Harper’s “anti-Terror” Bill C-51 IS WRONG And Here’s Why

This article will deal only with the proposed bill’s general and alleged raison d’etre, not the specifics of why such vaguely-defined extra-judicial powers would be an extremely BAD IDEA if left in, say, the hands of Justin Trudeau’s fascist liberals, or a joint Liberal/NDP coalition government.

=========

I’m Conservative as heck, but even I don’t think we really need this redundant Bill C-51 nonsense just to fight “terrorism” (i.e: only already-criminal violent extortion gangs)!

Here’s my response to THIS Conservative Party of Canada email which I just received today from them as they tried to get my endorsement for it:

ConservativePartyLogo

One of the most important aspects of our new anti-terrorism legislation is cracking down on people trying to use Canada as a recruitment ground for ISIS.

If you support us on this, please let me know here.

This is important for two reasons.

The first is we want to prevent the spread of radical jihad here in Canada.

Those who would attempt to abuse the rights enjoyed by Canadians to spread their ideology of hate must be stopped.

We also want to prevent the heartache of families who have learned that their sons and daughters have, aided by these criminals, flown to Iraq and Syria.

Already we’ve seen too many cases where this has happened, or has almost happened.

Twin brothers in Ottawa were stopped as they were about to leave the country, but six teens from Montreal are now believed to be in Syria.

Our new legislation will give our police and security forces the tools they need to prevent these cases in the future.

So please, show your support for this vital legislation. Let me know you support the efforts of our Conservative team to combat the recruitment of Canadians for radical jihadist terrorist groups like ISIS.

Thank you,

Fred DeLorey
Director, Political Operations
Conservative Party of Canada

(Hence, MY REPLY):

To: info@conservative.ca

Not that these replies of mine ever end up actually going anywhere, but …

NO, I don’t think we need any more anti-“Terrorism” (anti-Violent Extortion) legislation in Canada – extortion is already a crime! Advocating violence against innocents is already a crime! Being a member of a crime-gang is also already a crime!

JUST ENFORCE THE EXISTING LAWS!

Re: “The first (reason) is we want to prevent the spread of radical jihad here in Canada.

OK, FIRST: Terrorism is an entirely normative, not in any way “radical,” component of islam itself.

SO, YES, I AGREE WITH you assertion that:

“Those who would attempt to abuse the rights enjoyed by Canadians to spread their ideology of hate must be stopped.”

So, just BAN ISLAM!

Isn’t it strange how “extremist,” “fundamentalist,” and “radical” are all oxymorons? If one is extremely fundamental to the core message of the source texts, then how can one also be “radical” (divergent to it)?!

Here’s the real “difference” between “radical” and “moderate” muslims:

“Radical” muslims want to murder us for not being muslims.
“Moderate” muslims want “radical” muslims to murder us for not being muslims.

;-)

Get it, yet?!

And why is this? Simple!

In Judeo-Christian lore, of one commits suicide (much less by, or when, also trying to murder others) one learns that one is destined for Hell.

But the criminal Qur’an tells it’s Submissive “muslim” dupes that, if and when they’re feeling down, they can instantly get to Heaven itself BY randomly murdering others!

So it’s obviously islam itself which causes any and all “radicalization!”

The only pretended “mystery” is why more rank-and-file muslims aren’t already “radicalized:” and the easy and obvious answer is that it’s simply because they’re still somewhat ignorant of what’s written the Qur’an concerning allah’s ultimate expectations of them. Most muslims aren’t allowed to read the Qur’an in their native languages.

Here’s how and why any and all “Radicalism” and “radicalization” occurs in islam:

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzmyuCXS2sTdZDcxYTA1YzYtOWJmNS00YzNmLWI4YTMtNjRiNDRmMDExYzg3/edit?pli=1&hl=en

(Official ‘Abrogation’ of all the semi-peaceful verses in the Qur’an)!

In handy web-based .PDF format!

Bottom line:

There are no “moderate” muslims, simply because there is no “moderate” islam!

So, why are the liberals and socialists and their pet enemedia lying to us all the time about this?!

