What is the TPP?

In one word? It’s TREASON.

See, even if it wasn’t full of secret globalist corporate control stuff, (which will open up the country to globalist corporazi bankster control, which means unlimited muslim invaders) it’s still insane because it wants to open up full trade with China.

China is a giant corporation (Sinocorp) which by definition means their taxpayers subsidize EVERYTHING there by default.

And since our corporations already all outsource their manufacturing to China, what good will it do?

Are we supposed to believe we can buy all the components for what we make from them wholesale right now, but it’ll be even better when we try to sell them back to them at marked-up retail prices?!

Who (OK: Obama, Stephen Harper and Jistin Turdeau) is stupid enough to even pretend to believe that nonsense?!

Here’s what will really happen: As usual, China lets us set up factories there to produce our widgets for cheap. As usual, at the same time, they copy our products and make them themselves for even cheaper.

But now, with this idiot “Great Trade Deal!” in place, our stuff will have to compete directly with theirs!

And worse (see Sinocorp subsidies, above) they can make all their shipping costs to North America disappear, in order to undercut EVERY industry we still have left here.

It’s just as bad as our farmers thinking they can sell their products there or in India, after adding on all the shipping costs – it will simply never happen.

All the TPP will do, is open us up to losing our industries!

We will be undercut at every turn.

No manufacturing or jobs here = no taxes here = no government here = no country here!


Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Globalization, Legal, media, Military, Policy, politics, Privacy, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, Technology, Treason, United States, USA, War | Tagged , | Leave a comment


This isn’t made up. These free-form liberal slanders have to be stopped.

From The Ottawa Citizen, Wednesday, September 30, 2015, P.# C6, and from here:

Racism abounds in election campaign





Funny how despite the article’s title, there wasn’t a shred of proof or any facts sourced or cited to make even the most feeble attempt to prove the current election has any kinf of a ‘racist’ component whatsoever.

In stead, I guess, we’re all just supposed to feel guilty for actions taken by those in charge in time of War – World War II, to be precise. I’m pretty sure those people are all dead now.


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Liberal LIES about Migrants Escalate

This is what passes for “rational” in the leftarded spewspaper I am forced to read here in Ottawa every day when I wake up:

From HERE:

“Canadians feel too much for Syrian refugees.” Several Canadian commentators issued this warning last week. Compassion is understandable, they say. Sweet, even. But emotions don’t make good policy.

So yes, let’s be rational about the Syrian refugee crisis. Let’s assess the most common logic of keeping people out.

The crisis is potentially limitless, bringing hundreds of thousands — millions! — to Canada.

Turkey hosts more Syrian refugees than any country, yet they don’t quite number two million. In all 28 EU countries, only 138,000 Syrian asylum claims were made in 2014. Migration ad infinitum to Canada seems less likely. The NDP wants Canada to resettle 46,000 Syrians over four years; the Liberals, to accept 25,000 now. Maybe emotions are obstructing the part of my brain reserved for simple math, but the last I checked, neither 46,000 nor 25,000 equals a few million or a few hundred thousand. Nor would they likely represent even one per cent of Syrian refugees.

Resettling Syrian refugees in Canada won’t solve everything.

True. We should urge Western allies to donate more. We should donate more. We should rescue Syrian people however we can. But aid and protection don’t preclude resettlement. Or does logic dictate that if a country does one thing in response to a global catastrophe, then it can’t do a complementary thing?

Canada can’t help everyone.

True again. We can help more, though.

Islam will take Canada over through immigration.

False. And paranoid. But we’re not talking about feelings, so I’ll leave it.

People from the Middle East hate the West.

Oh, now we talk about feelings. Then let’s talk about the love that a welcoming haven inspires. It’s not for her sparkling personality that Syrian refugees swear devotion to Angela Merkel. If some Syrians have “great grievances against the West,” as one commentator put it, the West can offer no better rebuttal than rescued Syrian lives.

Most are 20-something men

Most are women and children.

Yeah sure Shannon, “most are women and children!” This proves your lies to be lies:


But many Syrian men plan to send back for wives and children. They decide — rationally — to spare their families dangerous journeys. Rather than fear men who risk their lives for others, it’s more appropriate — more rational — to show them respect.

Canada previously resettled sophisticated people, unlike Syrians.

Let’s pretend “cultural advancement” is an objectively discernible quality. Let’s further imagine that a refugee’s legal asylum rights depend on her exposure to Caillebotte, the Mariinsky Ballet, and the Brandenburg Concertos. Even then, one would have to be truly delusional and, moreover, culturally unsophisticated, to believe that Syria — football-playing, poetry-reciting, architecture-loving Syria — wasn’t culturally sophisticated.

OR we could all pretend cultural indoctrinations of “THOU SHALT KILL!” get exactly the same socio-economic results as “THOU SHALT NOT KILL!” Because “all cultures are the same” – right, Shannon?

Some Syrians just exploit the crisis for their own economic gain.

The condition of being poor doesn’t nullify the condition of being physically endangered: the one usually exacerbates the other. Poor Syrian refugees are still refugees.

They’re not poor if they can afford the $40,000 price-tag demanded of them by people-smuggling pirates. Well OK, maybe AFTER paying for the privilege, they became poor!

Some Syrians have medical degrees and iPhones.

If cell-phone ownership voids asylum, countries ought to turn away even the occasional North Korean. Hold on, though: Doesn’t the fact of Syrian peoples’ resources and skill-sets negate the argument that they’re culturally bankrupt economic migrants? Well, no matter. We musn’t let rationality get in the way of an argument.

Syrians might be terrorists.

Your neighbor might be a terrorist. If he is, he may be trying to get into Syria. Mostly victims get out, and Western countries try to resettle the most vulnerable.

Yes, if my neighbour is a liberal, then she’s definitely a terrorist like you, Shannon. And  I dearly wish you were trying to leave Canada to get into Syria. Why should Western countries try to resettle ANY of them, when the Saudis, Kuwaitis, Bahrainis, Qataris, Omanis, and Iranians refuse to?! Other than that, 


“Terrorism” is really only the simple crime of “extortion” writ large! Extortion is “threats!”

ALL Muslims are MURDERER-GANG MEMBERS. Their Quran COMMANDS murder. Therefore the only good Muslim, is a dead one. Unless he only commits “moderate” murder. Then give him “moderate” death.

ALL muslims are criminals, simply by being members of the world’s largest and most ancient yet ongoing crime-gang. Being a member of a crime-gang is a crime, even if the member hasn’t committed any specific crime beyond that of their general membership, because they represent the inherent public threat the crime-gang presents. It’s the LAW. Everything muslims pretend to believe is “holy” is already a crime!

Syrians are “country-shopping.”

If running for one’s life across continents is “shopping,” it’s the shopping trip from hell. Refugees can’t safely continue concentrating in countries like Lebanon, which the UNHCR calls a “tinder box.” Nor should refugees concentrate in poorest European entry points. Refugee flows have to be managed so host countries won’t be overwhelmed. Until then, refugees will manage themselves.

Sudden influxes of Syrians will inevitably be attacked.

Ah, yes: the “we’re excluding you to protect you” argument. A classic. Working women were warned that colleagues would harass them; gay military service-people warned that fellow officers would hurt them. But somehow, these warnings sound awfully like threats when the proposed remedy is to give attackers what they want instead of resolutely fending off their attacks.

OR they could be true, with sources cited, which you inevitably ignore:



Above all, those urging caution seem to believe that Canadians’ compassion came only from a picture. That picture certainly made support for resettlement boil over, but it’s been simmering throughout the long years that Syrian and international advocates argued that we have to let people in. There’s nothing rational about continuing to ignore them.









Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Of “Migrant Refugees” and Liberal Dead-Baby Porn


The dead-baby drowning off Turkey was completely staged and posed by muslims (of course) but also of course, the Western enemedia has chosen to completely ignore it!

Story told by father of drowned toddler Aylan Kurdi is full of holes

ByPAMELA GELLER on September 6, 2015
Abdullah Kurdi and sons

“Abdullah Kurdi’s story is made-up. But his lies are now being used and rewarded by the media in full blown propaganda, while pressuring policies to force Europe to take in more economic migrants who have never experienced a war zone. The dead toddler pornography is a dream-come true PR campaign serving ISIS and their overwhelming Muslim supporters.”

Yes. This fake story is being used to justify the Islamic “refugee” invasion of Europe. Here is a superb piece about the many inconsistencies in the father’s story:


“Family of drowned toddler Aylan Kurdi had been given FREE housing in Turkey, while father’s story is full of holes,” The Muslim Issue, September 4, 2015:

Abdullah Kurdi’s story is made-up. But his lies are now being used and rewarded by the media in full blown propaganda, while pressuring policies to force Europe to take in more economic migrants who have never experienced a war zone. The dead toddler pornography is a dream-come true PR campaign serving ISIS and their overwhelming Muslim supporters.

Abdullah was never on that boat to watch his wife and children drown. That’s why he was the only survivor. The first time he learned of their death was from the hospital after the photos of his young son was circulating in the media. Listen to all the contradictions and holes in his story.

This was an attempt to send his wife and children into Europe before his own arrival to apply for refugee status as a lone woman with children, while they never even lived in a war zone.

Unfold the #migrationfraud :

After leaving from what they say was a war zone (Syria is huge and the entire country is not a war zone) the Kurdi family was given FREE housing in Turkey and had been there for THREE years. Abdullah Kurdi was not in any war zone. He was safe, he had food, he had over $4,400 in cash, which is over 13,000 Turkish Lira – so why did he leave?

Frankly the whole story simply doesn’t add up.

This is what he told the press initially, as reported in the Guardian yesterday:

“I took over and started steering. The waves were so high and the boat flipped. I took my wife and my kids in my arms and I realised they were all dead,” he told AP.

