Here’s how liberals have always viewed islam and sharia:
Initially, liberals must assume that, “Since God is unknowable &/or religion is only some silly opinions anyway, it doesn’t really matter what anyone describes their god as! (even if, as “allah,” he’s portrayed as a violent sadistic slaver.)
To which they *might* add the “unless they believe in it and abuse their kids with it and want to impose it on everyone else against their will, of course!” bits left only implied, but which they’re too polite and “culturally sensitive” (i.e: racist) to ever actually articulate; so that, as selfish cowards, they can safely ignore all the muslims’ crimes by pretending to not pre-judge them, and so leave the crimes and criminals in a perpetually contextually-abstracted, idolatrous state: as eternally innocent until (never even bothering to try to find them to ever be) proven guilty!
To aid them in this delusive deception, they also claim the false, allegedly Christian Commandment, of “Judge Not – EVER!” Whee.
Further, whenever they describe muslim crime as “islam-IST,” Extrem-IST, Radical-IST, Militant-IST, etc., they’re really only sublimating the suffix “-ISH;” as in islam-ish, muslim-ish (but not *really* fully islam-IC)!
At first, they’ll want to assert that “Islam is a great religion of peace,” and “an Abrahamic monotheism,” neither of which are true:
The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims.
So, if and when liberals consider islam to be a religion, they must also implicitly agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?
As soon as you pretend this divine extortion fantasy excuse is even a remotely possible scenraio, you’ve also instantly Submitted to the alibi of becoming a criminal “muslim” yourself!
After this, their initial reaction will predictably be: “You can’t claim islam is against us, as in it’s an us-vs-them creed! (because they’re more violent than we are, so it isn’t safe to do so!”) coached in terms of immoral might-makes-right relativism:
“Islam isn’t evil because we (i.e: you) all do it, too!”
Or, in the slightly more intelligent attempt:
“But non-muslims commit crimes, too, so islam isn’t responsible for (any) crimes!”
Well, obviously islam isn’t the *only* cause of crime, (although, in this world and at this time, it has long maintained the position of being the main cause of most crimes globally) but it is definitely a crime-causing venture: if one were to consciously take all the rationalizations and reasons for any humans committing any crimes, and bundle them all into one book, appended with the exhortations that “God” wanted people to commit crimes for these reasons, and which further, were NOT really crimes, BECAUSE said God endorsed them – then you would have created exactly what we are all faced with here and now: the Qur’an, islam, and it’s muslim mobsters.
Islam is a threat to everyone because IT says it is.
Holy mobster Moslems only hate infidels because the Qur’an says “god” orders them to – Period.
ALL moslems are criminals because, by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an.
And the Qur’an tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-moslem humans, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-moslems in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being moslems.
“Slay the idolators wherever you find them…” Chapter 9, verse 5
“When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them….” Ch. 47:4
So the Qur’an is a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat.
But then, both liberals and muslims pretend to be proud of their practicality in submitting to the extortionist’s creed that one must “Go Along” (with the criminal’s lies) “To Get Along” (with the lying criminals)!
To liberals, this is called “Political Correctness” and to muslims, it’s known as Submissive lying (“to Keep The Peace!”)
Liberals also call this cowardly instinctive Submission to despair: “shrewdness,” “realism,” & “realpolitik.”
Both liberals and muslims are group-might-makes-right criminal extortionist gangsters.
Both liberals and muslims believe in the supremacy of group identities over individual choices.
Both liberals and muslims believe in forcing outcomes which are against individual free-will choice.
Both use fatalistic predeterminism excuses: muslims: “the will of allah;” libs: “historical determinism.”
Both believe minority groups are helpless victims, slaves to destiny, and so should all be treated as such.
Both feel the right to be noblesse oblige elitists to “protect” submissive victims, in stead of enabling them to defend them selves.
Most Liberals believe that we’re all really only random mistakes, and, as such, also potentially dangerous victims of predetermined force – victims of society, products of our environments, and slaves of allah – so their great “solution” is always the same: to dilute our potentially dangerous individual propensity to make mistakes by forming into pre-emptively defensive groups (of potentially dangerous mistakes LOL) and all for our own good and “protection,” of course!
Pretending a group of individuals is entitled to have more rights than the sum of those individuals, is idolatry (image over reality, form over substance, lies over truth). When groups have idolatrous rights, then all individuals who are not members of those groups have less rights. And all group-might-makes-rights amounts to anyway is the crime of extortion. Either all humans have the exact same rights, or none have any real rights.
All humans have a right to defend themselves, and part of that defense involves being able to be free to speak to accuse those who seek to attack them first.
Fred Bastiat said something like: “We all have the natural right to self defense; bad laws are those which try to deprive us of that right.”
Criminals attack first by fraudulently lying to slander and blame their own victims in an attempt to remove their victims’ rights to self-defensive free-speech, by asserting that they themselves are the victims and their victims are the criminals who therefore have no right to slander them.
To achieve this irrationality, they must often pretend there is no discernable cause and effect, that all is relative, expecially when it applies to them, because their group is in a minority.
When groups have rights, individuals don’t – simply because such a stance creates an injustice system, where some people (these days, in the West, who are part of some subjectively determined “identifiable protected minority groups,” including “women’s rights”) have more rights than others, which means those others have LESS rights than the protected group, and so are to be officially pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent in comparison.
By endorsing group rights, any criminal has an automatic alibi for their crimes, if they can pre-posterously claim “retaliation” for something that once happened anywhere else to anyone else who was even only vaguely or remotely “like them.”
Pre-judice is slander, and vice-versa. Group rights is pre-judicial, obviously false idolatry, slander, and fraud – it’s a crime.
Reversing the onus of proof to guilty until never proven innocent is fradulent prejudicial slander and might-makes-right extortion (crime)!
It’s attacking first!
Any so-called Judges or politicians who supported and enabled these crimes are guilty of same.
They are also guilty of criminal harrassment and extortion (conformity, like all communazis want for everyone, is extortion; aka terrorism).
Any “legal” system which endorses group rights – even “minority” ones – is NOT a legal system at all: It’s only an extortion-promoting CRIME system!
And like all gangsters’ extortion rackets, it’s really only formed because each individual criminal (libertine liberal) really only wants rights without responsibilities for them SELF – to dilute their own responsibility in a group (because delinquent cowardice loves company) in order to be able to say:
“I didn’t do it! ONLY The GROUP did it!” and “In fact, NONE OF US in The Group did it, either – ONLY The GROUP did it! Whee!”
These infantile delinquent criminal negligent cowardly traitors in fact always want the false right to remain irresponsibly wrong.
Why do they crave government dictators and slavery? “Because with no power comes no responsibility!”
There’s no perverse crime a lefty won’t compromise with or Submit to!
Liberals racists can invariably be relied on to ignore even the worst depredations of muslims, under the blanket alibi/excuse of:
“Who Are We To Say Our Culture Is Better Than Theirs?”
– And yet they feel perfectly free to say our culture is WORSE than theirs (everyone else’s) – the guaranteed liberal response to the threat of the muslim conquest of the West is always:
“So what?! We’re worse than them so we deserve it!”
They feel perfectly safe and so free to challenge and attack the West, knowing full-well that our history of collaborative discussion and “Thou Shalt Not Kill” and “sticks and Stones” proportional-response cultural indoctrination will save them from any violent retaliation for their incessantly slanderous harrassments.
This is why these self-described champions of diversity and “minority victim’s rights equality” will never be found advocating for the oppressed and victimized minorities in muslim countries: Christians, Jews, or Women!
Here in the West, it’s far easier to be the vicious little guy attacking bemused, innocent goliaths, making names for themselves by complaining, rather than by self-improvement, than it would ever be anywhere else in the world!
And their cries of relativist “multi-culturalism” really only ever amount to racism, because, in denying the obviously inferior cultural indoctrination nurture of islam, leaves the liberals with only nature to explain the total failure of the muslim nations!
They insist we mustn’t belittle the inferior races’ attempts, and so must in stead defend their failures in stead of granting them the equal regard necessary to solve their problems by explaining them to them!
Liberals believe muslims, being inferior animals at the mercy of their instincts, cannot learn from mistakes, so it’s mean of the rest of us to try educating them away from their crime-creed!
In rabidly and vociferously denying the role “nurture” or education (cultural indoctrination) has on any given people’s development, liberals reveal their true prejudicial stance: that “nature” (or ‘race’) is at the bottom of it all anyway!
FINALLY, I wouldn’t hold out too much hope that this recent anti-Boko-Haram trend is any kind of a true wake-up call for liberals.
Just as they’ve prefered to pretend they were always against “Al Quaeda” and “The Taliban” and radical-IST extreme-IST militant-IST islam-ISTS (“IST” = “ISH,” as in: “They’re islam-ISH and muslim-ISH, but “not really” islamic muslims!”) but never against the ancient ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndiate of islam itself, nor against any of its holy-mobster muslims.
Criminals (such as liberals and muslims) like “allah,” because allah is predetermined force (the perfect excuse for their own crimes: “The allah made me do it!”) while the Judeo-Christian God allegedly gave us all free-will choice and so both the self-reliant rights to, AND responsibilities for, our own actions – which is why all the criminals hate Him!
They choose Lucifer (allah) because then they get to pretend it’s all someone else’s fault, so they won’t have to face the painful truth that rights only come with responsibilities.
If with great power comes great responsibility, then leftists want to enjoy the right of any slave to remain irresponsibly wrong – because with no power comes no responsibility.
It’s divide and conquer to them, where they pretend to imagine they can have pleasure without pain, hope without fear, and pleasant rights without painful responsibilities. They love the idea of forced predeterminism, so they can always pretend to be the victims, helpless infantile delinquent criminal negligents that they are.
And Cowardice loves company, too!
People who want rights without responsibility always intrinsically, inherently slander their victims by downloading those responsibilities onto them; being an infantile delinquent is really just another form of negligent criminal extortion.
People who are truly cooperative, collaborating to reach a truly objective universal truth, realize that all individuals are equal. But contentious adversarial subjectivists must inplicitly and intrinsically oppose everyone else’s basic human rights to self defense, and so must be seen to at least seem to champion group might made rights extortion, while pretending they are really only “defending groups of victims” by slandering everyone else first.
i.e: If you’re a selfish liberal, you must oppose any and all objective standards of the equality of universal individual human rights, while idolatrously pretending to champion GROUPS (of “poor oppressed minorities”) as a cover for your false ‘right’ to do so!
These adversarial (satanic) lefties (left-hand-path followers) really always oppose EVERYONE and everything else, including, of course, the All (God).