Islam IS Political Correctness

Islam is a perfect fit with modern liberalism: ISLAM IS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

What sane people call “the slippery slope,” liberals call “progress!”

Political correctness (slanderous victim-blaming factual incorrectness) is both fraud (crime) and extortion – pretending that, either you lie along with the majority, or you’ll be replaced with a better liar by that same majority; group might makes right! Exact same as communazism.

Political correctness = factual incorrectness.

Anything that qualifies, modifies or otherwise dilutes “Correctness” is, by definition, less than Correct: it’s Incorrect; a lie and a FRAUD. “Political” Correctness is a lie backed up with the threat of might-made “right.”

[Similarly, “Multi-Culturalism” is nothing but “PC,” too – extortion and slander – it implies that all “cultures” (cultural indoctrinations) must now be INCORRECTLY tolerated as “equal” because in the past they were “unfairly,” “intolerably” discriminated against as “unequal” by “hatefully prejudiced bigoted racists.” ONLY White, Western cultures are forced to be “Multi-Cultural.” The intolerant Saudis aren’t derided for banning all non-muslims from Mecca or for carving up women. Nobody forces the “racist,” isolationist Japanese to open their borders to “poor” muslim immigrants or ebola-stricken Africans].

PC is also a clear case of ends-justify-means,* might-makes-right. Political correctness is only advocating for others to masochistically Submit to extortion – to “Go Along” (with criminal lies) “To Get Along” (with lying criminals).

It is a pretended and idolatrous philosophy of perpetual and habitual self-sacrifice, (whether or not the given situational circumstances require it) which agrees with the militarist’s extortion creed slanderously asserted by all ‘Authorities” everywhere, that we never have a right to self-defense.

And enforced self-sacrifice isn’t self-sacrifice at all!

But PC is worse than that – it’s an extortion attempt at mind/thought control, it embodies an implicit threat asserting that one WILL be attacked, if and when one even dares to THINK about defending one’s self, or even about preparing to do so!

It reverses cause and effect, inflicting fear to effectively neuter our ability to be rational.

It embodies the criminal’s assertion that only they have rights, while we only have responsibilities. It advises and commands us all to embrace their slavery – or else!

“Militarists and Pacifists both agree that there should be no resistance to the use of force!”

PC pretends – as all nannystate kindergarten teachers always insist – that all “attacks” (even counter-attacks, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others) are equally BAD things; PC is a LIE defined by immoral relativism.

And lying is the most basic form of theft – it’s the at-least-attempted theft of the Truth. Since all crimes are forms of theft, lying (“fraud”) is a crime. And lying backed up with the implicit threat of force, is the crime of extortion.

PC is an empty, fake pseudo-philosophy of submission to despair, to “inevitable” pain and failure, EXACTLY like islam – which is probably WHY islam is being deliberately embraced and forced on us all by our would-be corporazi globalist bankster oil-masters.

Extortion = give up, Submit, or DIE. StopIslam ………………… Let’s examine the most basic psychological assumptions present in both Judeo-Christianity and islam. Christianity encourages hope; while islam enforces despair:

Genesis claims we ARE able to distinguish evil (attacking innocents first) from good (self-restraint) and Isaiah says God only wants us to Reason with Him, while muslims claim he is both unknown and unknowable, and liberals like to pretend life is too complex for any of us to ever really understand cause and effect, so there’s no such thing as free will, choice, self-reliant responsibility, or even evil crimes nor evil criminals, because we’re all really only helpless before random predetermined, predestined forces outside our control, so we’re really all only victims of society, products of our environments, and slaves of allah.

Since their god never gave us free will, it also never separated itself from its creation, so they (both muslims and liberals) are really only atheists – when one’s version of a god is generally only “Everything!*” it’s also specifically only “Nothing!” (Existentialism IS Nihilism)!

“Islam” literally means “pacification” (violently forced compliance) not peace (which is “salaam”). Islam is coercion, (aka intimidation, bullying, duress, harrassment, activist agitation, extortion, and of course, “terrorism”) – it’s not voluntary.

While at “worst,” all real religions only say:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

ONLY islam says:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

And a forced “Faith!” ISN’T a “Faith!” at all – it’s only extortion, which is always a crime (unless done in defense of one’s self &/or innocent others, which islam is most specifically NOT doing).

At “best,” islam is designed to protect muslims FROM allah, BY sacrificing  all the non-muslims in the world to him!

Islam is the religion of murder. And Satan was a murderer from the beginning.

Leftists admire the “noble savage’s” murderous “freedom” from self-restraint.

Islam is all about FORCE and group (family, clan, tribe, ‘religion’)-might-made “rights” ABSOLUTELY trumping all individual ones:

In islam, abortions aren’t limited by age – parents and grandparents can kill their children and grand-children at ANY age, with no legal penalties for these allah-sanctioned murders!

OBJECTIVITY means all individual humans (and citizens of any groups thereof) should be treated EQUALLY, with the exact same rights and responsibilities.

SUBJECTIVITY means special-interest double-standards, where certain groups claim: “Only we have rights (to attack you first) while you only have responsibilities (like, to not defend yourselves from our attacks)!”

So: Objectivity = universal equality (law);

Subjectivity = CRIMINAL double standards: the unsolicited, forced transfer of rights and responsibilities (crime), because it’s proponents insist that NOT everyone should have equal rights, and thus also insists some should be denied rights, in advance (and not because they have lost their rights BY trying to take others’ rights away).

Obviously, islam falls into the latter category, where us-vs-them might makes right.

Bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying definition of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of criminal laws.

Bad (“positivist,” “defensively pre-emptive”) laws are crimes because they attack first, by slandering citizens as criminals, and so also insisting that they have no inherent right to self-defense.

The Bibles posit God gave us free will BY separating us from Him (the tree, the expulsion).

So we’re left to discover basic cause-and-effect (‘scientific’) principles without having it forced on us.

We get to Reason things out, all on our own. And, according to Isaiah, that’s what God most WANTS us to do!

This means that we’re not pre-perfected robots, like the angels allegedly are.

The ability to learn from self-inflicted mistakes, to solve problems, also leaves us able to (choose to) NOT learn from those same mistakes, and to refuse to solve problems (both of which choices define “Sin.”)

And “Sin” is a synonym for Crime, and “sinner” = criminal.


CRIMINALS (1. muslims; 2. liberals) hold that there is no Golden Rule of Law and morality social contract between people (i.e; simply: “Do Not Attack First,”) because 1. allah (unlike our self-detatched God) always attacks first, and 2. life is too complex for anyone to ever really understand cause and effect.

In Judeo-Christianity, the notion of original sin posited that we can and do understand morality, and are therefore granted the free will to choose our own fates.

Both islam and liberalism deny free-will human conscience and responsibility; to them, we are all still really only dumb animals, at the mercy of our base instincts (like Muhammad demonstrated he was) and so there are no real evil crimes nor criminals, because we’re all only helpless victims: of society, products of our environments, and slaves of allah.

To both kinds of criminal, “God” didn’t give us free will, and didn’t stand back apart from his creation, separate (and distinct) from it. *

That “allah” is NOT in any way separate from his creation, is the MAIN point of islamic ‘theology.’

So their “god” is random, predetermined, predestined, unstoppable violent force (what the Qur’an describes as “in the way of allah”) – so “we can either Submit to this ‘fact,’ and thereby join it, or try to pointlessly resist it and so be destroyed by it.” Might Makes Right!

Both liberals and muslims pretend to be proud of their practicality in submitting to the extortionist’s creed that “We Have To Go Along” (with criminal lies) “To Get Along” (with lying criminals)! To liberals, this is called “Political Correctness,” and to muslims, it’s known as Submissive lying (“to Keep The Peace!”)

Liberals also call this cowardly instinctive Submission to despair: “shrewdness,” “realism,” & “realpolitik.”

Both liberals and muslims are group-might-makes-right criminal extortionist gangsters.

Both liberals and muslims believe in the supremacy of group identities over individual choices.

Both liberals and muslims believe in forcing outcomes which are against individual free-will choice.

Both use fatalistic predeterminism excuses: muslims: “the will of allah;” libs: “historical determinism.”

Both believe minority groups are helpless victims, slaves to destiny, and so should all be treated as such.

Both feel the right to be noblesse oblige elitist masters and so also to “protect” their submissive victim slaves, in stead of enabling them to defend them selves.

And, of course (being criminals) both reserve the right to always attack innocent others first. At most, they pretend to use “group rights” to “justify” this criminal position:

By endorsing group rights, any criminal has an automatic alibi for their crimes, if they can pre-posterously claim “retaliation” for something that once happened anywhere to anyone even only vaguely or remotely “like them.”

Then they can always claim “acting under mental duress of institutional oppression” excuses.

Which is basically just another variant on the institutional systematic procedural favorite:

“I didn’t do it – ONLY The GROUP did it! Whee!” always endorsed by corporate government types!

The group rights stance is always idolatry and slanderous, prejudicial fraud and extortion; it’s crime.

I notice the leftists Postmedia rags (Ottawa Citizen, etc) are still “trying to understand” the “tragedy” of the 2 jihadis who killed those two Canadian soldiers.

They insist one was only a typical Canadian drug addict; no islam here, folks!

Well it’s a simple thing to “understand,” really:

Whenever a Judeo-Christian feels depressed (probably because of liberal propaganda in society) and contemplates suicide, he knows he’s been told he’ll go to HELL for it.

In islam, on the other hand, muslims know that, if and when they feel depressed and suicidal, all they have to do is attack some unsuspecting, RANDOM “infidels,” and their sick version of a god will automatically welcome them into it’s highest HEAVEN, with special added bonuses for their family members, too!

After all, the human sacrifice of others is the main tenet of the koranimals’ forced “faith!”

Muslims are told to sacrifice “infidels” to protect them selves from their “god’s” wrath!


*The only time the ends justify the means is in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others. One has no right to defend or cover up one’s crimes. Islam embraces the worst notion in the Old Testament, that of sacrificing OTHERS (although even Judaism only sacrificed animals as tasty ghost-meals to appease the offended spirit/s) to atone for one’s crimes, a role only God Himself can honesty fulfill, even by the muslims’ own rules, since even according to them, only He is truly responsible for, and so, “Guilty” of, everything.

In Christianity, Jesus is supposed to have been that final human sacrifice, “The Lamb:” saving us from the alleged need to be sacrificed in proportional response for our crimes.

By His own self-sacrifice, Jesus not only confirmed the Old Testament notion that God had deliberately separated Himself from his creation (including us), but also that He had done it FOR us, and still didn’t hold us accountable for His gift to us: of our ability to learn by making mistakes and inadvertently causing problems for our selves and others.

True “sin” only comes about if and when we pridefully assert “Screw you! I meant to do that!” and thus append our own lying slanderously masochistic criminal intent to gloss over our mistakes, in stead of owning up to, and so only then being able to correct them!

Muslims are in a perpetual state of eternal sin because they falsely claim that, since God is perfect, and He created them, then they are perfect, too, and so also posit that everything that ever goes wrong cannot be their fault, so there’s not only no need to try to correct mistakes and fix or solve problems here, but also that it would be an insult to “allah” to even try to do so! At most, they are to eliminate the mistaken people who cause problems!

Bottom line: Judeo-Christians see this world as an opportunity, as a learning experience. Muslims see it as a painful curse or test to be feared and opposed – or at most, endured.


About unclevladdi

This entry was posted in America, Australia, Canada, Corruption, Crime, Education, Europe, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, United Nations, United States, USA, War and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Islam IS Political Correctness

  1. QuotingIslam says:

    Perfect! My sister sprays perfume on turd!

  2. dajjal says:

    Reblogged this on Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back and commented:

    A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
    Chet Beates, definition of Political Correctness used in Son of a Gun : The Life and Times of a Lifer Brat (2007), p. 209. Attributed to a student at Texas A&M University pre 2006 (
    [From wikiquote] .

    Turds do not have clean ends; Islam is not peaceful. Ismam means submission: “I submitted to Islam, you will submit to me or die.”
    Uncle Vladdi has distilled inshalla down to its essence and crystallized it, taking some literary licence in the process. This thought provoking post is a must read.
    Those who have not read the Qur’an should read the ayat and ahadith in this list for full comprehension of the essential truth in this post: 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

    • vladdi says:

      Forcing a responsibility for others’ “Hurt feelings” is FASCISM (psychological extortion)!

      • dajjal says:

        PC is a form of heckler’s veto. it stifles free and open discussion of ideas. Isdamn has three ideas which make it inimical to civilization; we must be allowed to expose them in public:
        1. Only Allah has the right to rule and govern in human affairs; the sole right to legislate.
        2. Only Allah has the right to be worshipped.
        3. Disbelievers must be killed.

  3. dajjal says:

    I depart immediately for FB where I hope to post this in your blog page.

  4. herbork says:

    Thank you, Unk. As always, I learn more and better from every exposure to your thought — and then publicize your choicest insights on various comment threads, to make myself look smarter about Islam than I really am. We got 81 up-clicks on Breitbart, the other day, with just two of your sentences. 😉

    • vladdi says:

      Thanks, gents, and there’s more to this insidious victim-blaming guilt-inducing slander of a psychological extortion racket:

      PC pretends one is responsible to other people for their (possibly mistaken) reactions to one’s new ideas, or to ideas which *might* offend them.

      And the offense taken, is always subjective.

      Since the deliberate use of PC implicitly slanders people AS being offensive, it attacks first, and therefore also inherently defends first-attackers (criminals).

      PC implies one can and so should manage or avoid others’ inevitable reactions of denial (automatic ‘offense’) to one’s exchange of ideas, as if one somehow ‘should,’ even if one could, always try to defuse all of their normal psychologically procedural reaction stages (i.e: basic thinking) as summed up by Elizabeth Kubler-Ross.

      Normal people WILL REACT to new ideas BY a well-established process of denial to acceptance, so it’s literally outrageous to posit that any one person is responsible for monitoring, or has a duty to actively prevent this common thought process occurring in others.

      This thought, or “thesis” (previously “Theosis,” of “knowledge of God”) process, prioritizing focus on the ‘BAD’ (the anti-thesis) in order to avoid it and ultimately test a hypo-thesis, to prove it good (as the final “syn-thesis”) has been historically referred to as “Greek Logic” and called “Hegelian Dialectics,” before Kubler-Ross added her modern speculations to it, but it’s obviously nothing more than basic “thinking.”

      So obviously, “Political Correctness” is only an extortion attempt at THOUGHT CONTROL, designed to shield criminals’ crimes, and to prevent everyone from thinking at all, beyond the most shallow and banal trivialities. It defines the willfully ignorant and irresponsible, criminally negligent “victimology” process.

      It is to insist (as all authoritarian extortions do) that one must ALWAYS Submit one’s self to the greater (gang’s “might-makes-right”) good.

      What is currently misconceived as ‘altruism’ and ‘Hegelian dialectics’ is really only a lie: a slanderous fraud designed to induce perpetual guilt in the victim, by way of the same, ages-old “carrot-and-stick,” fear-and-greed behavioural conditioning binary.

      It’s proponents sadistically advocate for perpetual, self-sacrificing masochism in others, demanding they pacifistically agree with the predatory criminal aggressor’s militaristic notion that they have no right to self-defense, nor even to think about planning for it.

      To them, if their victims even THINK about planning to defend them selves, it’s slandering the criminals AS the aggressors, which they in fact already ARE, just by dint of their PC extortion-attempts.

      Bottom line: criminals hate other people (potential victims and/or potential opponents) thinking about their crimes, just as they hate the admitting to them selves of being criminals.

      And hating thinking has always had a perfectly valid label: “Psycho-Path” (literal translation: “Thought-Killer”).


      • dajjal says:

        Brilliant logic as usual, Unk. Keep refining the essential concepts of your cmnt. to Herb.

      • unclevladdi says:

        OK; here:

        Problem is, evil criminals begin with masochism, where they pretend to be able to “control” their natural logical fears, BY causing the very worst-case scenario pains they most fear!

        You know that old saying, “We have nothing to fear, but fear itself!”?

        It’s FUCKING STUPID! And criminal, too!

        The real Truth is:

        “We have nothing to fear, but (the mistakes and problems which cause the) pain itself!”


        Fearing fear AS pain, and then deciding to attack it BY ignoring it, in stead of listening to and learning from it, is the first lie all criminals tell themselves (AND their victims)! It’s the root cause of all blustering criminally negligent outrages and “sins!”

        And, as I said in the main article here:

        “The ability to learn from mistakes, to solve problems, also leaves us able to (choose to) NOT learn from those same mistakes, and to refuse to solve problems (both of which choices define “Sin.”)

        And “Sin” is a synonym for Crime, and “sinner” = criminal.”


      • dajjal says:

        Franklin said: “If evils come not, our fears are vain, and if they do fear but augments the pain.”

      • unclevladdi says:

        Nice and poetic of him, but, unfortunately, just plain WRONG. Proves even the smartest people gets things dead wrong, on occasion LOL!

        Of course, it’s also possible he had differentiated between rightly fearing, and, by fearing, paying proper heed to, our own potential MISTAKES, and obsessing overmuch about the deliberately EVIL tortures designed to be inflicted on us by evil people (which are generally far more unavoidable).


    • vladdi says:

      Yeah, I need an editor LOL! (Hint taken)!


  5. vladdi says:

    I love it when reality so-precisely reflects my assessments (and so also ‘predictions’) of it:

    (Thanks for notifying me about this, article Dajjal)!


  6. vladdi says:

    Awesome comment from here:

    by BowenG

    100 years ago, on November 14, 1914, the last “Caliph” of the Islamic world declared a holy war on all non believers. Just a few months later, a jihadist genocide of Christians occurred on a massive scale, resulting in the deaths of millions. The Organizer of Muslim Prayer at National Cathedral called it a ‘Deliciously Appropriate’ Event on Anniversary of Call to Jihad This is classic Islam & community organizing… instigating chaos and squatting on Christian soil. To claim that the fabric of America is made up from “achievements and contributions of Muslims” is not only factually incorrect, it is a blatant lie. Think back if you will. Name great achievements and contributions by Muslims to the fabric of America. Up until Rep. Keith Ellison’s election, America never had a Muslim representative in Washington. Even more telling is that Ellison sits on the board of a Sodomite and gender confused organization! No my friends, Islam is not really a part of the fabric of America. It is a cancer to the soul of America.

    What I wonder is why neither Obama or Elibiary will talk of the real influence of Islam upon the United States? Why are they silent on the Barbary Pirates? Why are they silent on the jizya imposed upon our nation during that same time? Why are they silent on Somali pirates who have taken our people hostage and murdered scores of Americans? I’ll tell you why, it’s called taqiyya (Muslim deception). Taqiyya is used to gain an advantage against unbelievers in order to overthrow them and advance the caliphate (Islamic state).

    Finally, Obama tells a blatant lie that should turn the stomach of every Christian and Jew not only in America, but the world. He went on to state, “That is why we stand with people of all faiths,” he continued, “here at home and around the world, to protect and advance their rights to prosper, and we welcome their commitment to giving back to their communities.”

    No, Mr. Obama, you do not stand with “people of all faiths” in protecting and advancing human rights. As you speak, Churches and relics over 2,000 years old are being plundered and destroyed; Christians from such communities are being murdered all over the Middle East simply because they are Christians, at times crucified as in Iraq, and those carrying out this mass murder are doing so in the name of an Islam America now retreats from, Obamacrats desire to fund and refuse to stop. Obamacrats continue to say and do absolutely nothing about these unspeakable crimes. Do Christian, Jewish, Budhist and others lives mean so little to you? Can you not, “do it for the children?”

    When I type “President Obama Speaks Out,” or “Speaks Against,” in the search engines of Bing, Google, and Yahoo, the sentence automatically closes with such objects as “Trayvon Martin,” “Kanye West,” “Fox News,” and “Bullying.” I can search in vain to find you condemning the genocidal slaughter of Christians by Muslims.

    Ditto for Jews. Muslim terrorists are killing Jews in Israel and their representatives have pledged to wipe Jews off the face of the earth. Yet your administration spends most of its time lecturing Israelis to be patient. About what? Being bombed because they are Jews? Do Jewish lives mean so little to you?

    No one wants you to insult Muslim Americans in the White House, but you had an opportunity to at least call on them to speak out about what their people are doing in the Middle East, and you blew it. Instead, you decided to patronize them for all their contributions to human rights. Could you itemize them please Mr. Obama?

    Last I read all the Founders were grounded in Enlightenment from a Western European Tradition coming out of Protestantism. Christian Tolerance with a heritage of education and scientific inquirery. Does Obama look like he is standing for patriotic Americans who want the law to be followed and who have given their lives in the defense of America? Does he stand for those that adhere to the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments as the only Word of God?

    Obama made the statement as Muslims around the world celebrate Eid-al-Fitr. In his remarks, Obama said, “Michelle and I extend our warmest wishes to them and their families. This last month has been a time of fasting, reflection, spiritual renewal, and service to the less fortunate.”
    “While Eid marks the completion of Ramadan, it also celebrates the common values that unite us in our humanity and reinforces the obligations that people of all faiths have to each other, especially those impacted by poverty, conflict, and disease.”

    He ended his statement with this “Eid Mubarak,” which is also known as Salat al-Eid and Salat-al-Eidain, which are the special prayer to commemorate the two Islamic festivals of Ramadan which Obama has forced America’s military to observe, while prohibiting Christian services at the same time, Where is the Freedom from Religion Foundation on this? All I hear is crickets.

    No, it does not. The institute of Islam does not reinforce the obligations of Christianity, Judaism or any other religion. In fact, Islam is expressly against Christianity and Judaism as well as Sihks & Bahia’s. Certainly against Bhudism, Zoastrism, Pagans, Wickens and all new age relgions (Hollywood be advised).

    Does Obama look like he cares one bit for the tens of thousands of Christians being raped, pillaged, forced to pay Islamic taxes and murdered in the name of Allah? Does Obama seem to give a single thought to the thousands of Israelis who are constantly defending themselves from attack, yet he and his administration make them out to be the bad guys and want them to be the only ones making concessions while their enemies concede nothing?

    No, my friend, Obama stands apart from all these people. He does not stand with “people of all faiths.” He stand with the Muslims, period. And this should come as no surprise when Obama has only a 39% approval rating overall (still shocked at that number), but among Muslims, he has a 72% approval rating.

    Perhaps it’s because if anyone did speak out against attrocities and ugliness perpatrated in the name of ISLAM, protested with burning flags, rioted shouting anti-Semtic remarks or dragged murdered bodies around it would be criminal, a hate crime… but only if you’re not a muslim.

    • unclevladdi says:

      …and therefore, someone else (“LogicAndTruth”) noticed that:

      “Is it significant that his happened nearly a year to the day of the following?”

    • dajjal says:

      Your quote of BowenG sent me to the search. Here is what I found at Breitbart:
      “Rasool was asked whether it was appropriate to hold Muslim prayers on such a tragic anniversary for the Christian people. “It’s deliciously appropriate,” replied Rasool. “We stand in a Christian cathedral, make common cause with the Christian middle ground, and make a commitment, that never again must there be intolerance towards Christians or any other faith,” he added. “We stand up against extremism from the house of Islam and wherever it else it may emanate.””

      What in the Goddamn Hell is ‘Christian middleground’? Jesus Christ: born son of God, crucified, burried & resurrected for our salvation. There is no middle ground. Jesus spat out the lukewarm for being neither cold nor hot.

      ‘Common cause’? God damn!! Christianity has no common cause with Islam. Christianity seeks life temporal and eternal, Islam seeks death and domination. There is no common ground between live & let live and “kill them wherever you find them”.

      ‘Never again…intolerance’? God damn!!! Muslims slaughtered 1.5 million Armenians and he calls it intolerance? The word is genocide! QV 2.6-7, 2.161, 3.85, 3.110, 5.60, 8.67 & 9.29 .

      ‘We stand against extremism…’? God damn!!! If Moe said it and did it, it is not extreme, it is normative. “Who will kill Kab Ashraf?” Sahih Muslim 19.4436, that is not extreme. According to the Sira, that murder put every Jew in Medina at fear for his life. Slaughtering 900 prisoners of war is not extreme, Moe did it. 33.26, Sahih Bukhari 4.52.280. Will the Goddamn AssWhole explicitly condemn HAMAS? Then let him proceed immediately to Hell, where he belongs.

  7. vladdi says:

    Above, I noted that

    the human sacrifice of others is the main tenet of the koranimals’ forced “faith!”

    So it’s not all that surprising to find that Actual And Literal Islamic Human Slaughterhouses For Christians were recently Discovered by Walid Shoebat:

    • dajjal says:

      On return from Shoebat’s site, I have this to declare: Read the text. Watch the videos. Curse Isdamn if you have a soul.

    • dajjal says:

      The sound track is not good enough Besides it is long and tedious. There is no proof for anything in the Koran or hadith. Besides which it is entirely hearsay. The Bible can not be proved either. Believe it or not. I know that the Koran is false ‘cuz it contains contradictions and errors.
      4:82. Do they not then consider the Qur’ân carefully? Had it been from other than Allâh, they would surely have found therein much contradictions. how long did it take to create the world? Where does the sun set? Is there compulsion in religion? 2:256 contradicts 8.39 & 9.29 which abrogate it. .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s