Victimology Studies Lead To Death By Muslim!

“Victimology” Studies have arrived at last! Sign your kids up and pay big bucks to let them share the accumulated excuse-making wisdom of countless generations of academic criminals before them!

Your kids have learned what soft touches you are, and how whining and wheedling gets results! Well, it’s now officially a career choice! Teach your SocialJustice Warriors how to slander & extort others!

I’ve been laughing at this term for at least the last decade, because I had long-since past realized it’s what criminals (aka libertine “liberals” and “muslims”) are all about – but now they’ve doubled down so much that it’s become a real, official, academic faculty of instruction in our colleges! As if somehow all “victims” of diverse problems and crimes, somehow all had something in common, which could be scientifically studied!

“Victimology” (now openly “taught” in colleges!) is really only the criminals’ main alibi to excuse their crimes – the false notion that there are no real crimes nor criminals, because there is no free-will intent or choice: everyone is a helpless victim of “inevitable” force: of “society” / mere products of their environments (or of “Historical Predeterminism” as Karl Marx put it) and of course as proud “slaves of allah!”

In the hallowed halls and ivory towers of Academia, Life is now officially too complex for anyone to ever be able to really understand causes and effects, so, “since” all ‘facts’ are really only opinions anyway, from now on all of the leftists’ entirely fact-free, subjective opinions, are to be legally deemed and held to be the diversely opposite equals to those silly conservatives’ so-called objective ‘facts!’ If you look like a man but feel like a woman, then hey presto! From now on, the Law will say that you are a woman, and may allah help those female bigots who expect their daughters to be able to safely use the women’s change-rooms and washrooms while denying you entry!

So nothing is really ever anyone’s fault, so everyone can from now on have rights without any silly concomitant, corollary responsibilities! People are now free to do what they want, whenever and wherever they want to do it, and to whomever they want to do it with or to, too! Now that’s “progress!” Whee!

C’mon, people: There are no wrong answers, crimes or criminals. And the Devil now officially doesn’t exist! Whee.

Shooting victim studied to help victims of violence

Ottawa Citizen, Tuesday March 29, 2016 P.# A1 & A5:



A young woman shot in Bells Corners early Easter Sunday morning had hope to use her education to work with youths who were victims of crime.

But the 24-year-old Algonquin College student herself became a victim of violence over the weekend and wasn’t expected to recover from her injuries.

Christina Voelzing was only weeks from completing a “graduate program in victimology” when she was shot several times inside her Bells Corners home.

Police said at press time Monday evening that Voelzing remained on life support. Friends, meanwhile, had posted pictures in tribute to Voelzing on social media throughout the day.

A day earlier, neighbours said they heard several gunshots at about 5 a.m. at 11D Sonnet Cres., a four-unit building near Old Richmond Road and Moodie Drive.

Several neighbours also said they heard a single loud bang coming from the direction of the building three hours before they heard the shots. By Monday night, police did not have a suspect in custody and had released few details about the shooting, which continued to be investigated by major crime detectives.

Hmmmm … no details on the shooters or motivations, but since a “victimologist” is involved, I’m gonna go out on a limb here, and posit the (extremely obvious) guess that IT WAS HER SWARTHY MUSLIM BOYFRIEND!

Flags were flying at half-mast at Algonquin College on Monday.

Voelzing’s mother, Sherryl Fraser, is the chair of general arts and sciences at the college.

“It is difficult to imagine the shock, pain and loss felt by our friend and colleague,” said college president Cheryl Jensen in a memo to staff. “I know you will all join me in expressing our deepest condolences to Sherryl and her family, who remain in our thoughts and in our prayers.”

If she was in your thoughts, you might want to blame her for ruining AND ENDING her daughter’s life by abusing her with these ridiculously criminally negligent notions that everyone is a victim and all criminals need coddling!

The college’s tragic events response team was offering counselling to students, and college staff in need of support were directed to the employee assistance program. PURE VICTIMOLOGY IS INGRAINED HERE TOO!

According to her own social media profiles, Voelzing also studied hospitality at Algonquin, in 2012, and most recently worked as a server at Fitz Classic Grill.

Co-workers at the Bells Corners restaurant expressed their shock and disbelief when contacted Monday.

Voelzing was due to complete a two-year graduate program in victimology in April.

“Upon graduation, I hope to work with youth involved in the criminal justice system,” she wrote on one online profile. “I hope to use my skills and understanding of victims’ rights and needs as well as the victim-offender continuum to work with and support youth.” SHE WAS “STUDYING THE VICTIM-OFFENDER CONTINUUM!”

Voelzing made several other postings on her Facebook profile, which took on an unsettling tone following Sunday’s shooting.

Just before Christmas, she posted a picture of herself planting a kiss on a young man’s cheek, writing the caption: “RIP. Forever loved. Forever missed.”

Her friends were sharing similar sentiments about Voelzing in social media postings.


Ottawa Citizen (two days later) Thursday march 31, 2016, P.#A1, A3:

Christina Voelzing died taking a bullet from a gun aimed at her roommate.

Postmedia has learned that a gunfight erupted between two men inside Voelzing’s home around 5 a.m. Easter Sunday after an armed gunman known to the young Algonquin student busted through the front door and then began firing at several occupants of the home at 11D Sonnet Cres.

Another man inside the home, also known to Voelzing, also had a gun and the two exchanged gunfire. 

“HMMMM!” Unusual in Ottawa, Canada –


At one point, a gun was pointed at Voelzing’s roommate and Voelzing pushed the woman out of the way and was shot in the neck.

Police believe the shooting was targeted, but would not detail who they suspect the intended target was. 

Because that might risk their own pensions and careers if it got them accused of being “hateful racist bigots!”

“The shooter had a clear and focused intent to attack a person,” said acting Staff Sgt. Darren Vinet, who heads the homicide unit.

The 24-year-old woman was found unconscious inside the home after neighbours heard several gunshots and a loud bang.

Voelzing had no vital signs once at hospital, but was revived and taken into surgery. She was kept on life support for several days before ultimately succumbing to her injuries early Wednesday morning.

Vinet said police are looking for “at least one suspect” in the killing and that investigators, for their part, are still trying to determine the sequence of events that led to Voelzing’s killing. A vehicle was seized at the scene on Sunday.

Aside from a 2013 impaired driving conviction, Voelzing did not have a criminal record, but friends said that in recent years she had been involved in troubled, and at times violent, relationships. AHAH! Methinks “muslims!”

Postmedia has learned that police are also probing the killing for links to the sex trade. Again: I’d bet: “Muslims!”

Voelzing was just weeks away from graduating from a victimology program at Algonquin College, where her mother Sherryl Fraser is chair of general arts and sciences. Complicit enabler of coddling criminals!

Voelzing had hoped to work with youth victims and offenders. Because to liberals, there is no real difference.

The college is in the process of collecting donations to create a bursary in Voelzing’s honour. To liberals, blatant Stupidity should always be honoured. 

The co-ordinator of her program called her kind, compassionate and full of “inspiring resilience.” She must mean “willful ignorance!”

In a statement released Wednesday morning, just hours after Voelzing’s family took her off life support, her uncle Randy Booth said the family confirmed her death with “heavy hearts.” Can’t neck wounds be repaired?
Oh, wait – in true liberal (think: “Planned parenthood”) tradition, they wanted to chop her up and sell the parts!

Voelzing was kept alive long enough that her organs could be donated – something her family said she would’ve been happy to know — and that family and friends could get the chance to say goodbye to the young woman.

“The outpouring of support from friends and the community is overwhelming and much appreciated,” Booth said.

Voelzing’s family has requested privacy as they grieve. “We taught our daughter that there are no criminals and so everyone, muslims included, are always innocent until never proven guilty, because they are always victims!”

Booth said that while the homicide investigation into his niece’s death continues, the family has not received any updates on the investigation.

Voelzing’s is the sixth homicide of the year. She is the fifth person to die by gunfire in Ottawa in 2016.


Her shooting was the 17th shooting in a year that has seen 18 reported incidents of gunshots in city limits.

Her funeral is scheduled for the weekend.

NEXT UPDATE (now here’s the money-shot):
Ottawa Citizen, Saturday, April 16, 2016, P.# A3

A former boyfriend of the victim in the Bells Corners Easter Sunday shootout that killed Christina Voelzing was arrested without incident on Friday in the Greater Toronto Area.

Police had issued a Canada-wide arrest warrant for Behnam Yaali, 23. He was wanted on a charge of second-degree murder. A MUSLIM SHOWING UP ARMED TO KILL SOMEONE IS ONLY 2ND DEGREE MURDER!

Yaali is to appear in Ottawa court on Saturday.

Randy Booth, Voelzing’s uncle, had said the family was “relieved” that police were making progress in the investigation and that a person of interest had been identified.

“We ask the public to keep an eye out for this individual so justice may be served,” he had said on behalf of Voelzing’s family, who asked for privacy as they grieve.

“We’re going to let the authorities handle this, let them do their jobs and we’re just going to try to heal as a family and carry on,” Booth said.

Voelzing, 24, was mortally wounded early Easter Sunday morning when two of her former lovers exchanged gunfire inside the apartment she shared with two roommates. Around 5 a.m., police believe Yaali kicked in the front door and began firing inside the home at 11D Sonnet Cres.

Another man inside the home, believed to be Voelzing’s former boyfriend whom she had recently rekindled a relationship with, also had a gun and the two exchanged gunfire.

Friends told Postmedia the Algonquin College student, who was weeks away from completing a victimology program, died after a gun that was initially pointed at her roommate was fired at her. She leapt in to intervene and was shot in the neck.  Police allege Yaali pulled the trigger.

Voelzing had no vital signs once at hospital, but was revived and taken into surgery. She was kept on life support for several days so that her organs could be donated and so that her brother, who lives in Dubai, could return to Ottawa to see her. Voelzing died from her injuries three days after being shot. SO OBVIOUSLY THE WHOLE FAMILY ARE A BUNCH OF FUCKED UP LIBERAL RACISTS PRETENDING ARABS ARE VICTIMS!

Friends alleged that both Yaali and the second gunman in the house were involved in drug activity. “GOSH!”

Police had been probing any connections the gunmen had to the sex trade.

Yaali has never been convicted of a crime in Ontario. In 2011, he was charged with drug possession but that charge was later withdrawn. He does, however, have an American criminal record.

On July 24, 2012,  Yaali was arrested at the Miami International Airport with 7.78 kilograms of cocaine that he smuggled into the country from Ecuador.

Yaali’s American Airlines flight arrived shortly after 2:20 p.m. from Quito, Ecuador, according to information sworn by a special agent for homeland security investigations. During a secondary examination of Yaali’s luggage, customs officers found “a white powdery substance concealed in a false siding and the railings” of his suitcase. Yaali lied and said he didn’t know about the dope since he had bought the suitcase in Ecuador but then later admitted the truth.

He was initially charged with importing cocaine and, because of the large quantity, possession with intent to distribute.

Yaali negotiated a plea deal that saw him plead guilty to smuggling the drugs so that the trafficking charge was dismissed. He was sentenced to 30 months in jail. THEN THEY LET HIM INTO CANADA WITH HIS GUNS.

Voelzing’s mother, Sherryl Fraser, is chair of general arts and sciences at Algonquin College, where her daughter was a student in the victimology program. Voelzing had hoped to work with youth victims and offenders.

The college began collecting donations to create a bursary in Voelzing’s honour after her death.

Voelzing’s was the sixth homicide of the year. She is the fifth person to die by gunfire in Ottawa in 2016.

Posted in Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Globalization, gun control, human rights, islam, Legal, media, muslim, Policy, politics, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, Uncategorized, War | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Vladdi Impales Moe by Bosch Fawstin!

Check THIS out!


Posted in Crime, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, muslim, Policy, politics, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Ironic Justice: Brussels Funds Terrorists!

From here and  here:

The Consequences of Anti-Zionism

The Israeli government needs to pointedly and consistently explain to the leaders of Europe that their assault on Israel will not convince the jihadists to spare them.
What do radical Israeli groups have in common with their European funders? Last Thursday, Channel 2 broadcast candid camera footage of Breaking the Silence members gathering classified information on IDF operations. The footage was taken by Ad Kan activists.
Breaking the Silence claims to be an organization dedicated to collecting testimonies from IDF soldiers documenting ill-treatment of Palestinians. Posing as soldiers with information to share, Ad Kan activists were interrogated by Breaking the Silence investigators.
Yet rather than question them about how their units treated Palestinians, Breaking the Silence members asked them about troop movements, weapons platforms, IDF cooperation with foreign militaries. The investigators asked what sort of guns an unmanned combat vehicle carried, who controlled the vehicle and whether it was in operational use.
They wanted to know how the IDF discovers Hamas tunnels. They wanted to know when tanks were used in battles and how.
TREASON: Breaking the Silence’s intelligence operations didn’t stop with post-operational debriefs.
A Breaking the Silence employee named Frima Bobis is filmed telling Ad Kan activists how when she was still in high school, a Breaking the Silence worker advised her where to serve during her military service. Hey, that even qualifies as a subversion conspiracy!
She followed his advice, served in the civil administration’s office in Nablus, and upon her discharge, was able to give Breaking the Silence useful information.
Breaking the Silence hired her shortly after her return to civilian life.
Julia Novak, Breaking the Silence’s executive director, did not dispute Ad Kan’s findings. In her response to the broadcast she gave three defenses for her group’s activities.
First, she said, Ad Kan’s findings are unworthy of attention because it is a “settler” organization.
Second, she said that her group’s noble goal of “ending the occupation” gives it the right to collect and hold classified information. In other words, just as Ad Kan’s support for Israeli control over Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem makes it illegitimate, so Breaking the Silence’s support for ending “the occupation” renders it immune from criticism. All criminals are victim-blaming slanderous hypocrites.
These claims ring familiar. Similar claims were made in January by her comrades after Channel 2’s investigative magazine Uvda broadcast another Ad Kan, report. That report showed members of Breaking the Silence engaging in what appeared to be various forms of criminal activities with members of Ta’ayush. Those activities included tax evasion and unlawfully interfering with military operations as well as assaulting soldiers.
The January report also showed senior Ta’ayush and B’Tselem operatives Ezra Nawi and Nasser Nawaja apparently plotting to turn a Palestinian interested in selling his land to Jews over to Palestinian security services with the full knowledge that they would torture and murder him.
B’Tselem’s response to the January report was first to dismiss its legitimacy. Uvda, the group insisted, was wrong to broadcast the report because it was filmed by Ad Kan investigators rather than Uvda reporters. Typical criminal subjectivism: they only care about who does something, not what’s done!
B’Tselem’s claim was particularly rich given that Channel 2 makes liberal use of footage B’Tselem provides its reporters.
Just as Novak doubled down on Breaking the Silence’s spying operations, insisting they were legitimate without explaining why, so B’Tselem justified Nawaja’s actions insisting that handing Palestinian land sellers over to the PA is “the only legitimate path available to Palestinians.”
B’Tselem didn’t explain why Nawaja didn’t just get his donor friends to buy the land. The self-proclaimed human rights group didn’t explain why its senior employee couldn’t accept the human right of Palestinians to sell their land to Jews or the human right of Jews to buy land from a willing Palestinian seller.
B’Tselem didn’t explain why it legitimate to turn over innocents to PA henchmen with the full knowledge that doing so will lead to their torture and murder.
It isn’t that the radical Left’s goal of expelling all Jews and IDF units from Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem is inherently illegitimate. It is arguably just as legitimate as the late Meir Kahane’s goal of expelling all Arabs from Judea and Samaria.
I’m surprised Caroline Glick would make this argument from racism, when she should know that the ‘Arabs” reasons for expelling all the Jews from Israel have nothing to do with fake “palestine” – and everything to do with the Qur’an – which was written at a time when there were no Jews left there!
But it’s a common fallacy trope used by clueless Israelis, who presume the conflict is race & religion!
But the fact that your goal is legitimate doesn’t give you the right to break the law. In other words, Breaking the Silence is legitimate. Breaking the law is not. Being a crime-gang, islam is illegitimate.
Ad Kan’s revelations are startling not because they call into question the legitimacy of the radical Left’s goal. They are startling because they show that in advancing that goal, radical leftist groups have a distressing comfort level with criminal activities. All leftists are extortionist criminal gangsters, Ms.Glick.
And this brings us to Novak’s third justification for her group’s intelligence operations.
Novak said that Breaking the Silence’s activities are permissible because it always gets the Military Censor’s permission before it publishes its reports. But that merely exacerbates suspicions.
If it isn’t publishing the classified information it gathers, why is it gathering it? Whom is it gathering it for? Which brings us to Europe.
According to NGO Monitor, in 2014, 61 percent of Breaking the Silence’s budget came from European governments.
After Uvda broadcast Ad Kan’s footage of Nawi and Nawaja apparently plotting the murder of an innocent Palestinian in January, British legislators demanded that the Foreign Office justify government funding of B’Tselem.
The same parliamentarians could just as easily have asked why their government funds the Palestinian Authority, which murders innocent Palestinians.
In the event, once the media storm passed, things went back to normal for the British and their radical leftist agents.
Will the same pattern follow today? In the aftermath of the ISIS attacks in Brussels, will Europeans demand to know why European resources are being used to fund espionage against the IDF on the one hand, and Palestinian security services that commit murder and support jihad on the other? The upshot of Ad Kan’s revelations, which indicate widespread criminal activity by EU-funded radical groups, is not that these groups are inherently criminal. Why the hell not?!
But they do indicate that members of these groups have a cavalier attitude – at best – about respecting the law. Which means they are criminals – criminality requires intent, ditto for criminal negligence!
In a similar fashion, Europe’s funding of anti-Israel campaigns like its bankrolling of the PA does not make the EU incompetent to deal with the jihadist forces that are presently assaulting its member nations and citizens. But it is true that there seems to be a direct correlation between hostility to Israel and inability to competently fight jihadists. And this makes sense. If you believe that Israel is the cause of the pathologies of the Islamic world, then you will likely be blind to the nature of the jihadist threat and the danger it poses to your nation.
Following the ISIS strikes in Brussels, both Israeli and American security experts spoke bitterly of the ineptitude of Belgian security services. It is not that the forces themselves are incompetent. Rather, the experts said, their political leadership refuses to allow them to take the actions necessary to protect their country.
The Belgians, like their European brethren generally, refuse to deal with jihad. Rather than acknowledge and deal forthrightly with the phenomenon, they seek every possible excuse to ignore it.
According to senior government officials, the Belgians are among the most vociferous foes of Israel in the EU. Europe’s obsessive castigation of Israel is a central aspect of their jihad avoidance strategy. If Israel is to blame for everything, then they can save themselves by pouring billions of euros on the PA and by funding Israeli anti-Zionist subversives.
This position is of course irrational. In clinging to it, the Europeans have enabled the jihadist forces arrayed against them to gather and grow.
Consider the July 7, 2005, attacks in London. Shortly after they occurred, British investigators discovered that Muhammad Sidique Khan, who led the British al-Qaida cell that carried out the attacks, was connected to the British jihadists who carried out the 2003 suicide bombing at Mike’s Place pub in Tel Aviv, adjacent to the US Embassy.
The Mike’s Place bombers were also connected with the radical Left, having toured Israel and Gaza with an International Solidarity Movement group before carrying out their attack.
Yet, just as British authorities ignored the significance of the participation of British jihadists in the jihad against Israel 13 years ago, and disregarded the significance of the post-7/7 revelations 11 years ago, so in the intervening years, as jihadist forces grew and spread throughout the continent, rather than shed their hostility toward Israel and stop blaming it for the jihadist Islam, the Europeans expanded their onslaught against the Jewish state.
The EU’s subversive activities on the ground massively expanded as did its political and economic war against Israel internationally. The EU’s decision to promote economic boycotts of Israel by labeling Israeli products is just the latest indication that as the threat of jihad grows, the Europeans have doubled down on their campaigns to harm Israel.
Is it possible for them to change course? Last week Foreign Ministry director-general Dore Gold visited South Africa. The anti-Israel boycott movement, like the pernicious campaign to libel the Jewish state “apartheid,” was born in South Africa 15 years ago. At the notorious Durban conference on the eve of the September 11, 2001, jihadist attacks, the international NGO movement voted to criminalize the Jewish state.
Since 1994, reports have surfaced of jihadist groups, including al-Qaida, Hamas and Hezbollah, operating training camps in South Africa. The order for jihadists to carry out the 2013 massacre at Nairobi’s Westgate Mall reportedly came from al-Qaida operatives in South Africa.
Last October, South African President Jacob Zuma hosted Hamas terrorism-master Khaled Mashaal for a four-day visit.
During his stay in South Africa, Gold gently tried to explain to his hosts that their support for jihadists and their hostility for Israel would not protect them from the ravages of jihad. But the danger is still too intangible for them. They couldn’t grasp what he was saying.
Now that Europe is paying the price for its refusal to contend with the threat of jihad, will its leaders wake up to reality?
With ISIS now capable of attacking at will in almost every city in Europe, will they realize that the time has come to stop funding Palestinian jihadists and Israeli subversives? Or is it too late for them to change course?
Will they cling to the bitter end to their anti-Semitic delusion that by feeding the Jewish state to the jihadist tiger, he will not come for them?
For Israel, the path is clear regardless of what Europe decides. Our law enforcement bodies need to investigate and prosecute left-wing criminals with the same seriousness they investigate and prosecute all other criminals, regardless of the support they receive from their European funders. And our government needs to pointedly and consistently explain to the leaders of Europe that their assault on Israel will not convince the jihadists to spare them. So far all the Europeans have for their efforts are massacred civilians and shattered defenses.
Posted in Education, Europe, Globalization, human rights, islam, media, Military, muslim, Policy, politics, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Technology, Treason, Uncategorized, War | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Usual Bothersome Questions

Golly gee whillikers, aren’t these acts illegal? In fact, don’t they represent an overt attempt to interfere with America’s most crucial political process? As in, over TWO CENTURIES of our nation’s almost unique and unprecedented ability to hand off the reins of power without serious bloodshed?

So here are some truly niggling questions:

Why hasn’t 0bama and his Justice Department publicly condemned this flagrant attack upon America’s most hallowed Democratic process?
Why haven’t various law enforcement bodies announced a $1 million reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of “Anonymous”?

Why hasn’t Hillary Clinton openly denounced this obviously underhanded ploy to tilt the election in her favor?*

* Shouldn’t Hilliary be aghast at even the remote chance that her possible presidential win might be tainted by smears and allegations of election fraud just like GW Bush had to endure for the first four years of his presidency?

Finally, shouldn’t all of us expect that Donald Trump would be equally swift to vociferously decry such an attack if the tables were turned and this was happening to Hillary Clinton?

In fact, shouldn’t the American public, as a whole, be furious that anyone of any partisan stripe would stoop to this sort of blatant manipulation of a presidential election?

Where’s the outrage?

Where are the promises of arrest and prosecution? After all, hacking into a bank or airport will get you some serious jail time, right?

Where is the bipartisan unity against this vile assault upon America’s representative democracy?

Is this a final manifestation of the “win at any cost” mentality that has insidiously permeated our financial institutions and organized sports?
Isn’t it time for every last presidential candidate to loudly protest against this threat to America’s electoral process?

Why is it so difficult for prominent figures to defend Trump’s Constitutional right to say whatever offensive things he chooses to? After all, if what Trump says is so unpopular, then all it will do is ensure that he won’t be elected, right? So why is there such an almost unanimously tacit refusal to rally against this attack on the American way?

Please pardon me whilst I vomit.

Posted in America, Corruption, Crime, economics, human rights, Legal, media, Policy, politics, Privacy, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, Technology, Treason, Uncategorized, United States, USA, War | Tagged , , | Leave a comment


From here:

“Canadian Psycho,” Patrick B., Rebrands Tories As Liberal Lite! Whee!

From here and here:

This “Canadian Psycho,” Patrick B., is mouthing all the libtarded buzzwords: “Diversity, equality, all the gays, LGBT, trans and Bi’s are welcome in the Big Blue Tent” etc – and says that, even though we *may* disagree with liberals, he says we MUST RESPECT THEM!

Published on: Monday March 7, 2016 P.#A1 & A4 of the Ottawa Citizen

Ontario Tory leader begins rebuilding, redefining party
Ontario PCs face big changes under Patrick Brown, an enigmatic Tory leader who supports carbon tax Andrew Duffy

(CAPTION:) Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Patrick Brown delivers a speech at the Ontario Progressive Conservative convention in Ottawa on Saturday, March 5, 2016. ‘Never again,’ Brown vowed, ‘will our candidates and volunteers have to defend faith-based funding or 100,000 job cuts at the front doors of Ontario’s voters.’

His teardown of the old party complete, Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Patrick Brown began on the weekend to build in its place something bigger, greener — and more open-concept.

Brown used the three-day Tory convention, his first as party leader, to launch an ambitious, year-long policy development process designed to cull ideas from “anyone with a computer” in Ontario. The enigmatic 37-year-old leader also began the task of defining himself for voters, stamping himself a pragmatist, and announcing his support for a carbon tax to combat climate change. Noting that he was first drawn to politics because of his environmentalism, Brown called climate change a man-made threat that cannot be ignored by politicians of any stripe.

“The Sky is Falling! We have to do something! Quick – give me your wallets!” 
(he cried like a Liberal)!

“We have to do something about it, and that something includes putting a price on carbon,” he told 1,600 delegates in his keynote speech Saturday night in downtown Ottawa. He said a sensible carbon pricing scheme should be revenue neutral, and he criticized Premier Kathleen Wynne’s cap-and-trade plan as an ill-conceived “cash grab”. Wynne’s plan, which will price carbon at about $18 a tonne, is expected to add as much as four cents to the cost of a litre of gasoline. Brown’s policy direction, which met with tepid applause from delegates, was a clear signal that he intends to drastically change the party after four consecutive election defeats — even if it means alienating the party’s most conservative factions.

No, retards: acting like Liberals will alienate ALL conservatives in the Conservative party, not just a ‘faction!’

“I wanted to speak from my heart tonight and talk about the challenges that Progressive Conservatives need to address,” he later explained to reporters.
“I see there being no contradiction in being a proud Progressive Conservative and believing that we have to do something on the environment.” The decision to announce support for a carbon tax at the convention, he said, came with unanimous caucus support. “I am going to be a Progressive Conservative who talks about the environment,” he vowed. Brown’s climate change overture is part of a broader effort to rebrand the party and make it attractive to more Ontario voters. Related: Ontario Conservatives unveil new logo, change in tactics: in his keynote, Brown made a point of inviting union members, immigrants, gays, lesbians, and the poor to join the Progressive Conservatives. “It doesn’t matter who you love. It doesn’t matter if you belong to a union. It doesn’t matter how much you make. It doesn’t matter where you worship,” (a pandering cry to endorse the crime-gang of islam if only some muslims would take a few minutes off from jihad to vote for him) he said. “You have a home in the Progressive Conservative party of Ontario.” Diversifying the party is an essential component of the Progressive Conservatives’ 2018 election strategy, which was presented to delegates in broad strokes. Campaign chair Walied Soliman (Huh? What? The Psycho’s campaign chairman is called Walid Sulimuslim?!) told the convention that the party will not concede to the Liberals any group of voters: not teachers, nurses, public servants, union members or immigrants. The campaign strategy, he said, will be based on hard work, energy, diversity, trustworthiness and pragmatism, and will not be driven by winnable ridings, wedge issues or polls.

“Under our plan, there is no Liberal safe seat in Ontario,” he vowed.

You have a home in the Progressive Conservative party of Ontario

The party will open nominations for its ridings next January, well in advance of the late 2018 election. Several speakers at the convention, including Brown, levelled pointed criticism at previous election platforms, and blamed old party brass for those gaffes. “Never again,” Brown vowed, “will our candidates and volunteers have to defend faith-based funding or 100,000 job cuts at the front doors of Ontario’s voters.” Those unpopular policies sunk party fortunes in the past two elections, and Brown vowed not to make adversaries out of public sector workers as former leader Tim Hudak did in 2014 by promising to slash jobs. Brown was a federal Tory MP during the last provincial election, and won the PC leadership with little support from inside the legislative caucus. Hudak did not make an appearance in Ottawa this weekend. Key to the party’s 2018 election strategy is a wide-ranging policy development process that will culminate in a March 2017 policy convention. Policy chief Katie Richmond said the party will consult with party members and invite all Ontarians to offer their ideas on a website, “We are going to listen relentlessly,” she vowed. To whom, morons? Only to the enemy? Sure seems like it! Richmond said the process will result in the most grassroots-driven election platform in party history. “The way we have strayed from the wisdom of our grassroots has been painful, and it ends now,” she said. Brown told delegates that Progressive Conservatives can’t escape from the fact that they lost to Wynne’s Liberals when that party was weak and under police investigation. The Ontario Tories have not held power since 2003, and have been frustrated by an inability to expand beyond their core support. The party is also about $5 million in debt and must rebuild its finances in time for the next election campaign. “We have to have the courage to say, ‘We must change,’ ” Brown said, suggesting much is at stake for the party and for Ontario. The high-debt policies of the Wynne government, he said, threaten health care and education. The province now carries a “staggering” $308-billion debt, which requires $1 billion a month in interest payments; it is the third-largest government expense, he said, and robs money from schools, hospitals and people in need. Brown linked fiscal restraint and reduced energy costs to an improved job market and a better social safety net. “Compassion and prosperity go hand-in-hand,” he said. No, communism lets lazy takers screw the makers, tard! The Tory leader also used the weekend convention to pour cold water on the simmering feud between two high-profile local MPPs, Nepean-Carleton’s Lisa MacLeod and Jack MacLaren of Carleton-Mississippi Mills. The two have been jousting over nominations in Nepean-Carleton, which is being split in two. The two MPPs appeared on stage together Friday night, and Brown publicly endorsed MacLeod’s re-nomination as a candidate in the next election. The party also unveiled a new logo this weekend, and gave the stage to former Canadian Football League star Mike “Pinball” Clemons for what was billed as an official endorsement. But during his 45-minute presentation — a mix of locker-room pep talk and religious revival — Clemons neither talked about Brown, nor why he’s endorsing the party. At one point, a party official reassured reporters that Clemons was, in fact, endorsing the party and wasn’t being paid for the appearance. Clemons told the convention that the new Progressive Conservative party has to embrace liberals. “Real respect means this party has to make room for liberals,” said Clemons, who explained that leaders represent everyone and must respect all viewpoints. Actually that makes them mindless followers!

Canadian Psycho Patrick B literally channeled Justin Turdeau, exactly quoting his own party lines: Brown, for one, made it clear he’s at least comfortable with Liberal rhetoric. In a television ad campaign, debuted at the convention, he tells voters over soaring music that,

“I believe that better is always possible.” Liberal party Leader Justin Trudeau used that exact phrase during his successful federal election campaign last year. On Twitter, the prime minister’s principal secretary, Gerald Butts, said Sunday he was shocked by Brown’s phraseology: “Just when I thought my gob could no longer be smacked,” he wrote. “Holy fricoli.”


Scattered and rattled, Ontario’s Progressive Conservatives look for coherence DAVID REEVELY Published on: Monday March 7, 2016 P.#A2 of the Ottawa Citizen Mike ‘Pinball’ Clemons, seen in a file photo, told Progressive Conservatives, ‘We have to enjoy doing the best for people. Life is not about stuff. It’s about people.’ Mike ‘Pinball’ Clemons, seen in a file photo, told Progressive Conservatives, ‘We have to enjoy doing the best for people. Life is not about stuff. It’s about people.’ BRIAN DONOGH / POSTMEDIA If you want to govern Ontario, you can’t be jackasses, football star Michael “Pinball” Clemons told the province’s Progressive Conservatives at their convention here. Well, he said a lot more than that. Clemons, now a Toronto Argonauts executive and a charity leader in his adopted home city, had been billed as a speaker who’d bring Ontarians to their feet when he endorsed the provincial conservatives Saturday morning — a thing he did not actually do except implicitly by his presence. In a 45-minute talk, Clemons managed not to say that in the 2018 election, voters should pick the Progressive Conservatives or Leader Patrick Brown. He didn’t explain why he himself has. But he did wander the big room at the Shaw Centre as he riffed through an improvised address. He hugged people and recited poetry and drew on scripture. He urged Tory delegates to act as if the whole world will see the unedited movies of their lives. He talked about football. He offered a lot of aphorisms. “This is not a power play. It’s a people play,” he said. “We’ve got to be excited about service. … This has to be ingrained — we have to enjoy doing the best for people,” he said. “Life is not about stuff. It’s about people,” he said. “Canada is like my wife. That’s who I choose to live with,” he said. A lot of it could have been delivered to literally any room in need of a motivational talk: Liberals or New Democrats, for sure. Probably high-schoolers, car salesmen or environmental activists (though a party spokesman made sure reporters knew this wasn’t a paid gig for Clemons). A long discussion on the harmful effects of technology sounded really weird, coming as it did after a presentation about how the Tories will use a website called as the backbone of their efforts to develop policies for the 2018 election. Parts of it, though, the Tories really needed to hear. “Respect is the choice of the person that is delivering it. With that, I want to challenge us to be more respectful,” Clemons said. Clemons, of course, is black and grew up poor in Florida, though he’s now a Canadian and apparently a Progressive Conservative. We, he said, need to embrace lesbians, gays and trans people. Women. Aboriginals. Even Liberals. Tories don’t have to agree with them, Clemons said. But they do have to respect them.
“If we don’t exhibit respect, it’s almost impossible to expect it anywhere else,” he said.


The Tories have to bring outsiders into their rebuild because, frankly, the rump of a party remaining after the last election isn’t qualified for the job. The party caucus — presumably some of its best and most thoughtful people — is massively white, male and rural. It includes one avowed Creationist, numerous opponents of Ontario’s school health curriculum (who don’t like that it talks about sex), and landowners’ rights fanatics. Ask the Republican party how it works to leave a reconstruction to the hardest of the hardcore.

Kaydee Richmond, a Brown adviser who’s been devising the party’s method for deciding its 2018 platform, talked about seeking ideas in every corner of Ontario. Literally any Ontarian can use that website to tell the Tories about problems that are important to them, she said: “Everyone is welcome here. Everyone has a voice in the Ontario PC party.” They’ll solicit solutions from anybody with expertise, she said. Several times, she talked about reaching out to unions, including in the public sector. This is, pointedly, the opposite of the strategy the party followed for its disastrous 2014 campaign under Tim Hudak (who’s still an MPP but was not at the convention). He and his inner circle decided the party platform, and even sitting MPPs found out about parts of it as they were announced. He declared war on public-sector workers. “Never has it been more clear that when our members are not in the driver’s seat, our policy goes off the rails,” Richmond declared. The party needs its current members but can’t be hostage to them. It can’t stick Brown with policies he can’t sell. And it can’t infuriate its own people or look like a circus to outsiders. It needs ideas that are big but linked by a coherent philosophy (“winning” can’t be it). The platform certainly can’t come out like a Pinball Clemons speech. The task is immense, difficult and profoundly delicate. And not a bad rehearsal for governing.
Posted in Canada, Corruption, Crime, economics, Education, Globalization, human rights, islam, Legal, media, muslim, Policy, politics, proglodyte, proglodytes, progressive, progressives, propaganda, Psychology, Regulation, religion, Treason, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Turdeau’s Liberals plan to build refugee camps on seven Canadian military bases – Taxpayers will fund mosques, Korans

From here:

The Canadian military has been ordered by Justin Trudeau’s Liberals to draft plans to house more than 6,000 Muslim migrants on a long-term basis at military bases, according to documents obtained exclusively by The Rebel (see below.)

Included in the Department of National Defence budgets are hundreds of thousands of dollars set aside for “religious support,” including the purchase of Muslim Korans, prayer mats and foot-washing towels.

The plans also call for the construction of mosques or “worship centres,” using taxpayers dollars.

The planning documents, in English and French, were released in response to a Rebel “Access to Information” request about religious expenditures by the Department of National Defence.

But the detailed Quebec budget plans also shed light on the sheer scale of the Trudeau government’s plans to set up refugee camp-style accommodations on seven Canadian Forces Bases across Quebec and Ontario.

The budget for Quebec alone totals more than $46 million for the first six months.

For a typical migrant family, that’s a $200,000/year subsidy — not including medicare or welfare.

It’s shocking that Canadian Armed Forces personnel will be ordered to abandon the coalition battle against ISIS and return to Canada to become waiters, chauffeurs and social workers for Muslim migrants, and that Canadian Forces Bases will be turned into squalid refugee camps.

It’s a disgrace that Canadian military personnel have been sent eviction notices to make way for foreign migrants.

But for the DND’s budget to be diverted away from military purposes and towards buying Korans and building mosques for foreign migrants, is especially outrageous.


To fight back against Justin Trudeau’s dangerous plan to rush tens of thousands of unvetted Muslim migrants to Canada, visit and sign the petition!

PS: The Rebel is ONLY media company in Canada that would even ask about government-funded mosques for refugees on military bases.

Please help us CROWDFUND our independent journalism.

RELATED: “A national embarrassment: U.S. Senate demands answers about Trudeau’s reckless refugee plan”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

What’s Behind This Alliance of Globalist Oil-Banksters, Leftist Governments, and Muslims?!

Ask: why do “leftist” ‘activist’ extortionist gangsters always support “muslim” extortionist gangsters?

Proglodytes are “taught” SEDITION (abused by the false and backwards notion) that “Nations Cause Wars!”

To them, the idea of “nations” and “nationalism” only began during the Enlightenment, and was a concept – exactly like that of “greedily” owning, hording (and improving!) personal property, which was an idea deliberately invented by racist white people (including, of course, the Jews) to create exclusivist borders and restrict the movements of all those noble swarthy collectivist tribal savages on the planet.

Ignoring the fact that all the nations on earth evolved organically over time, from families to clans to tribes to nations to states and eventually empires, they “reason” in their usual, literally backwards, pre-posterous ways, that, in order to achieve world peace, they must first destroy the concept of “nations!”

That way those who destroyed their own nations won’t have to feel jealous anymore about those who didn’t.

And they hate Israel the most, because it is the most successful nation, the main one to disprove their fantasy claims.

Muslims, too, are never patriots; they regard all national sovereignties as temporary, man-made false idols which must all be eventually destroyed and replaced with the one-world global muslim Ummah, to be ruled by their theocratic caliphate, and their duty is to wage offensive war to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims. Terrorism is an inherent, not an incidental, component of islam.

No self-determined muslim believes in any sovereign national governments nor countries at all, ever!

Islam’s Sharia is either compatable with our Western, morality-based law (in which case it is superfluous) or it is not (in which case it is illegal).

There is only one universally accepted version of sharia crime (‘law’) and that is the original, Haneefite version as recorded in The Hedaya and used by the Ottoman Empire to rule all of islam for centuries; all moslems in all their countries are very aware of its simple might-makes-right and us-versus-them tenets and strictures.

There is really only one Qur’an, one islam, and one sharia.

And since islam is inherently SEDITION against ALL sovereign national countries (which it regards as only temporary man-made false idols, to be eventually destroyed and replaced by the global muslim Ummah, ruled by their theocratic Caliphate government – Sura 18:26) because since the Qur’an and subsequent sharia elaborations embody “god’s” perfect laws which are to apply to all mankind everywhere, why would anyone ever need any merely human legislators (even ‘democratically elected’ ones)?!

So, since islam is a subversive anti-national and anti-legal entity, why on earth are any of its “muslim” members ever afforded any legal standing to promote their criminal treasonous sedition, before any of our courts of law?!

Allowing foreign (sharia “law”) courts to exist in your country is to enable those foreign governments to govern in your country; it’s obviously TREASON.

Nation-hating leftist racist gangsters love islam because it’s full of poor oppressed angry violent noble swarthy savages who hate the idea of nations as much as they do! They think they can control muslims by coddling them, and aim the muslims at their mutual enemies – at the hard-working civilized patriotic nationalists.


They are too short-sighted to realize how badly this will backfire on them, but by the time they do come to realize it, it may be far too late for the rest of us!

PS: The globalist banksters fail to realize that there is no such thing as “sharia-compliant financing!”

Sharia law manuals like the Hedaya state it’s perfectly acceptable to charge interest TO INFIDELS because it’s a way to enslave and destroy them.

But it’s never acceptable to charge fellow muslim gang-members interest.

And government went along with their owners because of an antiquated energy policy from the 1970s, which traded endless immigration opportunities for muslim Arabs for “stable” (aka cheap) oil prices.

The energy strategy was to buy up all the Arabs’ oil first before using our own, simply to keep it away from rivals like China. Then the theory went, in the future we would still have all our oil, and they would have none left, so we could sell ours for such a high price that we’d recoup all our losses.

But the impossible plan depended on politicians not being so stupidly greedy as to massively go into debt to China in order to pander tot heir own special interest voting blocks during the same time-period.

“A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy…”

Alexander Fraser Tytler, Scottish lawyer and writer, 1770


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment