Are ALL Religions REALLY “the Same!”?

Let’s start with Catholicism versus islam, then compare Judaism and islam to, you know, see if all those leftist claims of “Those evil Abrahamic monotheisms are all the same!” are really true:

The Catholics have engaged in several (defensively “just”) holy wars, collectively called “The Crusades,” themselves – but in each and every case, islam started those wars by violently invading and enslaving all the formerly Greek, Christian and Jewish countries in the Middle East (like Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iraq and Turkey – not to mention India and Iran, too).

Popes aren’t religious people, they’re only “religions” salesmen, and that usually always only means: “Have Faith, for Hope IS a plan!” (“and Please Give Generously – AGAIN!”)

Islam sells the opposite: Hope is no plan at all, so always Submit to the fear of Pain!

Neither is any good for humanity, but the first creed is less evil than the latter one.

The god the moslems fear (not admire, love, nor really worship; but only obey) is similar to the old testament one, which was basically Pain incarnate, but which was replaced by the Christian one (the hope of no pain).

Christianity is infinitely better than islam (or, to put it another way, islam is LITERALLY infinitely worse than either Judaism or the Christianity that evolved from it, via the Jew named Jesus) and here’s exactly how and why:

The OT – even in its worst, homophobic, kill-your-children-if-they-don’t-worship-Yahweh, etc and genocidal bits, was only BY THE JEWS AND FOR THE JEWS!

Even those (7+2) tribal genocides were arguably defensive in nature, as the Jews, having escaped Egyptian slavery, were only en route back to their historical place of origin and homeland in Canaan, when their old neighbours decided to block their return. So they were told to kill THESE specific tribes, ONCE, and HERE (in the environs immediately surrounding the land of Israel). They were and still are only descriptive histories, not prescriptive commands.

Contrast that with the Koran, where Muhammad had all those old, BAD, genocidal bits read to him, declared them to be GOOD things, and then extrapolated them from being merely temporary, situational historical references and descriptions, into ETERNAL and GLOBAL prescriptions and “commands of god” to apply EVERYWHERE and FOR ALL TIME, and to EVERYONE else, too!

So the (literally infinite) difference is: ONCE, HERE, for us, contrasted with ALWAYS, EVERYWHERE, for everyone else, too!

Now, having clarified that, I can indeed agree about the claims of religion in general, and can also easily contrast them with those of philosophy and science, too:

Philosophy – is speculation, presented AS speculation.
Science – is tested speculation, presented AS tested speculation.
Religion – is speculation, presented AS FACT.

So, obviously, only one of these (religion) is a LIE – and lying is only the most basic form of theft (it’s the theft of the Truth) and all forms of theft ARE crime. All religions are crimes.

However, (that being said) at best, religion is the opinion of the religion-salesman, presented as fact, and sold as helpful advice: do what god advises, or bad things will happen, not because god is (or the gods are) out to get you, but because you ignored their laws (like gravity). And, at WORST, all “real” religions only say:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”


“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

Thus proving the moslems have absolutely NO faith nor belief in their god’s own desires or abilities to enforce his own, us-versus-them and might-makes-right “laws.”

So all moslems are really only atheists, and “worse:” While the OT saw god as a big bad scary unknown (basically, they were told to fear god AS Pain) the New Testament reversed this, to seeing god as hope (of no pain). In fact, even in the OT, there were intimations of this evolution from fear to hope, as the “God IS Love!” bit was actually said first by MOSES, and Isaiah said that god “ONLY WANTS US TO REASON WITH HIM.”

The Koran, however, said “NO! That’s not right! God is still only a big, bad, scary unknown thing, (i.e: Pain incarnate) and so is always only to be feared, not loved!

God (“allah”) doesn’t need you, and he doesn’t love you, either! In fact, he’s the one who blinds you to his own truth, and throws you into eternal Hell for it, too!

So basically, islam is all stick, no carrot. On his own deathbed, Muhammad was asked what he thought would happen to him in the afterlife, and his reply was: “I have absolutely no idea.”

I think most of the smarter moslems say to themselves:

“I know I worship nothing – but it’s MY Nothing!”

Islam is empty of all hope, and only demands we all fear pain (which is natural to everything anyway) – it’s nothing more than idolatry, and an excuse to evade the pains of personal self-responsibility and thinking for one’s self. And that’s why it’s so hard to destroy and why it seems to be “winning” – because it gives it’s moslem mind-slaves the right to remain irresponsibly wrong, and to slanderously commit all crimes in god’s name. It might as well be (“Who dares, wins!”) Satanislam:

The ‘theological’ notion of Allah’s “oneness” is CRUCIAL to their main criminal, might-makes-right alibi, that “we aren’t responsible, and no one is every really a criminal anyway, because we’re all really only Allah‘s slaves and victims;” i.e:

“The Allah Made Me Do It!”
“In fact, I didn’t do it at all – ONLY The ALLAH did it! Whee!”

[8.17] So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote, and that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is All-Hearing, Knowing.

Sura 4:77: “Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected:
“War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

“Fight them; Allah will punish them by your hands and will disgrace them and give you victory over them” – 9:14-15


Basically, islam denies there is a god at all, because Islamic “beliefs” include the belief that their god cannot be understood nor reasoned with, (so it might as well not exist at all) it can only feared and obeyed.

But when your “god” is simply and *generally* “everything,” then it’s also simply *specifically* “nothing” (existentialism IS nihilism)!

If your “god” is so remote that it doesn’t respond to you, then it might as well not exist at all (so it’s not really a “god” at all)!

It’s not really Ha-Shem, but more like Shiite-Happens.

Islamic beliefs also include the criminal notion that, since Muhammad got away with committing his crimes, (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, many times and, far from ever feeling remorse or apologizing for them, instead encouraged everyone else to join him in committing them, too) then “god” must have wanted him to get away with committing those crimes!

Sura 48:20: “Allah has promised you abundant spoils that you will capture, and He has hastened for you this, and He has restrained the hands of men from (defending themselves) from you, that it may be a sign for the believers, and that He may guide you to a Straight Path.”


“…and that He may guide you to a VERY Crooked Path INDEED!

Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they pay the jizya willingly while they are humbled.” – 9:29

So obviously islam is only an ancient yet ongoing extortion-racket CRIME syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”



Christianity holds the exact opposite: that, even if God is too complex for us to understand, that still doesn’t stop God from being able to understand us, and to relate to us, and communicate with us, on our own terms, in the person of Jesus Christ. And Jesus, the Jew, advised us to help each other, not to prey on one another.

Moslems and other backwards, adversarial satanic fear-salesmen say: “pain or be pained!” because they fear that fear causes pain. Christians know this world is one of pain and be pained, so fear (the memory of pain, projected to the future) is only the first step in the thought process: to correct our mistakes and avoid future sins, to get to the hope of no pain, one must first face one’s fears of pain, not ignore them or project them onto innocent others.

Greed (limited, selfish hope) is not the opposite of the fear of pain – fear and greed are the exact same thing! Moslems fear fear and so have no hope; they only worship their own fears of pain, and avoid thinking about them (more fear) by projecting the relief of them onto others.

Muhammad commands everyone to “Submit to the inevitability of Might-Makes-Right!” while Christ advises and demonstrates to all that, not matter how bad it gets, they should not Submit to becoming a part of the problem by downloading their unjustly-victimized pains onto others, too.

PS: “Revealed religion” has NOT been responsible for more deaths than any other; because atheistic communism hold that “winning” tally – after islam, of course – but then, islam is tribal us-versus them and group-might-makes-rights extortionist conformity, i.e: CRIME, exactly the same as communazism!


If any non-moslem is to believably assert in indulgence of their historical lies, that he or she agrees with the moslems’ claims that islam is a “religion,” (at all, much less one “of peace,”) then they must also supply valid reasons as to why they have chosen to believe in Muhammad’s most basic claims, that “God” has ordered him to order his followers to kill everyone not a member of his gang (like, for instance, the non-moslem now found to be endorsing his lies)!

i.e: If islam is such a valid religion, why does God order you to be murdered by it’s moslem members?

Do you really think that’s a valid way for one of God’s religions to behave?!

Besides being a liberal, what do you think you have done to deserve the moslem god’s eternal scorn and hatred?

Or, more generally,

“Do you believe that islam is NOT a danger to non-moslems?” (and, if so: WHY not?)!

As my American friend Dajjal recently put it:

Objectors declare that Islam is a religion, an equally valid pathway to God.

They pray and they sway so it must be ok.
(Me, I’d have said bray and spray, Dajjal)!

Was any legitimate religion founded for the personal emolument of its founder?

Does the deity of any legitimate religion sanctify and reward acts of terrorism?

Does the founder of any legitimate religion brag about winning wars by terrorism?

3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. 2

Does the deity of any legitimate religion demand genocide as the price of admitting its founder to Paradise?

Is Islam a legitimate religion entitled to the umbra of protection afforded by the First Amendment’s free exercise clause?

Here’s the predictably obvious differences between raising tabula-rasa human children in an indoctrinating culture of  “THOU SHALT KILL!” as opposed to one of “THOU SHALT NOT KILL!”

Holy mobster Moslems only hate “infidels” because the Qur’an says “god” orders them to – Period.

Islam is a threat to everyone because IT says it is.

ALL moslems are criminals because, by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an.

And the Qur’an tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-moslem humans, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-moslems in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being moslems.

So the Qur’an is a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat.

And all threats are psychological attacks (aka: coercion, duress, extortion, “terrorism”) and all non-defensive attacks are already classified as crimes.

After all, when you attack the Others first, then, by definition, you are the predatory criminal aggressor, and they are your innocent victims – there’s no two ways about it!

(Attacking second, or counter-attacking, in defense of one’s self and/or of innocent others, is always OK, and in fact such retaliation is the most basic and crucial, mandatory requirement for having any sort of deterring justice in the world at all, ever)!

In fact, one doesn’t need a god to agree to the basic principle embodied in the Golden Rule of Law which simply defines all sitational morality as:
Do Not Attack First.

Attacking second (Retaliatory counter-attacking to deter evil) is mandatory for justice.

And Threats (intimidation; coercion; duress; extortion; terrorism) are attacks.

We only have on real right – to not be attacked first – and one real responsibility – to not attack innocent others first. And that’s it; the entire social contract of Civilization.

In reality, it’s all about human reason and an ongoing, dynamic agreement to become situationally right (as in factually correct) as opposed to whining that one should be entitled to the static, idolatrous and victim-blaming right to remain irresponsibly wrong:

We in the West self-reliantly CHOOSE to agree to the Golden Rule of Law, which, by simply defining all situational morality as: “Do Not Attack First!” enables trust, progress, and Civilization.

(See all “Western” countries)!

Even the “Ten” Commandments are really only a bunch of listed symptoms, illustrating this simple binary; the first five are all cautions to “Fear and Obey!” while the second five are all admonishments not to steal! Thus, they, too, can be summed up as “Greed NOT; Be Fearful!” (or, as The Golden Rule of Law which defines all situational morality as: Don’t Attack First)!

But they in the East force everyone to obey the brazen rule of chaos, which embodies immorality as: “Our god says we always have to attack all ‘The Others’ first!” and so inflicts distrust, stagnation, and Barbarism.

(See all ‘moslem’ countries)!

So anyone who engages in the puerile, critical thinking logical fallacy of the Argumentum Tu Quoque, by falsely and slanderously asserting that “All Religions Are The Same!”

… is really only a coward who already knows, fears, and so Submits to islamic extortion; i.e:


…as if merely by listing and comparing two or more incidental cases of wrongs, would somehow magically turn one of them into a right!


About unclevladdi

This entry was posted in Canada, Crime, human rights, islam, media, muslim, politics, propaganda, religion, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Are ALL Religions REALLY “the Same!”?

  1. chicagoja says:

    All religions are the same in the only area that counts – control of the masses. As for the difference between religion and science, it was Dorion Sagan who said, “The difference between science and philosophy is that the scientist learns more and more about less and less until she knows everything about nothing, whereas a philosopher learns less and less about more and more until he knows nothing about everything.”

    • unclevladdi says:

      Re: “All religions are the same in the only area that counts – control of the masses.”

      I’ll have to disagree with that, as far as the specifics go; for instance: Islam micro-manages which hand one must use to wipe one’s own arse with, and which foot one must use to first step into the washroom in order to do it.

      All “other” religions only offer advice, (and I put the word “other” in quotes because islam is NOT a religion at all, much less one “of peace”) or at worst only make threats that their god or gods will carry out, while only islam says:

      “Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

  2. Jon says:

    UV, I think you meant to say, this, I hope,

    “Christianity, via the Jew named Jesus that it evolved from, is infinitely better than islam (or, to put it another way, islam is LITERALLY infinitely worse than either Judaism or the Christianity) and here’s exactly how and why:”

    I have been very please to have found your site, in which you express thoughts almost identical to my own wording. Thus I have gotten myself into convoluted sentences like above frequently. I took the “literary liberty” of rearranging your words to make sense of the thought, so like mine that you were making, that was chronologically impossible. Hopefully, you can make corrections if you agree with my presumption..And the site allows it.

    Again, I’m am gratified to have found that you know what I know, about islam, and the peril to humanity. And that it is a criminal gang, never a religion, not in one iota. So long as it is classified a religion of death, of thou SHALT KILL, under rule of law, we have no real chance to defeat it peacably. They know that, and all activities are bent to rapidly taking advantage of that. People must become informed that no god has ever ordered unlimited killing as the solution to all “problems of ‘ala’ in imaginary ‘life’”.

    • unclevladdi says:

      Hi Jon,

      Yes, my sentences are sometimes convoluted even after extensive editing; please feel completely free to re-arrange them if it suits you; I have no copyright on the objective facts nor the Truth! Thanks for your input!


  3. Jon says:

    A bit more by way of comment, I would somewhat disagree with one statement, being “Neither is any good for humanity, but the first creed is less evil than the latter one.” Certainly I’ll give you the latter part as being more that true, night and day for me.

    And I really approve and appreciate your writing from the point of view from a relatively sterile or atheistic viewpoint, rather than being tainted by commentary from Catholicism, Protestantism, Evangelism, etc. beliefs, that can be so distracting from such a critical topic as is this.

    My thought on “Neither is good….” is that JudeoChristianity, and in some form of the Golden Rule in several other faiths, has one special advantage over all else, in that it has transmitted an inspiring good through the millennia of the Godden Rule, and eventually the Ten Commandments. Loosely and collectively, these I believe act as a fabric of society to rally ’round, an inspirational flag of sorts, for mankind, and be reminded of, as constantly held up as the most primal good for and to enable society to falteringly advance, through the difficult ages, that humanity has been allowed to exist in, so far.

    Mankind is part of and is subject to nature, or our Founders Nature’s God, and the grand scheme of the universe, the rules of which, even including apparent but not real chaos, we all must live within. And I’m a person of some faith, having gone from faith, agnostic, atheist, back to general faith in a God, due to experiences, unable to explain any other way. My background is high scientific including the top engineering school, and medical training and experience. Full realities up or down, inner or outer in the universe, are astounding.

    muslims due to their profound insecurity and amazing self-limits on knowledge, education and progress, will never have the opportunity to see the realities in life, so long as they don’t all, each, and everyone, run from islam, into almost anything else, even the “howling wilderness of atheism” (Hitchens), or any of the real religious faiths. Wherever they may find sheltering comfort or support in, but the support structure built into a faith community, is often a comfort, for one leaving such a satanic existence.

    No matter how far out into the universe, or how deeply into the microcosms, nearly all scientists are illuminating increasing vision of organization and rules, of such complexity and unimagined breadth the farther we peer, chaos becomes an organization, unseen before.

    Islamics, insecure in all but the most primal butchery, refuse consciously to grasp any such concept.

    • unclevladdi says:

      My own University background is in Law, Biopsych, and politics, but my Father was a nuclear physicist, and Mom was also a top scientist.

      Personally, I’ve discovered that the universe is actually a very simple place; binary, in fact. Have you read Mark McCutcheons’s book (which unifies the various fields of the hard sciences – a truly unified field theory – called The Final Theory (Of Everything) yet?


  4. unclevladdi says:

    Let’s compare the other great monotheism (albeit not acknowledged as an ‘Abrahamic’ one, despite the no-doubt Hindu origins of same; A-Brahman and his wife, Saraswati /Abraham and Sarai, etc), Buddhism, vis-a-vis both Christianity and islam:

    Like Christianity and unlike islam, Buddhism condemns violence, but there it’s quite a simple case of:

    “Life sucks, so ignore it and you’ll go away!” nihilism.

    Besides, Buddha himself acted contrary to his own doctrines (and I’m not talking about his evolution from a skinny but rich noble into a fat pacifist sitting under a tree): he claimed the above concept (i.e: “Just give up on this world, and your stress will go away, so you won’t have to be endlessly reincarnated and suffer any more pains, fears of those pains, and hopes of no pains, any more; you’ll “succeed” in not existing at all (attain ‘Nirvana'”) … but then even he didn’t follow through on that, choosing instead to somehow “stand in the doorway” to Nirvana, helping to usher in lesser ‘spiritualy evolved’ humans, one can assume through education somehow. But by doing so, he embodied the notion that love of his fellow man (self-sacrifice) was a higher ideal than attaining Nirvana, which is exactly what Jesus later said, after living in India and studying Buddhism. Many of Jesus’ own words are inscribed in Buddhist caves pre-dating Christianity by many years … word for word, paragraph for paragraph!

    So, while both islam and Buddhism advise Submitting to the fear of pain, despair and failure in this world, in pretending that Giving Up is a holy virtue, Buddhism advocates for pre-forgiving, delinquently infantile negligent total non-violence (it’s even against the defense of one’s self and of innocent others), ultimately it does advocate for self-sacrificing love, while islam commands the exact opposite, criminal stance: victim-blaming violence and the sacrifice of others to assuage one’s own subjective fears of pain.

    But anyway, the root doctrines of Buddhism are all nonsense, too, because the whole thinking process is ongoing, in learning to faces one’s fears of pains in order to find out how to solve the problems and correct the mistakes (‘sins’) which cause those pains, in order to be able to get to having the valid hope of no pains.

    Abstracting contextually dynamic, situationally evolving problems and solutions, mistakes and corrections as static “sins” (or even “Dharma”) is idolatry. And like all idolatry, the concept of “Karma” is pure predeterminism.

    Existentialism IS only Nihilism, and vice-versa; neither approach offers any solutions.

    But the difference between Buddhism and islam is that Buddhism is peaceful nihilism; islam is violent, aggresssive, criminal nihilism; so islam is literally infinitely worse than Buddhism.

  5. herbork says:

    Unk, you keep pumping out the truth. I’m proud of your courage. Jon, I felt the same way when I, too, discovered this man’s amazing blog. All three of us are stuck at the same point conceptually. When to fight back. Unk likes my new novel, Piece of Resistance, where, when fedgov won’t help, it’s everyday guys versus punk jihadists.

  6. Peter35 says:

    Very well reasoned “Unc”, the single, solitary criticism I would make is “muslims are really atheists”, hell no Unc, say it ain’t so!
    In February 1940 I was sent to sunday school and hated it; I could never bring myself to believe there was an ever loving super being sitting on a cloud smiling benevolently down. So as a 5 yr old kid I found out I was an atheist, oh dear!
    So tongue in cheek, I ask you to not equate sensible atheists to the Islamic rabble! (though I understand why you did, to make a point. Cheers!

    • unclevladdi says:

      Well, as any given atheist from Dawkins on knows, atheism isn’t a club or religion any more than stamp collectors all vote the same way. Muslims, as atheists, are idolaters who at most declare (if they’re honest with them selves) “I know I worship nothing, but it’s MY Nothing!” and, from Muhammad onwards, islam’s “muslims” have used their “unknown and unknowable allah” construct as their predeterministic, shit-happens excuse for their own criminal penchants. This, of course, doesn’t mean all atheists are criminals – just all self-determined “muslim” ones!


  7. Caren says:

    Very thought provoking!! Thanks for writing this!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s