Yay! Our New Sister-site now comes with DISQUS!

Not that we’re moving or anything (I’m going to cross-post as backup) but I’ve always felt the one drawback with WordPress was it not having an easy and open commenting system compatible with most other sites, i.e: it doesn’t encourage traffic by integrating DISQUS.

SO I’ve opened up a new blog site, HERE:

http://unclevladdi.blogspot.ca/

NJOI!

;-)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Liberalism” IS Crime

I don’t know how many times I have to repeat this, but at least all the practice is making the message more concise LOL!

Recently, Dr. Ben Carson, world-renowned neurosurgeon and American Conservative presidential nominee, was slandered as an “extremist hate-monger” by the perpetually hate-mongering leftist extremist gang called the “Southern Poverty Law Center.”

They eventually retracted their slander (sort of, by elaborating on it) and so it seems now that Dr. Carson had then graciously called for a more generalized civil discourse between what he still seems to see as two equally valid opposing sides, in future.

But pretending there is no objective truth, that all people are such helpless victims before the daunting complexities of life, such that there is no real cause-and-effect Truth, and so all objective facts are really only subjective opinions anyway, so that the liberals’ subjective opinions are somehow the diversely equal opposites of the Conservatives silly objective facts – is really ever only a “liberal” criminal stance, and so one Dr. Carson should reject.

From here:

Re: Carson said “It is important for us to once again advocate true tolerance. That means being respectful of those with whom we disagree and allowing people to live according to their values without harassment. It is nothing but projectionism when some groups label those who disagree with them as haters.”

BUT – What if those you disagree with, are hateful criminals? Does one owe people who pre-emptively decide to “hate” their victims, as their preposterous, backwards rationalization for victimizing them, (as the SPLC itself always does) “respect!”?

Crime is all about the objectification: victim-blaming “defensively pre-emptive” slander.

All criminals – communist liberals included – decide at some point to use jealousy to motivate their slander, that:

“You earned stuff I didn’t bother to, so YOU OWE ME!”

Sane, civilized people agree to obey the Golden Rule of Law, most simply put as:
“Do Not Attack First.” After all, choosing to attack first, self-defines one as the predatory, criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it!

So, our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (thereby innocent) others, first.

Between two or more people, this means neither one is allowed to do anything either TO, or FOR, the others, unless and until it’s specifically agreed to.

In other words, philosophically, All is forbidden, unless & until specifically agreed on.

The Law, then, is voluntary a social contract; albeit not-agreeing to it, does define one as a criminal, because to attempt to somehow reserve the false “right” to attack innocent people first, is an inherent form of psychological threat.

Rights only come by agreeing to their concomitant, corollary responsibilities; one cannot have the one without agreeing to the other, for, as even the falsely-sundered criminal and civil laws agree, one must pay for what one takes. When criminals choose to give up on their responsibilities to others to not attack them first, the law demands they lose their rights to not be counter-attacked second for it.

Which brings us to “LIBERALISM:”

Like ALL criminal endeavors, libertine “liberalism” holds that, in stead, All is permitted – that they are allowed to do whatever they want TO others, as long as they can pretend it’s FOR them – for their own good – unless and until it’s specifically forbidden.

The best way to achieve this is to pretend their victims are unable to ask for their help against “oppressors” so it’s then automatically presumed the “liberal” criminal is acting in defense of those same people, and the best way to achieve this state is by pretending that everyone is a helpless victim in need of an authority’s “protection.”

And the obvious corollary to this crime philosophy, (that “All is allowed unless and until specifically forbidden”) is that nobody has any right to self-defense against the criminals’ right to do whatever they want ‘FOR’ (to) you – i.e: no right to defend one’s self against their attacking you first, and so you also have no free-speech right to complain to others about it, in aid of defending yourself, either!

Which brings us to the liberal criminals’ “hate-crimes” (thought control) attempts:

“Hate” (perpetual anger) is only the most natural, human response to ongoing crimes, like islam) as well as being the first step in the basic thought process itself: the instinctive rejection of new and strange ideas, pending further consideration.

To pretend people have a right or responsibility for others’ offended hurt feelings is insane, and it again only results in giving the infantile delinquent criminals the false right to remain irresponsibly wrong. (See also the modern liberal “Education System,” which not only no longer teaches kids how to think, or even what to think, but only how not to think at all – how to remain entitled to being irresponsibly wrong).

All criminals want rights without responsibility – like, false “rights” to our stuff, without any concomitant corollary responsibility for having to earn or otherwise pay for it!

In trying to make “hate” into a crime, they only make it “illegal” to hate crime and the criminals who commit it!

Bottom line: EVERYTHING about libertine “liberalism” involves “crime-PREVENTION” – in pre-judging people guilty of committing crimes, BEFORE they have actually committed any!

And that “pre-emptively defensive” stance self-defines itself as victim-blaming pre-judicial SLANDER; in other words, CRIME ITSELF.

Other than that, they claim to be controlling and “protecting people from themselves.”

Which is to say, they put their judgment of others ahead of those others’ self-judgment.

What these arrogant elitist liberals call progress, sane people call “the slippery slope.”

Posted in Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, human rights, Legal, media, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, Treason, War | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

ISLAM IS AGAINST THE LAW

Criminal Obama Openly Defends Crime; Will Fight Media To Stop Anti-Jihad Articles
cartoon011515-600x500
We already have many valid laws on the books against extortion and being members of a crime-gang. When “Our Leaders” refuse to enforce these laws against muslims, simply because their criminal extortion gang uses “God told us to commit these crimes!” as their #1 alibi-excuse, “Our Leaders” show them selves to be delinquent criminal negligents who have abdicated their positions of authority, voiding their oaths of office to defend us from crime!
toon011215

It was recently reported that the Obama White House not only still refuses to admit islam is NOT “A Great Religion Of Peace,” but that he intends to go after journalists who report otherwise:

Re: “President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Jan. 12.”

So, the extortion attempts of all these “aggressive members of peaceful islam” must be extra-tolerated?!

TraitorJohnKerrySnogsAnImam

NO!!!

It should never be allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (muslims) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes!

No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, and nobody is doing even these muslims any favours, by indulging their historic lies that islam is a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) or a “race” (much less one of poor oppressed “People Of Colour”)!

Pretending there is NOT a Muslim problem but only a white racist problem accepting diversity, is criminally negligent TREASON.

Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

“I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

– Muhammad –

Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

Islam is a threat to everyone because it says it is.

According to their own Eastern histories, islam has an official 1,400 year history of “holy” lies, extortions, robberies, tortures, arsons, kindappings, slaveries, rapes and 270 million murders (that’s OVER A QUARTER-BILLION INNOCENTS SACRIFICED TO ALLAH, so far – it’s a larger death-tally than that of EVERYONE ELSE, both secular and religious, COMBINED, and with an historical average of less than 1% of the global population to have committed it with, too)!

Do the math: 270 million divided by 1,400 is almost 200,000 per year, or over 500 per day, or over 20 per hour or about one person every three minutes being murdered by Muslims ever since Islam was founded.

So, simply and precisely because of their “THOU SHALT KILL!” cultural indoctrination, MUSLIMS ARE STILL FROM BETWEEN FOUR AND SEVERAL HUNDRED TIMES MORE LIKELY TO ENGAGE IN MURDER (and all other crimes,) THAN EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD!

So, islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)!

Obviously, islam is ONLY an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”

(Capisce?)!

;-)

We should simply BAN ISLAM – because everything muslims pretend to consider “holy” is already a crime!

;-(

The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:

Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur’an:

1: non-muslims are bad, because they insult allah by dividing his nature;
2: muslims are good, because to them allah is the cause of everything;
3: Allah made them both like that;
4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims’ heads.
(Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him).”

It’s all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all specific grievance-driven.

(And chapter 47 isn’t by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to either chapter 8 or 9).

So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

At WORST, all REAL religions only say:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

…but ONLY islam says:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

At forced ‘Faith!’ ISN’T a “Faith!” at all – it’s only extortion, and extortion is always a CRIME.

Bottom line: If you decide to believe in “allah,” you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of “faith” in your crime-god will help us to do so!

Posted in America, Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, United States, USA, War | Tagged , | Leave a comment

LYING IN ISLAM

HERE’S PROOF THAT ALL MUSLIMS HAVE BEEN OFFICIALLY TRAINED SINCE BIRTH TO LIE TO EVERYONE, ALL THE TIME:

I now know almost everything about islam (unfortunately; although it’s members never cease to amaze and sicken me with creative new atrocities) simply because it has its core (the Qur’an, 2 sahih and 4 less-so ahadith, the Sirat, and the 4 Sunni and 1 Shia maddhab fiqhs of sharia) and that’s it.

They cannot add to it, nor “reform” any of it; islam cannot and will not ever change, in any way, because it’s the “perfect” word of allah, and the metaphoric so-called “gates of ijtihad” (interpretation) have been closed for centuries!

Surah Al-Ma’idah 5.3 informs Muslims that Allah has PERFECTED Islam. Can perfection be improved? Can perfection be reformed?? If genocidal conquest is perfect, how can it be eliminated as a sacrament of Islam???

All muslims are liars. Their creed informs them their god wants them to lie all the time, to everyone* – to their own families and friends (“to keep the peace”) and of course to their infidel enemies (“to keep the peace until you are in a position of strength and able to successfully attack them again”). Obviously, since islam is only an extortion racket CRIME syndicate, they have to lie to them selves, too, in order to pretend it’s a “religion” in any way; i.e:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”

(Capisce?)!

*(Narrated in al-Bukhari, 2546; Muslim, 2605)

It was narrated that Asma’ Bint Yazeed said: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: ‘It is not permissible to tell lies except in three (cases): when a man speaks to his wife in a way to please her; lying in war; and lying in order to reconcile between people.’”

Muslims are told by allah to LIE TO EVERYONE, ALL THE TIME: (and all “to keep the peace!”) to their own families and friends, and of course to their “infidel enemies.”

Similarly, one of Mohammed’s own daughters, Umm Kalthoum, testified that she had never heard the Apostle of Allah condone lying, except in these three situations:

1.) For reconciliation among people.
2.) In war.
3.) Amongst spouses, to keep peace in the family.

In other words, “allah wants you to lie to everyone, all the time!”

And, while they amputate the appropriate limbs for theft, not only do they not cut out their own tongues for lying, but they actively encourage it…yet lying is only the most basic form of theft – it’s the theft of the Truth. And theft IS crime.

So “allah” is only an immoral thief, just like his creator, Muhammad was.

PS: The ends don’t justify the means – they only ever really DEFINE the end results: If you lie, murder and steal to get your way, in the end, you’re NOT “a great success” – you’re still really only a lying, murdering THIEF!

“If that is beyond your means, fast for three days. That is the expiation for the oaths ye have sworn. But keep to your oaths (to each other, not to infidels). Thus doth Allah make clear to you His signs, that ye may be grateful.” Surah 5:89 (In other words, if you feel guilty about lying, just go on a diet for three days and allah will forgive you).

“Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness (vain) in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing.” Surah 2:225

“Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief, except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith – but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty.” Surah 16: 106

The noted Islamic commentator, Al-Tabari explained Surah 16:106 as a verse that had been revealed to Mohammed after he learned that Ammar Ibn Yasser was forced to deny his faith in Mohammed when kidnapped by the Banu Moghera tribe. Mohammed consoled Ammar by telling him, “If they turned, you turn.” (Meaning: if they again capture you, you are allowed to deny me again.)

3:28 [http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html], 3:118, 4:89, 4:139, 4:144, 5:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

3:28. Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

And why would muslims “fear a danger from unbelievers”?

Maybe because the muslims have been told they are so superior to all the non-muslims in the world, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy responsibility to their god to extort, enslave, and murder them all for their ‘crime’ of not being muslims? That might upset their victims, so of course they’re supposed to lie in order to be able to ‘defend’ their holy right to continue to commit their crimes against their victims!

Ibn Kathir quotes ahadith which are not included in Khan’s translation but are included in Aisha Bewley’s, in his explanation of 3:28.

… meaning, except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said,

“We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.”

Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, “The Taqiyah (holy deception and lying to infidels to promote the islamic criime-gang) is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” (i.e: forever and always).

Qur’an 9:3     “Allah and His Messenger dissolve obligations.”
Qur’an 66:2     “Allah has already sanctioned for you the dissolution of your vows.”

Islam elevates lies and deception to the level of a sacrament.

So, don’t ask a muslim about islam, because it’s inevitable that they will lie to you about it, as they lie to themselves about it.

Just read their stuff for your self, secure in the knowledge that it is immutable and will never change.

;-)

Posted in Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, War | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Arguing with Liberals

ArguingWithLiberals

“It’s like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it’s victorious.”

-ANONYMOUS-

Ever try arguing with a liberal? It’s pointless trying to use facts to educate people who have been taught that the truth doesn’t exist! They will always ignore your facts and counter them with emotive feelings and anecdotes.

EXCUSES, EXCUSES!

The state education leftist propaganda indoctrination system teaches abuses kids with the false notion that they’re entitled to unearned self-esteem, and to not be offended by having their feelings hurt by the often-painful truth. Cause and effect are ignored, because it’s always someone or some thing else’s fault: enforced predeterminism excuses are at the root of all their favorite victimology sales scenarios.

When “self-esteem” (like “respect!”) is demanded but not earned, the demanders are insisting they are entitled to have rights without the concomitant corollary responsibility for having to earn them – exactly like ALL criminals always assert!

Criminal Marxists insist: “You earned stuff I didn’t bother to, SO YOU OWE ME!

The criminal negligents in the ‘education system’ only indoctrinate children in how to be better criminals!

And criminality retards children, because it keeps them dependent on others.

The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens.”—Leo Tolstoy

Here’s an obvious difference between the left and right: remember the old adage about “Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day, but teach him how to fish, and you’ve fed him for a lifetime!“?

Right-thinking, civilized and law-abiding folk are all for promoting individual self-reliant responsibility, and so want to teach people how to fish (fend) for them selves, while leftist proglodytes really only want their victims to become dependent on them, as slaves are to a master; i.e:

Vote for us again, or you won’t get tomorrow’s fish – CAPISCE!?”

Liberalism is extortion, bribery, and blackmail all in one! Whee!

Criminals are infantile delinquents (worse than juvenile delinquents) because by imitating children and acting childishly, by posing as perpetually demanding infants, they can often play on their victims’ instincts to defend and educate children. Children are the only people in society who really are – at least temporarily – entitled to have rights without responsibilities. Criminals like to bask in the false perpetual extension of their pretended childhoods, routinely and slanderously accusing their victims of being “unfair!” to them.

In short, criminals only ‘teach’ victimology and how to be better extortionists, to children.

So, to liberals, there really are no evil crimes nor evil criminals, because everyone’s really only a helpless victim – of “society,” “products of their environments” (what’d Karl Marx himself call it – ‘Historical Predeterminism’ or something?) and/or “Slaves of Allah!”

And besides, to them, life’s too complex for anyone to ever really understand cause and effect, so, “since” all facts are therefore really only opinions anyway, any given liberals’ entirely fact-free opinion is the diversely opposite equal of any of those silly conservatives’ objective facts!

And THAT’S why everyone is equally entitled to unearned self-esteem! Whee!

(And remember, kids: “There’s No Wrong Answers”)!

Ever try arguing with a liberal? It’s pointless trying to use facts to educate people who have been taught that the truth doesn’t exist!

They’ve really only declared a confession of non-compus-mentis!

And their favorite deflection is the childish critical thinking logical fallacy called the Argumentum Tu Quoque, which only amounts to trying to compare two unrelated wrongs in order to pretend to make one of them into a right. “Two Wrongs Make a Right”:

There’s no evil crime nor evil criminals because we (i.e: you) all do it, too! Whee!”

Beyond that, their crime is all about the objectification: victim-blaming “defensively pre-emptive” slander.

They embrace the slanderous victim-blaming attack-first criminal “philosophy” that the best “defense” is a good offense, to keep their opponents on the defensive so they will remain emotionally off-balance and so never be able to (counter-)attack ‘first!’

Only lying thieves (fraud being the most basic form of criminal theft, the theft of the Truth) slanderously pretend their victims are too dumb to be educated!

The “elites” – including the “education” elites – are cowardly masochist traitors to rationality and civilization, who always want to form ever-larger gangs to protect them selves; they are all about the double-standards of subjectivism, and so oppose universal objectivity; they want rights without responsibilities, and so must offload their responsibilities onto their victims.

The reason they embrace might-made group “rights,” is both offensive and defensive: they can always assert they are “defensively protecting” others if and when they can make even a tenuous connection between some others at least somewhat similar to them selves who,  somewhere else, at some other time, were oppressed by some other people who were sort of like YOU; in which case, YOU OWE THEM!

The corollary is that if and when they get caught for their crimes, they can always use the group idol as an alibi-excuse to dilute their own culpability:

“I didn’t do it! ONLY ‘the GROUP’ did it! Whee!”

(Substitute “The System,” &/or “The Procedures” or your choice of idolatry for “The Group!”)

I’m pretty sure the main strategy AND subsequent tactics of liberals is to always generalize to dilute personal responsibility. It’s why they endorse group rights and responsibilities and absolutely hate factual cause-and-effect specifics. Generalizations are lies and exaggerations used to hide all the specific details of their individual criminal culpability. And they also get to blame specific victims for general group membership responsibilities, too!

They are criminals.

And, as such liberals like to assert that:

Criminals have rights, too!”

Well, actually: - NO, they don’t.

See, the Law is a social contract, where people agree to not attack (thereby innocent) others, first.

From agreeing to this, we get our only real right (to not be attacked first) and we have our only real concomitant, corollary responsibility (to not attack others first).

But when one chooses to break that contract and avoid one’s contracted responsibility BY attacking others first, one also thereby gives up one’s own right to not therefore be defensively (counter-)attacked by one’s attempted victims, second.

That counter-attacking second bit, was formerly known as “JUSTICE.” Criminals also used to be known as “Out-Laws” because their own choices had placed them outside the protections of the Law; it was therefore open season on them.

And even the courts do it, sometimes years later, when the perp is no longer a clear and present danger, because, as even the falsely divided civil and criminal laws agree, one must pay for what one takes.

The only job of any court or judge is to determine who started it, and to punish the instigating aggressors for their (even if failed) attempts; after all, it’s the thought (intent) which counts! And even “only attempted” crimes, are still crimes.

Any court or judge which refuses to do so, has abdicated their position of authority, and have become criminally negligent.

Basically, liberals are masochists: always trying to pretend to “control” their fears, BY causing the most worst-case-scenario pains they fear.

There’s no perversion or crime a liberal won’t Submit to or at least try to “compromise” with first. They seem to believe that it’s prudent, shrewd, realistic ‘realpolitik’ to rush in first, before some other fools beat them to it!

I believe even the most wilfully self-blinded, obtuse criminal negligent (muslim, liberal) is almost NEVER really focused on chasing nebulous “hope and change” (say, via dopamine output stimulation) as they so-often pretend to others, so much as they are avoiding pain (or, in their cases, more specifically avoiding the fear of pain – including the fear of having to face those fears to actually discover and cancel the root causes of the mistakes and unsolved problems which cause the pains they fear).

Even the most hardened drug addicts quickly become acclimatized to their drug of choice, and so require more and more and more of it to reach the same state of obliviousness, just as people who choose the relief from work tedium of a beach vacation quickly tire of the scene, as their minds automatically prioritize information by level of potential danger, and can be counted on toinstinctively cast about for more problems to solve, more pains to avoid.

Such is the nature of the thought process itself, whether they want to honestly admit it or dishonestly try to avoid it and distract and deflect others into not-noticing they are doing so; they find millenniae of hard-wired evolutionary learning isn’t so easily avoided by even the stupidest monkey.

So basically, everything liberals do is a deliberate attempt to pretend to ‘prove’ themselves to be mentally incompetent, so they won’t have any responsibility to think for them selves about anything. We should simply let them ‘prove’ their point, declare them non-compus mentis, and move on to other problems, while striving to improve the education system for all future generations.

He that is good at making excuses is seldom good for anything else.”

-Benjamin Franklin-

(But there’s some good news, too: People are born tabula rasa - as blank slates – so it’s plain to see that liberals have actually been trained to be stupid and evil, by other people who were also trained to be stupid and evil; each generation trying to outdo the previous ones in the depths of evil stupidity to which they sink)! Criminality is nurtured not nature.

And so, when arguing with liberals, please always remember this simple rule of thumb, kids:

Truth welcomes scrutiny. Falsehood demands tolerance.

;-)

In fact, lefties always sound retarded (hence, the accuracy of such terms as “leftardation,” “libtarded,” etc.) BECAUSE all they’re ever really doing is trying to think up alibi-EXCUSES FOR THEFT, so of course their language has to employ all the critical thinking logical fallacy evasions, distractions, deflections, euphemisms, and metaphors (i.e: lies) in order to sell it to sane people, (and all crimes are forms of theft); i.e: “Wealth Redistribution” and that of course requires lies, like I just said, most often in the form of evasive metaphors and euphemisms (like for the best instance example, the term “Wealth Redistribution” itself)!

Openly, honestly endorsing stating one’s “Theft is Good!” assertions usually won’t work, when trying to sell it to sane people.

If they were just plain stupid, they’d have to get some things right every now and then, just by random chance – but they don’t, because they have to know what’s right, in order to so perfectly oppose it all the time!

Since evil leftist masochists are always hell-bent on becoming victims of worst-case scenarios, they “project” onto and slander-blame their victims, because their first emotion is fear of getting caught for their crimes.

So subjective double-standards are what they’re all about! Deliberately! For them, No objective Truth allowed!

Most of their sub-sequent forced predeterminism and group-rights idolatry is also only an excuse to “defensively” either do nothing, or to enjoy a perpetual excuse to attack others first, even if only by having the false right to delinquently force their own self-reliant responsibilities onto groups of “privileged/guilty” (innocent) others.

And of course they’ll always try to co-opt the largest gang, the government, into helping them with their wealth redistribution theft schemes.

As Thomas Jefferson noted:

It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself. Subject opinion to coercion: whom will you make your inquisitors?

And yet deliberate “error” (i.e: wilfully intended, criminal negligence) isn’t really ‘error’ at all, is it?

The motto of criminally negligent leftists everywhere must be: “There’s No Money In Solutions!” (So: Please Give Generously – AGAIN!)

They will always refuse to solve temporary problems with easy, simple and permanent solutions, in favor of not-solving them, spinning and pretending they are “eternal crises” with only temporary, band-aid “management therapies” available, in order to exploit the almost infinite number of symptoms unsolved problems generate.

Unfortunately, there’s only so many symptoms of The Golden Rule of Law (which simply defines all situational morality as “Do Not Attack First!”) one can address with lesser, circumstantial “laws” of morality, only so many right answers, before one must veer off into exploiting the almost infinite number of sorta almost right,(but really wrong) answers, in order to keep up the pretense that the legislators are actually doing something responsible to earn their pay and to continue to enjoy the right to govern others – a point which, after whence reached, societies decline into criminality and empires fall into ruin.

Posted in Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Globalization, human rights, Legal, media, Policy, politics, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, Treason, War | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Racist liberal legal system covers for muslim, reduces his prosecution

Crown Prosecutor reduces Ottawa muslim’s original two counts of attempted murder to aggravated assaults, tries to ban his name by slanderously pretending Canadian whites would “re-victimize” his own family victims.

 Typical liberal racism: “Oh, the Poor Swarthy Animals! They Just Can’t Help Being at the Mercy of their Animal Instincts, Always Reacting Violently to Oppression! So We Whites Should Stop Picking On Them!”

Trying to hide the perp’s (obviously muslim) name, while slanderously pretending it’s to “protect his family from re-victimization” (HOW?! By random white people pointing and laughing at them on the streets of Ottawa?!)

And reducing his crimes from attempted murder to aggravated assault, as if they NEEDED that plea bargain to gain his comfession to prove his guilt, because there weren’t enough credible witnesses otherwise (I guess the prosecutor agreed to Submit to sharia, where women’s testimony is only worth half a man’s, at best!)?

From today’s (Tuesday, December 52nd, 2014) leftarded Ottawa Citizen newspaper; p.#A3:

Dad admits knife attack on  his wife, daughter

By Gary Dimmock

The Ottawa real estate agent who attacked his daughter and wife with a butcher knife in May did so seconds after he saw an online photograph of his eldest daughter posing with a man she knew from her university Glee club.

The strict father had forbidden his children to have any presence on the Internet and was so controlling that he monitored their mobile phones, computers and bank accounts. He didn’t allow his three children — aged 16 to 20 — to date anyone or post online photos of themselves, let alone have a Facebook account.

The father, who cries himself to sleep most nights at the Innes Road jail, pleaded guilty Monday to two counts of aggravated assault in a plea bargain with the Crown that spared him prosecution on the more severe charges of attempted murder.

Court heard that right after he saw his eldest daughter’s picture on the Internet, he went to the kitchen and returned with a butcher knife.

May 3, 2014, was a big day for their family. His wife and daughter had just returned from his daughter’s new apartment. The father had never agreed that his eldest daughter, 20, could move out. And when she said her father no longer controlled her life, he said that in fact he did and slapped her across the face.

He then grabbed a butcher knife from the kitchen and slashed his daughter in the shoulder. When she tried to grab it to stop the attack, her right pinky finger was severed and her ring finger partially severed.

When the attacker’s wife yelled for her daughter to call 911, drawing her husband’s attention, the man pushed his wife and slashed her. His wife suffered severe defensive wounds to both hands and her skull.

Ottawa police officers found the daughter’s severed finger and packed it in ice

Their daughter ran to the mud room, barricaded herself and called 911. Her mother fled to the basement and tried to call 911. Both then ran from their house and hid in a nearby ditch, then ran to their neighbour’s house for help. The neighbours tried to stop the bleeding until paramedics arrived.

When the Ottawa police arrived, they shouted for the real estate agent to open the front door. He did so, then crawled out to the front porch where he was arrested.

Ottawa police officers found the daughter’s severed finger and packed it in ice. The mother and daughter underwent lengthy surgeries and the daughter’s finger was re-attached.

The Crown prosecutor in the case requested and was granted a ban on publishing the names of the accused and his family so the victims wouldn’t be “re-victimized”.

He told court that although media reports at the time described the attacks as a family “honour crime”, nothing in the case file supports that theory.

No date has been scheduled for sentencing and the father remains in custody.

NOW LET’S CONTRAST THAT BLATHER WITH THE ORIGINAL NEWS RELEASE!

Original news release at the time, from here:

Ottawa-area realtor accused of trying to murder his wife and daughter

  • Updated 12:48 pm, May 5th, 2014
  • 5:19 pm, May 4th, 2014
Ottawa-area realtor accused of trying to murder his wife and daughter

Ottawa cops searched this upscale west-end home Sunday, May 4, 2014 after a woman and her daughter were attacked by a man with a butcher knife. The man is in custody and the girl’s finger had to be re-attached at hospital Saturday night

Credits: DOUG HEMPSTEAD/Ottawa Sun/QMI AGENCY

OTTAWA – A realtor accused of cutting off his daughter’s finger and stabbing his wife was charged with two counts of attempted murder Monday.

Labib Khawas, 55, will remain behind bars for at least the next three days so police can conduct “further investigation.”

The attack occurred Sunday at the family home near Ashton, southwest of Ottawa.

Khawas, a balding real estate agent with Coldwell Banker, said little during his brief court appearance Monday.

He was ordered not to communicate with his daughter, his son or his wife, who is a vice-principal at a Kanata elementary school.

His wife suffered serious stab wounds, including a cut to the back of her neck. His daughter’s finger was severed and another one was almost cut off as well.

The severed finger was reattached, but it remains to be seen if the operation will prove successful.

With files from Doug Hempstead

Posted in Canada, Corruption, Crime, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, War | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Seems likely Obama IS the antiChrist after all!

I found so much on this topic, when I went to YouTube and punched “obama is the antichrist” into their search!

LordOfDarknessObama2
One of the many videos on the Internet which suggest Obama is the antiChrist, asserts that a behind-the-scenes look at the languages Greek, Aramaic, and Hebrew reveals that in the Bible in Luke 10:18, Jesus may have revealed the name of the Antichrist. The video suggests that it’s Barack Obama.

The Antichrist, according to many Christian teachers, is a person who will fulfill Biblical prophesy by becoming a powerful leader in the world but will be an evil ruler, a false messiah, a person who is either against or the opposite of Jesus Christ.

The video is based entirely on the verse in Luke 10:18, in which Jesus says, “I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.” KJV

The video says that the words in the verse were translated into English from the Greek New Testament, but were spoken by Jesus in Aramaic. It also says that Aramaic is “the most ancient form of Hebrew.” It goes on to say that the Hebrew word for “lightning” is “baraq.”

Then the video goes to the book if Isaiah in the Bible, chapter 14:14 where Satan is quoted as saying “I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most high.”

ObamaSatanAccording to the video, there are several references to Satan as having fallen from the “heights” or the “heavens” and that the Hebrew word used for heights is “bamah.” Further, according to the video, there are conditions in Hebrew in which “bamah” would have sometimes been pronounced “U-bamah” or “O-bamah” and would have been translated literally as “Lightening from the heights.”

"If I had a son, he'd look exactly like Barack Hussein Obama!" -SATAN-

“If I had a son, he’d look exactly like Barack Hussein Obama!”
-SATAN-

The word for lightning is indeed “baraq” in Hebrew. In Aramaic it’s “beraq.” To muslims, it means the name of the flying female-headed donkey Muhammad rode to Heaven in his infamous “night journey” dream, from whence they lay claim to all of Jerusalem for islam. In all cases, it’s bad news!

;-)

Psychobama

Posted in America, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Globalization, gun control, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, United States, USA, War | Tagged , | 2 Comments