Will EZRA LEVANT or Solomon Friedman please step up? Via Rail terror suspect Chiheb Esseghaier still needs a lawyer!

From here:

“I want a judgment based on the holy Qur’an,” he told the judge…

by SHEIKYERMAMI on AUGUST 21, 2013

Our political correctness is enabling such attitudes, rather than stamping them out.

It’s not just in places like Egypt that you find people wanting to transform their country into an Islamist state.

It’s happening over here.

Via Rail terror suspect Chiheb Esseghaier once again appeared in court Monday. He reiterated his demand to be judged by Islamic law.

“I want a judgment based on the holy Qur’an,” he told the judge. “Any lawyer that refuses that need, goodbye to him.”  Esseghaier will represent himself if he cannot find such a lawyer — which of course he won’t. He believes the Qur’an is superior to Canadian law. That we should all be subject to it.

I emailed Ezra Levant & Solomon Friedman about this, and so far they blew it!MY G*D! This is the opportunity of a lifetime! I’d go back to Law School and finish up in a heartbeat, if that’d be what it takes to “defend” this muzbag in court!IMAGINE THE PUBLICITY, when you stand up before the Judge, in public, with the enemedia press present, and declare on your client’s behalf:

“Your honour, my client admits he committed this terror crime, but asserts that you have absolutely no jurisdiction over his, and so he is proud to say that he would, and, allah willing, will do so again, because GOD TOLD HIM TO COMMIT THESE CRIMES – CAPISCE?

Then, right out there in public, DETAIL how the Qur’an, ancillary ahadith, Ibn Hishan’s sanitized rendition of Ibn Ishaq’s sirat rasul allah, the Tabari histories, and the four Sunni and one Shia maddhab fiqhs of sharia crime (“law”), the Haneefite, Malikite, Shafeite and Hanbali, and Jafari, respectively, ALL OFFICIALLY back up his claims!

WHAT A G*D-GIVEN BONANZA FOR THE BAN ISLAM MOVEMENT!

😉

Advertisements

About unclevladdi

Vojvoda
This entry was posted in Canada, Crime, Education, human rights, islam, Legal, media, muslim, Policy, politics, Privacy, propaganda, Regulation, religion, Uncategorized, War and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Will EZRA LEVANT or Solomon Friedman please step up? Via Rail terror suspect Chiheb Esseghaier still needs a lawyer!

  1. Zenster says:

    unclevladdi: … couldn’t for the life of me slog all the way through it LOL!

    Hey! It’s only an hour of your life that you’ll never get back. What’s not to like?

    When someone so dedicated and consistently acute as Levant manages to poke the pony, where does that leave the rest of civilization?

    I’m hoping that you might join me in working to establish a basic litmus test which will help the average Joe (and Josephine), to determine exactly who is firing on all cylinders.

    References like Churchill’s “River Wars” quote: (short form):

    The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

    Belmont Club’s Richard “Wretchard” Fernandez’s brilliant magnum opus, “The Three Conjectures(excerpt):

    Even if Islam killed every non-Muslim on earth they would almost certainly continue to kill each other with their new-found weaponry. Revenge bombings between rival groups and wars between different Islamic factions are the recurring theme of history. Long before 3,000 New Yorkers died on September 11, Iraq and Iran killed 500,000 Muslims between them. The greatest threat to Muslims is radical Islam; and the greatest threat of all is a radical Islam armed with weapons of mass destruction.

    Or [blush] my own series:

    When Will it End?

    Why Will it End?

    How Will it End?

    It can only be hoped that these sort of articles, quotes and essays will persuade any “fence-sitters” to take sides.

    Please let me know what you think.

    • unclevladdi says:

      OK, a-slogging I shall go; and, unlike “some” people I could mention, I won’t call you names (like, a “life-hating eco-radical,” or some such)!

      😉

      PS: Voltaire had some nicely unkind things to say about Momo, too! In fact, he wrote a whole play about islamn!

      1) When will it end?

      “There’s No Money In Solutions! Whee!” is the motto of the traitor-class.

      2) Why will it end?

      No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, yet the criminally negligent greed-creed motto of those in charge always seems to be the exact opposite, that: “There’s No Money In Solutions! Whee!” (and its corollary: “It’s not broken, so let’s fix it!”)

      The real reason the islamic threat is being ignored in public, is this not-so-nascent “Globalization” movement, which is clearly treason to ALL sovereign national people’s governments. It’s a plutocratic kleptocracy to be run by all those corporazis who never want to pay any taxes to anyone, anywhere, ever; by the global communazi labour guys who want free movement and the same lowest common denominator wages for their 3rd-world slaves, and of course by the moslems who want their one-world islamic ummah, to be run by their theocratic caliphate government. It’s a triple-threat. Against all these evil forces, we have only the Truth … while only they currently control both the fear and the greed.

      As long as ONLY the enemy controls both the behavioural conditioning binaries of the stick (fear of personally having one’s own family firebombed or beheaded by the Jihad) and the carrot (greed for oil-money bribes), those sales-puppets we laughingly call “our leaders” and their complicit media presstitute pets will insist on maintaining their preposterously backwards, victim-blaming “narrative” that only we are to blame for the Qur’an’s 1,400 years of hate, so that we should all “Submit and learn how to be better victims!”

      Pre-forgiving criminals of their crimes, without them having to repent of them, as if those crimes were only tragic accidents or mistakes, is what’s insane; the liberal and false -Christian “Love the Sinner, but hate the Sin” notion only evinces all the symptoms of the Stockholm Syndrome, where, to survive, the criminals’ victims sympathetically adopt the criminals’ points of view, seeking to defuse and assuage their fears by making their captors feel safe, and to neutralize their greed by attempting to make them feel happy, respectively; they enslave themselves to their criminal captors.

      Hating only crimes is insane; crimes are events in which real live responsible (and so, guilty) humans used their free-will choice to attack innocent others first.

      Hating the criminals for their CHOICE of actions is the completely sane response.

      In choosing to hate (direct justified anger towards) only the static, long-past events, they only seek to avoid the risk of confronting the still potentially dangerous, real, live, dynamic human criminals.

      All liberals ever do is pretend to have to Submit to despair and failure for being “forced” by their predetermination idols; they pretend crimes are mysterious, uncontrollable “tragedies” simply to avoid confronting evil.

      But “tolerance becomes a crime, when applied to evil.”

      -Thomas Mann-

      Christ did not say, “Love the sinner, hate the sin.” It’s from St. Augustine. His Letter 211 (c. 424) contains the phrase Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum, which translates roughly to “With love for mankind and hatred of sins.” The phrase has become more famous as “love the sinner but hate the sin” or “hate the sin and not the sinner” (the latter form appearing in Mohandas Gandhi’s 1929 autobiography).

      Liberals might want to ponder that, as they attack Western civilization in favor of groveling before the barbaric criminal savages of islam as their dear leader always does. All they’re doing is trying to deflect the criminals’ attentions from them selves, and onto the other victims, by basically asserting:

      “I didnt’ do it! ONLY The (rest of the White, Western, middle class 1%ers) GROUP did it! Whee!”

      The reason they shoot cowards in wartime, is because cowards are also usually traitors.

      Unfortunately, it is not only “Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda (who) both view … the comfort and stability of Western-induced prosperity as a potent distraction that could make Muslims stray from the path of jihad” – this is what all low-information liberal voters fervently hope for as well: being masochists, they can indeed imagine the threat of islam invading their neighbourhoods, which is WHY they invite the muslim menace into them – to pretend to have a degree of control over the potential pains they fear. To these idolaters, Hope IS a Plan, and so they hope the muslim extortionsits will be too distracted by their newfound wealth to, well, extort any more, much less most or all, of it from them – but they ignore that extortion is ALL that islam teaches it’s muslim minions; it’s all they know, so their hope is doomed and, really, only ever was, or can be, criminally negligent infantile delinquency in action!

      3) How will it end?

      In light of all the Trillion$ of expenditures you list, in only one way: in total victory for the global banksters who have always, still do, and always will, fund all sides of every given conflict, so that in the end, both the winners and losers will owe it all to them. Simple!

      And the only way to have “won” and destroyed islam, would have been to have been straight-up about it’s true nature (as an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate) from the beginning.

      It should never be allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (moslems) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, & so “make” them commit even more crimes!

      No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, & nobody is doing even these moslems any favours, by indulging their historic lies that islam is a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) or a “race” (much less one of poor oppressed People Of Colour”)!

      Even I know almost everything about islam (unfortunately; although it’s members never cease to amaze and sicken me with creative new atrocities) simply because it has its core (the Qur’an, 2 sahih and 4 less-so ahadith, the Sirat, and the 4 Sunni and 1 Shia maddhab fiqhs of sharia) and that’s it!

      They cannot add to it, nor “reform” any of it, in any way, because it’s the “perfect” word of allah, and the metaphoric so-called “gates of ijtihad” (interpretation) have been closed for centuries!

      Islam can be easily studied and known in its entirety, by anyone.

      So, when Western people won’t educate them *selves* about islam because our culture defers all thinking to those “authorities” we PAY to do our thinking and research for us, while they secretly know full-well that the salesmen in charge will always sell us all out, they ARE CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT INFANTILE DELINQUENT TRAITORS TO RATIONALITY AND CIVILIZATION!

      Your last article leaves off where my “Ban Islam!” one begins:

      “Islam is a threat to everyone because IT says it is.

      Holy mobster Moslems only hate infidels because the Qur’an says “god” orders them to – Period.

      ALL moslems are criminals because, by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an.

      And the Qur’an tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-moslem humans, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-moslems in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being moslems.”

      See the rest, here:

      https://unclevladdi.wordpress.com/2013/05/19/ban-islam-3/

      Njoi!

      😉

  2. Zenster says:

    Pre-forgiving criminals of their crimes, without them having to repent of them, as if those crimes were only tragic accidents or mistakes, is what’s insane; the liberal and false -Christian “Love the Sinner, but hate the Sin” notion only evinces all the symptoms of the Stockholm Syndrome, where, to survive, the criminals’ victims sympathetically adopt the criminals’ points of view, seeking to defuse and assuage their fears by making their captors feel safe, and to neutralize their greed by attempting to make them feel happy, respectively; they enslave themselves to their criminal captors.

    I could not agree more. The Christian notions of forgiveness and absolution have been so totally perverted as to remove all culpability for crimes before the fact. No wonder so many modern criminals display a complete lack of conscience before or after committing their various outrages. At some point, especially with the unrepentant, you must learn to hate those who voluntarily engage in such malicious brutality. Forgiving it without any sincerely regret being shown by the malefactor is only an invitation to have more of such evil wreaked upon society with even less sense of guilt.

    No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, & nobody is doing even these moslems any favours, by indulging their historic lies that islam is a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) or a “race” (much less one of poor oppressed People Of Colour”)!

    Isn’t it curious how hand-and-glove the issues of Islam and Race Realism seem to be? Both involve people with a monstrous sense of entitlement and an unslakable thirst for playing the victim. Both are being pandered to by political groups whose inventory of solutions are limited to pandering and appeasement. Ask Neville Chamberlain how that appeasement thingy worked out.

    Finally, both groups focus nearly their entire agenda on the issue of “race” regardless of whether race is a valid point or even remotely pertinent. Think: Islamaphobia being racist. Think: IQ tests and background checks for hiring being racist. Yet, of course, all White people are racist solely because they are White.

    Finally, thank for reading my three part series. I hope that even a person like you who is so well-read about Islam found something to take away from the essays. If anything, the financial analyses contained in them should have given you a moment’s pause.

    • unclevladdi says:

      No, thank YOU for writing the essays; the pleasure was all mine; you have a great way with words, and are clearly a better writer than I am for sure LOL! You certainly lined up all the ducks in a row, and yes indeed addressed the insane economic suicide of indulging in the “No Money In Solutions” approach to destroying islam – insane, that is, only if you AREN’T A BANKSTER.

      And yes, I also previously addressed the notion of falsely conflating “religion” and “race” in an article describing how “multi-culturalism” IS “racism.”

      So now I guess I’ll have to go find it again!

      😉

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s