Let’s look at all the details of his story.

The report according to Abdullah’s own words is that he lived in Turkey for three years and prior to that he had lived in Damascus. His sister makes the story even more confusing saying that Abdullah was a barber originally from Damascus, who fled from Kobani to Turkey but “dreamed of a future in Canada” for his family. Was he living in Damascus or Kobani? Kobani is over 500 kms from Damascus.

After “fleeing” from “war zone” Kobani he now wants to return to Kobani to attend — a funeral. Huh…? So he’s safe to fly back by plane to Kobani and attend a funeral. And guess what? ISIS was not even in Kobani when Kurdi claims his family “fled” from ISIS.

ISIS was not in Damascus either three years ago when Kurdi claims he lived there. ISIS entered only a small rural part of northern Damascus last year and targeted a remote refugee camp with “Palestinians” earlier in 2015 and were pushed out. ISIS is present in a quarter of the country in Northern Syria, not in the South.

While Western media reports that he was trying to reach Canada, Swedish media are being given reports by Kurdi that he was trying to reach Sweden and that he had been receiving FREE housing in Turkey for three years. Abdullah claims he was trying to reach Canada but was denied asylum – while Canadian authorities say they have never received any application from him at all. Which story does Abdullah want to stick to?

What we’re reading here is a story about relatives serving as people smugglers to other relatives living in Turkey. This is what happened with Kurdi. His own family in Canada are his people smugglers trying to come up with ways for him to illegally fraud the immigration system, and make up stories about threats that he never experienced.

The father, Abdullah Kurdi, is giving different stories depending on who he is talking to. His sister Fatima gave an account of a phone conversation with her brother Abdullah that is reported in the DailyMail. That story is different to the one Abdullah Kurdi gave to the press.

Listen to the bits here from DailyMail:

Reliving the moments after the dinghy capsized and the Mediterranean waves crashed around them, Abdullah Kurdi described how he’d pleaded with his sons to keep breathing, telling them he didn’t want them to die.

It was only when he looked down at their faces and saw blood in Aylan’s eyes that he realised the boys had died in his arms and he was forced to let them go.

Looking around in the water, he spotted the body of his wife Rehan ‘floating like a balloon’. She had also drowned.

…and the version his sister Fatima gives, the DailyMail, is here:

Yesterday his sister Tima – who is also known as Fatima – revealed how the grief-stricken father had relived the final moments of his boys’ lives in a phone conversation she’d had with him.

‘When a bigger wave came and flipped the boat upside down, Abdullah right away caught both his kids and tried so hard with all the power he had to keep them up from the water, screaming, ‘Breathe, breathe, I don’t want you to die!’,’ she said.

‘In his left arm was Galip and he saw he was dead and he told me, ‘I had to let him go’,’ she added. 

Then he looked at Aylan and could see blood from his eyes, so he closed them and said, ‘rest in peace my son,’ she went on to say.

She said that while he was still in the water, Abdullah saw his wife’s dead body floating in the water ‘like a balloon’, causing him to struggle to recognise her.

Sobbing uncontrollably Abdullah yesterday recalled his terror when the flimsy and overcrowded dinghy overturned, causing the night to be pierced by the screams of his fellow Syrian refugees as he clung on to his wife.

I was holding her, but my children slipped through my hands,’ he said.

‘We tried to cling to the boat, but it was deflating. It was dark and everyone was screaming. I could not hear the voices of my children and my wife.’

The wife was ‘a balloon’ in less than three hours ? The rate of decay to a dead body in water is not instant. Obviously Abdullah had no idea how dead people in water decay and he knew at some point they would bloat, so he described his wife in a condition of decay that takes days to mature. Here from The Forensic Library is a description:

Bloated (2-6 days)
This stage of decomposition includes the first visible signs of decay, namely the inflation of the abdomen due to a build-up of various gases produced by bacteria inside the cadaver. This bloating is particularly visible around the tongue and eyes as the build-up of gases cause them to protrude. The skin may exhibit a certain colour change, taking on a marbled appearance due to the transformation of haemoglobin in the blood into other pigments.

Although Abdullah claims to have seen the dead bodies of his two children and his wife after their boat was hit by two large waves, his story then changes and he claims that he made it safely to the beach. He now assumed that the wife, who had laid bloated and drowned, and the two small boys who he had seen drowned right in front of him and he knew were dead,  had managed somehow to make it alive to the beach. He could not find them on the beach so he assumed they had “become scared and ran away”. He now sees these dead people nowhere. But he only finds the “truth” about their death after going to the hospital where their bodies were kept.
Can someone explain to us how dead bodies run away? In other words, he only knew they were dead after the pictures of his son started showing up in the media reports. Here’s his own account reported in the DailyMail:

Over the following three hellish hours in the water, [in the short time his wife turned onto a ‘balloon’ – a sign of decomposing that only occurs 2-6 days later] Mr Kurdi battled for survival, while frantically searching for his sons and his wife, who had also been pulled from his reach. He found one child but it was too late – the boy had drowned.

‘My first son died from the high waves,’ he said. ‘I was obliged to leave him to save the other one. I tried to swim to the beach by following the lights.

‘I looked for my wife and child on the beach but couldn’t find them. I thought they had got scared and had run away and I went back to Bodrum.

‘When they did not come to our meeting point I went to the hospital and learned the bitter truth.’ (How can he learn the bitter truth when he claimed earlier that he saw them die and tried to save one of the sons, who had already drowned? He then attempted to save the second one who was dead with bloodied eyes, while finding his wife floating and bloated in the water. How can dead people like this run away?)

The barber had paid people smugglers £2,900 over the course of three attempts to reach Greece from a refugee camp in Turkey.

But he has told friends he wished he had also drowned to be spared a lifetime of self-recrimination over the family’s desperate gamble for a better life. 

Pictures of Aylan and Galip have been shared by social networkers around the world, prompting calls for politicians to do more for fleeing Syrians.

So you can hear that we have completely different stories coming from Abdullah that don’t even match.

He doesn’t even know what exactly happened. This man was never on that boat and never watched his wife and children drown. That is why he was the only survivor without any injuries and without any need for medical help, although he claims to have undergone a violent and desperate situation for over three hours where everyone else drowned. He is lying and making the story up. We’ve worked long enough with these humanitarian issues to recognize a tall tale. Basically, the fragmented and fabricated story indicates to us that the wife and children were sent to arrive before him as a lone mother and children (easier to get accepted). Of course, this advice would come from his own family already living in Canada and parts of Europe who know more about the dhimmitude of Europe, now serving as long-distance human smugglers. The wife has clearly been told to go first, get her refugee case handled, and then help to get him entry at a later date where he can join them with a forged passport after the wife is already settled.

It’s all fraud. All of this explains his dry crocodile tears. No wonder his sister Fatima was crying more than he brother who lost his entire family. She had guilt that their suggestions and strategies caused the death of a  woman who could not swim and was afraid, and the death of three small children. They’re intentionally frauding the system. And now they also push propaganda to open the floodgates to the rest of these fraudsters.

It is however, noteworthy to hear this comment coming from Abdullah Kurdi that he does not mind sacrificing his wife and children for his agenda, according to his sister Fatima in Canada:

‘Of course it makes me sad that it’s taken this [tragedy] to make people realise what is going on,’ she said, adding: ‘Abdullah said, its ok if it has to be my kids and my wife who wake up the world, its ok. If it’s been written to happen that way, it was supposed to happen.’

And the Turkish people smuggler Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan responded to the deaths in his country’s waters by saying: “European countries, which have turned the Mediterranean, the cradle of the world’s oldest civilizations, into a cemetery for refugees, shares the sin for every refugee who loses their life.”

– See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/09/story-told-by-father-of-drowned-toddler-aylan-kurdi-is-full-of-holes.html/#sthash.dylWiDlG.dpuf

Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel (L) gestures while chatting with US President  Barack Obama sitting on a bench outside the Elmau Castle after a working session of a G7 summit near Garmisch-Partenkirchen, southern Germany, on June 8, 2015. AFP PHOTO / POOL / MICHAEL KAPPELER        (Photo credit should read MICHAEL KAPPELER/AFP/Getty Images)

Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel (L) gestures while chatting with US President Barack Obama sitting on a bench outside the Elmau Castle after a working session of a G7 summit near Garmisch-Partenkirchen, southern Germany, on June 8, 2015. AFP PHOTO / POOL / MICHAEL KAPPELER (Photo credit should read MICHAEL KAPPELER/AFP/Getty Images)

Waves of fake Syrians line up on Hungarian border with their eyes on Germany

 September 07, 2015: Crowds gathered at Frankfurt’s Hauptbahnhof station to welcome the first train of Syrian refugees to Germany

Police in Serbia, which has a border with European Union member country Hungary, are dealing with up to 3000 migrants each day, many who are now falsely claiming to be Syrian citizens, the Sydney Morning Herald reports.

Refugees from war-torn countries are far more likely to granted asylum than economic migrants who are fleeing poverty.

Authorities in Serbia are routinely discovering identity documents from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Iraq discarded in the bushes.

Syrian citizens, who are fleeing their homeland, are disturbed about the development and how it might impact their own plight.

“Everyone says they are Syrian, even those who are obviously not,” said Kamal Saleh, who is camped up in a Belgrade park.

September 06, 2015: Thousands of refugees have arrived in Austria and Germany following a long and dangerous journey to escape the war in Syria.

“That is not good for us Syrians because of limited number of people who will get the asylum.”

Last week Germany changed its rules for asylum seekers – but only for Syrians.

Under EU law, the country where a migrant first arrives must process the asylum claim.

However, Germany has now removed this barrier for Syrians, and this has led to a surge of migrants desperate to travel across EU member countries to reach Germany at any cost.

“I’m leaving my old life behind,” said a man identified only as Rafik.

Rafik is from Pakistan, but he had destroyed his travel documentation, as he continues try and make his way to a new life in Germany.

September 05, 2015: Thousands of Syrian refugees have made it to Austria after the Hungarian government provided buses to take them to the border.

The European Union border agency Frontex is also reporting a spike in the trafficking of fake Syrian passports being sent to Germany.

German customs have said packages containing Syrian passports, both real and fake, destined for the blackmarket have been intercepted.

The well-trodden Balkan corridor for migrants starts in Turkey, and winds its way through Macedonia and Serbia.

Crossing the Hungarian border is the objective for new arrivals, as it opens up the EU.

Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/world/2015/09/07/14/05/waves-of-fake-syrians-line-up-on-hungarian-border-with-their-eyes-on-germany#s9XUz8oiasgy4GXD.99

Muslim countries refuse to take Syrian refugees, cite risk of terrorism

But woe to you if you cite the same concerns regarding Europe. If you do, you’re a racist, bigoted “Islamophobe.”

Refugees in Muslim countries

“Muslim Countries Refuse to Take A Single Syrian Refugee, Cite Risk of Exposure to Terrorism,” by Donna Rachel Edmunds, Breitbart, September 5, 2015:

Five of the wealthiest Muslim countries have taken no Syrian refugees in at all, arguing that doing so would open them up to the risk of terrorism. Although the oil rich countries have handed over aid money, Britain has donated more than Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar combined.

Between 10 and 12 million Syrians have been displaced by the bloody civil war raging in their country. Most still remain within Syria’s borders, but around four million have fled over the borders into neighbouring countries, mostly Turkey Jordan and Lebanon, and beyond.

Lebanon, which has 1.1 million Syrian refugees, shut her borders to the Syrians in June of last year. Jordan, host to another 630,000, followed suit in August last year, preventing more Syrians from abandoning their country.

By early August 2015, European states had received nearly 350,000 asylum applications from Syrians, nearly a third of whom applied to Germany for asylum. Another 65,000 have applied Sweden and 50,000 in Serbia. Hungary and Austria have received close to 19,000 applications each although that figure is likely to rise, while the UK is processing 7,030 applications, according to the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR)….

Yet amidst cries for Europe to do more, it has transpired that of the five wealthiest countries on the Arabian Peninsula, that is, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain, not one has taken in a single refugee from Syria. Instead, they have argued that accepting large numbers of Syrians is a threat to their safety, as terrorists could be hiding within an influx of people. Sherif Elsayid-Ali, Amnesty International’s Head of Refugee and Migrants’ Rights, has slammed their inaction as “shameful”.

He said: “The records of Gulf countries is absolutely appalling, in terms of actually showing compassion and sharing the responsibility of this crisis… It is a disgrace.” None of the Gulf States signed the 1951 Refugee Convention, which legally defines a refugee as “A person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality”. However, they have taken refugees in the past.

Twenty-five years ago, hundreds of thousands of Kuwaitis fleeing Saddam Hussein’s invasion were given refuge. According to Arabian expert Sultan Sooud al-Qassemi: “in Abu Dhabi, the government rented out entire apartment blocks and gave them to families for free.”…

Instead the countries, all of which are within the Top 50 list of wealthiest nations by GDP, have opted to donate aid to those affected by the crisis. According to the Daily Mail, the UAE has funded a refugee camp in Jordan giving shelter to tens of thousands of Syrians, while Saudi Arabia and Qatar have donated funds, food, shelter and clothing to Syrians in Lebanon, Turkey and Jordan.

Total donations from the Gulf States are believe to total £589 million, less than a quarter of America’s £2.8 billion, and a fraction of the £65 billion they spent on defence in 2012 alone. The UK has handed over £920 million so far, but the Prime Minister yesterday pledged to increase that figure to £1 billion. He also promised to take in thousands more refugees….

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Useful Anti-Islam Source Indexes


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

TROLLS EXPLAINED! TV Really Does Make Us Stupid!

As I was getting ready to post this article the other day, I chanced upon someone over at JihadWatch who was quoting an older article which was arguing the exact opposite, so I figured I’d use it as a foil against which to sharpen up my own thesis. Simply put, Charlton’s hypothesis is that there’s an inverse correlation between intelligence and wisdom – the more intelligent people become, the less wise or smart. Now, while of course having a greater intelligence could lead people to actually think more slowly than their less “intelligence-impaired” brethren (because they have more facts to sort through before arriving at their conclusions) it isn’t likely to impact those conclusions’ veracities, as their increased scope of awareness would also lead them to envision scenarios and causes effecting the likely outcomes, too.

Let’s define terms:

Intelligence is speed of thought and memory; while smarts (previously known as ‘wisdom’) is how one uses it.


Thus one can be slow and wise, like the old Indian shaman stereotype, or fast (intelligent) and dumb (unwise), where one is able to do dumb things faster and more accurately – like running one’s head straight into a brick wall at the precise point one had intended to do so.
Liberals are especially prone to the latter, in acting on ‘instinct’ (emotion) they are apt to assert “We must do what the violent criminals want, or else they’ll do what they want to us anyway!” These knee-jerk reactions give the false appearance of liberals ‘thinking’ faster than the more considerate conservatives, as if automatic Submission were an intelligent habit to cultivate, but it really only proves them to be the real ‘reactionaries!’

Liberals embody the reflexive binary, automatic masochistic fear-focused determination to turn fear into rage [as Fear IS Greed(y Hope)]:


“If it isn’t broken, and we don’t attack first and rush in to “fix” (break) it, then some other fools will surely beat us to it! Whee!”
The second they imagine an immoral, scary bad idea, they will submit to ‘ethically’ compromising with it.
This leads them to always accidentally “fail upwards,” as, in refusing to solve problems, the exponential symptoms of their perpetual crimes of negligence cause the creation of endless crises for them to then exploitively, lucratively manage, as “there’s no money in solutions!”
But the true fault and differences between the two approaches to the dynamics of life must obviously lie in the software, (training/education) not the hardware (genetic intelligence), as was erroneously proposed by Bruce G. Charlton. Charlton seems to think the stereotypical and habitual pedantry of supposed geniuses (harping on minutae, in stead of seeing the big picture) is caused by something genetic, in stead of a choice to avoid being seen as wrong.
But those habitual choices are all driven, these days, by the “info-tainment” sales industry and advertising:
It’s a monkey-see, monkey-do process, foisted on our kids by the corporate advertising salesmen who always advertise fear in order to sell us the greedy hope of relief from their own initial threats – all it really is, is the same, ages-old stick and carrot, fear and greed behavioural conditioning binary at work.
They “teach” (abuse) our children with the libertine’s divide and conquer notion that they can have pleasure without pain, hope without fear, and rights without responsibilities – in fact, they ‘teach’ them every alibi excuse under the sun to pretend to have a false right to remain irresponsibly wrong, while also avoiding their own responsibility to become right by offloading it onto their victims by slanderously blaming them first. It’s a criminal’s kleptocracy.
What sane people call “the slippery slope,” liberals call “progress!”
And it’s no more than EXTORTION – aka coercion, duress, intimidation, bullying, harrassment, activist agitation, and of course, “terrorism” – criminality, exactly like in islam.
Kids today are actually being trained to become vapidly inane, shallow and contentious trolls, by watching TV; I’ve just stated why this is, and here’s exactly how:
Actors are lying fakers, and are reading from scripted responses, so their TV and film characters’ (“heroes’”) patter is always immediate and enlightened; in order to fit into their given time-slot and to advance the “narrative,” (story,) so, even when they seem to consider an option, at most it’s portrayed as “Hm!” – an immediate, considered response. Even when a character is scripted as insane or mistake-prone, he or she is a foil for the others who are instantly able to accurately appraise and devise plans to correctly counter their errors.

Thus our children are being trained to believe they too must instantly present a response – ANY response – as quickly as possible, and also that any response at all is all that is required.

So if and when a feral millennial responds with “I know you are but what am I!?” it’s held as good enough among their peers; because, as AN answer was given, it qualifies as a valid response.

They have been taught (abused) to react, trying to fight “fire” (fear and pain) with more of the same, creating a “pre-emptively defensive,” static fact-proof and habitual mind-shield to pre-empt other peoples’ “inevitable” attacks.

Re: The actual conclusion an author over as PsychologyToday comes to, concerning these allegedly too-smart people is: “They think in situations where they are supposed to feel.”

Emotive liberals say “Bonds are formed between people based on empathy, not on laws!”

But “altruism” and “empathy” is really only masochism – the desire to cancel other people’s natural fear and greed, by making THEM feel safe and happy, respectively!


In this case, empathy is a temporary masochism, a hope of solving a problem – BUT it can become a bad habit, self-enslaving in order to feel morally superior, when it isn’t reciprocated.

If you try to cancel my fears by making me feel safe, and to cancel my greed by making me feel happy, BUT I don’t want to do the same for you, because I’m evil and my chosen way of feeling safe is to make you feel unsafe and defensive, off-balance, and my way of making me feel happy is to make you feel unhappy, then for you to keep trying to make me feel safe & happy would be a mistake on your part, because it would be only a choice to self-enslave your self to me, in order to feel morally superior: “If and when I CHOOSE to agree to let you assert that you’re better than me, then it’s all your fault, and, since it’s all your fault, then none of it’s my fault, so I’m still better than you! Whee!” This is “The Moral High Ground.”

Evil people do that, and cowardly masochists go along with it, because slaves need a master to blame for their own choices. After all, if “With great power comes great responsibility,” then it’s equally true that “With no power comes no responsibility! Whee!”

Good people try to neutralize your potential threat to them, by making you feel safe and happy. Evil people try to fight fire with more fire. It’s a shallow, knee-jerk reaction, and it doesn’t matter if their attacker is telling the truth; their reaction is victim-blaming slander, not depending on any facts.

That’s why these days, when presented with unfamiliar facts, TROLLS can be guaranteed to rudely LIE to refute them(in stead of, say, simply asserting “I find that hard to believe!” and/or asking one to “Prove it?!”) – they will say “NO IT ISN’T!” or “NO IT DOESN’T!” and then dig themselves in ever deeper to bolster their initial reaction with rationalizations by doubling down on their LIES.

(Presenting one’s entirely fact-free, subjective opinion AS an objective fact, is to lie).

And the justification is slander: that they have to lie, “because everyone else is lying to them, too!”

That’s the problem with what passes for online public social media “discourse” these days – it’s an endless war of conflicting opinions, presented as facts! In order to not “lose the argument” an instant response, however wrong, is required these days. “Gotcha” politics and one-upmanship are the TROLL’s hallmarks.

Nobody seems to have ever bothered to teach these feral trolls that lying is the most basic form of theft – it’s the (at least, attempted) theft of the Truth. Since all crimes are forms of theft, lying (“fraud”) is a crime, and all such criminally libertine “liberals” are really no more than puerile thieves.

Is it even possible to be “glib,” yet always right (‘wise’)? 
As it turns out, YES it is! With training.
The nitty-gritty today is, as was foretold in the distant past by such luminaries as Isaac Asimov, that:
Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.’”
In stead of teaching kids how to think for them selves, or even what to think, all the so-called “education system” seems to do these days is teach kids how to not think at all – how to avoid thinking entirely. It thus only indoctrinates them into remaining infantile delinquents, (worse than the juvenile kind) dependent on the nannystate for all direction in their lives. It only ‘teaches’ them (abuses them) to enjoy slavery, to pave their own roads to hell with good intentions, and to look forward to the trip.
They tempt children into believing their lies: that, “Since life is too complex for cause and effect to ever really be understood, all facts are really only opinions, so your fact-free subjective opinions are the diversely opposite equals to those silly conservatives’ objective facts! Whee!”
Abusing kids with these false notions of “entitlement,” (to rights without concomitant corollary responsibilities) is a crime.
It also short-circuits the basic learning process, where exposure to unfamiliar ideas only STARTS with denial, but then moves on to acceptance. Liberals insist kids have the false right to remain irresponsibly wrong, to not be “offended” by having their “feelings hurt” by initial exposure to the often-painful Truth.
Their proud motto of “And always remember, kids – there’s no wrong answers!” corrupts kids into stopping learning at the point of their initial “But I don’t want to learn it!” reactions, depriving them of both their responsibility and their rights to learn to become self-reliant and responsible adults.
Victimology is irrationality or ‘deranged thinking:’
Criminals (“muslims” and “liberals”) have to pretend to be deranged – to reverse cause-and-effect, or proclaim life is too complex for it to exist at all – in order to present themselves as victims BY blaming their own victims for their criminal desires and actions.
Proud criminal idolaters pretend rights and responsibilities are unrelated opposites.
Any sense is based on dynamic thought and precise specifics, NOT static preconceived alibi-excuse generalizations (idolatry/nonsense)!
It’s the difference between seeing things as static nouns(Good/Bad) or dynamic verbs (Gain/Risk).
And NO ONE in academia/higher-learning/University/College ever seems to understand this; in fact, their income depends on the exact, criminally negligent, fraudulent opposite, as in: “There’s No Money In Solutions!” – and of course “Remember, kids! There’s No Wrong Answers! Whee!”
Such Libtards always sound literally retarded simply because they’re always trying to convince the law-abiding, sane people that theft and extortion are good ideas!
Lying criminal idolaters like to pretend dynamic verbs are static nouns (and ‘verse-vicea’) – for instance, like the ongoing circumstantial and situational process of reasoning is pretended by them to be some sort of standalone entity, once ‘abstracted’ or removed from that same circumstantial, situational context – which they then call ‘Reason.’

As if ‘it’ could exist without any people actually ‘reasoning!’

And let’s not forget the criminals’ favourite idolatry: “Tolerance!” (towards everything?! Well, it certainly seems like that’s what they mean; after all, their “Judge Not – EVER!” interpretation of Christian doctrine means “Go Along” (with criminal lies) “To Get Along” (with all the other lying criminals, too)!

The common liberal trope stance today is that not having one’s feelings hurt, trumps risking being offended by the often-painful truth – as if all humans didn’t naturally first react in denial to all new ideas (see Elizabeth Kubler-Ross and others).
Since they do, it’s not the responsibility or right of any other human to short-circuit their natural learning process – of going from fear to hope – by retarding them or allowing them to retard them selves by indulging in their first instinctive response:
“But I don’t want to learn that!”
Unfortunately, this is exactly what the corrupt traitors in today’s so-called education system are abusing the children in their charge with, by dint of tempting kids with it:
“Remember, kids – there’s no wrong answers! Whee!”
Their next step is inevitably to assert it’s “unfair!” that other people learn to do things better than they can do them, and to then also insist those others be prevented from learning, too!
Liberal “educators” say it’s perfectly fine for students to hate learning new things, but then want to make ‘hate’ illegal too!
ALL “Academic” and “discipline” fields of education are nothing more or less than basic Idolatries:
Beyond the leftists’ group-rights, fear-avoiding idolatry and politics, what universities and colleges most abuse people with is in describing dynamic, human-driven processes, (habits) by the use of static nouns, as static, immutable objects. c.f: “Economics;” “Politics;” “Psychology;” etc – as if these things, like “Reason,” “Freedom,” etc actually existed as real things abstracted outside their only real circumstantial situational contexts of being nothing more than human actions and chosen activities.
i.e: “Freedom” TO – what? “Freedom” – FROM what?!
There is no such thing as the generalized, false concept of “Reason,” beyond some real live individual human people in different situational circumstances, doing some very specific reasonING.
In other words, they are idealized as static excuses, which “make” humans do things; as predetermining causes, not as the mere effects which they always, in fact, really are.
To “idealize” dynamic processes (into static ideals) by abstracting or removing them from their original situational circumstantial cause-and-effect contexts, is to lie (to commit intellectual & criminal fraud).
And psychology is binary – it’s a “hard science,” too, despite all the “soft science” evasions to date!
What have been described (or more accurately mis-labeled from an evolutionary hardware standpoint,) as the “primary” and “secondary” emotions, are simply the perceptual predictive levels of fear, greed, and hope. (Freud anthropomorphosized them as “Id, Ego, Superego.”)
The more intelligence (speed of thought and memory) an animal has, the ‘deeper’ the levels of it’s emotional perceptions CAN be, but they must be applied to the future, not short-circuited by fear.
Problem is, evil criminals begin with masochism, where they pretend to be able to “control” their natural logical fears, BY causing the very worst-case scenario pains they most fear!
You know that old saying, “We have nothing to fear, but fear itself!”?
It’s STUPID! And criminal, too!
The real Truth is:
“We have nothing to fear, but (the mistakes and problems which cause the) pain itself!”

In a related article, Charlton asked whether or not Christians were smarter or dumber than non-Christians.

Fearing fear AS pain, and then deciding to attack it BY ignoring it, in stead of listening to and learning from it, is the first lie all criminals tell themselves (AND their victims)! It’s the root cause of all blustering criminally negligent outrages and “sins!”

The ability to learn from mistakes, to solve problems, also leaves us able to (choose to) NOT learn from those same mistakes, and to refuse to solve problems (both of which choices define “Sin.”)
And “Sin” is a synonym for Crime, and “sinner” = criminal.”
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Liberal Enemedia Primer

From here:

An English primer (a glossary translating political rhetoric into plain English)

by Thomas Sowell

Appeared in National Review, Dec 31, 1985 v37 p17(1)

(h/t: Mars)

EVERY FIELD has its own special words and expressions which others find hard to understand. Politics is no exception. For those who have difficulty understanding the strange way words are used by politicians and the media, here is a glossary translating political rhetoric into plain English:

Crisis: Any situation you want to change.

Bilingual: Unable to speak English.

Equal opportunity: Preferential treatment.

Non-judgmental: Blaming society.

Compassion: The use of tax money to buy votes.

Insensitivty: Objection to the use of tax money to buy votes.

Simplistic: An argument you disagree with but can’t answer.

Rehabilitation: Magic words said before releasing criminals.

Demonstration: A riot by people you agree with

Mob violence: A riot by people you disagree with.

A matter of principle: A political controversy involving the convictions of liberals.

An emotional issue: A political controversy involving the convictions of conservatives.

Funding: Money from the government.

Commitment: More money from the government.

Docudrama: A work of fiction about famous people.

Autobiography: A work of fiction about yourself.

Federal budget: A work of fiction about government spending.

People’s Republic: A place where you do what you are told or get shot.

National liberation movements: Organizations trying to create People’s Republics.

Stereotypes: Behavior patterns you don’t want to think about.

Reaganomics: Media explanation of downturns in the economy.

Robust economy: Media explanation of upturns in the economy.

Constitutional interpretation: Judges reading their own political views into the Constitution.

Politicizing the courts: Criticizing judges for reading their own political views into the Constitution.

A proud people: Chauvinists you like.

Bigots: Chauvinists you don’t like.

Antiwar movement: Disarmament advocates who know the idea won’t fly under its own name.

Private greed: Making money selling people what they want.

Public service: Gaining power to make people do what you want them to.

Innovation: Something new.

New innovation: Something new by someone who doesn’t understand English.

Competency: Competence, as described by the incompetent.

Moderate Arabs: Mythical beings to whom State Department officials make sacrificial offerings.

Special-interest lobby: Politically organized conservatives.

Public-interest group: Politically organized liberals.

Accountability: Holding teachers, public officials, and private business responsible for their misdeeds.

Chilling effect: Holding journalists responsible for their misdeeds.


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers