamist fundamentalist radicalist extremist militantists” which only implies “islam-ish, (but not really!)”

The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims.

So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

Bottom line: If you decide to believe in “allah,” you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of “faith” in your crime-god will help us to do so.

It’s depressing and amazing how much he continues to miss the point, while almost getting it:

“How do we convince the world and many of our own, that this is not just anti-Semitism, that this is not just anti-Zionism but a full throttled attack by unholy, radical Islamists on everything that is morally precious to us? How do we convince the world and many of our own that conciliation is not an option, that compromise is not a choice? Everything we are. Everything we believe. Everything we treasure, is at risk. The threat is so unbelievably clear and the enemy so unbelievably ruthless how anyone in their right mind doesn’t get it is baffling. “


As a further sad example of his own blindness, he blithely continues with adding the following proud fallacy:

“I was no great fan of George Bush – didn’t vote for him. (By the way, I’m still a registered Democrat.) I disagreed with many of his policies but one thing he had right. His moral clarity was flawless when it came to the War on Terror, the War on Radical Islamist Terror.”

I think that, if he is able to think this through at all, he’ll find he is afraid of pitting his Rabbi status endorsing and selling Judaism against “another great world religion” because then people could claim it was a mere “conflict of superstitious religious opinions” open to subjective relativistic interpretations, and thus cancelling out any moral authority he might initially have had by seeming to be denigrating another “religion.”

But we cannot, as he noted, worry about offending the offenders’ sensibilities, and this is a false meme:

Criminal muslims are full of victim-blaming fallacies; like all criminals, slander is their weapon of choice.

We cannot EVER dissuade them from using such fraudulent lies, no matter how we try to Reason with them.

One, they pretend WE are slandering islam/muslims, “because” of our Judeo-Christian faith!

But the facts are, that the Christian faith demands slander of nobody!

Since Christianity came long before islam, there is nothing specifically anti-islamic in the Bibles.

There is only one line in the Christian bible about how Jesus saw the proto-islamic ‘faith’ of the Syro-Phoneocian Woman, in Mark 7:24-30 / Matthew 15:21-28: He called it “dogfood.”

To me, islam is dogSHIT, but there’s nothing in the Bible that forces me to say that out of “faith” except maybe the part of Isaiah  that says God only wants us to Reason with Him, to use our own reasoning, and NOT to have any false “faith” LOL!

Finally, islam isn’t a religion (at all, much less one “of peace!”) so to notice that the Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims, has NOTHING to do with any pre-conceived/pre-judicial “religious” viewpoint, it’s just FUCKING OBVIOUS.

And yet this poor benighted Rabbi continues giving credence to the enemy’s main trope:

“Our parents and grandparents saw the swastika and recoiled, understood the threat and destroyed the Nazis. We see the banner of Radical Islam and can do no less.”

Oy, Vey!


Subconsciously, I think he knows the reality, because his final, rhetorical question did not refer to “imams:”

“During WWII and the Holocaust was it business as usual for priests, ministers, rabbis? Did they deliver benign homilies and lovely sermons as Europe fell, as the Pacific fell, as North Africa fell, as the Mideast and South America tottered, as England bled? Did they ignore the demonic juggernaut and the foul breath of evil? They did not. There was clarity, courage, vision, determination, sacrifice, and we were victorious. “

Perhaps he remembered that the Arab and Turkish muslims were on the side of the Nazis?

“Today it must be our finest hour as well. We dare not retreat into the banality of our routines, glance at headlines and presume that the good guys will prevail.”

Nevertheless, he seems to be a “religions salesmen,” defending all similar-seeming creeds and thus ensuring and safeguarding his authority and pension, in stead of being a truly religious person, one prone to telling the hard truths even if it meant self-sacrifice.

Judeo-Christianity does not motivate people to proactively defensive acts, only to reactively irresponsibly palliative ones. People drag their butts into the churches and synagogues once a week, enduring the drone of the sermons, in penance for their subconscious guilt and to deflect their own moral responsibilities onto the preacher. They drop a few dollars into the collection plates, and thus ritually assuage their consciences, much in the same way as they defer their responsibility to think and act for them selves onto those they elect and pay to do their thinking for them. In a way, defering to any and all forms of moral authority is really criminal negligence.

But in reality, and in general, no force or police or laws or idolatrous authorities are necessary among free citizens who can and will govern themselves, while the opposite is: no amount of force or police or laws or idolatrous authorities are enough for a people who CANNOT – or will not – govern themselves.



Interestingly, the next, sister-article starts off right where the first left off:

“I remembered Joseph Conrad’s sadly, cynical observation – – “The belief in a supernatural source of evil is not necessary.  Men alone are quite capable of every wickedness,” and sadly it felt right.”


“But what disturbs me is where are the other 950 million Muslims who are not terrorists?  Who are not bomb blasting, acid throwing, zealots?  Where are the other 950 million Muslims who tuck their children in at night with a lullaby, who are okay with Christians and Jews, crave a peaceful world and wish nothing more than a tasty bowl of hummus and a friendly game of Shesh Besh with a neighbor?

I want to believe they are out there for their sake and for ours.  I want to believe they weep in pain over the desecration of their faith.  I want to believe that we have partners who dream the dreams we do and wish upon the same star.

I want to believe – – but where are they?

A silent partnership is no partnership.  Sin is not just in the act of commission – it is also in the act of omission.

Most Germans were not Nazis – but it did not matter.
Most Russians were not Stalinists – but it did not matter.
Most Muslims are not terrorists – but it does not matter.”





Edmund Burke’s powerful warning, that “All that is necessary for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing,” won’t amount to anything when the OFFICIAL QUR’ANIC DEFINITION OF GOOD AND EVIL is reversed from what we have been fallaciously led to believe holds universally true for all creeds and breeds of humans!

Islam is NOT about universally objective standards of good and evil; in stead, it’s ALL about subjective double-standards of pre-posterous, victim-blaming slander, where all the non-muslims in the world must be extorted, enslaved, and murdered simply for their “crime” of not being muslims – even though they also insist that their “allah” has most deliberately caused their (our) infidelity!

Even that word, ‘infidel,’ is backwards slander, for Muhammad’s creed came AFTER our Judeo-Christian one; so how can we have always been “unfaithful” to something which is relatively new?! Backwards muslims pretend their islam is the world’s original religion, and ours is the corrupted degraded and ultimately false form of it.

SO we have all been pre-emptively objectified as “the worst of creatures, as apes and swine, as lower than braying donkeys, lower even than demons who have converted to islam,” OFFICIALLY right in their “holy” Qur’ans!!!

So, according to their book, prophet, archangel and deity, we must convert or be murdered by them.

Islam OFFICIALLY sentences all the world’s non-muslims to “Death by Muslim!” for our “crime” of not being them! Sure, until their global conquest is achieved, there’s a grace period where we get to buy our way out of the last bit, by self-enslaving our selves to them, paying a 50% tax to fund their world conquest war effort, but that temprary escape clause, too, will expire immediately upon the instant of their final victory!


When “our leaders” blather on about how “islam is a great world religion of peace!” they hope to pretend that their wilfully self-blinded ignorance is a virtuous example of allowing islam to remain innocent until proven guilty, but their having failed to read the mere 500 pages of the Qur’an is evidence of criminal negligence, abdication of their oaths of office to protect their citizens, and dereliction of duty. They are traitors.

The Rabbi, then blithely continues with his falsehoods, concerning the fate of Europe:

“The continent that gave birth to Western civilization, the continent that defined high culture is crumbling before our very eyes.  Because of well-intentioned tolerance and an undisciplined pluralism, Europe is returning to the dark ages.  By most estimates, Europe will be unrecognizable by the middle of this century – crushed by a demographic tsunami.  The birthrate of the Brits, the French, the Dutch and the rest of the EU is well below ZPG.  The Muslim community’s birthrate is prolific.  The danger, however, is that Europe has not been a melting pot, assimilating new Muslims.  And these new Muslims, for the most part, are not interested in respecting the great democracies of Europe.  They want Sharia law and Islamic culture to be ascendant and with their birthrate, the ballot box and their disdain for the West, in time, they will get it.

The element that is surging and redefining Europe are not the democracy respecting Muslims” …


“… but those who are rampaging in nearly every capital.  They are preaching hate for Jews, for Christians, for Israel, for America, for the entire Western world.  It is not our grandfather’s Europe and it will not be a Europe our grandchildren will recognize.

For the record, Europe is being flooded not by freedom loving, tolerant, assimilating Muslims who wish to share in Western freedom, in Western tolerance, in Western culture but rather by violent Islamists, extremists who reject every value we treasure.”


Islam is inherently a form of SEDITION – because it never agreed with the Christian notion of separating secular (road-paving, taxation) and religious realms (render unto Caesar) and went with “Render The World Unto Muhammad!”

So it doesn’t believe in national sovereignty, preferring global theocracy (‘ummah’) ruled by the Caliphate government!

Islam is ONLY a crime syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it’s where they say: “God told us to commit these crimes!

Muslims are never national citizens; they regard all national sovereignties as temporary, man-made false idols which must all be eventually destroyed and replaced with the one-world global muslim Ummah, to be ruled by their theocratic caliphate, and their duty is to wage offensive war to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims. Terrorism is an inherent, not an incidental, nor in any way a “radical,” component of islam.


No self-determined muslim believes in any sovereign national governments nor countries at all, ever!

Sharia is allegedly the perfect law of allah, based directly on the Qur’an!

So it always applies to all humans everywhere!


Recall the Ayatollah Khomeini’s words during his 1980 speech in Qom, the Shi’ite spiritual hub:

“We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land burn. I say let this land [Iran] go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.”

So, since islam is a subversive anti-national and anti-legal entity, why on earth are any of its “muslim” members ever afforded any legal standing to promote their criminal treasonous sedition, before any of our courts of law?!

Allowing foreign (sharia “law”) courts to exist in your country is to enable those foreign governments to govern in your country; it’s obviously TREASON.

The Rabbi CONTINUES TO PRETEND “Not all muslims (nazis) are muslims (nazis!):”

“I say it again loudly, slowly and clearly – we are at war, here in America as well, with radical Islamists.

We have been attacked repeatedly and yet we continue to turn away.  We euphemize the enemy.  Disguising his identity and his intent.”

Speak for your self, pal!


It’s sadly laughable how he twists the facts and reverses the truth:

“we dare not make the mistake that all is well and that Islamic terrorists are simply violent criminals.”

NO! All is well enough, at the moment, that if we were to finally announce that islamic terrorists ARE indeed really ALL only violent criminal extortionists, blaming a sick version of a “god” for their criminal desires, the global threat of islam would be over within a year, at most!

He continues:

“For us, WWII lasted 4 years.  It has been 13 years since 9/11.  35 years since the invasion of our Iranian embassy and like it or not, we are still at war with radical Islam.  Declaring we are not at war with radical Islam does not make it so.”

Actually, IT IS SO!


I simply think it’s obvious that this Rabbi hasn’t bothered to read the Qur’an, yet – it’s the ony way I can see for him to have correctly observed all the resulting symptoms of islam (intolerant, offensive and violent jihads everywhere) and yet still be able to pretend to suppose to himself in public that islam itself must’ve somehow been “hijacked” or “misunderstood” by evil people.

But in fact, the Qur’an itself officially commands the muslims’ violent behaviour:






Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Europe, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, United Nations, United States, USA, War | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

ISIS soon to get nukes; Justin Trudeau says “Harper started it!”

Pakistani terror group swears allegiance to ISIS

Tehrik-i-Taliban threatens to overthrow Islamabad government, seize nukes

From here:

By F. Michael Maloof

WASHINGTON – The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan – the Taliban group that seeks the overthrow of the Pakistani government – has sworn allegiance to the Islamic State, or ISIS, and has directed jihadists across the region to help ISIS set up its caliphate.

ISIS declared its caliphate from territory seized last June from northeastern Syria to western and central Iraq, and threatens to take over all of the Levant that includes Jordan, the rest of Syria, Lebanon and Israel.

ISIS and its caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, already have received backing from Abdul Maulana Aziz, a follower of the Afghan Taliban supreme leader Mulla Mohammad Omar who led the infamous Red Mosque rebellion in Pakistan.

Aziz also is close to the Tehnik-i-Taliban Pakistan, or TTP, as WND recently revealed.

The TTP seeks to overthrow by violent means the Pakistani government, which possesses nuclear weapons.

Aziz’s support for Baghdadi and ISIS comes as Pakistan, a predominantly Sunni country, faces yet another political crisis that threatens the existence of its democratic secular government. Political opponents of Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif have demanded his resignation, which he has refused.

His opponents want sweeping constitutional reform to replace parliamentary democracy and to confront alleged corruption that has crept into the electoral process.

However, jihadist groups see an opportunity now to assert their influence as Pakistan’s political crisis grows worse.

Until now, the Afghan Taliban had been aligned with al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.

As further evidence of the TTP’s allegiance to ISIS, the jihadist group’s supporters have been seen in the Pakistani city of Peshawar distributing pamphlets praising ISIS.

In addition, ISIS flags have been seen in street rallies in Indian-administered Kashmir.

The TTP announced its support for ISIS in a message celebrating the Muslim holy festival of Eid al-Adha.

“Oh our brothers, we are proud of you in your victories,” the message said. “We are with you in your happiness and your sorrow.

“In these troubled days, we call for your patience and stability, especially now that all your enemies are united against you. Please put all your rivalries behind you. … All Muslims in the world have great expectations of you,” the message added. “We are with you, we will provide you with mujahideen (fighters) and with every possible support.”

The message was released following posting of a video on Friday of the beheading of ISIS’ latest victim, British aid worker Alan Henning.

Like ISIS, the TTP is funded by supporters in Gulf Arab countries to include Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

TTP’s swearing of allegiance to ISIS potentially extends the jihadist groups influence and potential for a caliphate from the Middle east into South Asia.

Although the TTP and the Afghan Taliban are separate entities with differing goals, they have been known to collaborate on occasion. The Afghan Taliban seeks to take over Afghanistan itself.

With the Afghan Taliban biding its time until U.S. forces completely leave Afghanistan by 2017, ISIS has the opportunity to extend its influence in that country as well.

The TTP’s support for ISIS is just the latest indication that a number of jihadist groups, previously affiliated with al-Qaida, are calling for a truce between the two groups to unite against the western “Crusader attacks.”

The call comes in the form of a proposal titled “An Initiative and Call for a Ceasefire Between Factions in Syria.”

“Due to the Crusader attacks on our Muslim brothers in Syria and Iraq,” the proposal called on all jihadist groups to put aside their disagreements, many of which have resulted in fighting among the various factions.

“We call on all factions in Syria and Iraq to cease fighting among themselves no later than the evening of (Oct. 3, 2014), for perhaps Allah most high will descend his mercies upon Syria and its people in the prayer of Muslim crowds on that great day.

“And we request from all the factions that they announce their position regarding this initiative in their manner in three days from the date of the publication of this statement, so that it can be made known and clear who rejects this blessed initiative.”

The jihadist proposal pointed out that 40 countries had united “and gathered together to wage war against” Islam itself.

“So, does our loyalty to Islam and its people not require of us to stop the infighting under the bombardment of this Crusader campaign at the very least if a permanent end to it is not possible?” the proposal asked.

Since last year, ISIS has been in a pitched battle with al-Qaida-affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra, although there have been increasing indications that many fighters from al-Nusra are joining ISIS due to its declaration of a caliphate over territory it has captured and occupied. Al-Qaida similarly seeks a caliphate but hasn’t taken over territory as ISIS has.

F. Michael Maloof, senior staff writer for WND/ G2Bulletin, is a former security policy analyst in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. He can be contacted at mmaloof@wnd.com.



This afternoon, Mr. Harper introduced a motion calling on Parliament to support Canada’s going to war in Iraq.In response, I gave a speech making it clear that the Liberal Party of Canada cannot and will not support this Prime Minister’s motion.

Given the significance of this issue, I felt it was important for you to have a copy of my speech:

* * *

Remarks by Liberal Party of Canada Leader Justin Trudeau

3 October 2014

With this motion, the Prime Minister has finally said in Canada what he said in New York City more than a week ago. He is intent on taking Canada to war in Iraq.

ISIL is a threat both to the region and to global security.

ISIL murders ethnic and religious minorities across Iraq and Syria.

They murder innocent civilians, humanitarian workers, and journalists.

These awful acts have been fully documented – often by the perpetrators themselves.

This is why the Liberal Party supported a 30-day, non-combat role on good faith and on which we were briefed.

This time, instead of briefings, there has only been overheated rhetoric.

Liberals will take the following core principles into the debate next week.

One: That Canada does have a role to play to confront humanitarian crises and security threats in the world.

Two: That when a government considers deploying our men and women in uniform, there must be a clear mission overall and a clear role for Canada within that mission.

Three: That the case for deploying our Forces must be made openly and transparently, based on clear and reliable, dispassionately presented facts.

And four: That Canada’s role must reflect the broad scope of Canadian capabilities. And how best we can help.

Unlike the Prime Minister, Liberals believe Canada can make a more helpful contribution to the international effort to combat ISIL than aging war planes.

I think Canadians have a lot more to offer than that. We can be resourceful, and there are significant, substantial, non-combat roles that Canada can play.

i.e: “We have MORE to offer than that, so we WON’T EVEN OFFER that.”

And some we can play better than many – or perhaps any — of our allies.Whether they are strategic airlift, training, or medical support.

We have the capabilities to meaningfully assist – in a non-combat role – a well-defined international mission.

The fact remains: the Prime Minister has not been upfront with Canadians about his plans.

The Prime Minister and the government have given us no reason to believe that once in combat they will be able to limit our role.

How and why not, Justin? Why can’t we just leave again, once there?
Please, DO at least TRY to explain your attempted slanders premises!

Their overheated and moralistic rhetoric is being used to justify more than just air strikes.It is an attempt to justify a war.

So, just by noticing ISIS has started an evil war, Harper is justifying it?!

For Canadians it’s all too familiar, particularly from this Prime Minister.

The 2003 Iraq war was waged on false pretenses and flawed intelligence.

It was a mission that destabilized the region, sowed further conflict, cost our allies three trillion dollars, and cost thousands of people their lives.

The world is still dealing with the consequences of that mistake.

Yes, by Obama squandering those expensive gains by giving it all away.

Let us never forget how that mission was sold to the public.Back in 2003, this Prime Minister called President Bush’s Iraq war a matter of “freedom, democracy and civilization itself.”

We know the Iraq fiasco haunts the choices we have to make today. But we cannot make the wrong decision now because the wrong decision was made then.

And yet, we Canadians did NOT “make the wrong decision” back then!

Canada has asked a lot of our men and women in uniform over the last decade. And too often they have returned home only to be let down.

If we are to ask more of them now, our deliberations in this house should be honest and forthright to show ourselves worthy of the valour and strength we know our Forces always show in the field.

We owe it to them to show them their strength by NOT-sending them?!

We owe them that.We think there is a role for Canada to be involved in the fight against ISIL.

But there is a clear line between non-combat and combat.

Justin, a “non-combat role in a fight,” is NOT a role in that FIGHT.

It is much easier to cross that line than to cross back.

It always is easier to get into a war than to get out of one.

The Prime Minister has a sacred responsibility to be honest and truthful with people, especially about matters of life and death. At the end of every decision to enter combat is a brave Canadian in harm’s way. We owe them clarity. We owe them a plan.

Most of all, we owe them the truth.

The Prime Minister has offered none of those.

The simple truth that Stephen Harper offers us all in this case, is this:
“ISIS is an evil threat, so we should go forth and stop them!”
The Liberal Party of Canada cannot and will not support this Prime Minister’s motion to go to war in Iraq.
Turdeau, the war in Iraq caused by ISIS already exists there. To ignore it is pure cowardice, especially since, once they get the nukes, it’s coming HERE, too.
Bottom line: the liberal’s Trudeau and the NDP’s Mulcair both want Canada to supply only “humanitarian aid” to the victims of ISIS; in other words, give them enough food and medicine to remain alive until ISIS can finally manage to behead them and their children!
Here’s a perfect – and quite recent! – example of Justin Trudeau’s “Deep Thoughts” processes:
Posted in Canada, Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, War | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

… they’re maybe islam-ist, or islam-ish, but defintitely NOT islam or muslims!

Not IslamSqueamish enemedia inaction … these stockholm syndrome drones capitulate daily, willfully blinding them selves and attempting to cover for, and so enable, the ongoing atrocities of the global crime gang called “islam!”

Posted in America, Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, Treason, War | Leave a comment


When the news first broke, most if not all Americans were sympathetic to “reporter” James Foley, and gave him the doubt benefit:




But it turns out that recently-beheaded “reporter” James Foley was a typical MSM liberal cowardly masochist and delusive criminally negligent muslim-loving racist who hated the West after all:


We have to remember: ALL the MSM presstitutes ARE our enemies. The friend of my enemy is my enemy; when they choose to ignore and cover up the islamic crime-gang, they are criminally negligent traitors, whose lies (fraud is a crime) deliberately endanger us all for their own gain.




Presstitutes have no souls. Because today’s “journalists” are all corporate drones, who get given their stories by their editors and publishers, on a day-by-day basis; there is no individual initiative room for any of them to follow up on any stories!

They are all empty vessels, nothing more than actors given their lines by their owners.

They have no opportunity nor desire to learn any basic principles beyond keeping their jobs and padding their pensions, no loyalty to the country or citizens at all!

The MSM are all traitorous self-serving cowards. The reason they used to shoot cowards in wartime (unlike today, where they promote them) was because, being masochists, most cowards are also traitors. Masochists cause their own imagined worst-case scenarios all the time, in order to maintain an illusion of “control” over them.

So, while a very FEW sites, like this one, PersonalLiberty, WND, ConservativeBytes, and a FEW others, do somehow manage to exist on the Internet, ALL the “official” ones, including Fox (which has major Saudi stockholders) which have global television presences, are traitors.

Idolatrous Americans were aghast at his (presumably coerced) pre-execution, openly anti-Western denunciations, but, as it turns out, even if he hadn’t been kidnapped and threatened, he’d probably have made those exact same, anti-American and Western-civilization-hating comments of his own free will anyway.

Many people still support these liars, these presstitutes, who try to sell our children their lies, their false “narratives” that “islam is a Great Religion Of Peace!” all the time, while excusing, covering up and ignoring all the muslim’s many rape murder arson kidnapping ransoming slavery crimes!

They even made up excuses for Foley’s “homegrown” murderer.

“But he enjoyed the full range of “Western” (rap) “culture!” He ate fish and chips, and went to soccer games!


Foley killed by a “moderate” British muslim rapper:


There are no moderate muslims, simply because there is no moderate islam. There is only one Qur’an, one islam.

The only way anyone having the misfortune to be born into the crime-cult has, to be seen in a positive light, is to risk being murdered by the others (as the others are commanded to do to them, in Sura 4:89) and LEAVE ISLAM. Period.

After all, without “nazis,” there would have been no ‘national socialism,’ and without “muslims,” there will be no ‘islam!’

One cannot be against completely criminal islam, and still pretend to like individual “muslims,” any more than one could be against national socialism, and still pretend to have “good nazi” friends!


James Foley wasn’t innocently mistaken – he was a prejudiced racist bigot who got his just deserts!

Posted in America, Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, progressive, progressives, propaganda, religion, Treason, Uncategorized, United States, USA, War | 2 Comments

DIVERSE AND CONQUER! Leftardation Explained!


Liberals love to pretend that life is just too “complex” for any of us fallible, helpless and so potentially dangerous victims to ever be able to understand cause and effect, so to them cause and effect don’t really exist, because, when all facts can be spun as opinions, it gives them the false relativistic right to pretend their entirely fact-free, subjective opinions are the “diversely opposite equals” to conservatives’ objective facts; it gives them the false ‘right’ to remain irresponsibly wrong.

In fact, lefties always sound retarded (hence, the accuracy of such terms as “leftardation,” “libtarded,” etc.) BECAUSE all they’re ever really doing is trying to think up alibi-EXCUSES FOR THEFT, so of course their language has to employ all the critical thinking logical fallacy evasions, distractions, deflections, euphemisms, and metaphors (i.e: lies) in order to sell it to sane people, (and all crimes are forms of theft); i.e: “Wealth Redistribution” and that of course requires lies, like I just said, most often in the form of evasive metaphors and euphemisms (like for the best instance example, the term “Wealth Redistribution” itself)!

Libs aren’t stupid, they’re evil slanderous victim-blaming masochists, always trying to cause their own imagined worst-case scenarios before anyone else can, so they can pretend to have “control” over them!

If they were just plain stupid, they’d have to get some things right every now and then, just by random chance – but they don’t, because they have to know what’s right, in order to so perfectly oppose it all the time!

Since evil leftist masochists are always hell-bent on becoming victims of worst-case scenarios, they “project” onto and slander-blame their victims, because their first emotion is fear of getting caught for their crimes.

So subjective double-standards are what they’re all about! Deliberately! For them, No objective Truth allowed!

Most of their sub-sequent forced predeterminism and group-rights idolatry is also only an excuse to “defensively” either do nothing, or to enjoy a perpetual excuse attack others first, even if only by having the false right to delinquently force their own self-reliant responsibilities onto groups of “privileged/guilty” (innocent) others.

And of course they’ll always try to co-opt the largest gang, the government, into helping them with their wealth dedistribution theft schemes.

As Thomas Jefferson noted:

“It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself. Subject opinion to coercion: whom will you make your inquisitors?”

And yet deliberate “error” (i.e: wilfully intended, criminal negligence) isn’t really ‘error’ at all, is it?

The motto of leftists everywhere must be: “There’s No Money In Solutions!”
(So: Please Give Generously – AGAIN!)

They will always refuse to solve temporary problems with easy, simple and permanent solutions, in favor of not-solving them, spinning and pretending they are “eternal crises” with only temorary, band-aid “management therapies” available, in order to exploit the almost infinite number of symptoms unsolved problems generate.

Leftist idolaters love giving their imaginative alibi-excuses to criminals, don’t they? There’s never any personal responsibility: it’s always the case to them that criminals are really just victims, too, of some idealized, cause-and-effect-free predetermined force: they are victims of society, products of their environments, and slaves of allah!

Diluting self-reliant responsibility into group-might-made rights extortion works best for them, not only defensively, i.e:

“I didn’t do it! ONLY The GROUP did it!”


(Substitute the words “SYSTEM,” or “PROCEDURES” for “group”)!

But also offensively: Group rights (for them, but only group responsibilities for their opponents) give them the false right to attack someone who slightly resembles others who may have oppressed people sort of like them, at some other time and place – because if you look like the people who may have oppressed people who look like them, YOU OWE THEM!

To others, such generalized slanders would be called “stereotyping,” but to them it’s “reverse discrimination!” Their motto is “Diverse and Conquer!”

Liberal ‘psychology’ is very simple: commit any and all crimes, because the ends (enriching them selves) justify the means (screwing over others first, before and “because” those others will inevitably try to screw them over too, anyway)!

Like all criminals, they want to have false rights (like, to our stuff) without any responsibilities (like, for having to earn or otherwise pay for it)!

Because you bothered to earn stuff they didn’t, they feel perfectly entitled to extort you by asserting you OWE them!

It actually starts with masochism – they feel compelled to inflict the worst-case scenario them selves, because then they can pretend to themselves that they had control over it. Criminals turn mere negligence (accidents, mistakes) into criminal negligence all the time, by adding their own backwards false pride confession of intent to it: “Screw you, I MEANT to do that!”

That’s what “progressives” always do – they rush in first before some other fools can beat them to it!

There is no crime or perversion a liberal won’t instantly Submit to or immediately compromise with, all the while claiming they are doing so by just being “practical” about it. They call it ‘Realpolitik.’

And cowardice loves company, too… which is why their band-aid therapeutic “solution” to every “eternal crisis” is always to form a bigger gang! It explains “Globalism,” too.

To them, if something CAN go wrong, then so it WILL go wrong, SO they must make sure to cause it so they can control the amount of resulting wrongness, since preventing it completely is “impossible.” This immorality of despair is what they call ‘ethics.’

ALL libertine “liberals” are CRIMINALS too. After all, their entire pre-emptively defensive idolatrous alibi-excuse creed pretends there are no evil crimes nor evil criminals, because we’re all just helpless victims of predetermined force (products of our environments, victims of society, slaves of allah)! Whee! The Devil’s greatest trick is to pretend he doesn’t exist – after all, he’s really only ever a helpless victim, too!

Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Europe, Globalization, gun control, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Treason, Uncategorized, United Nations, United States, USA, War | Leave a comment


So, what are all those Wascally Wetards in the American congress up to now?

The federal government has hatched a plan to take over the Internet! 

Using the broad powers of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC),Washington is planning to put unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats in control of the Internet–which will mean higher prices, less competition, and increased government regulations. 

To help me stop them from achieving their goal:

Please sign American Commitment’s new petition to the FCC right away, to make sure they stop this unprecedented takeover of the Internet – before it destroys online free enterprise for good.

Plus, if you sign today, we’ll also send duplicate copies to your U.S. Representative and your Senators – just so they know that their constituents are listening, and ready to fight for Internet freedom.

Right now, the federal government has launched a campaign to turn the Internet into a “public utility” just like the local water and power companies you use today. 

“Public Utility” means no competition. There are no other companies to turn to. They are in charge and if you don’t pay, be prepared to sit alone, thirsty in the dark. 

Just imagine what this would mean to your Internet service. 

Government bureaucrats could tie the Internet up in red tape, censor content, decide who can use the Internet, how to use it and when and more. If they succeed, it will:

  • End competition between Internet companies to win customers and set pricing.
  • Destroy the engine of innovation that has made the Internet what it is today.
  • Drive out the very risk-taking entrepreneurs that have invested billions to get us this far. And,
  • Erase your Internet freedoms, upend your right to privacy, censor the content you view on Internet, seize control of e-commerce, keep records of the sites you visit and when, track what you read and for how long and so much more!

Say no to Internet control - sign our petition
That’s not all. 

If the FCC forces your Internet provider to transform itself into a “public utility” get ready for these additional nightmares.

  • Public sector unions going on strike for higher wages, fat benefit packages, platinum health care plans and “Golden Parachute” retirement packages – all at your expense.
  • “Public Interest Regulation” forcing your favorite websites to give “equal time” to liberal views you find offensive. And;
  • “Nickel and Dime” charges that all monopolies use including fees for service repair, “cost recovery,” pay-by-phone penalties and more.

If you think these kinds of costs and abuses are unlikely, please take a good look at your latest phone bill. (Or think back to your phone bill in the bad old monopoly days.) 

Did you read the “Terms and Conditions” on your bill? What about your phone company’s “Privacy Policy”? 

And what about all those confusing taxes, fees and other charges that you must pay each month – fees and taxes you don’t understand but better payto keep your phone connected? 

Now imagine these terms, privacy policies, fees and taxes on your Internet bill – taxes the government will force you to pay once they are running the show. 

All this is coming and more if we fail to cut the legs out from under the government’s seemingly harmless plan to “reclassify” the Internet as a “Public Utility.” 

This is why I urge in the strongest terms to sign American Commitment’s petition to the FCC today. This is the only way to STOP this unbelievable FCC power grab to gain dictatorial control of the Internet.

With your signature, you will be joining American Commitment’s pro-freedom army of liberty activists to shed light on this un-American scheme and stop the government’s effort to take over the Internet dead in its tracks.

Our battle cry in this struggle – our motto – is to “Stop Internet Regulation.”And I need you on our team, if we’re going to keep the Internet free. 

Thank you for signing our American Commitment petition to the FCCimmediately after you finish reading this message because we cannot win this historic battle against our government any other way. 

United in Freedom, 

Phil Kerpen, President
American Commitment 

Say no to Internet control - sign our petition

American Commitment
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW #190-406 | Washington, D.C. 20004
Office: (202) 656-2193
Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Europe, Globalization, human rights, Legal, media, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Technology, Treason, United Nations, United States, USA, War | Leave a comment


…and here’s how and why:

Montesquieu was wrong.

There is no system of checks & balances, division of powers etc – as even Aristotle noted long ago, the legislative branch only looks to the future, the forensic judiciary only looks to the past, while only the executive is free to rampage at will in the present; none of them pays even the slightest attention to any of the others!

And, as for government being the people’s servant, that will always backfire, too, when the people themselves become tyrants, through the democractic process:

“A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy…”

Alexander Fraser Tytler, Scottish lawyer and writer, 1770


H.L. Mencken (1880 – 1956) was a journalist, satirist, critic, and Democrat. He wrote this editorial while working for the Baltimore Evening Sun, which appeared in the July 26, 1920 edition.

“As democracy is perfected, the office of the President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last and the White House will be occupied by a downright fool and complete narcissistic moron.”

- H.L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920

So, while the Second Amendment exist to defend citizens from tyrannical governments, when government tyranny is what people eventually vote for in a democracy, they (a majority of tyrannical self-entitled leftist citizens) are the government, so they will assiduously work hard at disarming themselves.


PHILOSOPHICALLY, it’s the difference between the real, objective Golden Rule of Law (what Mark Levin calls “negative rights”) most simply defined as Do Not Attack First, and as was first phrased by Confucius in the negative as “Do NOT Do Unto Others, That Which You Would NOT Have Them Do Unto You,” where one can do nothing either TO nor FOR others, without getting their express permission first – and the false, “positivist” one, (aka “Do Unto Others”) and which I have termed the Brazen Rule of criminal Chaos, which gives criminals the subjectivist “out” for instance, all criminal masochists could claim “I love punching my self in the head, so, since you have also agreed to the positivist golden rule, you won’t mind me exercising my ‘freedom’ to punch YOU in the head, too! Whee!” i.e: They can do whatever they want TO you, as long as they also claim to be doing it FOR you (for your own good)!

Similarly, criminals (like, say, Muhammad) can assert:

“I’d LOVE to be ruled with an iron fist by ME, even if I wasn’t ME! Whee!”



George Washington was completely against political parties.

It’s the idolatrous political “party” system itself which permits our otherwise public SERVANTS to indulge them selves in interest-conflicted divided loyalties, and so to metaphorically slip from the tethers of oversite we should be keeping them on.

Unless we eliminate political parties, the salesmen in government will destroy the country.

Politicians don’t represent the people – they only represent their parties. And their parties only represent those who pay them – who happen to be the exact same people for each party.

So ALL politicians are only treasonous sales-puppets, foisted on us by their corporazi sales-masters. Their real job is to sell us all out by selling off our country to the highest bidders – usually by buying our enemies’ money to fund their own pet projects. The faster the turnover (more sales per minute) the more quick profits, even at low-low fire-sales prices. It’s a race to the bottom.

So, let’s just FIX DEMOCRACY! And here’s how: If we just hold 2 quick, back-to-back elections each time (the first, as usual, to hire the worker’s pool of our Public SERVANTS from our districts, and the second where WE ALL appoint them DIRECTLY to their cabinet portfolio positions) then we eliminate their self-interested conflicts of loyalty-dividing political “parties,” (which always only “party” at our direct expense, anyway,) forever!


These days, most if not ALL elected politicians are statists who always want to grow government to reward followers, who are more concerned with the ‘rights’ of their own groups (parties) than with any of their constituents, because if the other members of their party cause it to fall, they fall too.

Similarly, they will therefore also protect their own political CLASS – members of BOTH parties – lest they all fall as one, too.

The reason corporazi globalist traitors can puppetize the politicians is because the divisive interest-conflicted political party gangs exist at all. If there were NO funds allowed, no campaigning, but only platforms posted on free websites, and where the people could DIRECTLY appoint the elected politicians to their cabinet positions, the power of corporate money to influence elections would be reduced to near-zero.

Each politician would then be beholden ONLY to the people who elected them, not to group-rights loyalty conflicts.

And, what sane people call “The Slippery Slope,” liberals (criminals) call “Progress!”

Bad (“positivist,” “defensively pre-emptive”) laws are crimes because they attack first, by slandering individual citizens as criminals, and so also insisting that they have no inherent right to self-defense.

Unfortunately, there’s only so many symptoms of The Golden Rule of Law (which simply defines all situational morality as “Do Not Attack First!”) one can address with lesser, circumstantial “laws” of morality, only so many right answers, before one must veer off into exploiting the almost infinite number of sorta almost right,(but really wrong) answers, in order to keep up the pretense that the legislators are actually doing something responsible to earn their pay and to continue to enjoy the right to govern others – a point which, after whence reached, societies decline into criminality and empires fall into ruin.


Here’s a few examples to illustrate this point:

If a Republican doesn’t like guns, he doesn’t buy one.

If a Democrat doesn’t like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a Republican is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat meat.

If a Democrat is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a Republican is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.

A Democrat wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a Republican doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels..

Democrats demand that those they don’t like be shut down.

If a Republican is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church.

A Democrat non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.

If a Republican decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job ..that provides it.

A Democrat demands that the rest of us pay for his.

That’s how you create a Republican: Give him a job.

And here’s how you create a Democrat: by giving him welfare.

Here’s another obvious difference between the left and right: remember the old adage about “Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day, but teach him how to fish, and you’ve fed him for a lifetime!”?

Rightists are all for individual self-reliant responsibility, and so want to teach people how to fish (fend) for them selves, while leftists want their victims to become dependent on them, as slaves are to a master; i.e:

“Vote for us again, or you won’t get tomorrow’s fish – CAPISCE!?”

‘Liberalism’ is extortion, bribery, and blackmail all in one! Whee!



Posted in America, Education, Legal, Policy, politics, progressive, propaganda, Regulation, Treason, Uncategorized, United States, USA | Leave a comment