Here’s what’s really going on:

Although it’s true that not all Germans were Nazis, not all Italians are Mafiosis, not all whites are Hell’s Angels, and not all Arabs are muslims …

… it IS nevertheless true that all Nazis WERE nazis, all Mafiosis ARE Mafiosis, all Hell’s Angels ARE Hell’s Angels, and ALL MUSLIMS ARE MUSLIMS!

The politically correct pretence du jour is to pretend that

NOT ALL MUSLIMS ARE “REALLY” MUSLIMS!

And in order to sell that lie to people, some mythical and entirely unsupported sub-categories of “muslims” (“Fundamentalists,” “Extremists,” Radicalists,” “Militantists,” etc and of course the most mythological illusion of all, the “Moderates,”) had to be invented and screamed at us, over and over again.

ALL MUSLIMS ARE TERRORISTS!

“Terrorism” is really only the simple crime of “extortion” writ large! Extortion is “threats!”

ALL muslims are criminals, simply by being members of the world’s largest and most ancient yet ongoing crime-gang. Being a member of a crime-gang is a crime, even if the member hasn’t committed any specific crime beyond that of their general membership, because they represent the inherent public threat the crime-gang presents. It’s the Law.

The Qur’an and islam itself should be banned, because everything muslims pretend to believe is “holy” is already a crime!

The Qur’an is more than just another flawed book of confusing, contradictory superstitious nonsense, it’s evil.

It should never be allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (muslims) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes!

No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, and we aren’t doing even any of these muslims (whose own ancestors were among Muhammad’s first victims) any favours by going along with any of their historic lies and alibi excuses for their crimes.

Islam is a threat to everyone because it says it is.

According to their own Eastern histories, islam has an official 1,400 year history of “holy” lies, extortions, robberies, tortures, arsons, kindappings, slaveries, rapes and 270 million murders (that’s OVER A QUARTER-BILLION INNOCENTS SACRIFICED TO ALLAH, so far – it’s a larger death-tally than that of EVERYONE ELSE, both secular and religious, COMBINED, and with an historical average of less than 1% of the global population to have committed it with, too)!

Do the math: 270 million divided by 1,400 is almost 200,000 per year, or over 500 per day, or over 20 per hour or about one person every three minutes being murdered by Muslims ever since Islam was founded.

So, simply and precisely because of their “THOU SHALT KILL!” cultural indoctrination, MUSLIMS ARE STILL FROM BETWEEN FOUR AND SEVERAL HUNDRED TIMES MORE LIKELY TO ENGAGE IN MURDER (and all other crimes,) THAN EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD!

ALL muslims are criminals: by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an, which tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-muslims, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being muslims.

So the Qur’an is a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat.

ALL muslims are criminals, as being members of the ancient, ongoing global extortion racket called islam. In sharia law texts, muslims are SUPPOSED to be regarded as threats (as “objects of fear”) by all the unbelievers, whether or not the individual muslim has itself actually committed any crimes.

That’s why we have laws against simply being a MEMBER of a crime-gang or ‘criminal enterprise’ because their membership endorses the inherent threat. Threats are crimes in themselves: they are psychological attacks, also known as intimidation, bullying, coercion, duress, harassment, activist agitation, extortion, and “terrorism.”

And even any “only” attempted crimes are still considered by civilized people to be crimes.

Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

“I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

– Muhammad –

Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

So, islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)!

Obviously, islam is ONLY an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”

(Capisce?)!

;-)

The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:

Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur’an:

1: non-muslims are bad, because they insult allah by dividing his nature;
2: muslims are good, because to them allah is the cause of everything;
3: Allah made them both like that;
4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims’ heads.
(Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him).”

It’s all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all specific grievance-driven.

(And chapter 47 isn’t by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to either chapter 8 or 9).

So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

At WORST, all REAL religions only say:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/‘the gods’) will get you!”

…but ONLY islam says:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

At forced ‘Faith!’ ISN’T a “Faith!” at all – it’s only extortion, and extortion is always a CRIME.

Bottom line: If you decide to believe in “allah,” you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of “faith” in your crime-god will help us to do so.

So, once again, NO, we don’t need more redundant laws to specify what is already generally illegal!

Just ban islam itself as the “terrorist” organization (criminal extortion-gang) that it so-obviously IS!

;-)

Also posted it here:

http://www.therebel.media/video_toronto_s_stopc51_rally

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“CommieCore” Slanders Children!

I was just reading an article about “Commie Core” here:

http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/orwellian-nightmare-unleashed-on-schoolkids/

These paranoid “liberals” (criminals) always prejudicially pre-judge and slander everyone else as being Guilty Until Never Proven Innocent.

Morality is very simple, and most if not all small children already instinctively inherently know it as the “But Mom! They Started It!” Rule.

But we all know nannystate kindergarten-teacher types are criminals who pretend to believe – and indoctrinate – kids in the exact opposite, immorally-relativist and victim-blaming opposite, causing untold emotional psychological and mental stress on the kids in their charge, as they torture them with liberal (criminal) nonsense: Being self-serving autocrats, they assert “ALL attacks are equally bad, whether initiated first by aggressive bullies, or second, in defensive counter-attacks by the victims!”

In other words they always “Just want it all to stop!”

But this only encourages the bullies, by splitting the blame between them and their victims! The ‘teachers’ hope in this way to appease and co-opt the bullies into attacking less, as a favor to themselves, but of course it never works out that way.

And it discourages the bullied victims, forcing them to Submit to liberal statism, where the notion that they have no right to defend them selves is forced on them, and they are tortured with the idea that they are and will always remain helpless victims, who must always go running off to seek the help of a parental figure, so that once they become adults (in body, but never in mind) they become dependent on the State and authoritarian governments everywhere, little socialist drones.

The modern liberal “Education System” not only no longer teaches kids how to think, or even what to think, but only how not to think at all – how to remain entitled to being irresponsibly wrong.

Modern “education” only “teaches” (abuses kids with) liberal corruption – they inflict their own infantile delinquency and criminal negligence by offering them alibi-excuses to NOT have to think for them selves:

“Life is too complex for us helpless fallible and so, potentially dangerous mistakes to ever understand cause and effect, so, “since” all facts are therefore really only opinions anyway, our subjective, entirely fact-free opinions are the diversely opposite equals to those silly Conservatives’ objective facts! Whee! And remember, kids: There’s No Wrong Answers!”

To pretend there is no evil crime, and no evil criminals because everyone’s really only a helpless victim, they pretend to a predetermined inevitability excuse: Marxist historical determinism, that people are all helpless victims of society, mere products of their environments, and slaves of allah.

And of course their inevitability alibi involves unavoidable mob-rule extortion, for which idolatrous group rights serve them well:

Ever try arguing with a liberal? It’s pointless trying to use facts to educate people who have been taught that the truth doesn’t exist!

They’ve really only declared a confession of non-compus-mentis!

And their favorite deflection is the childish critical thinking logical fallacy called the Argumentum Tu Quoque, which only amounts to trying to compare two unrelated wrongs in order to pretend to make one of them into a right:

“There’s no evil crime or criminals because we (i.e: you) all do it, too! Whee!”

Beyond that, their crime is all about the objectification: victim-blaming “defensively pre-emptive” slander.

They embrace the slanderous philosophy that the best “defense” is a good offense, to keep their opponents on the defensive so they will remain emotionally off-balance and so never be able to (counter-)attack ‘first!’

Only lying thieves (fraud being the most basic form of theft, the theft of the Truth) slanderously pretend their victims are too dumb to be educated!

The “elites” – including the “education” elites – are cowardly masochists who always want to form ever-larger gangs to protect them selves; they are all about the double-standards of subjectivism, and so oppose universal objectivity; they want rights without responsibilities, and so must offload their responsibilities onto their victims.

The reason they embrace might-made group “rights,” is both offensive and defensive: they can always assert they are “defensively protecting” others if and when they can make even a tenuous connection between some others at least somewhat similar to them selves who, somewhere else, at some other time, were oppressed by some other people who were sort of like YOU; in which case, YOU OWE THEM!

The corollary is that if and when they get caught for their crimes, they can always use the group idol as an alibi-excuse to dilute their own culpability:

“I didn’t do it! ONLY the GROUP did it! Whee!”

(Substitute “The System,” &/or “The Procedures” or your choice of idolatry for “The Group!”)

I’m pretty sure the main strategy AND subsequent tactics of liberals is to always generalize to dilute personal responsibility. It’s why they endorse group rights and responsibilities and absolutely hate factual cause-and-effect specifics. Generalizations are lies and exaggerations used to hide all the specific details of their individual criminal culpability. And they also get to blame specific victims for general group membership responsibilities, too!

They are criminals.

;-(

By abusing kids with the silly notion that they’re entitled to not be “offended” or have their “feelings hurt” by the often painful truth of new ideas, these crooks are short-circuiting the most basic thinking and learning process itself – because in humans, all new ideas are initially met with rejection (as has been known since at least Aristotle to Elizabeth Kubler-Ross these days)!

Liberals prefer to “rationalize” their crimes – to look backwards to pretend to think their crimes weren’t really crimes at all, but only moral reactions to others’ crimes against themselves – as all criminals always do. At most, they prefer to pretend that there are no real crimes or criminals, because “we (i.e: you) all do it, too!” This argumentum tu quoque critical thinking logical fallacy is the basis for their endless immoral relativism (victim-blaming slander) stance. Everything they do is designed to promote criminals as victims and perversion as just retaliation.

And worse – beyond these basics, Liberalism is sedition. They teach each other in the colleges the lie that “nations” and “nationalism” causes all wars, so, to eliminate these evil restrictive borders which cause jealousy and greed, all they have to do now is to eliminate all sovereign nations and countries (which were invented by evil white racists during the Enlightenment, just to apartheid and oppress all the peaceful swarthy noble collectivist tribal savages) in order for there to finally be “peace!”

But, “strangely” enough, as far as I know, sedition is still illegal. Hmm!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LIBERALS PROGRESSIVELY BACKWARDS THINK!

Recently, a (liberal, progressive) “Institute of Higher Learning” decided to effectively end a student’s career because he reminded a rape victim of her attacker. You just can’t make this sort of thing up!

http://personalliberty.com/college-effectively-ends-students-career-reminded-rape-victim-attacker/

CONCLUSION:

Liberals are backwards idolaters and simpletons – they “think:”

“Hey – to eliminate rape, just ban people who look like rapists!”

Just like they say “To eliminate racism, just blend all the races together (but really only the white one, because only whites are racists!”) And let’s not forget their dumb idea that “Nations” were created (by whites) during the Enlightenment, and somehow (due to jealousy over other people’s territory) they “cause” wars, so to eliminate war, just just blend all the nations together into one global union, no borders, because then people won’t have any “territory” to fight over any more!

And of course, since only the whites invented borders and the concept of ownership and (improving) personal property (which “causes” greed) we must import tons of noble tribal collectivist savages who believe in group ownership and no personal dignity whatsoever, because then, with lots more muslims to help us out, THERE WILL FINALLY BE PEACE!

“Progressives” refuse to understand that there is no such thing as “crime PREVENTION.”

That would mean “defensively, pre-emptively” (and so, pre-judicially) slanderously pre-judging everyone as Guilty Until Never Proven Innocent, and arresting people for crimes they had not yet committed.

But then, that’s what “progressive” means – incrementally being a self-defeating criminal MASOCHIST: attacking everyone else first, “Before they can ‘inevitably’ attack US first!”

Another recent example, is Obama’s latest gun (people) control attempt, at banning guns by banning the ammunition.

Know how many cops have been killed by the “armor-piercing” ammo he’s trying to ban?

ZERO.

http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/zero-cops-killed-by-obamas-bad-ammo/

And the whole “Education System” encourages this literally pre-posterous lunacy! Abusing students with the notion that they have the false right to not be “offended” by having their “feelings hurt” by the often-painful truth, that “Generation Entitlement” is somehow entitled to the right to remain irresponsibly wrong, in stead of having the responsibility to become right (as in, factually correct) is a CRIME.

Because as everyone from ancient Greek Logicians to Elizabeth Kubler-Ross has noted, denial of new ideas is only the natural FIRST step in the learning process; to let kids stop at “I don’t want to learn!” is doing the exact opposite of fulfilling these educators oaths to encourage learning in their charges, as is of course represented by their “Remember kids, there’s no wrong answers!” motto.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Yay! Our New Sister-site now comes with DISQUS!

Not that we’re moving or anything (I’m going to cross-post as backup) but I’ve always felt the one drawback with WordPress was it not having an easy and open commenting system compatible with most other sites, i.e: it doesn’t encourage traffic by integrating DISQUS.

SO I’ve opened up a new blog site, HERE:

http://unclevladdi.blogspot.ca/

NJOI!

;-)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Liberalism” IS Crime

I don’t know how many times I have to repeat this, but at least all the practice is making the message more concise LOL!

Recently, Dr. Ben Carson, world-renowned neurosurgeon and American Conservative presidential nominee, was slandered as an “extremist hate-monger” by the perpetually hate-mongering leftist extremist gang called the “Southern Poverty Law Center.”

They eventually retracted their slander (sort of, by elaborating on it) and so it seems now that Dr. Carson had then graciously called for a more generalized civil discourse between what he still seems to see as two equally valid opposing sides, in future.

But pretending there is no objective truth, that all people are such helpless victims before the daunting complexities of life, such that there is no real cause-and-effect Truth, and so all objective facts are really only subjective opinions anyway, so that the liberals’ subjective opinions are somehow the diversely equal opposites of the Conservatives silly objective facts – is really ever only a “liberal” criminal stance, and so one Dr. Carson should reject.

From here:

Re: Carson said “It is important for us to once again advocate true tolerance. That means being respectful of those with whom we disagree and allowing people to live according to their values without harassment. It is nothing but projectionism when some groups label those who disagree with them as haters.”

BUT – What if those you disagree with, are hateful criminals? Does one owe people who pre-emptively decide to “hate” their victims, as their preposterous, backwards rationalization for victimizing them, (as the SPLC itself always does) “respect!”?

Crime is all about the objectification: victim-blaming “defensively pre-emptive” slander.

All criminals – communist liberals included – decide at some point to use jealousy to motivate their slander, that:

“You earned stuff I didn’t bother to, so YOU OWE ME!”

Sane, civilized people agree to obey the Golden Rule of Law, most simply put as:
“Do Not Attack First.” After all, choosing to attack first, self-defines one as the predatory, criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it!

So, our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (thereby innocent) others, first.

Between two or more people, this means neither one is allowed to do anything either TO, or FOR, the others, unless and until it’s specifically agreed to.

In other words, philosophically, All is forbidden, unless & until specifically agreed on.

The Law, then, is voluntary a social contract; albeit not-agreeing to it, does define one as a criminal, because to attempt to somehow reserve the false “right” to attack innocent people first, is an inherent form of psychological threat.

Rights only come by agreeing to their concomitant, corollary responsibilities; one cannot have the one without agreeing to the other, for, as even the falsely-sundered criminal and civil laws agree, one must pay for what one takes. When criminals choose to give up on their responsibilities to others to not attack them first, the law demands they lose their rights to not be counter-attacked second for it.

Which brings us to “LIBERALISM:”

Like ALL criminal endeavors, libertine “liberalism” holds that, in stead, All is permitted – that they are allowed to do whatever they want TO others, as long as they can pretend it’s FOR them – for their own good – unless and until it’s specifically forbidden.

The best way to achieve this is to pretend their victims are unable to ask for their help against “oppressors” so it’s then automatically presumed the “liberal” criminal is acting in defense of those same people, and the best way to achieve this state is by pretending that everyone is a helpless victim in need of an authority’s “protection.”

And the obvious corollary to this crime philosophy, (that “All is allowed unless and until specifically forbidden”) is that nobody has any right to self-defense against the criminals’ right to do whatever they want ‘FOR’ (to) you – i.e: no right to defend one’s self against their attacking you first, and so you also have no free-speech right to complain to others about it, in aid of defending yourself, either!

Which brings us to the liberal criminals’ “hate-crimes” (thought control) attempts:

“Hate” (perpetual anger) is only the most natural, human response to ongoing crimes, like islam) as well as being the first step in the basic thought process itself: the instinctive rejection of new and strange ideas, pending further consideration.

To pretend people have a right or responsibility for others’ offended hurt feelings is insane, and it again only results in giving the infantile delinquent criminals the false right to remain irresponsibly wrong. (See also the modern liberal “Education System,” which not only no longer teaches kids how to think, or even what to think, but only how not to think at all – how to remain entitled to being irresponsibly wrong).

All criminals want rights without responsibility – like, false “rights” to our stuff, without any concomitant corollary responsibility for having to earn or otherwise pay for it!

In trying to make “hate” into a crime, they only make it “illegal” to hate crime and the criminals who commit it!

Bottom line: EVERYTHING about libertine “liberalism” involves “crime-PREVENTION” – in pre-judging people guilty of committing crimes, BEFORE they have actually committed any!

And that “pre-emptively defensive” stance self-defines itself as victim-blaming pre-judicial SLANDER; in other words, CRIME ITSELF.

Other than that, they claim to be controlling and “protecting people from themselves.”

Which is to say, they put their judgment of others ahead of those others’ self-judgment.

What these arrogant elitist liberals call progress, sane people call “the slippery slope.”

Posted in Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, human rights, Legal, media, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, Treason, War | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

ISLAM IS AGAINST THE LAW

Criminal Obama Openly Defends Crime; Will Fight Media To Stop Anti-Jihad Articles
cartoon011515-600x500
We already have many valid laws on the books against extortion and being members of a crime-gang. When “Our Leaders” refuse to enforce these laws against muslims, simply because their criminal extortion gang uses “God told us to commit these crimes!” as their #1 alibi-excuse, “Our Leaders” show them selves to be delinquent criminal negligents who have abdicated their positions of authority, voiding their oaths of office to defend us from crime!
toon011215

It was recently reported that the Obama White House not only still refuses to admit islam is NOT “A Great Religion Of Peace,” but that he intends to go after journalists who report otherwise:

Re: “President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Jan. 12.”

So, the extortion attempts of all these “aggressive members of peaceful islam” must be extra-tolerated?!

TraitorJohnKerrySnogsAnImam

NO!!!

It should never be allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (muslims) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes!

No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, and nobody is doing even these muslims any favours, by indulging their historic lies that islam is a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) or a “race” (much less one of poor oppressed “People Of Colour”)!

Pretending there is NOT a Muslim problem but only a white racist problem accepting diversity, is criminally negligent TREASON.

Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

“I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

– Muhammad –

Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

Islam is a threat to everyone because it says it is.

According to their own Eastern histories, islam has an official 1,400 year history of “holy” lies, extortions, robberies, tortures, arsons, kindappings, slaveries, rapes and 270 million murders (that’s OVER A QUARTER-BILLION INNOCENTS SACRIFICED TO ALLAH, so far – it’s a larger death-tally than that of EVERYONE ELSE, both secular and religious, COMBINED, and with an historical average of less than 1% of the global population to have committed it with, too)!

Do the math: 270 million divided by 1,400 is almost 200,000 per year, or over 500 per day, or over 20 per hour or about one person every three minutes being murdered by Muslims ever since Islam was founded.

So, simply and precisely because of their “THOU SHALT KILL!” cultural indoctrination, MUSLIMS ARE STILL FROM BETWEEN FOUR AND SEVERAL HUNDRED TIMES MORE LIKELY TO ENGAGE IN MURDER (and all other crimes,) THAN EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD!

So, islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)!

Obviously, islam is ONLY an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”

(Capisce?)!

;-)

We should simply BAN ISLAM – because everything muslims pretend to consider “holy” is already a crime!

;-(

The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:

Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur’an:

1: non-muslims are bad, because they insult allah by dividing his nature;
2: muslims are good, because to them allah is the cause of everything;
3: Allah made them both like that;
4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims’ heads.
(Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him).”

It’s all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all specific grievance-driven.

(And chapter 47 isn’t by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to either chapter 8 or 9).

So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

At WORST, all REAL religions only say:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

…but ONLY islam says:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

At forced ‘Faith!’ ISN’T a “Faith!” at all – it’s only extortion, and extortion is always a CRIME.

Bottom line: If you decide to believe in “allah,” you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of “faith” in your crime-god will help us to do so!

Posted in America, Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, United States, USA, War | Tagged , | Leave a comment

LYING IN ISLAM

HERE’S PROOF THAT ALL MUSLIMS HAVE BEEN OFFICIALLY TRAINED SINCE BIRTH TO LIE TO EVERYONE, ALL THE TIME:

I now know almost everything about islam (unfortunately; although it’s members never cease to amaze and sicken me with creative new atrocities) simply because it has its core (the Qur’an, 2 sahih and 4 less-so ahadith, the Sirat, and the 4 Sunni and 1 Shia maddhab fiqhs of sharia) and that’s it.

They cannot add to it, nor “reform” any of it; islam cannot and will not ever change, in any way, because it’s the “perfect” word of allah, and the metaphoric so-called “gates of ijtihad” (interpretation) have been closed for centuries!

Surah Al-Ma’idah 5.3 informs Muslims that Allah has PERFECTED Islam. Can perfection be improved? Can perfection be reformed?? If genocidal conquest is perfect, how can it be eliminated as a sacrament of Islam???

All muslims are liars. Their creed informs them their god wants them to lie all the time, to everyone* – to their own families and friends (“to keep the peace”) and of course to their infidel enemies (“to keep the peace until you are in a position of strength and able to successfully attack them again”). Obviously, since islam is only an extortion racket CRIME syndicate, they have to lie to them selves, too, in order to pretend it’s a “religion” in any way; i.e:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”

(Capisce?)!

*(Narrated in al-Bukhari, 2546; Muslim, 2605)

It was narrated that Asma’ Bint Yazeed said: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: ‘It is not permissible to tell lies except in three (cases): when a man speaks to his wife in a way to please her; lying in war; and lying in order to reconcile between people.’”

Muslims are told by allah to LIE TO EVERYONE, ALL THE TIME: (and all “to keep the peace!”) to their own families and friends, and of course to their “infidel enemies.”

Similarly, one of Mohammed’s own daughters, Umm Kalthoum, testified that she had never heard the Apostle of Allah condone lying, except in these three situations:

1.) For reconciliation among people.
2.) In war.
3.) Amongst spouses, to keep peace in the family.

In other words, “allah wants you to lie to everyone, all the time!”

And, while they amputate the appropriate limbs for theft, not only do they not cut out their own tongues for lying, but they actively encourage it…yet lying is only the most basic form of theft – it’s the theft of the Truth. And theft IS crime.

So “allah” is only an immoral thief, just like his creator, Muhammad was.

PS: The ends don’t justify the means – they only ever really DEFINE the end results: If you lie, murder and steal to get your way, in the end, you’re NOT “a great success” – you’re still really only a lying, murdering THIEF!

“If that is beyond your means, fast for three days. That is the expiation for the oaths ye have sworn. But keep to your oaths (to each other, not to infidels). Thus doth Allah make clear to you His signs, that ye may be grateful.” Surah 5:89 (In other words, if you feel guilty about lying, just go on a diet for three days and allah will forgive you).

“Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness (vain) in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing.” Surah 2:225

“Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief, except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith – but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty.” Surah 16: 106

The noted Islamic commentator, Al-Tabari explained Surah 16:106 as a verse that had been revealed to Mohammed after he learned that Ammar Ibn Yasser was forced to deny his faith in Mohammed when kidnapped by the Banu Moghera tribe. Mohammed consoled Ammar by telling him, “If they turned, you turn.” (Meaning: if they again capture you, you are allowed to deny me again.)

3:28 [http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html], 3:118, 4:89, 4:139, 4:144, 5:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

3:28. Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

And why would muslims “fear a danger from unbelievers”?

Maybe because the muslims have been told they are so superior to all the non-muslims in the world, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy responsibility to their god to extort, enslave, and murder them all for their ‘crime’ of not being muslims? That might upset their victims, so of course they’re supposed to lie in order to be able to ‘defend’ their holy right to continue to commit their crimes against their victims!

Ibn Kathir quotes ahadith which are not included in Khan’s translation but are included in Aisha Bewley’s, in his explanation of 3:28.

… meaning, except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said,

“We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.”

Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, “The Taqiyah (holy deception and lying to infidels to promote the islamic criime-gang) is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” (i.e: forever and always).

Qur’an 9:3     “Allah and His Messenger dissolve obligations.”
Qur’an 66:2     “Allah has already sanctioned for you the dissolution of your vows.”

Islam elevates lies and deception to the level of a sacrament.

So, don’t ask a muslim about islam, because it’s inevitable that they will lie to you about it, as they lie to themselves about it.

Just read their stuff for your self, secure in the knowledge that it is immutable and will never change.

;-)

Posted in Corruption, Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, War | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment