I’m going to try to keep this site for my own thoughts, and the Vladdi one for sharing interesting pertinent articles. I will, of course, link to the pertinent articles there, from here, and in my commentary there, to here, and vice-versa! (i.e: Here’s Brandon’s article).
This one is in response to an article by Brandon Smith about PC, from here.
So here’s my (book-length LOL) response to him:
Political correctness = factual incorrectness (lying; fraud; CRIME).
What sane people call “the slippery slope,” liberals call “progress!”
Political correctness (slanderous victim-blaming factual incorrectness) is both fraud (crime) and extortion – pretending that, either you lie along with the majority, or you’ll be replaced with a better liar by that same majority; group might makes right! Exact same as communazism.
Deliberately maintaining the LIE that Jihad = “peaceful inner struggle,” against ALL the clear evidence and Qur’anic definitions to the contrary, is not only to wilfully engage in perpetuating the perpetration of the crime of public deception, but to act as a willing accessory enabling all the crimes of our self-determined moslem enemies.
Any lawyer, judge, or politician who enages in such practices is a criminal and an outlaw, and so should be dealt with accordingly.
The cause of the liberals’ perpetual irrational cause-and-effect-hating immmoral relativism is that they see all facts as attacks!
‘ALWAYS DENY EVERYTHING!’ seems to be their motto.
It comes from their belief in the brazen rule of chaos, that since something bad CAN happen, SO it WILL happen, SO they have to “pre-emptively, defensively” (i.e: really slanderously) always attack first!
They believe that all is allowed except for that which is specifically disallowed, which, since nothing can be THAT specific (i.e: “Fat Tony isn’t allowed to kill you today from between 1 and 4 PM!”) really only ever means “If it can happen, it will happen!” This is at the root of the libertine/ muslim’s predeterministic, idolatrous, paranoid fatalism.
This is what’s known as “psychopathy”
I don’t think the expect to win, since they have no rational arguments to present, they just endeavor to not-lose, by forcing everyone else to “admit” to being spineless relativists, too – for cowardice loves company!
All lefties (communazis, muslims) are really only total(itarian) conformists: extortionist group-might-makes-right collectivists; slanderously victim-blaming gangsters; criminals.
Liberals (and all other criminals) don’t ever really think, situationally – because if they did, they wouldn’t be criminals – they only ever react (by means of infantile delinquent ‘projection;’ i.e: “I know you are, but what am I?”) and attack, because they had long since before now slanderously and “pre-emptively” decided at some point in their lives that everyone was out to get them. So they constructed a simple and ritualistic cookie-cutter like behavioural response pattern to fit all future occasions. And since their message always only amounts to declarations of pure, selfish evil, their pre-programmed, fear-based and almost instinctively reactionary tactics must by necessity always involve messenger-shooting, victim-blaming slander.
Once you’ve been proven factually wrong in public, you can no longer prove yourself right, so there’s only two possible responses left to you: admit it and thank your educator for enlightening you, or evasively try blustering to deflect attention from your mistakes, by distracting people with irrelevant examples of your accuser’s own mistakes, to attempt to “prove” them to be wrong, “too!” i.e: Blame your victims!
This is where people turn mistakes from mere negligence into criminal negligence, more or less by slanderously asserting: “Screw you! I meant to do that, because I knew you were gonna make me do it, so it’s all your fault! Whee!” Then they follow up with “There are no real crimes, because we all do it, too – even you make mistakes!” This is immoral relativism and the false, victim-blaming ’emotion’ of subjective “jealousy!”
Since they automatically pretend that everything’s relative, there is no real right or wrong, that it’s an absolute fact that there are absolutely no absolute facts, and that, since there’s no real cause and effect (or it’s too complex for any of us mere mortals to ever truly fully discover or understand) then all facts are only opinions, so therefore all the liberals’ entirely fact-free opinions are in reality the diversely opposite equals of the “conservatives'” silly objective facts!
They also thus often prefer to focus on WHO said something, rather than on WHAT was actually said.
So, never having any facts which would ever agree with their perpetual irrationality, the left must always resort to the slanderous evasions known collectively as the critical thinking logical fallacies – the deflective ad-hominem personal attacks, the distractive strawman red-herrings, and of course the immoral relativist’s favorite slander, the argumentum tu quoque – i.e: “Crime isn’t crime, and islam isn’t evil, because we (i.e: you) all do it too! Whee!” As if simply comparing many different categories of wrong, somehow made one of them into a right!
Isn’t it funny that people who actually have facts, rarely (if ever) seem to feel the need to indulge in fallacies?
The left has to have “victims” to defend or their lives are just not worth a dime. In their zero-sum world, they can’t imagine making themselves safe and happy, but maybe it’d work for others. Still, if the leftists couldn’t find (or create) groups of oppressed victims to defend, they’d have to get real jobs and actually work for a living! Out-sourcing and projecting their adversarial needs onto “deserving victim groups” might magically transform them from whiny losers into altruistically committed “crusaders for social justice!”
Bear in mind that they will also remain too afraid to accuse any real, potentially dangerous live human criminals of their crimes, and so must in stead always restrict them selves to accusing group idols, and that always means introducing fact-free, cause-and-effect reversed relativism into the equation: all real live criminals must be seen to be helpless victims of some other group’s historical oppressions, for it to work.
And this is also of course why they will always back the aggressors (muslims and other criminals) ‘rights,’ and always attack the non-violent (Christians and Jews) – because there’s no personal risk in it for them, and lots of public support available for such actions for them among the ever-present criminal elements.
And, by aligning them selves with, and championing, some unrelated group’s historic oppression narrative, they can give free rein to their own propensity for attacking everyone first, by rationalizing it as really only being an ongoing, defensive counter-attack (attacking second). Their opinions, they pretend, get to define the actual start of the conflict, and when and where some group is deemed to be in a ‘minority’ status (Blacks, for instance, outnumber Whites worldwide, but not yet, say, at the North Pole. So a liberal would pretend to be perfectly justified in slandering all Whites at the North Pole as being racist oppressors). Also note: the liberals’ defense of the minority will never result in improved conditions for that minority, as the liberals will instead insist said minority will have no obligation to improve themselves, but must in stead enslave them selves to the liberals’ liberation timetable (i.e: never; Please Give Genersously AGAIN)!
Liberals want to help you.
SO they do NOT want you helping your selves!
This is besides the obvious fact that, when groups get rights, individuals lose theirs along with their responsibilities to them selves and to others. Liberals divide humanity into sub-groups, to conquer it.
The liberal criminals’ chosen stance of irrationality always involves reversing cause and effect, &/or pretending it doesn’t actually exist in the first place. These idolatrous alibis are only excuses for crime.
The left doesn’t want to change things for people, it wants to change people for things like false group (might-made) rights, and maybe even genociding them all for “the environment.”
It’s the same, ages-old “The allah made me do it!” excuse, and liberal relativists love the same sort of thing: “There is no real evil, crimes nor criminals, because we’re all really only helpless victims of society, products of our environments, and slaves of allah. Since there’s such a diverse multiplicity of causes and effects, we can never really know anything for sure, so there might as well be no real causes and effects at all. This means that, since it’s an absolute fact that there are absolutely no absolute facts, and all facts are really only opinions, then our entirely fact-free, subjective liberal opinions are really the diversely opposite equals to your silly objective Conservative facts! Whee!”
“Besides (they go on, using their favorite, critical thinking logical fallacy slander, the Argumentum Tu Quoque) might makes right, so evil isn’t evil and crime isn’t crime because we (i.e: you) all do it, too! Whee!”
And, even if THAT fails (as all fallacies must) they pretend to imagine they still have the “moral high ground” excuse, that of “Since (I agree to Submit to your assertion that) you say you’re better than me, then it’s all your fault; and, since it’s all your fault, then none of it’s my fault, so I’m really still better than you!”
This stance, of course, ignores that deciding to do nothing to prevent other’s criminal extortions – is still a choice.
Everything the left says and does is a critical-thinking logical fallacy, most likely the argumentum qu quoque, i.e: an excuse or evasion for their false right to remain irresponsibly wrong by (usually slanderously) attacking innocent people first. In this way, the false blame they use to accuse them, keeps their victims on the defensive, and so unable to protest or counter-attack them; it’s a fairly successful recipe for crime. The Argumentum is as I stated: “Evil isnt’ evil, and crime isn’t crime, because we (i.e: you) all do it, too!” As if merely comparing two or more wrongs could somehow magically transform one of them into a right (Do two dissociated wrongs make one of them right? No – the only way the ends can ever be used to justify the means, is in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others; otherwise, the means only ever define the end results – if you lie, murder, and otherwise steal to get your way, in the end you aren’t a great success, but remain only a lying, murdering thief) so the victim-blaming pretense of self-defense is a de-rigeur requirement for their slanderous attacks; such criminal idoltry explains the left’s endless victimology and group-might-makes-rights scenarios. But when groups have rights, all real live individual humans don’t have rights, because non-members of those special groups have less rights; it’s just more guilty-until-never-proven-innocent slander: “Since someone sort of like you may have discriminated or oppressed someone sort of like them in the past, somewhere (but not even necessarily here) we’re going to take from you and give to them!” Or, “You owe me because you earned stuff I didn’t bother to!” It’s still really always only extortion, robbery and crime, with a self-righteous holier-than-thou alibi on top. CAPISCE?
Liberals are all about irresponsibility – after all, what’s left to liberate, here in the West?! We have a (mostly real, sort of) democracy, a mostly stable economy, good enough jobs, no one starves or (usually) freezes to death (unless they’re drunk) etc. So what’s the purpose of their implicitly slanderous title (“liberal”) as if they have to liberate people from evil conservative oppressions?! What they really want, is to be above all human laws; to have the right to remain irresponsibly wrong. The liberal party (we have one up here) should be re-named as “The Irresponsible Party!” … and their motto should, of course, be “Whee!”
They’re definitely all psychopaths (thought-killers) because they have assumed in advance that life is a zero-sum game; that it’s all pain or be pained, fear or be feared, attack first or be attacked first – that everyone’s their enemy, and having hope or even thinking about it is a form of stupidity and madness. In fact, that’s what pretty-much defines them: they will always pre-emptively cancel hope, and focus on their subjective images of the worst-case scenario as if it were already an objective fact; they are static idolaters and cannot really imagine any change, except for the worst (which, as proud masochists, they will then work hard to bring to pass, in order to maintain their illusion of “ethical” control over the immoral crime.
Their masochism is exposed by their “screw you – I meant to do that!” attitudes where they turn every simple mistake and act of negligence, into criminal negligence by reversing cause and effect to blame their victims.
From this, it doesn’t take much to make a habit of “There’s no money in solutions!” as they fail upwards.
In fact, they hate thinking about details, so they always contentiously emote as infantile delinquent children in stead: “It’s never my fault, and it’s always your/some body or some thing else’s fault!”
That’s their de-fault setting, and they will never evolve from it’s self-imposed restrictions; they will always absolutely refuse to learn from their mistakes – ever. They are Adversarial by nature.