TROLLS EXPLAINED! TV Really Does Make Us Stupid!

As I was getting ready to post this article the other day, I chanced upon someone over at JihadWatch who was quoting an older article which was arguing the exact opposite, so I figured I’d use it as a foil against which to sharpen up my own thesis. Simply put, Charlton’s hypothesis is that there’s an inverse correlation between intelligence and wisdom – the more intelligent people become, the less wise or smart. Now, while of course having a greater intelligence could lead people to actually think more slowly than their less “intelligence-impaired” brethren (because they have more facts to sort through before arriving at their conclusions) it isn’t likely to impact those conclusions’ veracities, as their increased scope of awareness would also lead them to envision scenarios and causes effecting the likely outcomes, too.

Let’s define terms:

Intelligence is speed of thought and memory; while smarts (previously known as ‘wisdom’) is how one uses it.


Thus one can be slow and wise, like the old Indian shaman stereotype, or fast (intelligent) and dumb (unwise), where one is able to do dumb things faster and more accurately – like running one’s head straight into a brick wall at the precise point one had intended to do so.
Liberals are especially prone to the latter, in acting on ‘instinct’ (emotion) they are apt to assert “We must do what the violent criminals want, or else they’ll do what they want to us anyway!” These knee-jerk reactions give the false appearance of liberals ‘thinking’ faster than the more considerate conservatives, as if automatic Submission were an intelligent habit to cultivate, but it really only proves them to be the real ‘reactionaries!’

Liberals embody the reflexive binary, automatic masochistic fear-focused determination to turn fear into rage [as Fear IS Greed(y Hope)]:


“If it isn’t broken, and we don’t attack first and rush in to “fix” (break) it, then some other fools will surely beat us to it! Whee!”
The second they imagine an immoral, scary bad idea, they will submit to ‘ethically’ compromising with it.
This leads them to always accidentally “fail upwards,” as, in refusing to solve problems, the exponential symptoms of their perpetual crimes of negligence cause the creation of endless crises for them to then exploitively, lucratively manage, as “there’s no money in solutions!”
But the true fault and differences between the two approaches to the dynamics of life must obviously lie in the software, (training/education) not the hardware (genetic intelligence), as was erroneously proposed by Bruce G. Charlton. Charlton seems to think the stereotypical and habitual pedantry of supposed geniuses (harping on minutae, in stead of seeing the big picture) is caused by something genetic, in stead of a choice to avoid being seen as wrong.
But those habitual choices are all driven, these days, by the “info-tainment” sales industry and advertising:
It’s a monkey-see, monkey-do process, foisted on our kids by the corporate advertising salesmen who always advertise fear in order to sell us the greedy hope of relief from their own initial threats – all it really is, is the same, ages-old stick and carrot, fear and greed behavioural conditioning binary at work.
They “teach” (abuse) our children with the libertine’s divide and conquer notion that they can have pleasure without pain, hope without fear, and rights without responsibilities – in fact, they ‘teach’ them every alibi excuse under the sun to pretend to have a false right to remain irresponsibly wrong, while also avoiding their own responsibility to become right by offloading it onto their victims by slanderously blaming them first. It’s a criminal’s kleptocracy.
What sane people call “the slippery slope,” liberals call “progress!”
And it’s no more than EXTORTION – aka coercion, duress, intimidation, bullying, harrassment, activist agitation, and of course, “terrorism” – criminality, exactly like in islam.
Kids today are actually being trained to become vapidly inane, shallow and contentious trolls, by watching TV; I’ve just stated why this is, and here’s exactly how:
Actors are lying fakers, and are reading from scripted responses, so their TV and film characters’ (“heroes’”) patter is always immediate and enlightened; in order to fit into their given time-slot and to advance the “narrative,” (story,) so, even when they seem to consider an option, at most it’s portrayed as “Hm!” – an immediate, considered response. Even when a character is scripted as insane or mistake-prone, he or she is a foil for the others who are instantly able to accurately appraise and devise plans to correctly counter their errors.

Thus our children are being trained to believe they too must instantly present a response – ANY response – as quickly as possible, and also that any response at all is all that is required.

So if and when a feral millennial responds with “I know you are but what am I!?” it’s held as good enough among their peers; because, as AN answer was given, it qualifies as a valid response.

They have been taught (abused) to react, trying to fight “fire” (fear and pain) with more of the same, creating a “pre-emptively defensive,” static fact-proof and habitual mind-shield to pre-empt other peoples’ “inevitable” attacks.

Re: The actual conclusion an author over as PsychologyToday comes to, concerning these allegedly too-smart people is: “They think in situations where they are supposed to feel.”

Emotive liberals say “Bonds are formed between people based on empathy, not on laws!”

But “altruism” and “empathy” is really only masochism – the desire to cancel other people’s natural fear and greed, by making THEM feel safe and happy, respectively!


In this case, empathy is a temporary masochism, a hope of solving a problem – BUT it can become a bad habit, self-enslaving in order to feel morally superior, when it isn’t reciprocated.

If you try to cancel my fears by making me feel safe, and to cancel my greed by making me feel happy, BUT I don’t want to do the same for you, because I’m evil and my chosen way of feeling safe is to make you feel unsafe and defensive, off-balance, and my way of making me feel happy is to make you feel unhappy, then for you to keep trying to make me feel safe & happy would be a mistake on your part, because it would be only a choice to self-enslave your self to me, in order to feel morally superior: “If and when I CHOOSE to agree to let you assert that you’re better than me, then it’s all your fault, and, since it’s all your fault, then none of it’s my fault, so I’m still better than you! Whee!” This is “The Moral High Ground.”

Evil people do that, and cowardly masochists go along with it, because slaves need a master to blame for their own choices. After all, if “With great power comes great responsibility,” then it’s equally true that “With no power comes no responsibility! Whee!”

Good people try to neutralize your potential threat to them, by making you feel safe and happy. Evil people try to fight fire with more fire. It’s a shallow, knee-jerk reaction, and it doesn’t matter if their attacker is telling the truth; their reaction is victim-blaming slander, not depending on any facts.

That’s why these days, when presented with unfamiliar facts, TROLLS can be guaranteed to rudely LIE to refute them(in stead of, say, simply asserting “I find that hard to believe!” and/or asking one to “Prove it?!”) – they will say “NO IT ISN’T!” or “NO IT DOESN’T!” and then dig themselves in ever deeper to bolster their initial reaction with rationalizations by doubling down on their LIES.

(Presenting one’s entirely fact-free, subjective opinion AS an objective fact, is to lie).

And the justification is slander: that they have to lie, “because everyone else is lying to them, too!”

That’s the problem with what passes for online public social media “discourse” these days – it’s an endless war of conflicting opinions, presented as facts! In order to not “lose the argument” an instant response, however wrong, is required these days. “Gotcha” politics and one-upmanship are the TROLL’s hallmarks.

Nobody seems to have ever bothered to teach these feral trolls that lying is the most basic form of theft – it’s the (at least, attempted) theft of the Truth. Since all crimes are forms of theft, lying (“fraud”) is a crime, and all such criminally libertine “liberals” are really no more than puerile thieves.

Is it even possible to be “glib,” yet always right (‘wise’)? 
As it turns out, YES it is! With training.
The nitty-gritty today is, as was foretold in the distant past by such luminaries as Isaac Asimov, that:
Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.’”
In stead of teaching kids how to think for them selves, or even what to think, all the so-called “education system” seems to do these days is teach kids how to not think at all – how to avoid thinking entirely. It thus only indoctrinates them into remaining infantile delinquents, (worse than the juvenile kind) dependent on the nannystate for all direction in their lives. It only ‘teaches’ them (abuses them) to enjoy slavery, to pave their own roads to hell with good intentions, and to look forward to the trip.
They tempt children into believing their lies: that, “Since life is too complex for cause and effect to ever really be understood, all facts are really only opinions, so your fact-free subjective opinions are the diversely opposite equals to those silly conservatives’ objective facts! Whee!”
Abusing kids with these false notions of “entitlement,” (to rights without concomitant corollary responsibilities) is a crime.
It also short-circuits the basic learning process, where exposure to unfamiliar ideas only STARTS with denial, but then moves on to acceptance. Liberals insist kids have the false right to remain irresponsibly wrong, to not be “offended” by having their “feelings hurt” by initial exposure to the often-painful Truth.
Their proud motto of “And always remember, kids – there’s no wrong answers!” corrupts kids into stopping learning at the point of their initial “But I don’t want to learn it!” reactions, depriving them of both their responsibility and their rights to learn to become self-reliant and responsible adults.
Victimology is irrationality or ‘deranged thinking:’
Criminals (“muslims” and “liberals”) have to pretend to be deranged – to reverse cause-and-effect, or proclaim life is too complex for it to exist at all – in order to present themselves as victims BY blaming their own victims for their criminal desires and actions.
Proud criminal idolaters pretend rights and responsibilities are unrelated opposites.
Any sense is based on dynamic thought and precise specifics, NOT static preconceived alibi-excuse generalizations (idolatry/nonsense)!
It’s the difference between seeing things as static nouns(Good/Bad) or dynamic verbs (Gain/Risk).
And NO ONE in academia/higher-learning/University/College ever seems to understand this; in fact, their income depends on the exact, criminally negligent, fraudulent opposite, as in: “There’s No Money In Solutions!” – and of course “Remember, kids! There’s No Wrong Answers! Whee!”
Such Libtards always sound literally retarded simply because they’re always trying to convince the law-abiding, sane people that theft and extortion are good ideas!
Lying criminal idolaters like to pretend dynamic verbs are static nouns (and ‘verse-vicea’) – for instance, like the ongoing circumstantial and situational process of reasoning is pretended by them to be some sort of standalone entity, once ‘abstracted’ or removed from that same circumstantial, situational context – which they then call ‘Reason.’

As if ‘it’ could exist without any people actually ‘reasoning!’

And let’s not forget the criminals’ favourite idolatry: “Tolerance!” (towards everything?! Well, it certainly seems like that’s what they mean; after all, their “Judge Not – EVER!” interpretation of Christian doctrine means “Go Along” (with criminal lies) “To Get Along” (with all the other lying criminals, too)!

The common liberal trope stance today is that not having one’s feelings hurt, trumps risking being offended by the often-painful truth – as if all humans didn’t naturally first react in denial to all new ideas (see Elizabeth Kubler-Ross and others).
Since they do, it’s not the responsibility or right of any other human to short-circuit their natural learning process – of going from fear to hope – by retarding them or allowing them to retard them selves by indulging in their first instinctive response:
“But I don’t want to learn that!”
Unfortunately, this is exactly what the corrupt traitors in today’s so-called education system are abusing the children in their charge with, by dint of tempting kids with it:
“Remember, kids – there’s no wrong answers! Whee!”
Their next step is inevitably to assert it’s “unfair!” that other people learn to do things better than they can do them, and to then also insist those others be prevented from learning, too!
Liberal “educators” say it’s perfectly fine for students to hate learning new things, but then want to make ‘hate’ illegal too!
ALL “Academic” and “discipline” fields of education are nothing more or less than basic Idolatries:
Beyond the leftists’ group-rights, fear-avoiding idolatry and politics, what universities and colleges most abuse people with is in describing dynamic, human-driven processes, (habits) by the use of static nouns, as static, immutable objects. c.f: “Economics;” “Politics;” “Psychology;” etc – as if these things, like “Reason,” “Freedom,” etc actually existed as real things abstracted outside their only real circumstantial situational contexts of being nothing more than human actions and chosen activities.
i.e: “Freedom” TO – what? “Freedom” – FROM what?!
There is no such thing as the generalized, false concept of “Reason,” beyond some real live individual human people in different situational circumstances, doing some very specific reasonING.
In other words, they are idealized as static excuses, which “make” humans do things; as predetermining causes, not as the mere effects which they always, in fact, really are.
To “idealize” dynamic processes (into static ideals) by abstracting or removing them from their original situational circumstantial cause-and-effect contexts, is to lie (to commit intellectual & criminal fraud).
And psychology is binary – it’s a “hard science,” too, despite all the “soft science” evasions to date!
What have been described (or more accurately mis-labeled from an evolutionary hardware standpoint,) as the “primary” and “secondary” emotions, are simply the perceptual predictive levels of fear, greed, and hope. (Freud anthropomorphosized them as “Id, Ego, Superego.”)
The more intelligence (speed of thought and memory) an animal has, the ‘deeper’ the levels of it’s emotional perceptions CAN be, but they must be applied to the future, not short-circuited by fear.
Problem is, evil criminals begin with masochism, where they pretend to be able to “control” their natural logical fears, BY causing the very worst-case scenario pains they most fear!
You know that old saying, “We have nothing to fear, but fear itself!”?
It’s STUPID! And criminal, too!
The real Truth is:
“We have nothing to fear, but (the mistakes and problems which cause the) pain itself!”

In a related article, Charlton asked whether or not Christians were smarter or dumber than non-Christians.

Fearing fear AS pain, and then deciding to attack it BY ignoring it, in stead of listening to and learning from it, is the first lie all criminals tell themselves (AND their victims)! It’s the root cause of all blustering criminally negligent outrages and “sins!”

The ability to learn from mistakes, to solve problems, also leaves us able to (choose to) NOT learn from those same mistakes, and to refuse to solve problems (both of which choices define “Sin.”)
And “Sin” is a synonym for Crime, and “sinner” = criminal.”
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Liberal Enemedia Primer

From here:

An English primer (a glossary translating political rhetoric into plain English)

by Thomas Sowell

Appeared in National Review, Dec 31, 1985 v37 p17(1)

(h/t: Mars)

EVERY FIELD has its own special words and expressions which others find hard to understand. Politics is no exception. For those who have difficulty understanding the strange way words are used by politicians and the media, here is a glossary translating political rhetoric into plain English:

Crisis: Any situation you want to change.

Bilingual: Unable to speak English.

Equal opportunity: Preferential treatment.

Non-judgmental: Blaming society.

Compassion: The use of tax money to buy votes.

Insensitivty: Objection to the use of tax money to buy votes.

Simplistic: An argument you disagree with but can’t answer.

Rehabilitation: Magic words said before releasing criminals.

Demonstration: A riot by people you agree with

Mob violence: A riot by people you disagree with.

A matter of principle: A political controversy involving the convictions of liberals.

An emotional issue: A political controversy involving the convictions of conservatives.

Funding: Money from the government.

Commitment: More money from the government.

Docudrama: A work of fiction about famous people.

Autobiography: A work of fiction about yourself.

Federal budget: A work of fiction about government spending.

People’s Republic: A place where you do what you are told or get shot.

National liberation movements: Organizations trying to create People’s Republics.

Stereotypes: Behavior patterns you don’t want to think about.

Reaganomics: Media explanation of downturns in the economy.

Robust economy: Media explanation of upturns in the economy.

Constitutional interpretation: Judges reading their own political views into the Constitution.

Politicizing the courts: Criticizing judges for reading their own political views into the Constitution.

A proud people: Chauvinists you like.

Bigots: Chauvinists you don’t like.

Antiwar movement: Disarmament advocates who know the idea won’t fly under its own name.

Private greed: Making money selling people what they want.

Public service: Gaining power to make people do what you want them to.

Innovation: Something new.

New innovation: Something new by someone who doesn’t understand English.

Competency: Competence, as described by the incompetent.

Moderate Arabs: Mythical beings to whom State Department officials make sacrificial offerings.

Special-interest lobby: Politically organized conservatives.

Public-interest group: Politically organized liberals.

Accountability: Holding teachers, public officials, and private business responsible for their misdeeds.

Chilling effect: Holding journalists responsible for their misdeeds.


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Anarchists Are Communists, Not Libertarians

Just as Existentialism IS Nihilism, Anarchists ARE Communists.


Whether they like it or not, all people are individuals, not groups (of individuals). Many of them can (and do) lie, and endorse this pretense, because, as Brandon Smith noted, “their endgame … is conning the masses into believing that the group mind is real and that the individual mind is fiction.”

Yes, endorsing group rights is all about avoiding individual responsibility, and so they only commit this fraud to induce others to serve them as slaves.

Their posited “group Rights” is really only ever idolatry – an alibi of predestined, predetermined might-makes-right extortive force to excuse their lazy false claims of the right to remain irresponsibly wrong.

The common liberal trope stance today is that not having one’s feelings hurt, trumps risking being offended by the often-painful truth – as if all humans didn’t naturally first react in denial to all new ideas (see Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, Aristotle, and others).

Since they do, it’s not the responsibility or right of any other human to short-circuit their natural learning process – of going from fear to hope – by retarding them or allowing them to retard them selves by indulging in their first instinctive response:

“But I don’t want to learn that!”

Unfortunately, this is exactly what the corrupt traitors in today’s so-called education system are abusing the children in their charge with, by dint of tempting kids with it:

“Remember, kids – there’s no wrong answers! Whee!”

Their next step is inevitably to assert it’s “unfair!” that other people learn to do things better than they can do them, and to then also insist those others be prevented from learning, too!

Next up, this idolatrous fear of others’ thinking and learning is extended and extrapolated to their acquiring goods and services, through dint of trading (scary) hard work for them:

“But I don’t want to do that!”

Thieves (extortive “communist” gangsters) like to pretend that, “since resources are finite,” then everything other people (aka “The Makers”) earn, we’re really only ‘stealing’ from THEIR (unearned) share! (We should all get equal shares in everything without working for/earning or otherwise paying for them – right?)!

Nor should any other people be allowed to increase their shares of goods throug dynamic “economics,” for instance by trading labour and services for them. “That would be bad,” because it creates “inequality.”

Everyone must remain at the lowest common denominator of both education and number of possessions.

There should be no individual property rights. That is the only way the idolaters GROUP can feel “safe.”

Do it for the good of the gang – sacrifice your life to be and remain part of the Greater Good. And all groups need a leader – so that would be ME, they presume, as all crime-gangsters do. Might makes right!

Lazy people (criminals such as them selves) who want rights without responsibilities, to remain irresponsibly wrong, and entitled to their shares without working for them, should be able to halt and reverse the economic choices of those who, like themselves, become “victims” by agreeing to trade their share of the finite resources to those who are willing to trade work for them. Theft is good, and so communism (gangster extortion and theft) is naturally formed from the puerile anarchists’ selfish desires.

There is no free-will choice, so those who agree to trade possessions for work, were really only taken advantage of by those sneaky evil greedy selfish “capitalists.” Those 1%ers should have to give it back.

In short, they presume that they are automatically entitled to a one in seven billionth equal share of everything anyone else mines, hunts, traps, or builds on earth – they’re entitled to one in seven billionth of my salary (as, unfortunately, am I) but since they don’t work, they’re ahead of the “game.”

They realize large groups of other people already exist, so they want in on that action – they want to encourage other lazy Takers to form into gangs to extort the Makers into giving them free stuff.

They want to destroy the collective insurance companies called “Governments” their parents built up with their blood, sweat, and treasure, to tear them down and then re-built them, but this time with them in charge.

They want to offload their responsibilities onto groups of other people, to dilute them via group rights and in order to sell their fraud to others, they inevitably, and invariably must resort to groupthink idolatry.

This is both how and why lying Anarchists (who exist to tear down others’ groups, aka government) are NOT Libertarians (who are the Makers, and as such, only want to literally mind their own businesses).

Libertarians are Conservatives without the need for the group religious excuses for their own hopes.

Anarchists are really only a bunch of whiny liberal bedwetting crybaby, criminally negligent infantile delinquents who resent living in their parents’ world, (and basements) really only asserting “I never asked to be born!”

They forget that existing Civilization was built up by individuals who built their own roads, owned their own properties, and then decided to band together to defer the maintenance to ever-larger groups of insurance company-like entities, which eventually became “government.”

Now all the land is taken, and these newborns don’t like following the rules built up by others over time and tradition, so they want to tear it all down and re-build what will only amount to being basically the exact same thing, but with THEM in charge this time!

Government, (best conceived of by Albert Einstein as the largest collectively-owned insurance company) is a great idea if and when it doesn’t compete with (much less pre-empt) private enterprise; it’s OK for the government to buy food to feed the poor, but not to demand that only it is qualified to regulate food growing everywhere, much less to restrict and deny private individuals from growing or stockpiling their own food. Same goes for defending every other need: government can defend the country, but not restrict the citizens’ rights to also own and bear their own arms to defend them selves; government can and should enhance private defense, but never replace it!

The false “group-might-made-rights” idol is gangster extortion, and as such, is often communicated by soft, self-correcting “political correctness.”

While the criminal Takers are always motivated to assert without need for proof: “I’m Better Than You!” the Makers are too busy lilterally minding their own businesses to work diligently to contradict and disabuse them of their extortiive fraudulent criminal slanders.

I doubt there will be a fight, because the Makers, by our very natures, CAN NOT RESIST EVIL MEN, simply because we’re trying to hope to collaborate to objectively solve universal problems, while the Takers – the PC (Psychopathic Criminal) negligent, delinquent libertine “liberals” are all focused on their fears, and obsessively “PMS“ing about it all the time – since they don’t believe in winning, they spend all their time trying to not-lose, to prove “I’m better than you!” all the time, by attacking innocent others first.

They are Paranoids (“They’re all out to get me!”) Masochists (“I’d better focus on my fears AS pain, lest I forget to defend myself, since hope is a trick!”) and Slanderers (“Since they’re all out to get me, I’d better get all of them, first!”).

Political correctness (i.e: factual incorrectness) is extortion – fraud and slander – in that it pretends a civil ‘probable’ test applies, based on group-might-made-rights scenarios, to all aspects of life: white males are always to be ‘legally’ and ‘defensively’ pre-judged as “guilty until never proven innocent,” for instance. It’s extortion, and extortion is always a crime!

What sane people call “the slippery slope,” liberals call “progress!”

Political correctness (slanderous victim-blaming factual incorrectness) is both fraud (crime) and extortion – pretending that, either you lie along with the majority, or you’ll be replaced with a better liar by that same majority; group might makes right! Exact same as communazism.

It extorts people to “Go Along” (with criminal lies) “To Get Along” (with criminal liars).

PC pretends one is responsible to other people for their (possibly mistaken) reactions to one’s new ideas, or to ideas which *might* offend them.

And the offense taken, is always subjective.

Since the deliberate use of PC implicitly slanders people AS being offensive, it attacks first, and therefore also inherently defends first-attackers (criminals).

PC implies one can and so should manage or avoid others’ inevitable reactions of denial (automatic ‘offense’) to one’s exchange of ideas, as if one somehow ‘should,’ even if one could, always try to defuse all of their normal psychologically procedural reaction stages (i.e: basic thinking) as summed up by Elizabeth Kubler-Ross.

Normal people WILL REACT to new ideas BY a well-established process of denial to acceptance, so it’s literally outrageous to posit that any one person is responsible for monitoring, or has a duty to actively prevent this common thought process occurring in others.

This thought, or “thesis” (previously “Theosis,” of “knowledge of God”) process, prioritizing focus on the ‘BAD’ (the anti-thesis) in order to avoid it and ultimately test a hypo-thesis, to prove it good (as the final “syn-thesis”) has been historically referred to as “Greek Logic” and called “Hegelian Dialectics,” before Kubler-Ross added her modern speculations to it, but it’s obviously nothing more than basic

So obviously, “Political Correctness” is only an extortion attempt at THOUGHT CONTROL, designed to shield criminals’ crimes, and to prevent everyone from thinking at all, beyond the most shallow and banal trivialities. It defines the willfully ignorant and irresponsible, criminally negligent “victimology” process.

It is to insist (as all authoritarian extortions do) that one must ALWAYS Submit one’s self to the greater (gang’s “might-makes-right”) good.

What is currently misconceived as ‘altruism’ and ‘Hegelian dialectics’ is really only a lie: a slanderous fraud designed to induce perpetual guilt in the victim, by way of the same, ages-old “carrot-and-stick,” fear-and-greed behavioural conditioning binary.

It’s proponents sadistically advocate for perpetual, self-sacrificing masochism in others, demanding they pacifistically agree with the predatory criminal aggressor’s militaristic notion that they have no right to self-defense, nor even to think about planning for it.

To them, if their victims even THINK about planning to defend them selves, it’s “slandering” the criminals AS the aggressors, (which they in fact already ARE, just by dint of their PC extortion-attempts).

Bottom line: criminals hate other people (potential victims and/or potential opponents) thinking about their crimes, just as they hate the admitting to them selves of being criminals.

And hating thinking has always had a perfectly valid label: “Psycho-Path” (literal translation: “Thought-Killer”).


Like I said:

“PC” (Psychotic Criminal) “Liberals” are all about the “PMS” (Paranoid Masochistic Slander).

The general paranoia looks to the past, the masochism to the present, and the slander addresses the future.

Armoured and armed with such emotive generalities, criminal psychopaths have no need to think of any specifics.


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

AGENDA 21: Who’s in YOUR Wallet?

AGENDA 21:  Who’s in YOUR Wallet?


Have you read about UN Agenda 21 or Sustainable Development? 

Do you know what it is?  Are you aware it is being played out in RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE?  Even a Democrat gets it!

TAKE A LOOK at these videos!!

Rosa Koire explains Agenda 21 (1.45mins) – July 11, 2015:

Rosa Koire Speaks in Bradley County, TN (www … – YouTube

grindall61 shows what is going on in CA today (23.07mins) – June 1, 2015:

this is one of the most important videos you will ever see on agenda

NOW, Go to, share this information and sign up for my newsletters!!
Download and keep a copy, for EVERYTHING  – is dictated by the UN and can be found in this book of 40 chapters, 350 pages designed to CONTROL EVERY aspect of HUMAN ACTIVITY.


By now, you’re saying:
“Oh Karen, You are a crazy person. That is just NOT TRUE. 

America is a Sovereign Nation – NOT governed by the United Nations!” 

REALLY? Wanna bet money on that?

Just look at what is going on today.  Every president since Bush 41, including Jeb – who partnered Florida with the UN (SEE: has seceded power from the American People…to the UN!

NGO’s (Non-Government Organizations) form regional councils and make local government irrelevant as they make new unconstitutional statutes forcing individuals to lose private property. Private property is “NOT SUSTAINABLE” because if you own 1 acre and I own 10, that is not “fair”. If you own a business and I don’t, that is not fair. Equal opportunity, not social justice is the true meaning of fair.
Obama’s actions of getting affirmation from the UN first is nothing new.  Obama has just succeeded in making it well known, out in the open. It is the goal of the moderates both RINOS AND DINOS, aka GLOBALISTS – to eliminate the US Constitution of Rights…granted by God – for the UN Earth Charter of Rights granted by Government and Man. 
UN Habitat stated: “Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Social justice, urban renewal and development, the provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole.”

Wonder why we are in SO MUCH DEBT? 

UN VP Christian Figueres told us time and time again! Were you listening: UN Climate chief calls for TRIPLING of Clean Energy investment. Why? to save the planet, of course – or is it? “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said.
Read More At Investor’s Business Daily:
The HIDDEN GOAL comes to the SURFACE.


Because individuals CAN OWN Land and Businesses,

and that is not FAIR!

Because of income redistribution, they must Nationalize all industry. 

How is that accomplished? According to Agenda 21, just label these businessesUnsustainable. Whatever that means…and whichever bureaucrat defined it as such!

Call them polluters, tax them, and fine them out of existence. Let the Government take over and run the show!

Let the inefficient, corrupt Government RULE…


Teach in schools that Government is God, and in 12 years – the new graduates are WILLING to give up their Freedoms, all while they turn on their families and country.  

Why choose the Environment and Energy? Fear of destroying the Earth motivates the people to action, while Energy is POWER necessary for every business and product to function.  Make the people AFRAID, and they willingly GIVE UP THEIR POWER.

Power cannot be in the hands of the individual. It is not FAIR!
Who benefits? The corporations in bed with the government, as the individual is forced to use these new “safe, energy, efficient products.”  The fact that they are ridiculously expensive and often don’t work never comes into play. After all, if the individual cannot afford a car, they can rent one. If they cannot afford a house, they can rent one.  Renters are slaves to their landlords – we go back to the old days and ways of becoming indentured servants.  American is founded on property rights
and individual freedom.

The Founding Fathers of our great Republic fought a Revolution to throw off the chains of a tyrannical and repressive government.

The Founders created the

Constitution and Bill of Rights

of the United States of America to

GUARANTEE those Rights

to Americans and future generations.

Once the Constitution and American History


the Chains of Tyranny…Return.

Don’t believe me?  Read analysis of Executive Order #13603 – by Dave Hodges:

Obama’s EO 13603 Reintroduces Slavery to America

Executive Order 13603Obama authorizes SLAVE LABOR on a


Trump Goes Head On Against The NWO! This Is Why Establishment Politicos And MSM Want Him Gone

Why do you think Donald Trump is SUCH A THORN – in the GOP’s Side? 

His non-PC is only part of it. He is living proof that a man from modest means with hard work can become a huge success. He understands how to work the system. He wants to share that information with you.  He has shared it with you in his book, “The Art of the Deal.” He values success and realizes if America is successful, he will be more successful. He values and understands the meaning of American Exceptionalism.

He is not afraid to say, ”  I am a success – and you can be one too.”  The Donald…is NOT for Sale. He made it on his own HARD WORK, and is not beholden to LARGE CORPORATIONS, or the GOP. Interesting, isn’t it?

  If not YOU, WHO?  If not NOW, WHEN?
In Liberty,
Karen Schoen

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Taqiyya Template Terminated!

The common liberal trope stance today is that not having one’s feelings hurt, trumps risking being offended by the often-painful truth – as if all humans didn’t naturally first react in denial to all new ideas (see Elizabeth Kubler-Ross and others). Since they do, it’s not the responsibility or right of any other human to short-circuit their natural learning process – of going from fear to hope – by retarding them or allowing them to retard them selves by indulging in their first instinctive response: “But I don’t want to learn that!”

Unfortunately, this is exactly what the corrupt traitors in today’s so-called education system are abusing the children in their charge with, by dint of tempting kids with it:

“Remember, kids – there’s no wrong answers! Whee!”


But islam can be easily studied and known in its entirety, by anyone. It will never change!

So, when Western people won’t educate them *selves* about islam because our culture defers all thinking to those “authorities” we PAY to do our thinking and research for us, while they secretly know full-well that the salesmen in charge will always sell us all out, they ARE CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT INFANTILE DELINQUENT TRAITORS TO RATIONALITY AND CIVILIZATION!

It should never be allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (muslims) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes!

No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, and nobody is doing even these muslims any favours, by indulging their historic lies that islam is a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) or a “race” (much less one of poor oppressed “People Of Colour”)!

Pretending there is NOT a Muslim problem but only a white racist problem accepting diversity, is criminally negligent TREASON.

Keeping the muzzie masses ignorant of their own hate-crime death-threat canon seems to be the self-imposed mission of most of the enemedia, government and of course their corporazi owners these days – it’s most likely why they keep lying about islam being a “great religion of peace” all the time! That, and their inherent racism, of course!

We wouldn’t want any of these poor oppressed mentally-inferior swarthy holy-mobster criminals to suffer any “blowback” retaliation (i.e: JUSTICE) for their crimes, now, would we?

Anyway, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller deconstructed one of the most vile recent  muslim attempts at proselytizing to our children, by slandering them all as hatefully bigoted racists, in a teen magazine today!

From HERE:

Proselytizing for and whitewashing Islam in…Teen Vogue


Over at, I discuss yet another sly exercise in Islamic proselytizing slipped into a forum that would have no space for a similar presentation from any other religious group:

Teen Vogue is just that: a magazine for teenage girls. Articles featured on its front page today include “Justin Bieber and Sam Smith Are Already Listening to Tori Kelly’s New Album, and You Should Be, Too”; “The 35 Coolest Back-to-School Backpacks”; “7 Desserts That Require No Baking At All”; “The Complete Guide to Washing Your Makeup Brushes — Yes, You Need To”; and the immortal “I Understand My Period, But What’s Coming Out Of Me The Other Three Weeks of the Month?” In that company, “10 Misconceptions About Islam That Muslim Americans Are Tired of Hearing” stands out like Hillary Clinton at a Tea Party meeting, and manifests the indefatigable determination of Muslims to proselytize anywhere and everywhere they can, as well as the naive multiculturalism of Leftist publishers and editors who give them a platform to speak positively about their religion that they would never offer to Jews or Christians or any other religious group.

This piece, like so many others of its kind, packages its proselytizing in the guise of clearing up “misconceptions” that people supposedly have about Islam, and follows the pattern of other articles like it in presenting some “misconceptions” that no one really holds and are entirely innocuous anyway amidst others that are more or less straight proselytizing and outright deception designed to keep Americans — even those far more concerned about Kendall Jenner and Katy Perry than about Mohammad Abdulazeez and Usaama Rahim — ignorant and complacent about the jihad threat.

And it starts, unsurprisingly, with a highly questionable anecdote that situates Muslims firmly as victims, and smears opponents of jihad terror as bigots:

10 Misconceptions About Islam That Muslim Americans Are Tired of Hearing,” by Hishaam Siddiqi, Teen Vogue, July 6, 2015:

Can you grab that bottle of Sriracha on the top shelf?” my mother asked, as we made our way down the “ethnic” aisle at our local grocery store. It was around 5:30pm, my father was almost home from work, and my mother and I were out getting last minute ingredients for dinner. As we waited in the checkout line, waiting to pay for our goods, I hear a voice behind me, “You here to steal something?”

I turn around to find a tall man, broad shoulders, a baseball cap pulled low over his forehead, looking straight at my mother. I stand there bewildered, wondering if this was an acquaintance of hers trying to be funny or make some sort of weird joke.

Are you here to blow something up? Why are you wearing that?” he barks again, referring to my mother’s hijab and abaya. At this point, everyone within earshot tenses up and I find myself flooding with both embarrassment and panic. What was this guy trying to get at? We were just at the grocery store trying to get home on time, and this man, who we had never seen before, was going out of his way to harass my mother.

Unfortunately, this wasn’t an isolated incident. My mother, petite as she may be, has no problem holding her own and isn’t new to being singled out and hassled for her choice of Islamic clothing. She clearly and eloquently explained her religious garb to the man, told him to not yell at her, and swiftly sent him on his way.

Note the semaphores: “the ‘ethnic’ aisle at our local grocery store” — America is intrinsically racist, “otherizing” racial and religious minorities in innumerable ways large and small, even to the point of labeling an aisle containing food that Muslims eat the “ethnic” aisle, as if it is not quite American. “Baseball cap pulled low over his forehead” — a racist, redneck yahoo. “A tall man, broad shoulders…My mother, petite as she may be” — Muslims are weak, small, endangered victims of monstrous, hulking bullies. “Are you here to blow something up? Why are you wearing that?” — only idiots who do things like berate strangers in supermarkets are concerned about Islamic terrorism. “Unfortunately, this wasn’t an isolated incident. My mother, petite as she may be, has no problem holding her own and isn’t new to being singled out and hassled for her choice of Islamic clothing.” — Muslims are routinely subjected to this kind of treatment, you see. And while there may indeed exist baseball cap-wearing louts who bark at petite hijabis in the ethnic aisle, although I highly doubt it, the claim that this anecdote represents a general tendency is belied by FBI hate crime statistics that show that anti-Jewish hate crimes are over four times more common than anti-Muslim hate crimes — but you don’t see Jews whining in Teen Vogue about creeps who yelled at them in a supermarket.

Growing up, I’ve had plenty of these experiences. Whether it was strange looks at my mother or jokes about my Arabic name, life as a Muslim in post 9/11 America isn’t the cutest feeling. The constant villainization of Muslims in mainstream media makes it difficult to do even simple things such as buy groceries or get through airport security without crude jokes or dangerous assumptions, and with the murder of three innocent Muslim kids in Chapel Hill this past year, it’s clear that stereotyping can lead to even fatal consequences.

The constant villainization of Muslims in mainstream media”? What? Where? When? Has Siddiqi never heard of Christiane Amanpour or Niraj Warikoo or Lisa Wangsness or Manya Brachear or a thousand other mainstream media “journalists” who do their utmost to whitewash Islamic jihad terror and to “villainize” those who oppose it? Is there even a single instance of this “villainization” to which she could honestly point? The mainstream media goes out of its way to distance Islam and jihad from terrorism, and seizes upon every possible opportunity to present Muslims and Islam in a positive light. This claim that Muslims are “villainized” in the media is designed to inhibit even further any honest reporting about jihad terror activity.

There is actually no evidence whatsoever that the murder of the Muslims in Chapel Hill was motivated by hatred of Muslims. The fact that Hishaam Siddiqi (along with many other Muslim writers these days) refers to it reveals how rarely Muslims are really victimized: instead of being able to point to an actual murder inspired by anti-Muslim hatred, they keep having to point to this one, in which the victims happened to be Muslim but their religion had nothing to do with why they were murdered. This is because there aren’t any murders inspired by anti-Muslim hatred.

Fortunately we live in the age of technology and open information—we don’t always have to be victims of ignorance and perpetuate harmful stereotypes. Misconceptions can be overcome with a simple but powerful thing, knowledge: here are ten common misconceptions about Islam and Muslims to help you break the cycle.

No one wants to be ignorant and hateful, or to be thought of as such. In this connection, remember the supermarket racist’s question: “Are you here to blow something up?” To be concerned about Muslims because of jihad terrorism, you see, is ignorant and hateful. And now Hishaam Siddiqi helpfully provides the antidote.

1. Muslim women have no rights
This is definitely a hot-topic and complicated issue but one of my favorite misconceptions to tackle. It’s important to realize the difference between cultural influences and religious policy. Many countries across the world, including Muslim countries, have patriarchal cultures (cultures in which men are automatically assumed to lead), which are often socially constructed and influenced by the traditions, gender roles, and practices of that culture. Islam as a religion, however, preaches equality of the sexes. There are many Muslim women who have made great accomplishments in the fields of science, entertainment, academia, art, and politics—just this year, Ameenah Gurib-Fakim, a professor of biology, became president of Muslim majority African country Mauritius!

It’s a common Islamic apologist’s claim that the mistreatment of women in Muslim countries is due to culture, not Islam, but this is absurd on its face. Islam is an all-encompassing system, covering every aspect of life. Does Hishaam Siddiqi expect us to believe that in countries where it has been firmly entrenched for nearly 1,400 years, it hasn’t had any effect on the culture? On the contrary: in such countries, Islam is the culture. And while the claim that “Muslim women have no rights” is an overstated straw man, the mistreatment of women in Islamic countries is firmly rooted in Islam. The Qur’an likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills: “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” (2:223). It declares that a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man: “Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her” (2:282). It allows men to marry up to four wives, and have sex with slave girls also: “If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice” (4:3). It rules that a son’s inheritance should be twice the size of that of a daughter: “Allah (thus) directs you as regards your children’s (inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females” (4:11). Worst of all, the Qur’an tells husbands to beat their disobedient wives: “Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them” (4:34). It allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that Islamic divorce procedures “shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated” (65:4).

2. Muslims worship a different God
A lot of people think Allah is a specific Islamic deity, but really it just means ‘god’ in Arabic. Christian Arabs even use the word Allah when referring or praying to God. And since Islam is an Abrahamic religion, Muslims believe Allah is the same God who Jesus, Moses, and other biblical prophets all prayed to.

This is a proselytizing point, based on the Qur’an (29:46, which says that Muslims worship the same deity as that of Jews and Christians). It is designed simply to mitigate the strangeness of Islam that many feel, arising from the huge amount of violence done in its name and in accord with its teachings.

3. Islam doesn’t mix with other religions Again, it’s important to make the distinction between the behavior of various cultures and politics of countries compared to actual religious theology. Islam is an Abrahamic religion, which is in the same family of religions as Judaism and Christianity. All three of the religions share many similarities, including important religious figures, historical events, and spiritual beliefs. In fact, Muslims are religiously required to believe in Jesus as a divine prophet. There have been numerous periods of history throughout the Middle East where Muslims, Jews, and Christians lived together for centuries.

as long as the Jews and Christians knew their place, and paid the jizya, a Qur’an-specified poll tax, “with willing submission,” and felt themselves “subdued” (Qur’an 9:29). If, on the other hand, Jews and Christians refused to be subservient, they were massacred — as in the murder of 4,000 Jews in Granada in 1066, following the appointment of a Jewish vizier over the city, which Muslims believed violated the Qur’anic imperative that Jews must be subjugated.

4. Muslims must engage in Jihad, also known as holy-war
This misconception was a huge buzzword right after 9/11 and still does come up every now and then. A lot of people misconstrue Jihad to be a religious agenda to wage war, and is often cited as the reasoning for much of fringe Islamic extremism. However, Jihad doesn’t necessarily mean holy-war, it means to simply struggle for God—an overwhelming majority of Muslims are nonviolent and unfairly lumped with Islamic extremists. Jihad, as most Muslims see it, can include anything from wearing a head scarf to school even though you get teased for it to setting aside allowance money to donate. While fighting for your religious beliefs can be a form of jihad, the term itself refers to any sort of struggle to do good.

This explanation doesn’t even attempt to claim that jihad warfare is not jihad. It just posits that there are other forms of jihad as well. So what? If they don’t compel jihad warriors to stop killing Infidels, they are of no interest to Infidels.

5. Sharia Law is taking over the United States
I always roll my eyes at this one. Sharia law is the theory of Islamic law, derived from centuries old religious and historical texts, which outlines things such as how to settle finances after divorce, the legality of adoption, social etiquette, economics, and other spiritual topics. Almost every time I’ve heard the word Sharia Law on the news, it’s been fear mongering that’s had little to nothing to do with the actual body of laws. There’s no broad Islamic drive to push religious laws onto other political systems.

The Muslim Brotherhood “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” — “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America,” by Mohamed Akram, May 19, 1991.

6. All Muslims are Arabs
Couldn’t be further from the truth! Out of the 1.6 billion Muslims living worldwide, over 60% of them are from South and South East Asia, with Indonesia being the most populous Muslim country, followed by Pakistan. In the United States, the largest Muslim demographic is African-American followed by South Asian. Not all Arabs are Muslims either—many Arab countries have very large and historic Christian and Jewish populations.

This one is completely unimportant, and probably only included to reinforce the contention that only racist, ignorant yahoos care about jihad terror.

7. Muslim women are forced to cover up
Although Islamic teachings do require women to dress modestly, how a woman chooses to cover herself and to what degree is under her autonomy. The different ways Muslim women cover varies both religiously (from simple headscarves to full robes) and also culturally, with each region having it’s on take on modest clothing. Unfortunately, many patriarchal societies exploit this and force women to cover in order to systematically subjugate them.

How a woman chooses to cover herself and to what degree is under her autonomy? Really? Tell it to Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it; and to Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab; and to the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; and to Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; and to Amira Osman Hamid, who faces whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; and to the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; and to the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; and to the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; and to the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; and to the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; and to the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; and to the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; and to the women in Iran who protested against the regimeby daring to take off their legally-required hijab; and to the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; and to the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home andstarted living a double life in fear of her parents, and all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab.

8. Muslims starve for an entire month every year
This one is more of a misunderstanding than a misconception but it always makes me laugh because I hear it every year. Ramadan is a month in which Muslims partake in various charitable and religious activities, most prominent of which is fasting from sunrise to sunset in order to learn humility and appreciate their blessings. But you won’t believe how many people I’ve met who actually think we don’t eat or drink the entire month—not true! Although we do fast for one month, abstaining from food and drink only takes place during daylight hours, which usually ends with a big feast at sunset and way too many people over eating and raiding the fridge at 3am.

But you won’t believe how many people I’ve met who actually think we don’t eat or drink the entire month” — silliness. More ominous is that Siddiqi never mentions that Ramadan, because it is a time when Muslims renew their devotion to Allah, and because jihad is the supreme act of devotion to Allah, is a time of increased jihad terrorism. “The best acts that bring you closer to God are jihad, so hurry to it and make sure to carry out the invasion this holy month and be exposed to martyrdom in it,” so said Islamic State spokesman Abu Mohammed al-Adnani as Ramadan began this year.

9. Muslim Men are encouraged to practice polygamy
This misconception gets brought up a lot but a little historical context helps us better understand. Fourteen hundred years ago, during the rise of Islam, social structures did not provide women with the same assistance as they do today—women needed marriages not just romantically, but also as a means of protection, housing, employment, and tribalism. The law of allowing Muslim men to marry multiple wives was explicitly introduced so as to help widowed and divorced women retain social wellbeing. More importantly, Muslim men are discouraged from marrying more than one wife if they are unable to provide for them equally financially and emotionally. In many Muslim countries, and even Muslim communities here in the West, polygamy is looked down upon and considered an outdated tradition.

In reality, there are as many as 100,000 polygamous Muslim families in the U.S., in clear violation of U.S. law, and Islamic polygamy is not considered an “outdated tradition,” as it is sanctioned in the Qur’an (4:3).

10. Muhammad was the founder of Islam
Historians might consider Muhammad the one who introduced Islam, but Muslims believe Islam to be the same message revealed by Jesus, Moses, and all the other Biblical prophets. Additionally, Muslims do not pray to or worship Muhammad, if anything it is emphasized that he was human just like everyone else.

The same message revealed by Jesus, Moses, and all the other Biblical prophets. See? Nothing to be concerned about, unless you’re a baseball cap-wearing hijabi-harassing boor. So relax, Teen Vogue readers — only hatemongers care to resist Islamic jihad terror. Go back to Justin Bieber, and don’t worry about a thing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Thanks, Dems! Alinsky Plan Still On Track!

News at never.

Eight Levels Of Control!
 (this is scary)
    Saul Alinsky died about 43 years ago, but his writings influenced those in political control of our nation today…….
    Recall that Hillary did her college thesis on his writings and Obama writes about him in his books.
    Died: June 12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, Ca..
    Education: University of Chicago.
    Spouse: Irene Alinsky
    Books: Rules for Radicals, Reveille for Radicals
    Anyone out there think that this stuff isn’t happening today in the U.S.?
    All eight rules are currently in play.
    How to create a social state by Saul Alinsky: (Pay attention to his mandate, remember this almost 50 years ago
“There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important”.
    1) Health care Control health care and you control the people. Hello !

    2) Poverty Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing   everything for them to live. Really ?

    3) Debt Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. Is this not happening as you read this ?

    4) Gun Control Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. This happening, is it not ?

    5) Welfare Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). Is this not fact?

    6) Education Take control of what people read and listen to  take control of what children learn in school. Again, Hello ?

    7) Religion  Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. Thank You ACLU

    8) Class Warfare Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take Tax from the wealthy with the support of the poor. Is this not happening?

    Does any of this sound like what is happening to the United States?  Unless you are an idiot, you see that is exactly what is happening!

    Alinsky merely simplified Vladimir Lenin’s original scheme for world conquest by communism, under Russian rule.

    Stalin described his converts as “Useful Idiots.”

    The Useful Idiots have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control.

    It is presently happening at an alarming rate in the U.S.
    If people  can read this and still say everything is just fine  they are useful idiots.
    It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.” Pay Attention America, Soros/Obama created this nightmare of fact and clearly the “Lady” seeking to replace Obama has already confirmed she will follow the same path as Obama and his “useful idiots”

PS: See also the Cloward/Piven Strategy used by Obamination.  Note: George Romney was an Alinskyite.  The book delves deep into tactics, and they ain’t nice.

– Dajjal –

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

More Dangerous Than Islam!

What could be “More Dangerous Than Islam!” you ask?

The no-longer-so-nascent TPP “trade agreement” of course!

From here:

Their oil-bankster sales-master owners paid them to pass it, not read it.

This permanently shifts power from ALL governments to unelected corporations.

It bypasses all sovereign governments in favor of CORPORATE interests.

There will be no more “politics” allowed after this gets passed.
It’s a “Corporate Constitution” listing their rights over “our” governments.

That’s why it’s ‘secret,’ – because them selling off the country is TREASON.

“Our Leaders” know what’s best for us better than we do. That’s why we defer our responsibilities (and rights) to think for our selves by paying them to do our thinking “for us.” By which act we also told them we don’t consider our selves to be worth thinking about at all anyway! So we gave them the order to screw us!

They know what they’re doing – this gives them rights to their salaries authority and perks without any responsibility at all to we the people.

Having rights without responsibility is that “Progress!” which all criminals dream of: a right to our stuff without having to earn or otherwise pay for it!



Re: “Why is the Obamatrade deal being kept secret?”!


It’s a “Corporate Constitution!” It lists their rights over all of “our” governments.

Globalization is obviously treason to all sovereign national governments. Period.
So: anyone who signs this is a traitor. Period.

I actually know what’s in it (or what used to be in it). I have a rough-draft copy from a few years ago, when it was called “CETA.” Here it is:

Just check out the Union Farmer Quarterly Spring 2011/ Vol. 17 Issue 1 edition, pages 13 & 14 (Article by NFU president Terry Boehm). And/or you can see contact them or see them at and

Here’s what it says (or used to say, anyway):


CETA must be stopped (because it’s treason, plain & simple!)

– by National Farmer’s Union  President Terry Boehm

The NFU received a more recent draft of the CETA after the October round of negotiations.  On reading this document it is clear that our earlier analysis of the agreement was accurate and if anything, we see European positions hardening as the negotiation process continues.

The only bright spot in this process is that the specific reference to UPOV’91 has been dropped in this later version. I believe that the NFU ringing the alarm on this last summer played a huge part in getting this removed. However, the agreement still references working to advance UPOV, so we remain vigilant.

This agreement, while characterized as a trade agreement, is really about limiting the role of government to act in the public interest. It essentially penalizes governments if they do anything that could impact the profits of the largest corporations in the world.

What we have is a scenario where monopoly rents can be extracted indefinitely, and where governments are to create the conditions that perpetuate this by enforcing legislation like patents and other intellectual property rights as an example.

The courts are to become a vehicle of the corporations to threaten people with the precautionary seizure of their property if they are alleged to have infringed on an intellectual property right.


Intellectual property rights are to supersede all other property rights.


Governments are also to compensate corporations for lost profits in times of civil strife (strikes), war etc.


This is an additional clause to the equivalent provisions of the NAFTA Chapter 11 investor protection measures that this agreement is to include as well.

Governments can subsidize in very specific instances and sectors, for example the insurance sector. This will of course become increasingly important as natural disasters are to become more frequent with global warming. Coal is also to be freely subsidized.


What is particularly vexing is that the Europeans, or more accurately the European Commission is negotiating with these positions while the Canadians are seeking miniscule adjustments in Europe to increase acceptable GM contamination levels from 0.01 % to 0.1 % and to allow this for unapproved events as well.

Canadians are also hoping to gain access for hormone-treated beef products. European press and politicians including many members of the International Trade Committee of the European Parliament unequivocally state that this is not going to happen and that Canadian agricultural production will not gain significant inroads in Europe if we continue to insist on production methods that are unacceptable in Europe. Indeed Appendix 1 b of the draft exempts all European GM regulations from the provisions of this agreement.

What we must keep in mind is that the Europeans are able to generate surpluses in most agricultural commodities anyway and that they have east and central European neighbours right next door who can supply agricultural goods with much lower transport costs than we have.

The tariff levels between Europe and Canada are very low already – averaging about 4% – so this agreement can hardly open trade any further.

Unfortunately, the Government of Canada is selling this to Canadians as a free trade agreement (and our press is accepting this as well) when it really is a mechanism to redesign the function of government.


This can be the only rationale on behalf of the Canadian government as the actual economic benefits are so minimal when you carefully read the text.

The European Commission has the same neoliberal ambitions as the Canadian government but they are seeking to essentially re-colonize Canada for its natural resources and to open up government procurement at all levels to European companies.





It states that governments cannot favour local goods and service providers for any covered procurement subject to thresholds of the Government procurement agreement at the WTO. These are set at $135,000 for goods and services at the federal level and $355,000 at the provincial level and at $5,000,000 for construction projects.

The information I received from Canadian provincial negotiators in Brussels in January is that the three far western provinces are willing to reduce this to $25,000.

What this procurement covers under CETA is government activities but also municipal, hospital, school and university procurement.

One of the realities of this shift for agriculture is that it would be very difficult for any of these entities to establish local food systems.



The further danger in all of this is that governments trying to nurture local or domestic businesses would be disallowed from doing so.

Actions to favour disadvantaged areas or populations for, economic development would be subjected to the investor protection provisions if they impacted corporate profits negatively.

Environmental regulation would again be subject to these provisions.

Returning to the intellectual property rights (IPR) issues, one of the areas that will affect all Canadians is the effect these provisions will have on the cost of health care.



The Europeans are calling for extending drug patents by the length of time it takes a regulatory body to test and approve a product. This will both increase costs but will also pressure our regulators to make hasty approvals. If a minor use is found for the drug during the term of the patent it is extended again. In addition, the data supplied by the pharmaceutical or chemical company to the regulator is to remain exclusive to the companies for 10 to 13 years. It cannot be used for other studies or a base for creating alternatives.


Pharmaceuticals comprise one of the largest expenses of our healthcare system and this will add to their cost and transfer even more of our healthcare tax dollars to big pharmaceutical companies.

The precautionary seizure provisions remain in the new draft and extend to third parties accused of assisting in an ALLEGED infringement.


Interlocutory injunctions also are to be used to enforce patents or other IPR’s. The precautionary seizure of movable and immovable property and the freezing of bank accounts and communication of financial data of alleged infringers by the courts on behalf of corporations is an affront to democracy.

Farmers could be confronted with losing their farms, equipment, crops, and cash for being accused of having a patented gene in their crop.

In addition, a third party deemed to have assisted in the so-called infringement could be subjected to the same seizure provisions. This would include seed cleaners, for example.

The crops could be ordered to be destroyed or you could have an injunction placed on you to prevent you from planting your own seed.




It is clear that the culture of fear that flows out of these measures would cause most farmers to comply to corporate demands and pay the price for seeds or whatever input the corporations controlled, and produce in their deemed manner.

Farming as an autonomous occupation would evaporate. Those who farm accepting low returns because “I am my own boss” will be sorely surprised if this agreement comes to fruition.



Just as important, if not more, is what this agreement will do to our ability to govern autonomously. As you read the 361 pages of the CETA text, it is apparent that all of the advances made by our democracies are threatened and perverted by the real power behind this agreement and our governments are duplicitous pawns in a game of power not just over our food (via seeds) but over people as part of functioning democracies.

We have until the end of 2011 at best to stop this and we need to make this an issue wherever we can. The NFU has been protesting and lobbying both in Canada and in Europe but the level of knowledge is low among ordinary citizens and our government representatives.

We all need to challenge our politicians to look at this carefully and not just have them cheerlead for another trade agreement.

This is certainly not just another trade agreement but goes after the heart of our societies.


Also, Wikileaks proved this is still going on today as part of Obama’s SPP/TPP “deal:”

…and here:


Posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Europe, Globalization, gun control, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Technology, Treason, United Nations, United States, USA, War | Tagged , | 1 Comment